Preface |
|
xix | |
Acknowledgments |
|
xxi | |
Authors |
|
xxiii | |
Part I General |
|
1 | (96) |
|
|
3 | (14) |
|
|
3 | (3) |
|
1.2 Bridge types and design process |
|
|
6 | (3) |
|
1.3 Loads and load factors |
|
|
9 | (3) |
|
1.4 Current development of analysis and design of bridges |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
1.5 Outlook on analysis and design of bridges |
|
|
13 | (4) |
|
2 Approximate and refined analysis methods |
|
|
17 | (40) |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
2.2 Various bridge structural forms |
|
|
17 | (6) |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
|
19 | (2) |
|
2.2.3 Beam-slab deck type |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
|
21 | (2) |
|
2.3 Approximate analysis methods |
|
|
23 | (7) |
|
2.3.1 Plane frame analysis method |
|
|
23 | (7) |
|
2.4 Refined analysis methods |
|
|
30 | (11) |
|
2.4.1 Grillage analogy method |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
2.4.2 Orthotropic plate method |
|
|
31 | (2) |
|
2.4.3 Articulated plate method |
|
|
33 | (2) |
|
2.4.4 Finite strip method |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
2.4.5 Finite element method |
|
|
36 | (3) |
|
2.4.6 Live load influence surface |
|
|
39 | (2) |
|
2.5 Different types of bridges with their selected mathematical modeling |
|
|
41 | (16) |
|
2.5.1 Beam bridge and rigid frame bridge |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
|
43 | (2) |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
2.5.4 Cellular/box girder bridge |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
|
47 | (3) |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
2.5.8 Cable-stayed bridge |
|
|
52 | (2) |
|
|
54 | (3) |
|
3 Numerical methods in bridge structure analysis |
|
|
57 | (40) |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
3.2 Finite element method |
|
|
58 | (25) |
|
|
58 | (2) |
|
3.2.2 Geometric and elastic equations |
|
|
60 | (3) |
|
3.2.3 Displacement functions of an element |
|
|
63 | (3) |
|
3.2.4 Strain energy and principles of minimum potential energy and virtual works |
|
|
66 | (5) |
|
3.2.5 Displacement relationship processing when assembling global stiffness matrix |
|
|
71 | (2) |
|
|
73 | (2) |
|
|
75 | (3) |
|
|
78 | (2) |
|
3.2.9 Applications in bridge analysis |
|
|
80 | (3) |
|
3.3 Automatic time incremental creep analysis method |
|
|
83 | (6) |
|
3.3.1 Incremental equilibrium equation in creep and shrinkage analysis |
|
|
84 | (2) |
|
3.3.2 Calculation of equivalent loads due to incremental creep and shrinkage |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
3.3.3 Automatic-determining time step |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
3.3.4 A simple example of creep analysis |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
3.4 Influence line/surface live loading method |
|
|
89 | (10) |
|
3.4.1 Dynamic planning method and its application in searching extreme live loads |
|
|
89 | (5) |
|
3.4.2 Transverse live loading |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
3.4.3 Influence surface loading |
|
|
94 | (3) |
Part II Bridge behavior and modeling |
|
97 | (300) |
|
4 Reinforced concrete bridges |
|
|
99 | (30) |
|
|
99 | (2) |
|
4.2 Concrete and steel material properties |
|
|
101 | (7) |
|
4.2.1 Unconfined and confined concrete |
|
|
102 | (2) |
|
|
104 | (2) |
|
|
106 | (6) |
|
4.2.3.1 Inverse analysis method |
|
|
106 | (2) |
|
4.3 Behavior of nonskewed/skewed concrete beam-slab bridges |
|
|
108 | (4) |
|
4.4 Principle and modeling of concrete beam-slab bridges |
|
|
112 | (4) |
|
4.4.1 Linear elastic modeling |
|
|
112 | (2) |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
4.4.2.1 Cracking and retention of shear stiffness |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
4.5 2D and 3D illustrated examples: Three-span continuous skewed concrete slab bridges |
|
|
116 | (4) |
|
4.6 2D and 3D illustrated examples: RC T-beam bridge |
|
|
120 | (3) |
|
4.7 3D illustrated examples: Skewed simple-span transversely post-tensioned adjacent precast-concrete slab bridges-Knoxville Bridge, Frederick, Maryland |
|
|
123 | (6) |
|
5 Prestressed/post-tensioned concrete bridges |
|
|
129 | (42) |
|
|
129 | (5) |
|
5.2 Principle and modeling of prestressing |
|
|
134 | (6) |
|
5.2.1 Tendon modeled as applied loading |
|
|
135 | (2) |
|
5.2.2 Tendon modeled as load-resisting elements |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
|
137 | (3) |
|
5.3 2D illustrated example of a prototype prestressed/post-tensioned concrete bridge in the United States |
|
|
140 | (4) |
|
5.4 3D illustrated example of a double-cell post-tensioning concrete bridge-Verzasca 2 Bridge, Switzerland |
|
|
144 | (11) |
|
5.4.1 Visual Bridge design system |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
5.4.2 Verzasca 2 Bridge models |
|
|
145 | (6) |
|
5.4.2.1 Model 1: Continuous girder with constant cross section |
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
5.4.2.2 Model 2: Continuous girder with skew supports |
|
|
147 | (1) |
|
5.4.2.3 Model 3: One girder built in a single stage |
|
|
147 | (2) |
|
5.4.2.4 Model 4: Girder built with actual construction stages |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
5.4.2.5 Model 5: Three girders skew supported |
|
|
149 | (2) |
|
5.4.3 Verzasca 2 Bridge analysis results |
|
|
151 | (4) |
|
5.4.3.1 Model 1: Continuous girder with constant cross section |
|
|
151 | (1) |
|
5.4.3.2 Model 2: Continuous girder with skew supports |
|
|
152 | (1) |
|
5.4.3.3 Model 3: One girder built in a single stage |
|
|
152 | (1) |
|
5.4.3.4 Model 4: Girder built with actual construction stages |
|
|
153 | (1) |
|
5.4.3.5 Model 5: Three girders skew supported |
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
5.5 3D illustrated example of US23043 precast prestressed concrete beam bridge-Maryland |
|
|
155 | (5) |
|
5.5.1 US23043 bridge models |
|
|
156 | (4) |
|
5.5.1.1 Model 1: Slab modeled with plate elements |
|
|
156 | (3) |
|
5.5.1.2 Model 2: Slab modeled with beam elements |
|
|
159 | (1) |
|
5.5.2 US23043 bridge analysis results |
|
|
160 | (5) |
|
5.5.2.1 Model 1: Slab modeled with beam elements |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
5.6 Illustrated example of a three-span prestressed box-girder bridge |
|
|
160 | (5) |
|
5.7 Illustrated example of long-span concrete cantilever bridges-Jiangsu, People's Republic of China |
|
|
165 | (6) |
|
5.7.1 The continuous rigid frame of Sutong Bridge approach spans |
|
|
167 | (2) |
|
5.7.2 Results of webs' bent-down tendons |
|
|
169 | (1) |
|
5.7.3 Results of two approaches on deflections |
|
|
169 | (2) |
|
6 Curved concrete bridges |
|
|
171 | (22) |
|
6.1 Basics of curved concrete bridges |
|
|
171 | (5) |
|
|
171 | (1) |
|
6.1.2 Stresses of curved concrete box under torsion |
|
|
172 | (4) |
|
6.1.2.1 Equations for multiple cells |
|
|
173 | (1) |
|
6.1.2.2 Equilibrium equations |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
6.1.2.3 Compatibility equations |
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
6.1.2.4 Constitutive laws of materials |
|
|
176 | (1) |
|
6.1.3 Construction geometry control |
|
|
176 | (1) |
|
6.2 Principle and modeling of curved concrete bridges |
|
|
176 | (6) |
|
6.2.1 Modeling of curved concrete bridges |
|
|
177 | (4) |
|
6.2.2 Modeling of material properties |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
6.2.3 Modeling of live loads |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
6.2.4 Modeling of lateral restraint and movement |
|
|
182 | (1) |
|
6.3 Spine model illustrated examples of Pengpo Interchange, Henan, People's Republic of China |
|
|
182 | (3) |
|
6.4 Grillage model illustrated examples- FHWA Bridge No. 4 |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
6.5 3D finite element model illustrated examples-NCHRP case study bridge |
|
|
186 | (7) |
|
7 Straight and curved steel I-girder bridges |
|
|
193 | (40) |
|
7.1 Behavior of steel I-girder bridges |
|
|
193 | (9) |
|
7.1.1 Composite bridge sections under different load levels |
|
|
193 | (3) |
|
7.1.2 Various stress effects |
|
|
196 | (2) |
|
7.1.3 Section property in the grid modeling considerations |
|
|
198 | (4) |
|
7.2 Principle and modeling of steel I-girder bridges |
|
|
202 | (16) |
|
|
202 | (8) |
|
7.2.2 Modeling in specific regions |
|
|
210 | (2) |
|
7.2.3 Live load application |
|
|
212 | (2) |
|
7.2.4 Girder-substringer systems |
|
|
214 | (1) |
|
7.2.5 Steel I-girder bridge during construction |
|
|
215 | (3) |
|
7.3 2D and 3D illustrated example of a haunched steel I-girder bridge-MD140 Bridge, Maryland |
|
|
218 | (6) |
|
7.4 2D and 3D illustrated example of a curved steel I-girder bridge-Rock Creek Trail Pedestrian Bridge, Maryland |
|
|
224 | (2) |
|
7.5 2D and 3D illustrated example of a skewed and kinked steel I-girder bridge with straddle bent |
|
|
226 | (3) |
|
7.6 2D and 3D illustrated example of a global and local modeling of a simple-span steel I-girder bridge-I-270 Middlebrook Road Bridge, Germantown, Maryland |
|
|
229 | (4) |
|
8 Straight and curved steel box girder bridges |
|
|
233 | (32) |
|
8.1 Behavior of steel box girder bridges |
|
|
233 | (11) |
|
|
235 | (2) |
|
8.1.1.1 Longitudinal bending |
|
|
236 | (1) |
|
8.1.1.2 Bending distortion |
|
|
237 | (1) |
|
|
237 | (6) |
|
|
238 | (2) |
|
8.1.2.2 Torsional distortion |
|
|
240 | (3) |
|
8.1.3 Plate behavior and design |
|
|
243 | (1) |
|
8.2 Principle and modeling of steel box girder bridges |
|
|
244 | (5) |
|
8.2.1 2D and 3D finite element method |
|
|
244 | (3) |
|
8.2.2 Consideration of modeling steel box girder bridges |
|
|
247 | (2) |
|
8.2.2.1 Design considerations |
|
|
247 | (1) |
|
|
247 | (1) |
|
8.2.2.3 Description of the noncomposite bridge models |
|
|
248 | (1) |
|
8.3 2D and 3D illustrated examples of a straight box girder bridge |
|
|
249 | (4) |
|
8.3.1 Straight box shell model (M1) |
|
|
250 | (1) |
|
8.3.2 Straight box beam model (M3) |
|
|
251 | (1) |
|
|
251 | (2) |
|
8.4 2D and 3D illustrated examples of a curved box girder bridge-Metro bridge over 1495, Washington, DC |
|
|
253 | (2) |
|
8.4.1 Curved box shell model (M2) |
|
|
253 | (1) |
|
8.4.2 Curved box beam model (M4) |
|
|
254 | (1) |
|
8.5 2D and 3D illustrated examples of three- span curved box girder bridge-Estero Parkway Bridge, Lee County, Florida |
|
|
255 | (10) |
|
|
265 | (32) |
|
|
265 | (6) |
|
9.1.1 Classifications of arch bridges |
|
|
267 | (4) |
|
9.2 Construction of arch bridges |
|
|
271 | (9) |
|
9.2.1 Lupu Bridge, People's Republic of China |
|
|
272 | (3) |
|
|
273 | (1) |
|
|
274 | (1) |
|
|
274 | (1) |
|
9.2.2 Yajisha Bridge, People's Republic of China |
|
|
275 | (5) |
|
9.2.2.1 Cross section of the main arch |
|
|
276 | (1) |
|
9.2.2.2 Vertical rotation |
|
|
276 | (1) |
|
9.2.2.3 Horizontal rotation |
|
|
277 | (3) |
|
9.3 Principle and analysis of arch bridges |
|
|
280 | (7) |
|
9.3.1 Perfect arch axis of an arch bridge |
|
|
280 | (1) |
|
9.3.2 Fatigue analysis and affecting factors |
|
|
281 | (4) |
|
9.3.2.1 Positions of hangers |
|
|
282 | (1) |
|
|
283 | (1) |
|
9.3.2.3 Distance between side hanger and arch springing |
|
|
283 | (2) |
|
9.3.3 Measuring of hanger-cable force |
|
|
285 | (2) |
|
9.4 Modeling of arch bridges |
|
|
287 | (2) |
|
|
288 | (1) |
|
|
288 | (1) |
|
|
288 | (1) |
|
|
288 | (1) |
|
9.5 3D illustrated example of construction analyses-Yajisha Bridge, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China |
|
|
289 | (3) |
|
9.6 3D illustrated example of a proposed tied-arch bridge analyses-Linyi, People's Republic of China |
|
|
292 | (1) |
|
9.7 3D illustrated example of an arch bridge-Liujiang Yellow River Bridge, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China |
|
|
292 | (5) |
|
|
297 | (32) |
|
|
297 | (5) |
|
10.2 Behavior of steel truss bridges |
|
|
302 | (4) |
|
10.2.1 Simple and continuous truss bridges |
|
|
302 | (1) |
|
10.2.2 Cantilevered truss bridges |
|
|
303 | (2) |
|
10.2.3 Truss arch bridges |
|
|
305 | (1) |
|
10.3 Principle and modeling of steel truss bridges |
|
|
306 | (2) |
|
10.4 3D illustrated example-Pedestrian pony truss bridge |
|
|
308 | (5) |
|
10.5 2D illustrated example-Tydings Bridge, Maryland |
|
|
313 | (5) |
|
|
315 | (3) |
|
10.6 3D illustrated example-Francis Scott Key Bridge, Maryland |
|
|
318 | (3) |
|
10.7 3D illustrated examples-Shang Xin Bridge, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China |
|
|
321 | (8) |
|
|
329 | (40) |
|
11.1 Basics of cable-stayed bridges |
|
|
329 | (6) |
|
11.2 Behavior of cable-stayed bridges |
|
|
335 | (17) |
|
11.2.1 Weakness of cable supports |
|
|
336 | (1) |
|
|
337 | (3) |
|
|
340 | (2) |
|
|
342 | (1) |
|
11.2.5 Backward and forward analyses |
|
|
343 | (1) |
|
11.2.6 Geometric nonlinearity-P-Delta effect |
|
|
344 | (1) |
|
11.2.7 Geometric nonlinearity-Cable sag effect |
|
|
345 | (2) |
|
11.2.8 Geometric nonlinearity- Large displacements |
|
|
347 | (1) |
|
|
348 | (1) |
|
|
349 | (3) |
|
11.3 Construction control |
|
|
352 | (3) |
|
11.3.1 Observation errors |
|
|
352 | (1) |
|
11.3.2 Measurement of cable forces |
|
|
353 | (1) |
|
11.3.3 Construction errors |
|
|
353 | (1) |
|
11.3.4 General procedures of construction control |
|
|
354 | (1) |
|
11.4 Principle and modeling of cable-stayed bridges |
|
|
355 | (6) |
|
|
356 | (2) |
|
|
358 | (1) |
|
11.4.3 Connections between girder and pylon |
|
|
359 | (1) |
|
|
360 | (1) |
|
11.5 Illustrated example of Sutong Bridge, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China |
|
|
361 | (4) |
|
11.6 Illustrated example with dynamic mode analysis of Panyu Bridge, Guangdong, People's Republic of China |
|
|
365 | (2) |
|
11.7 Illustrated example with dynamic mode analysis of long cables with crossties |
|
|
367 | (2) |
|
|
369 | (28) |
|
12.1 Basics of suspension bridges |
|
|
369 | (4) |
|
12.2 Construction of suspension bridges |
|
|
373 | (6) |
|
12.2.1 Construction of pylons and anchorages and install catwalk system |
|
|
373 | (3) |
|
12.2.2 Erection of main cables |
|
|
376 | (1) |
|
12.2.3 Erection of stiffened girder |
|
|
377 | (2) |
|
12.3 Behavior of suspension bridges |
|
|
379 | (10) |
|
12.3.1 Basis of cable structures-Initial stress and large displacements |
|
|
379 | (3) |
|
12.3.2 Basics of suspension bridge analysis |
|
|
382 | (2) |
|
12.3.3 Live load analyses of a suspension bridge |
|
|
384 | (1) |
|
12.3.4 Determination of the initial configuration of a suspension bridge |
|
|
385 | (2) |
|
12.3.5 Consideration of cable tangent changes |
|
|
387 | (1) |
|
12.3.6 Offset of saddles and release of the deflection of pylons |
|
|
388 | (1) |
|
12.3.7 Low initial stress stiffness of the main cable close to pylon |
|
|
388 | (1) |
|
12.4 Principle and modeling of suspension bridges |
|
|
389 | (4) |
|
|
389 | (2) |
|
|
391 | (1) |
|
|
391 | (1) |
|
|
392 | (1) |
|
|
392 | (1) |
|
12.5 3D illustrated example of Chesapeake Bay Suspension Bridge, Maryland |
|
|
393 | (4) |
Part III Special topics of bridges |
|
397 | (178) |
|
13 Strut-and-tie modeling |
|
|
399 | (36) |
|
13.1 Principle of strut-and-tie model |
|
|
399 | (8) |
|
13.1.1 Development of STM |
|
|
400 | (3) |
|
13.1.2 Design methodology |
|
|
403 | (4) |
|
|
403 | (2) |
|
|
405 | (1) |
|
|
405 | (2) |
|
13.2 Hand-calculation example of STM |
|
|
407 | (7) |
|
13.2.1 Hammerhead Pier No. 49 of Thomas Jefferson Bridge, Maryland |
|
|
407 | (3) |
|
|
407 | (1) |
|
13.2.1.2 Determination of member forces |
|
|
407 | (1) |
|
13.2.1.3 Design of the tie |
|
|
408 | (1) |
|
13.2.1.4 Design of the strut |
|
|
409 | (1) |
|
13.2.2 Representative pile-supported footing |
|
|
410 | (4) |
|
13.2.2.1 Check the capacity of the ties |
|
|
411 | (1) |
|
13.2.2.2 Check the capacity of struts |
|
|
412 | (1) |
|
13.2.2.3 Check nodal zone stress limits |
|
|
413 | (1) |
|
13.2.2.4 Check the detailing for the anchorage of the ties |
|
|
414 | (1) |
|
13.3 2D illustrated example 1-Abutment on pile |
|
|
414 | (2) |
|
13.3.1 General properties |
|
|
415 | (1) |
|
13.4 2D illustrated example 2-Walled pier |
|
|
416 | (1) |
|
13.5 2D illustrated example 3-Crane beam |
|
|
416 | (5) |
|
13.6 2D/3D illustrated example 4-Hammerhead Pier of Thomas Jefferson Bridge |
|
|
421 | (5) |
|
13.7 2D illustrated example 5-Integral bent cap |
|
|
426 | (1) |
|
13.8 Alternate compatibility STM and 2D illustrated example 6-Cracked deep bent cap |
|
|
427 | (8) |
|
|
435 | (24) |
|
14.1 Basics of structural stability |
|
|
435 | (2) |
|
|
437 | (9) |
|
14.2.1 Linear buckling of a steel plate |
|
|
439 | (2) |
|
14.2.1.1 Formulation of plate buckling |
|
|
439 | (1) |
|
14.2.1.2 Solving plate and box girder buckling problem |
|
|
440 | (1) |
|
14.2.2 Linear buckling of steel members |
|
|
441 | (21) |
|
14.2.2.1 Buckling of steel structure members |
|
|
441 | (2) |
|
14.2.2.2 Buckling analysis of a pony truss by Timoshenko's method |
|
|
443 | (1) |
|
14.2.2.3 Case study of pony truss by Timoshenko's method |
|
|
444 | (2) |
|
14.3 FEM approach of stability analysis |
|
|
446 | (1) |
|
14.4 3D illustrated example with linear buckling analysis of a pony truss, Pennsylvania |
|
|
447 | (3) |
|
14.5 3D illustrated example with linear buckling analysis of a standard simple arch rib |
|
|
450 | (2) |
|
14.6 3D illustrated example with linear buckling analysis of a proposed tied-arch bridge-Linyi, People's Republic of China |
|
|
452 | (5) |
|
14.7 3D illustrated example with nonlinear stability analysis of a cable-stayed bridge, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China |
|
|
457 | (2) |
|
|
459 | (32) |
|
15.1 Basics of bridge redundancy |
|
|
459 | (3) |
|
15.2 Principle and modeling of bridge redundancy analysis |
|
|
462 | (3) |
|
|
463 | (1) |
|
15.2.2 Finite element modeling |
|
|
464 | (1) |
|
15.3 3D example with redundancy analysis of a pony truss, Pennsylvania |
|
|
465 | (10) |
|
|
468 | (1) |
|
|
469 | (6) |
|
15.3.2.1 Extreme event III |
|
|
469 | (3) |
|
15.3.2.2 Extreme event IV |
|
|
472 | (3) |
|
15.4 3D redundancy analysis under blast loading of a PC beam bridge, Maryland |
|
|
475 | (8) |
|
|
477 | (1) |
|
|
478 | (4) |
|
15.4.3 Analyze structural response |
|
|
482 | (1) |
|
15.5 3D analysis under blast loading of a steel plate girder bridge, Maryland |
|
|
483 | (8) |
|
|
485 | (1) |
|
|
485 | (4) |
|
15.5.3 Analyze structural response |
|
|
489 | (2) |
|
|
491 | (20) |
|
16.1 Basics of integral bridges |
|
|
491 | (4) |
|
|
491 | (2) |
|
16.1.2 Types of integral abutment |
|
|
493 | (2) |
|
16.2 Principle and analysis of IABs |
|
|
495 | (3) |
|
|
496 | (2) |
|
|
498 | (7) |
|
16.3.1 Equivalent cantilever finite element model |
|
|
498 | (1) |
|
16.3.2 Soil spring finite element model |
|
|
499 | (6) |
|
16.3.2.1 Soil spring and p-y curve |
|
|
500 | (1) |
|
16.3.2.2 Soil behind the abutment |
|
|
501 | (1) |
|
16.3.2.3 Soil around piles |
|
|
501 | (4) |
|
16.3.3 Soil continuum finite element model |
|
|
505 | (1) |
|
16.4 Illustrated example of a steel girder bridge in soil spring finite element model |
|
|
505 | (2) |
|
|
506 | (1) |
|
|
507 | (1) |
|
16.5 Illustrated example of a steel girder bridge in 3D soil continuum finite element model |
|
|
507 | (4) |
|
17 Dynamic/earthquake analysis |
|
|
511 | (36) |
|
17.1 Basics of dynamic analysis |
|
|
511 | (3) |
|
17.2 Principle of bridge dynamic analysis |
|
|
514 | (14) |
|
17.2.1 Vehicle-bridge interaction |
|
|
514 | (3) |
|
17.2.2 Pedestrian bridge vibrations |
|
|
517 | (2) |
|
17.2.3 Bridge earthquake analysis |
|
|
519 | (4) |
|
17.2.3.1 Linear and nonlinear seismic analyses |
|
|
520 | (3) |
|
17.2.3.2 Nonlinear time-history analysis |
|
|
523 | (1) |
|
17.2.4 Blast loading analysis |
|
|
523 | (4) |
|
|
527 | (1) |
|
17.3 Modeling of bridge for dynamic analysis |
|
|
528 | (8) |
|
17.3.1 Linear elastic dynamic analysis |
|
|
528 | (2) |
|
|
530 | (3) |
|
17.3.3 Nonlinear analysis |
|
|
533 | (3) |
|
17.3.3.1 Nonlinear static-Standard pushover analysis |
|
|
533 | (2) |
|
17.3.3.2 Nonlinear static alternate-Modal pushover analysis |
|
|
535 | (1) |
|
17.4 3D illustrated example of earthquake analysis by SPA, MPA, and NL-THA-FHWA Bridge No. 4 |
|
|
536 | (8) |
|
17.4.1 Foundation stiffness |
|
|
537 | (1) |
|
17.4.2 Finite element model and analyses |
|
|
538 | (6) |
|
17.5 3D illustrated example of a high-pier bridge subjected to oblique incidence seismic waves-Pingtang bridge, People's Republic of China |
|
|
544 | (3) |
|
|
547 | (28) |
|
|
547 | (1) |
|
|
547 | (6) |
|
18.2.1 Types of horizontal curves |
|
|
548 | (2) |
|
18.2.2 Types of vertical curves |
|
|
550 | (1) |
|
18.2.3 Types of transverse curves |
|
|
550 | (1) |
|
18.2.4 Superelevation and superwidening |
|
|
550 | (2) |
|
|
552 | (1) |
|
|
553 | (5) |
|
18.3.1 Bridge mainline curve model |
|
|
553 | (1) |
|
18.3.2 Roadway transverse curve model |
|
|
554 | (1) |
|
18.3.3 Transitions of transverse curves |
|
|
555 | (1) |
|
18.3.4 Spiral calculation |
|
|
556 | (1) |
|
18.3.5 Vertical parabola calculation |
|
|
557 | (1) |
|
18.4 Curve and surface tessellation |
|
|
558 | (2) |
|
18.5 Bridge deck point calculations |
|
|
560 | (1) |
|
18.6 Precast segmental bridge geometry control |
|
|
561 | (12) |
|
|
561 | (3) |
|
18.6.1.1 Long-line casting and short-line casting |
|
|
561 | (1) |
|
18.6.1.2 Final curve and theoretical casting curve |
|
|
562 | (2) |
|
18.6.1.3 Casting segment and match cast segment |
|
|
564 | (1) |
|
18.6.2 Casting and matching |
|
|
564 | (2) |
|
18.6.3 Control points and transformation |
|
|
566 | (1) |
|
18.6.4 Procedures of casting and control |
|
|
566 | (1) |
|
18.6.5 Error finding and correction |
|
|
567 | (1) |
|
18.6.6 Evolution of geometry control in precast segmental bridge |
|
|
568 | (1) |
|
18.6.7 Geometry transformation |
|
|
568 | (3) |
|
18.6.7.1 Direction cosines |
|
|
569 | (1) |
|
18.6.7.2 Direction cosines matrix of a local coordinate system |
|
|
569 | (1) |
|
18.6.7.3 Transformation between two coordinate systems |
|
|
570 | (1) |
|
18.6.7.4 Definition of the casting system in global system |
|
|
570 | (1) |
|
18.6.8 An example of short-line match casting geometry control |
|
|
571 | (2) |
|
18.7 Trend of bridge computer modeling and visualization |
|
|
573 | (2) |
References |
|
575 | (16) |
Index |
|
591 | |