Part I. Pollution Prevention and Waste Minimization |
|
|
Chemical Process Structures and Information Flow |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
Analysis Synthesis & Design of Chemical Processes |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
Strategy and Control of Exhausts |
|
|
2 | (3) |
|
Chemical Process Simulation Guide |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
Integrated Design of Reaction and Separation Systems for Waste Minimization |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
A Review of Computer Process Simulation in Industrial Pollution Prevention |
|
|
7 | (4) |
|
EPA Inorganic Chemical Industry Notebook Section V |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
Process Simulation Seen as Pivotal in Corporate Information Flow |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
Model-Based Environmental Sensitivity Analysis for Designing a Clean Process Plant |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
Pollution Prevention in Design: Site Level Implementation Strategy For DOE |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
Pollution Prevention in Process Development and Design |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
Pollution Prevention Research Strategy |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
Pollution Prevention Through Innovative Technologies and Process Design at UCLA's Center for Clean Technology |
|
|
17 | (2) |
|
Assessment of Chemical Processes with Regard to Environmental, Health, and Safety Aspects in Early Design Phases |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
Small Plants, Pollution and Poverty: New Evidence from Brazil and Mexico |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
When Pollution Meets the Bottom Line |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
Pollution Prevention as Corporate Entrepreneurship |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
Plantwide Controllability and Flowsheet Structure of Complex Continuous Process Plants |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
Computer-Aided Design of Clean Processes |
|
|
21 | (2) |
|
Computer-Aided Chemical Process Design for P2 |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
LIMN-The Flowsheet Processor |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
Integrated Synthesis and Analysis of Chemical Process Designs Using Heuristics in the Context of Pollution Prevention |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
Model-Based Environmental Sensitivity Analysis for Designing a Clean Process Plant |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
Achievement of Emission Limits Using Physical Insights and Mathematical Modeling |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
Fritjof Capra's Foreword to Upsizing |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
SRI's Novel Chemical Reactor - PERMIX |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
Process Simulation Widens the Appeal of Batch Chromatography |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
About Pollution Prevention |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
Federal Register/Vo1. 62, No. 120/Monday, June 23, 1997/Notices/33868 |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
EPA Environmental Fact Sheet, EPA Releases RCRA Waste Minimization PBT Chemical List |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
Environmental Monitoring for Public Access and Community Tracking |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
Health: The Scorecard That Hit a Home Run |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
Screening and Testing for Endocrine Disruptors |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
|
28 | (4) |
|
|
32 | (3) |
|
|
35 | (2) |
Part II. Mathematical Methods |
|
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
Combinatorial Optimization |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP)-Combinatorial Optimization |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
Optimization Subject to Diophantine Constraints |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
Global Optimization Methods |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
Molecular Phylogeny Studies |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
Adaptive Search Techniques |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
Advanced Mathematical Techniques |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
Scheduling of Processes for Waste Minimization |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
Extremal Optimization (EO) |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
Petri Net-Diagraph Models for Automating HAZOP Analysis of Batch Process Plants |
|
|
43 | (2) |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
KBDS-(Using Design History to Support Chemical Plant Design) |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
Dependency-Directed Backtracking |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
Best Practice: Interactive Collaborative Environments |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
The Control Kit for O-Matrix |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
The Clean Process Advisory System: Building Pollution Into Design |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
Nuclear Facility Design Considerations That Incorporate WM/P2 Lessons Learned |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
Pollution Prevention Process Simulator |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
Reckoning on Chemical Computers |
|
|
48 | (3) |
Part III. Computer Programs for Pollution Prevention and/or Waste Minimization |
|
|
Pollution Prevention Using Chemical Process Simulation |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
Introduction to the Green Design |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
Chemicals and Materials from Renewable Resources |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
EPA/NSF Partnership for Environmental Research |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
BDK-Integrated Batch Development |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
|
54 | (2) |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
Process Design and Simulations |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
Robust Self-Assembly Using Highly Designable Structures and Self-Organizing Systems |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
Synthesis of Mass Energy Integration Networks for Waste Minimization via In-Plant Modification |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
Pollution Prevention by Reactor Network Synthesis |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
|
60 | (2) |
|
Computer Simulation, Modeling and Control of Environmental Quality |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
Multiobjective Optimization |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
Risk Reduction Through Waste Minimizing Process Synthesis |
|
|
63 | (2) |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
|
66 | (2) |
|
CWRT Aqueous Stream Pollution Prevention Design Options Tool |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
OLI Environmental Simulation Program (ESP) |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
Process Flowsheeting and Control |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
Environmental Hazard Assessment for Computer-Generated Alternative Syntheses |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
Process Design for Environmentally and Economically Sustainable Dairy Plant |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
|
70 | (3) |
|
Pollution Prevention by Process Modification Using On-Line Optimization |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
A Genetic Algorithm for the Automated Generation of Molecules Within Constraints |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
|
73 | (2) |
Part IV. Computer Programs for the Best Raw Materials and Products of Clean Processes |
|
|
Cramer's Data and the Birth of Synprops |
|
|
75 | (1) |
|
Physical Properties from Groups |
|
|
75 | (1) |
|
Examples of SYNPROPS Optimization and Substitution |
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
Toxic Properties from Groups |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
|
79 | (3) |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
Computer Aided Molecular Design (CAMD): Designing Better Chemical Products |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
Reduce Emissions and Operating Costs with Appropriate Glycol Selection |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
Texaco Chemical Company Plans to Reduce HAP Emissions Through Early Reduction Program by Vent Recovery System |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
Design of Molecules with Desired Properties by Combinatorial Analysis |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
Mathematical Background I |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
Automatic Molecular Design Using Evolutionary Techniques |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
Algorithmic Generation of Feasible Partitions |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
Testsmart Project to Promote Faster, Cheaper, More Humane Lab Tests |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
European Cleaner Technology Research |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
|
87 | (5) |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
Design Trade-Offs for Pollution Prevention |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
Programming Pollution Prevention and Waste Minimization Within a Process Simulation Program |
|
|
92 | (2) |
|
Product and Process Design Tradeoffs for Pollution Prevention |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
Incorporating Pollution Prevention into U.S. Department of Energy Design Projects |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
Searching for the Profit in Pollution Prevention: Case Studies in the Corporate Evaluation of Environmental Opportunities |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
Chemical Process Simulation, Design, and Economics |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
Pollution Prevention Using Process Simulation |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
Scorecard-Pollution Rankings |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
|
98 | (3) |
|
Design Theory and Methodology |
|
|
101 | (2) |
Part V. Pathways to Prevention |
|
|
The Grand Partition Function |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
A Small Part of the Mechanisms from the Department of Chemistry of Leeds University |
|
|
103 | (3) |
|
Reaction: Modeling Complex Reaction Mechanisms |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
Environmentally Friendly Catalytic Reaction Technology |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
|
107 | (3) |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
Software Simulations Lead to Better Assembly Lines |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
ORDKIN a Model of Order and Kinetics for the Chemical Potential of Cancer Cells |
|
|
111 | (3) |
|
What Chemical Engineers Can Learn from Mother Nature |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
Design Synthesis Using Adaptive Search Techniques & Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
The Path Probability Method |
|
|
114 | (2) |
|
The Method of Steepest Descents |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory/ Pollution Prevention Branch Research (RREL/PPBR) |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
|
118 | (49) |
|
|
119 | (2) |
|
|
121 | (2) |
|
|
123 | (10) |
List of Figures |
|
|
Figure 1 Toxicity vs. Log (Reference Concentration) |
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
Figure 2 Parallel Control |
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
Figure 4 Feedback Control |
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
Figure 5 A Simple Series Circuit |
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
Figure 6 The Feeding Mechanism |
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
Figure 7 Organisms and Graphs |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
Figure 8 P-graph of Canaan Geneology Made by Papek Program |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
Figure 9 Example and Matrix Representation of Petri Net |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
Figure 11 Ratio of s in Two Transfer Functions |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
Figure 12 The Control Kit |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
Figure 13 The Bode Diagram |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
Figure 14 Conventional and P-graph Representations of a Reactor and a Distillation Column |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
Figure 15 Tree for Accelerated Branch-and-Bound Search for Optimal Process Structure with Integrated in Plant Waste Treatment (Worst Case) |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
Figure 16 Optimally Synthesized Process Integrating In-Plant Treatment |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
Figure 17 Conventional and P-Graph Representations of a Separation Process |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
Figure 18 P-Graph Representation of a Simple Process |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
Figure 19 Representation of Separator: a) conventional, b) Graph |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
Figure 20 Graph Representation of the Operating Units of the Example |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
Figure 21 Maximal Structure of the Example |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
Figure 22 Three Possible Combinations of Operating Units Producing Material A-E for the Example |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
Figure 23 P-Graph where A, B, C, D, E, and F are the Materials and 1, 2, and 3 are the Operating Units |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
Figure 24 P-Graph Representation of a Process Structure Involving Sharp Separation of Mixture ABC into its Three Components |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
Figure 25 Feasible Process Structures for the Example |
|
|
139 | (1) |
|
Figure 26 Enumeration Tree for the Basic Branch and Bound Algorithm Which Generates 9991 Subproblems in the Worst Case |
|
|
139 | (1) |
|
Figure 27 Enumeration Tree for the Accelerated Branch and Bound Algorithm with Rule a(1) Which Generates 10 Subproblems in the Worst Case |
|
|
139 | (1) |
|
Figure 28 Maximal Structure of Synthesis Problem (P3, R3, O3) |
|
|
140 | (1) |
|
Figure 29 Maximal Structure of Synthesis Problem (P4, R4, O4) |
|
|
140 | (1) |
|
Figure 30 Maximal Structure of the Synthesis Problem of Grossman (1985) |
|
|
140 | (1) |
|
Figure 31 Maximal Structures of 3 Synthesis Problems |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
Figure 32 Maximal Structure of the Example for Producing Material A as the Required Product and Producing Material B or C as the Potential Product |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
Figure 33 Solution-Structures of the Example: (a) Without Producing a Potential Product; and (b) Producing Potential Product B in Addition to Required Product A |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
Figure 34 Maximal Structure of the PMM Production Process Without Integrated In-Plant Waste Treatment |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
Figure 35 Maximal Structure of the PMM Production Process with Integrated In-Plant Waste Treatment |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
Figure 36 Structure of the Optimally Synthesized Process Integrating In-Plant Waste Treatment but Without Consideration of Risk |
|
|
143 | (1) |
|
Figure 37 Maximal Graph for the Folpet Production with Waste Treatment as an Integral Part of the Process |
|
|
143 | (1) |
|
Figure 38 Flowchart for APSCOT (Automatic Process Synthesis with Combinatiorial Technique) |
|
|
143 | (1) |
|
Figure 39 Reaction File for a Refinery Study of Hydrocarbons Using Chemkin |
|
|
144 | (2) |
|
Figure 40 Influence of Chemical Groups on Physicaland Biological Properties |
|
|
146 | (2) |
|
Figure 41 Structural Parameters and Structure to Property Parameter Used in SYNPROPS |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
Figure 42 Properties of Aqueous Solutions |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
Figure 43 SYNPROPS Spreadsheet of Hierarchical Model |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
Figure 44 SYNPROPS Spreadsheet of Linear Model |
|
|
150 | (1) |
|
Figure 45 Synthesis and Table from Cleaner Synthesis |
|
|
151 | (1) |
|
Figure 46 Thermo Estimations for Molecules in THERM |
|
|
151 | (1) |
|
Figure 47 Table of Therm Values for Groups in Therm |
|
|
152 | (1) |
|
Figure 48 NASA Format for Thermodynamic Value Used in Chemkin |
|
|
153 | (1) |
|
Figure 49 Iteration History for a Run in SYNPROPS |
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
|
155 | (1) |
|
Figure 51 Building a Synthesis for an Estrone Skeleton |
|
|
155 | (1) |
|
Figure 52 Any Carbon in a Structure Can Have Four General Kinds of Bonds |
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
Figure 53 SYNGEN Synthesis of Cortical Steroid |
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
Figure 54 Pericyclic Reaction to Join Simple Starting Materials for Quick Assembly of Morphinan Skeleton |
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
Figure 55 Sample SYNGEN Output Screen from Another Bondset |
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
Figure 56 Second Sample SYNGEN Output Screen |
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
Figure 57 The Triangular Lattice |
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
Figure 58 Essential Overlap Figures |
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
Figure 59 Effect of Considering Larger Basic Figures |
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
Figure 60 The Rhombus Approximation |
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
Figure 61 The Successive Filling of Rhombus Sites |
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
Figure 62 Distribution Numbers for a Plane Triangular Lattice |
|
|
158 | (1) |
|
Figure 63 Order and Complexity |
|
|
158 | (1) |
|
Figure 64 Order-Disorder, c=2.5 |
|
|
158 | (1) |
|
Figure 65 Order-Disorder, c=3 |
|
|
159 | (1) |
|
Figure 66 p/pO for Rhombus |
|
|
159 | (1) |
|
Figure 67 u/kT vs. Occupancy |
|
|
159 | (1) |
|
Figure 68 Activity vs. Theta |
|
|
159 | (1) |
|
Figure 69 F/kT: Bond Figure |
|
|
159 | (1) |
|
Figure 70 Probability vs. Theta, c = 2.77 |
|
|
159 | (1) |
|
Figure 71 Probability vs. Theta, c = 3 |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
Figure 74 Metastasis/Rhombus |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
Figure 75 A Fault Tree Network |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
Figure 76 Selected Nonlinear Programming Methods |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
Figure 77 Trade-off Between Capital and Operating Cost for a Distillation Column |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
Figure 78 Structure of Process Simulators |
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
Figure 79 Acetone-Formamide and Chloroform-Methanol Equilibrium Diagrams Showing Non-Ideal Behavior |
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
Figure 80 Tray Malfunctions as a Function of Loading |
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
Figure 81 McCabe-Thiele for (a) Minimum Stages and (b) Minimum Reflux |
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
Figure 82 Algorithm for Establishing Distillation Column Pressure and Type Condenser |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
Figure 83 P-Graph of the Process Manufacturing Required Product H and Also Yielding Potential Product G and Disposable Material D From Raw Materials A, B, and C |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
Figure 84 Enumeration Tree for the Conventional Branch-and-Bound Algorithm |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
Figure 85 Maximal Structure of Example Generated by Algorithm MSG |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
Figure 86 Maximal Structure of Example |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
Figure 87 Solution-Structure of Example |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
Figure 88 Operating Units of Example |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
Figure 89 Structure of Synphony |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
Figure 90 Cancer Probability or u/kT |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
Figure 91 Cancer Ordkin-Function |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
Figure 92 Order vs. Age for Attractive Forces |
|
|
166 | (1) |
|
|
166 | (1) |
|
Figure 94 Regression of Cancers |
|
|
166 | (1) |
Index |
|
167 | |