General preface |
|
xi | |
Acknowledgements |
|
xiii | |
|
List of symbols, conventions, and abbreviations |
|
|
xv | |
|
|
1 | (12) |
|
1.1 Concealed questions: what are they? |
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
1.2 Concealed questions: why are they interesting? |
|
|
3 | (2) |
|
1.3 Beyond definite concealed questions |
|
|
5 | (4) |
|
1.4 (Concealed) questions and meta-questions |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
|
10 | (3) |
|
2 Concealed questions and questions |
|
|
13 | (22) |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
2.2 The origin of the question approach |
|
|
13 | (4) |
|
2.3 CQs are only semantically questions |
|
|
17 | (3) |
|
2.4 A Challenge and A Refinement |
|
|
20 | (6) |
|
2.4.1 Copular questions are ambiguous---CQs are not |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
2.4.2 CQs denote specificational questions |
|
|
21 | (5) |
|
2.5 A Semantic Implementation |
|
|
26 | (2) |
|
|
28 | (4) |
|
|
32 | (3) |
|
3 Concealed questions and individual concepts |
|
|
35 | (52) |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
3.2 Concealed questions and individual concepts |
|
|
36 | (8) |
|
3.2.1 Montague and the temperature paradox |
|
|
36 | (3) |
|
3.2.2 Heim's (1979) analogy |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
3.2.3 Romero (2005) on knowCQ |
|
|
40 | (2) |
|
3.2.4 Abstraction and quantification over concepts |
|
|
42 | (2) |
|
3.3 NPs as predicates of individual concepts |
|
|
44 | (15) |
|
3.3.1 Montague and the temperature paradox, take #2 |
|
|
44 | (2) |
|
3.3.2 Reactions to Montague's proposal |
|
|
46 | (4) |
|
|
50 | (2) |
|
|
52 | (2) |
|
3.3.5 Romero (2006, 2007) |
|
|
54 | (3) |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
3.3.7 The modification argument |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
3.4 On the proper treatment of quantification over concepts |
|
|
59 | (6) |
|
3.4.1 The type-shifter approach: first attempt |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
3.4.2 Identifying the domain of quantification |
|
|
60 | (3) |
|
3.4.3 Meaningfully sorted concepts |
|
|
63 | (2) |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
3.6 An account of quantified CQs and simple abstraction |
|
|
66 | (9) |
|
3.6.1 Defining the domain of quantification |
|
|
66 | (4) |
|
3.6.2 Quantification: Clara knows every price |
|
|
70 | (3) |
|
3.6.3 Abstraction: The price that Miles knows is rising |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
3.6.4 Side note: the Q-shifter and traces of type <s, e> |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
|
75 | (10) |
|
3.7.1 Set readings with quantified CQs |
|
|
75 | (2) |
|
3.7.2 Set readings with indefinite CQs |
|
|
77 | (3) |
|
3.7.3 Meta-question readings |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
3.7.4 Puzzling counterparts |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
3.7.5 Pair-list readings with one-to-many relational nouns |
|
|
82 | (3) |
|
|
85 | (2) |
|
4 Pair-list and set readings |
|
|
87 | (36) |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
4.2 On the distribution of pair-list and set readings |
|
|
87 | (2) |
|
4.3 Set readings and the IOD shifter |
|
|
89 | (2) |
|
4.4 Toward an account of set readings |
|
|
91 | (14) |
|
4.4.1 The problem of semantically impoverished traces |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
4.4.2 The copy theory of movement |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
4.4.3 The interpretation of copy-traces |
|
|
93 | (2) |
|
4.4.4 Tackling set readings (first pass) |
|
|
95 | (2) |
|
4.4.5 Second pass: copy-traces in intensional contexts |
|
|
97 | (2) |
|
4.4.6 Third (and final) pass: exhaustivity and non-factive verbs |
|
|
99 | (6) |
|
4.5 Pair-list readings (round 2) |
|
|
105 | (4) |
|
4.5.1 Quantification over concepts with copy-traces |
|
|
105 | (2) |
|
4.5.2 One-to-many relational nouns and the PAIR-shifter |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
4.5.3 A Note on Restrictive Modification |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
4.6 Pair-list and set readings in the temporal domain |
|
|
109 | (2) |
|
4.7 Comparison with Romero (2010) |
|
|
111 | (7) |
|
4.7.1 Romero (2010) on set readings |
|
|
111 | (2) |
|
4.7.2 Open issues for Romero (2010) |
|
|
113 | (5) |
|
|
118 | (2) |
|
4.9 Appendix: equivalence with the Q-based analysis |
|
|
120 | (3) |
|
5 Concealed questions and meta-questions |
|
|
123 | (26) |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
5.2 Hyper-intensional CQ-readings |
|
|
123 | (2) |
|
|
125 | (5) |
|
5.3.1 The challenge of meta-question readings |
|
|
125 | (2) |
|
5.3.2 Romero's (2005) analysis |
|
|
127 | (3) |
|
5.4 Two additional readings |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
5.5 The matching analysis of relative clauses |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
|
132 | (8) |
|
5.6.1 Deriving set/MQ-readings |
|
|
133 | (2) |
|
5.6.2 Relative clauses can be extraposed |
|
|
135 | (3) |
|
5.6.3 Deriving set/Q readings |
|
|
138 | (2) |
|
5.7 A Second Look at Heim and Romero's Q/MQ-readings |
|
|
140 | (5) |
|
5.7.1 Romero (2005) with copy-traces |
|
|
140 | (1) |
|
5.7.2 The PAIR-shifter and Heim's ambiguity |
|
|
141 | (4) |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
5.9 Appendix: other possible LFs |
|
|
146 | (3) |
Conclusion |
|
149 | (2) |
References |
|
151 | (6) |
Index |
|
157 | |