Foreword |
|
5 | (4) |
Preface |
|
9 | (2) |
Abbreviations |
|
11 | (2) |
Introduction |
|
13 | (4) |
|
|
17 | (38) |
|
The context: evolving ecumenical discussions |
|
|
17 | (11) |
|
Argument: the need for this analysis |
|
|
28 | (16) |
|
Definitions: key terms, scope and sources |
|
|
44 | (11) |
|
|
55 | (30) |
|
Wittgenstein: meaning and analysis |
|
|
55 | (9) |
|
Taxonomy: its nature and role |
|
|
64 | (5) |
|
Taxonomy: applicable, compatible and useful? |
|
|
69 | (16) |
|
|
85 | (52) |
|
Examining related analyses |
|
|
85 | (18) |
|
|
103 | (23) |
|
A fuller account of the primary categories |
|
|
126 | (7) |
|
Comments on presenting the `final' taxonomy |
|
|
133 | (4) |
|
Characterizing use of `unity' |
|
|
137 | (46) |
|
|
137 | (12) |
|
|
149 | (9) |
|
|
158 | (20) |
|
Particular characterizations |
|
|
178 | (2) |
|
|
180 | (3) |
|
Referential use of `unity' |
|
|
183 | (52) |
|
|
183 | (24) |
|
|
207 | (28) |
|
Non-conceptual use of `unity' |
|
|
235 | (12) |
|
|
235 | (2) |
|
|
237 | (3) |
|
|
240 | (2) |
|
|
242 | (2) |
|
|
244 | (3) |
|
Where next for unity discussions? |
|
|
247 | (22) |
|
Some thoughts on methodology |
|
|
247 | (1) |
|
The wider value of this method |
|
|
248 | (1) |
|
Some broad ecumenical conclusions |
|
|
249 | (4) |
|
Conclusions drawn from the three primary categories |
|
|
253 | (5) |
|
Particular conclusions drawn from the working taxonomy |
|
|
258 | (6) |
|
What more needs to be done? |
|
|
264 | (5) |
Bibliography |
|
269 | |