I encourage anyone interested in the administrative state, separation of powers, or privatization to read this book. -- Sasha Volokh * Washington Post * In his book, Constitutional Coup, [ Michaels] argues that our professional bureaucracies are essential to Americas democracy The true strength of Michaelss book is reminding us why we have administrative government in the first place Michaels provides a useful reframing of what business-like government really means. -- Joshua Alvarez * Washington Monthly * A truly fundamental contribution to constitutional thought, especially important at a moment when the Trump presidency is escalating the privatization of American government. -- Bruce Ackerman, author of The Decline and Fall of the American Republic Jon Michaels has identified a key aspect of the modern state, its increasing delegation to private businesses of fundamental tasks historically associated with governance. What is fresh and compelling about his book is his elaboration of the truly constitutional dimensions of these developments. -- Sanford Levinson, author of Framed: Americas 51 Constitutions and the Crisis of Governance Constitutional Coup offers a learned, lucid, and important argument about the relationship between privatization, constitutional structure, and public values. Defenders and critics of the contemporary administrative state alike will profit from engaging with Michaelss innovative work. -- Jeffrey A. Pojanowski, Notre Dame Law School Michaelss book is not so much a celebration of the administrative state as it is an impassioned defense of administration as a central pillar of our modern constitutional structure that is increasingly under threat. For Michaels, the administrative state is not the bogeyman of big government; nor is it the specter of inefficiency and gridlock that privatizations proponents make it out to be. Rather, it is the modern instantiation of the central principles of our constitutional orderMichaels rightly argues that dismantling the administrative state risks creating more aggrandized and unchecked executive power, not lessMichaelss work is admirably expansive, resting on a deep conceptual core that generates a number of implications for debates in legal scholarship and for incredibly timely legal and policy questions about the future of administrative governance in an era marked by the puzzling combination of deregulation and expansive executive overreach. -- K. Sabeel Rahman * Harvard Law Review *
