Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

Constitutional Protection of Private Property in China: Historical Evolution and Comparative Research [Kõva köide]

  • Formaat: Hardback, 374 pages, kõrgus x laius x paksus: 236x160x28 mm, kaal: 700 g, 4 Tables, black and white; 1 Line drawings, black and white
  • Ilmumisaeg: 25-Jan-2016
  • Kirjastus: Cambridge University Press
  • ISBN-10: 110712543X
  • ISBN-13: 9781107125438
  • Kõva köide
  • Hind: 117,68 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Tavahind: 156,90 €
  • Säästad 25%
  • Raamatu kohalejõudmiseks kirjastusest kulub orienteeruvalt 3-4 nädalat
  • Kogus:
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Tasuta tarne
  • Tellimisaeg 2-4 nädalat
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • Formaat: Hardback, 374 pages, kõrgus x laius x paksus: 236x160x28 mm, kaal: 700 g, 4 Tables, black and white; 1 Line drawings, black and white
  • Ilmumisaeg: 25-Jan-2016
  • Kirjastus: Cambridge University Press
  • ISBN-10: 110712543X
  • ISBN-13: 9781107125438
This timely book reviews the changes in legal reform around the constitutional protection of private property in China since 1949. Using a comparative approach, it analyses the development of property theories and the various constitutionalisation models and practices of private property in representative countries including the United States, Canada, Germany, India and China. It also explores the interwoven social forces that have been driving the evolution of the constitutional protection of private property in China. By comparing China with the United States, Germany and India, the author reveals the unfairness, unjustness and insufficiency in China's application of three constitutional doctrines public use, just compensation and due process or procedure. The book concludes by predicting future progress and suggests feasible measures for gradual reform that will be compatible with China's existing political system.

Arvustused

'This book provides an excellent insight into the historical development of law, politics and practice concerning the legal status of land and property in land in China since 1949. It explains a lot for anyone interested in the history of China, but also for those interested in the development of law and politics concerning land in any contemporary society, given its interesting analysis of the different social forces that influence this development.' Matthias E. Storme, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

Muu info

Using a comparative approach, this book analyses the history of China's private property protection at the constitutional level since 1949.
List of figures and tables
ix
Foreword x
Acknowledgements xi
List of abbreviations
xiv
Cases and incidents xv
1 Introduction
1(10)
2 Private property and its constitutionalisation
11(34)
2.1 The perspectives of property
11(6)
2.2 Private property and its justifications
17(6)
2.3 Constitutionalising property or not: theoretical analysis
23(3)
2.4 Constitutionalising property or not: country practice
26(12)
2.5 Comparative analysis on the constitutionalisation of private property
38(7)
3 The private property protection in China's constitutions: a historical review
45(53)
3.1 Land reform in the New China
45(15)
3.2 The evolution of private property in the constitutions
60(6)
3.3 The party-leading route of China's constitutional change
66(3)
3.4 The current constitutional framework of private property protection
69(3)
3.5 The constitutional restraints against governmental taking
72(6)
3.6 Evolution in the era of globalisation: the inherent change of social forces
78(20)
4 The symbolised public interest
98(78)
4.1 The United States: public use
98(5)
4.2 Germany: public good test
103(3)
4.3 The anatomy of the public interest doctrine
106(15)
4.4 Public interest in the Chinese context
121(18)
4.5 Economic development as public purpose
139(29)
4.6 Reforming the public interest doctrine in China
168(8)
5 Unjust compensation
176(70)
5.1 To compensate: why and what?
176(3)
5.2 The United States: fair market value as the test for just compensation
179(4)
5.3 Germany: the linking clause and equitable balance
183(3)
5.4 India: compensation without constitutional restraint
186(8)
5.5 China
194(39)
5.6 Reform towards full compensation: India versus China
233(13)
6 Ineffective procedural and institutional mechanisms
246(55)
6.1 The United States: due process
247(8)
6.2 Germany and India: authorisation mode
255(6)
6.3 China
261(18)
6.4 Constitutional review
279(22)
7 Concluding remarks and suggested reform measures
301(22)
7.1 Concluding remarks
301(8)
7.2 Suggestions for reform
309(14)
Bibliography 323(17)
Index 340
Chuanhui Wang is Associate Professor at Lingnan (University) College, part of the Sun Yat-sen University in Guangzhou, China. He received a bachelor's degree from Yantai University and master's degrees from East China University of Political Science and Law and the University of Michigan. In addition to holding a PhD in law from Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium, he also has a PhD in economics from the Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences.