|
|
xi | |
|
|
xii | |
|
|
xiii | |
Abbreviations |
|
xiv | |
Preface |
|
xvi | |
|
|
|
|
3 | (44) |
|
|
3 | (2) |
|
1.1.1 Independent country |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
1.1.2 Internally independent political entity |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
1.1.3 Dependent political entity |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
|
5 | (14) |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
|
6 | (11) |
|
|
17 | (2) |
|
|
19 | (28) |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
|
20 | (5) |
|
|
25 | (3) |
|
|
28 | (16) |
|
|
44 | (3) |
|
2 Studying Cross-Border Areas |
|
|
47 | (30) |
|
|
47 | (4) |
|
2.1.1 Early boundary studies |
|
|
47 | (3) |
|
2.1.2 Recent research progress |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
2.2 Characterizing Cross-Border Areas |
|
|
51 | (6) |
|
2.2.1 Proximity and adjacency |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
2.2.2 Political economy of borders |
|
|
52 | (4) |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
2.3 Interdisciplinary Approach |
|
|
57 | (20) |
|
2.3.1 Natural and physical sciences |
|
|
58 | (3) |
|
|
61 | (4) |
|
2.3.3 Environmental economics |
|
|
65 | (2) |
|
2.3.4 Cultural influences |
|
|
67 | (4) |
|
|
71 | (3) |
|
|
74 | (3) |
|
3 Cross-Border Regional Science |
|
|
77 | (44) |
|
|
77 | (4) |
|
3.1.1 The 11/9 event revisited |
|
|
77 | (2) |
|
3.1.2 Evidence from the borderland |
|
|
79 | (2) |
|
3.2 Can Cross-Border Economies Be Optimized? |
|
|
81 | (8) |
|
3.2.1 An autarkic economy: The model |
|
|
81 | (2) |
|
3.2.2 Impacts of border-related barriers |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
|
84 | (5) |
|
3.3 Cross-Border Environmental Trajectory |
|
|
89 | (12) |
|
3.3.1 Environmental Kuznets curve and border areas |
|
|
89 | (5) |
|
3.3.2 Determinants of cross-border pollution |
|
|
94 | (7) |
|
3.4 Cross-Border Regional Economics |
|
|
101 | (20) |
|
3.4.1 Why does Samoa shift its time zone? |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
3.4.2 Cross-border economic cooperation |
|
|
102 | (2) |
|
|
104 | (3) |
|
|
107 | (10) |
|
|
117 | (4) |
|
4 Institutions for Cross-Border Resource Management |
|
|
121 | (46) |
|
4.1 Why Are Politicians Shortsighted? |
|
|
121 | (5) |
|
4.1.1 Spatial politics of global warming |
|
|
121 | (3) |
|
4.1.2 Global issues versus local views |
|
|
124 | (2) |
|
4.2 Enhancing Cross-Border Management: Principles |
|
|
126 | (4) |
|
4.2.1 The obligation not to cause harm |
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
|
129 | (1) |
|
4.3 Enhancing Cross-Border Management: Categories |
|
|
130 | (5) |
|
4.3.1 Cross-border resource allocation |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
4.3.2 Joint resource management |
|
|
131 | (3) |
|
4.3.3 Integrated cross-border planning |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
4.4 Cross-Border Management Regimes |
|
|
135 | (4) |
|
4.4.1 Joint management regimes |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
4.4.2 Co-management regime |
|
|
137 | (2) |
|
4.5 Strong Borders, Secure Territories |
|
|
139 | (28) |
|
4.5.1 Cross-border crimes |
|
|
139 | (2) |
|
4.5.2 Bioinvasion and border control |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
4.5.3 Creating boundaries for protected areas |
|
|
142 | (5) |
|
|
147 | (15) |
|
|
162 | (5) |
|
5 Cross-Border Resource Management in Disputed Areas |
|
|
167 | (36) |
|
5.1 Fuzzy Boundaries, Uncertain Territories |
|
|
167 | (3) |
|
5.1.1 Inappropriate terms and place names |
|
|
167 | (1) |
|
5.1.2 Vague geometrical features |
|
|
168 | (1) |
|
5.1.3 Intricate human and cultural features |
|
|
169 | (1) |
|
5.1.4 Inconsistent or contradictory statements |
|
|
170 | (1) |
|
5.2 Factors Activating Territorial Disputes |
|
|
170 | (8) |
|
|
171 | (2) |
|
|
173 | (1) |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
5.2.4 Geopolitical competition |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
5.2.5 Cultural difference |
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
|
176 | (2) |
|
5.3 Territorial Disputes and Resource Management |
|
|
178 | (25) |
|
5.3.1 Territorial-related conflicts |
|
|
178 | (3) |
|
5.3.2 Environmental impacts of armed conflicts |
|
|
181 | (2) |
|
5.3.3 Roadmap to peaceful development |
|
|
183 | (3) |
|
|
186 | (10) |
|
|
196 | (7) |
|
|
|
6 Methods for Dividing Territories among Claimants |
|
|
203 | (18) |
|
6.1 Territorial Exchange Scheme |
|
|
203 | (3) |
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
|
204 | (2) |
|
6.2 Fair Division: Methods and Steps |
|
|
206 | (6) |
|
6.2.1 Divider-chooser method |
|
|
206 | (1) |
|
6.2.2 Lone divider method |
|
|
207 | (1) |
|
6.2.3 Lone chooser method |
|
|
208 | (1) |
|
6.2.4 Last diminisher method |
|
|
208 | (1) |
|
6.2.5 Method of sealed bids |
|
|
209 | (2) |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
6.3 Fair Division: Application |
|
|
212 | (5) |
|
6.3.1 Continental shelf division |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
6.3.2 Territorial dispute resolution |
|
|
213 | (4) |
|
6.4 Fair Division: Summary |
|
|
217 | (4) |
|
|
219 | (2) |
|
7 Joint/Cooperative Development Models |
|
|
221 | (12) |
|
7.1 Solo Development Model |
|
|
221 | (1) |
|
|
221 | (1) |
|
|
221 | (1) |
|
7.2 Parallel Development Model |
|
|
222 | (4) |
|
|
222 | (1) |
|
|
223 | (3) |
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
7.4 Joint Authority Model |
|
|
227 | (3) |
|
|
227 | (1) |
|
|
228 | (2) |
|
7.5 Political Trusteeship Model |
|
|
230 | (3) |
|
|
230 | (1) |
|
|
231 | (1) |
|
|
232 | (1) |
|
8 Options for Cross-Border Conflict Management |
|
|
233 | (24) |
|
8.1 International Peace Park |
|
|
233 | (6) |
|
|
233 | (1) |
|
|
234 | (5) |
|
|
239 | (5) |
|
|
239 | (2) |
|
|
241 | (3) |
|
|
244 | (3) |
|
|
244 | (1) |
|
|
245 | (2) |
|
|
247 | (10) |
|
|
247 | (2) |
|
|
249 | (4) |
|
|
253 | (4) |
|
|
|
9 Seabed Petroleum Exploitation in Disputed Areas |
|
|
257 | (22) |
|
|
257 | (1) |
|
9.2 Sino-Japanese Disputes In the East China Sea |
|
|
258 | (5) |
|
9.2.1 Seabed petroleum exploitation |
|
|
258 | (2) |
|
9.2.2 Reasons for discord |
|
|
260 | (3) |
|
|
263 | (7) |
|
|
263 | (2) |
|
9.3.2 Defining zones for joint exploitation |
|
|
265 | (1) |
|
9.3.3 Taking into account all stakeholders |
|
|
266 | (4) |
|
|
270 | (9) |
|
|
273 | (3) |
|
|
276 | (3) |
|
10 U.S.-Mexico Border Environment Cooperation |
|
|
279 | (28) |
|
10.1 U.S.-Mexico Border Industrialization |
|
|
279 | (4) |
|
10.1.1 The U.S.-Mexico border area |
|
|
279 | (3) |
|
|
282 | (1) |
|
10.2 Environmental Problems in the Border Area |
|
|
283 | (5) |
|
10.2.1 Water supply and water quality |
|
|
283 | (1) |
|
|
284 | (2) |
|
10.2.3 Industrial and municipal wastes |
|
|
286 | (1) |
|
10.2.4 Disease and health care |
|
|
286 | (2) |
|
10.2.5 Biological resources |
|
|
288 | (1) |
|
10.3 U.S.-Mexico Border Environment Cooperation |
|
|
288 | (9) |
|
10.3.1 The International Boundary Commission |
|
|
288 | (1) |
|
10.3.2 The International Boundary and Water Commission |
|
|
289 | (4) |
|
10.3.3 The La Paz Agreement |
|
|
293 | (1) |
|
10.3.4 The Washington Agreement |
|
|
294 | (2) |
|
10.3.5 The Border XXI Program |
|
|
296 | (1) |
|
|
297 | (10) |
|
|
299 | (5) |
|
|
304 | (3) |
|
11 The Tumen River Delta: Development and the Environment |
|
|
307 | (18) |
|
|
307 | (3) |
|
11.1.1 About Northeast Asia |
|
|
307 | (1) |
|
11.1.2 The Tumen river delta |
|
|
307 | (3) |
|
11.2 The Tumen River Area Development |
|
|
310 | (5) |
|
11.2.1 Historical evolution |
|
|
310 | (4) |
|
11.2.2 Input-output analysis |
|
|
314 | (1) |
|
11.3 Cross-border Environmental Issues |
|
|
315 | (6) |
|
11.3.1 River pollution and its international impacts |
|
|
315 | (3) |
|
11.3.2 Tumen river development and its environmental implications |
|
|
318 | (3) |
|
|
321 | (4) |
|
|
323 | (2) |
Index |
|
325 | |