Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

Debate on God and Morality: What is the Best Account of Objective Moral Values and Duties? [Kõva köide]

  • Formaat: Hardback, 234 pages, kõrgus x laius: 229x152 mm, kaal: 476 g
  • Ilmumisaeg: 17-Jul-2020
  • Kirjastus: Routledge
  • ISBN-10: 0367135647
  • ISBN-13: 9780367135645
Teised raamatud teemal:
  • Formaat: Hardback, 234 pages, kõrgus x laius: 229x152 mm, kaal: 476 g
  • Ilmumisaeg: 17-Jul-2020
  • Kirjastus: Routledge
  • ISBN-10: 0367135647
  • ISBN-13: 9780367135645
Teised raamatud teemal:
"In 2018, William Lane Craig and Erik J. Wielenberg participated in a debate at North Carolina State University, addressing the question: "God and Morality: What is the best account of objective moral values and duties?" Craig argued that theism providesa sound foundation for objective morality whereas atheism does not. Wielenberg countered that morality can be objective even if there is no God. This book includes the full debate, as well as endnotes with extended discussions that were not included in the debate. It also includes five chapters by other philosophers who have written substantive responses to the debate - J. P. Moreland, David Baggett, Mark Linville, Wes Morriston, and Michael Huemer. The book provides crucial resources for better understanding moral realism and its dependence on, or independence from, theistic foundations. Key features a valuable debate about whether or not God is the best explanation for objective morality, bringing together theists and atheists working on the same subject who normally are not in conversation with each other. Includes clear coverage of ontological and epistemological issues in metaethical theories, focusing on Divine Command Theory and Non-natural Robust Moral Realism. Engaging and accessible throughout, making the book well suited for undergraduate and seminary classrooms"--

In 2018, William Lane Craig and Erik J. Wielenberg participated in a debate at North Carolina State University, addressing the question: "God and Morality: What is the best account of objective moral values and duties?" Craig argued that theism provides a sound foundation for objective morality whereas atheism does not. Wielenberg countered that morality can be objective even if there is no God. This book includes the full debate, as well as endnotes with extended discussions that were not included in the debate. It also includes five chapters by other philosophers who have written substantive responses to the debate - J. P. Moreland, David Baggett, Mark Linville, Wes Morriston, and Michael Huemer. The book provides crucial resources for better understanding moral realism and its dependence on, or independence from, theistic foundations.

Key Features

  • A valuable debate about whether or not God is the best explanation for objective morality, bringing together theists and atheists working on the same subject who normally are not in conversation with each other.
  • Includes clear coverage of ontological and epistemological issues in metaethical theories, focusing on Divine Command Theory and Non-natural Robust Moral Realism.
    • Engaging and accessible throughout, making the book well suited for undergraduate and seminary classrooms.
  • List of tables
    vii
    Preface viii
    List of contributors
    x
    1 Introduction
    1(28)
    Adam Lloyd Johnson
    PART I The Debate
    29(62)
    2 William Lane Craig's Opening Speech
    31(8)
    William Lane Craig
    3 Erik J. Wielenberg's Opening Speech
    39(9)
    Erik J. Wielenberg
    4 William Lane Craig's First Rebuttal
    48(8)
    William Lane Craig
    5 Erik J. Wielenberg's First Rebuttal
    56(6)
    Erik J. Wielenberg
    6 William Lane Craig's Second Rebuttal
    62(7)
    William Lane Craig
    7 Erik J. Wielenberg's Second Rebuttal
    69(4)
    Erik J. Wielenberg
    8 William Lane Craig's Closing Statement
    73(4)
    William Lane Craig
    9 Erik J. Wielenberg's Closing Statement
    77(3)
    Erik J. Wielenberg
    10 Question and Answer Time After the Debate
    80(11)
    William Lane Craig
    Erik J. Wielenberg
    Adam Lloyd Johnson
    PART II Responses to the Debate
    91(96)
    11 Wielenberg and Emergence: Borrowed Capital on the Cheap
    93(22)
    J. P. Moreland
    12 Does Morality Have a Theological Foundation?
    115(16)
    Wesley Morriston
    13 Psychopathy and Supererogation
    131(18)
    David Baggett
    14 Groundless Morals
    149(17)
    Michael Huemer
    15 Darwin, Duties, and the Demiurge
    166(21)
    Mark D. Linville
    PART III Final Remarks
    16 William Lane Craig's Final Remarks
    187(17)
    William Lane Craig
    17 Erik J. Wielenberg's Final Remarks
    204(17)
    Erik J. Wielenberg
    Index 221
    DebatersErik J. Wielenberg is Professor of Philosophy at DePauw University and is the author of Value and Virtue in a Godless Universe (2005), God and the Reach of Reason: C.S. Lewis, David Hume, and Bertrand Russell (2007); and Robust Ethics: The Metaphysics and Epistemology of Godless Normative Realism (2014).

    William Lane Craig is Professor of Philosophy at the Talbot School of Theology and Houston Baptist University. He has authored or edited more than forty books, including, Divine Foreknowledge and Human Freedom (1990), Theism, Atheism, and Big Bang Cosmology (with Quentin Smith, 1995), The Kalam Cosmological Argument (2000), God, Time, and Eternity (2001), and God Over All (2016).

    EditorAdam Lloyd Johnson is a Ph.D. student at Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary.

    Contributors

    P. Moreland, David Baggett, Mark Linville, Wes Morriston, and Michael Huemer