Preface |
|
xxi | |
Acknowledgments |
|
xxv | |
Author |
|
xxvii | |
|
Introductory Statistical Inference and Regression Analysis |
|
|
1 | (74) |
|
Elementary Statistical Inference |
|
|
1 | (32) |
|
Unbiased and Efficient Estimators |
|
|
2 | (2) |
|
Point and Interval Estimation |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
Confidence Intervals for Parameters of a Populations |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
Confidence Intervals for the Means |
|
|
5 | (2) |
|
Confidence Intervals for Differences between Two Means |
|
|
7 | (3) |
|
Confidence Intervals for Proportions |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
Confidence Interval for Difference between two Proportions |
|
|
10 | (2) |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
The Alternative Hpothesis |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
Type I and Type II Errors |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
Test of Hypothesis Parametric Tests |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
Tests for a Single Parameter (Mean) Involving the Normal Distribution |
|
|
14 | (5) |
|
Tests of Hypotheses for Single Means Involving the Student's t-Distibution |
|
|
19 | (2) |
|
Comparing Two Populations Using t-Distribution |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
Paired Comparison or Matched Pari t-Test |
|
|
22 | (2) |
|
|
24 | (3) |
|
Two-Sample t-Test with Unknown Variances |
|
|
27 | (2) |
|
Operating Characteristic Curves |
|
|
29 | (2) |
|
The p-Value Approach to Decisions in Statistical Inference |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
Making a Decision in Hypothesis Testing with p-Value |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
Applications to the Decisions Made in Previous Examples |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
|
33 | (35) |
|
|
35 | (5) |
|
Checking Model Adequacy---Diagnosis by Residual Plots |
|
|
40 | (5) |
|
Checking Model Adeqacy---Lack of Fit Test |
|
|
45 | (3) |
|
Multiple Linear Regression |
|
|
48 | (4) |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
|
53 | (4) |
|
Fitting Higher Order Polynomials |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
Fitting Othogonal Polynomials |
|
|
59 | (3) |
|
SAS Analysis of the Data of Example 1.4 |
|
|
62 | (2) |
|
Use of Dummy Variables in Regression Models |
|
|
64 | (4) |
|
|
68 | (5) |
|
|
73 | (2) |
|
Expermietnts, the Completely Randomized Design---Classical and Regression Approaches |
|
|
75 | (94) |
|
|
75 | (2) |
|
Experiments to Compare Treatments |
|
|
77 | (28) |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
|
79 | (3) |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
Requirements of a Good Experiment |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
One-Way Experimental Layout or the Completely Randomized Design: Design and Analysis |
|
|
84 | (2) |
|
Analysis of Experimental Data (Fixed Effects Model) |
|
|
86 | (2) |
|
Expercted Values for the Sums of Squares |
|
|
88 | (4) |
|
Estimating the Parameters of the Model |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
Analysis of Vairance Table |
|
|
93 | (3) |
|
Follow-Up Analysis to Check for Validity of the Model |
|
|
96 | (2) |
|
Least signigficant Difference Methods |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
Duncan's Multiple range Test |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
Tukey's Studentized Range Test |
|
|
99 | (3) |
|
SAS Program for Analysis of Responses of the Experiment in Example 2.2 |
|
|
102 | (3) |
|
Checking Model Assumptions |
|
|
105 | (16) |
|
|
106 | (4) |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
|
110 | (3) |
|
Nonhomogeneity of Variances |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
Modified Levene's Test for Homogeneity of Variances |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
Application of Data from Example 2.2 on Varieties of Nutrient Extractions of Fruit |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
Dealing with Heteroscedasticity |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
Variance-Stabilizing Transformations |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
Use of Welch F-test to Deal with Responses with Unequal Variances |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
One-Way ANOVA with Unequal Observations per Group |
|
|
117 | (4) |
|
Applications of Orthogonal Contrasts |
|
|
121 | (16) |
|
Analytical Study of Components of Treatment Effect Using Orthogonal Contrasts |
|
|
121 | (4) |
|
SAS Program for Analysis of Data of Example 2.3 |
|
|
125 | (2) |
|
Fitting Response Curves in One-Way Anova (CRD) Using Orthogonal Polynomial Contrasts |
|
|
127 | (2) |
|
Fitting of Polynomials by the Least Squares Regression Method |
|
|
129 | (4) |
|
Fitting of Response Curves to Data using Orthodgonal Contrasts |
|
|
133 | (4) |
|
Regression Models of the CRD (One-Way Layout) |
|
|
137 | (11) |
|
Regression Models fro CRD (Effects Coding Method) |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
Regression Models for the Responses f Example 2.2 |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
Analysis of Varuance to Test the Significance of the Fitted Model |
|
|
139 | (2) |
|
SAS Program for Analysis of Data of Example 2.2 Using Regression Mode (Effects Coding method) |
|
|
141 | (2) |
|
Refression Model for Cell Reference Methods |
|
|
143 | (3) |
|
SAS Program for Regression Model fot Example 2.2 (Reference Cell Coding Method) |
|
|
146 | (2) |
|
Regrssion Models for ANOVA for CRD Using Orthogonal Contrasts |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
Regression Model for Example 2.2 Using Orthogonal Contrasts Coding (Helmert Coding) |
|
|
149 | (7) |
|
SAS Analysis of Data of Example 2.2 Using Orthogonal Contrasts (Helmert Coding) |
|
|
154 | (2) |
|
Regression Model for Example 2.3 Using Orthogonal Contrasts Coding |
|
|
156 | (6) |
|
SAS Analysis of Data of Example 2.3 Using Orthogonal Contrasts (Helmert Coding) |
|
|
160 | (2) |
|
|
162 | (3) |
|
|
165 | (4) |
|
Two-Factor Factorial Experiments and Repeated Measures Designs |
|
|
169 | (50) |
|
Full Two-Factor Factorial Experiment (Two-Way ANOVA with Replication)---Fixed Effects Model |
|
|
169 | (21) |
|
SAS Analysis of Data of Example 3.1 |
|
|
175 | (3) |
|
Simple Effects of an Independent Variable |
|
|
178 | (1) |
|
Absence of Interaction in a Factorial Experiment |
|
|
179 | (2) |
|
Presence of Interaction in a Factorial Experiment |
|
|
181 | (3) |
|
Interpreting Interaction by Testing Simple Effects |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
Choosing the Simple Effects to Test |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
Testing the Simple Effects |
|
|
185 | (2) |
|
Examination of Interaction for Example 3.1 through Analysis of Simple Effects |
|
|
187 | (2) |
|
Testing for Homogeneity of Variances |
|
|
189 | (1) |
|
Two-Factor Factorial Effects (Random Effects Model) |
|
|
190 | (6) |
|
SAS Analysis of Data of Example 3.2 |
|
|
194 | (2) |
|
Two-Factor Factorial Experiment (Mixed Effects Model) |
|
|
196 | (3) |
|
SAS Analysis of Data of Example 3.2a (Mixed Effects Model) |
|
|
198 | (1) |
|
Repeated Measures Design (One-Way RMD) |
|
|
199 | (8) |
|
|
199 | (2) |
|
Mixed Randomized Complete Block Design |
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
Mixed RCBD versus One-Way RMD |
|
|
202 | (5) |
|
Mixed RCBD (Involving Two Factors) |
|
|
207 | (7) |
|
SAS Analysis of Responses of Example 3.4 |
|
|
211 | (3) |
|
|
214 | (3) |
|
|
217 | (2) |
|
Regression Approaches to the Analysis of Responses of Two-Factor Experiments and Repeated Measures Designs |
|
|
219 | (58) |
|
Regression Models for the Two-Way ANOVA (Full Two-Factor Factorial Experiment) |
|
|
219 | (12) |
|
Regression Model for Two-Factor Factorial Design with Effects Coding for Dummy Varibles |
|
|
220 | (1) |
|
Estimation of Parameters for the Regression Model for the General Two-Factor Factorial Design with Effect Coding for Dummy Variables |
|
|
220 | (1) |
|
Application of the Regression Model for the Two-Factor Factorial Design, with Effect Coding for Dummy Variables to Example 3.1 |
|
|
221 | (1) |
|
Relations for Estimation of Parameters for the Regression Model with Effect Coding for Dummy Variables for Responses of Example 3.1 |
|
|
221 | (1) |
|
Estimation of Parameters for the Regression Model |
|
|
222 | (4) |
|
SAS Program for Example 3.1 (Effects Coding for Dummy Variables) |
|
|
226 | (3) |
|
Splitting Regression Sum of Squares according to Factorial Effect and Performing ANOVA |
|
|
229 | (2) |
|
Regression Model for Two-Factor Factorial Experiment Using Reference Cell Coding for Dummy Variables |
|
|
231 | (8) |
|
Estimation of Parameters for the Regression Model with Reference Cell Coding for Dummy Variables (Example 3.1) |
|
|
232 | (4) |
|
|
236 | (3) |
|
Use of SAS for the Analysis of Responses of Mixed Models |
|
|
239 | (3) |
|
Implementation of the General Linear Mixed Model in PROC MIXED in SAS |
|
|
241 | (1) |
|
Use of PROC Mixed in the Analysis of Responses of RMD in SAS |
|
|
242 | (14) |
|
Choosing the Covariance Structure to Use |
|
|
244 | (1) |
|
Analysis of Responses of the Experiment on Guinea-Pig Ventricular Mycotes (Example 3.3) with PROC MIXED in SAS |
|
|
245 | (3) |
|
Residual Analysis for the Guinea-Pig Mycotes Experiment (Example 3.3) |
|
|
248 | (3) |
|
Analysis of Responses of Example 3.4 Using PROC MIXED in SAS |
|
|
251 | (1) |
|
Choosing Covariance Structure for Example 3.4 |
|
|
252 | (1) |
|
Specifying the Model and Analyzing Responses of Example 3.4 |
|
|
253 | (3) |
|
Discussion of SAS Output for Example 3.4 |
|
|
256 | (1) |
|
Residual Analysis for the Vitamin Experiment (Example 3.4) |
|
|
256 | (3) |
|
Regression Model of the Two-Factor Factorial Design Using Orthogonal Contrasts (Example 3.1) |
|
|
259 | (9) |
|
Use of PROC Mixed in SAS to Estimate Variance Components When Levels of Factors Are Random |
|
|
268 | (2) |
|
SAS Program for Analysis of Data of Example 4.1 |
|
|
270 | (4) |
|
|
274 | (1) |
|
|
275 | (2) |
|
Designs with Randomization Restriction---Randomized Complete Block, Latin Squares, and Related Designs |
|
|
277 | (64) |
|
Randomized Complete Block Design |
|
|
277 | (6) |
|
Testing for Differences in Block Means |
|
|
283 | (13) |
|
Relative Efficiency of the RCBD to CRD |
|
|
285 | (1) |
|
Application to Example 5.1 |
|
|
285 | (1) |
|
Residuals and Parameters Estimates in the RCBD |
|
|
286 | (2) |
|
SAS Analysis of Responses of Example 5.1 |
|
|
288 | (4) |
|
SAS Analysis of Data of Example 5.2 |
|
|
292 | (3) |
|
SAS Analysis of Responses of Example 5.3 |
|
|
295 | (1) |
|
Estimation of a Missing Value in the RCBD |
|
|
296 | (2) |
|
|
298 | (4) |
|
Use of Latin Squares for Factorial Experiments |
|
|
302 | (1) |
|
Some Expected Mean Squares |
|
|
302 | (5) |
|
Estimation of Treatment Effects and Confidence Intervals for Differences between Two Treatments |
|
|
303 | (4) |
|
Replications in Latin Square Design |
|
|
307 | (17) |
|
Treatment of Residuals in Latin Squares |
|
|
321 | (1) |
|
Estimation of Missing Value in Unreplicated Latin Square Designs |
|
|
321 | (3) |
|
Graeco-Latin Square Design |
|
|
324 | (7) |
|
SAS Analysis of Data of Example 5.9 |
|
|
329 | (2) |
|
Estimation of Parameters of the Model and Extraction of Residuals |
|
|
331 | (2) |
|
Application to Data of Example 5.9 |
|
|
331 | (2) |
|
|
333 | (7) |
|
|
340 | (1) |
|
Regression Models for Randomized Complete Block, Latin Squares, and Graeco-Latin Square Designs |
|
|
341 | (80) |
|
Regression Models for the Randomized Complete Block Design |
|
|
341 | (5) |
|
Dummy Variables Regression Model for RCBD with the Effects Coding Method |
|
|
341 | (1) |
|
Estimation of Parameters of the Regression Model for RCBD (Effects Coding Method) |
|
|
342 | (2) |
|
Application of the RCBD Regression Model 6.1 to Example 5.1 (Effects Coding Method) |
|
|
344 | (1) |
|
Estimation of Model Parameters for Example 5.1 |
|
|
344 | (2) |
|
SAS Analysis of Responses of Example 5.1 Using Dummy Regression (Effects Coding Method) |
|
|
346 | (2) |
|
SAS Program for Regression Analysis of Data of Example 5.1 (Effects Coding Method for Dummy Variables) |
|
|
347 | (1) |
|
Dummy Variables Regression Model for the RCBD (Reference Cell Method) |
|
|
348 | (7) |
|
Regression Model for RCBD of Example 5.1 (Reference Cell Coding) |
|
|
350 | (1) |
|
Estimation of Parameters of the Model Fitted to Responses of Example 5.1 (Reference Cell Method) |
|
|
350 | (3) |
|
SAS Program for Regression Analysis of Responses of Example 5.1 (Reference Cell Coding for Dummy Variables) |
|
|
353 | (2) |
|
Application of Dummy Variables Regression Model to Example 5.2 (Effects Coding Method) |
|
|
355 | (5) |
|
Estimation of Parameters for the Regression Model for Responses of Example 5.2 (Effects Coding Method) |
|
|
355 | (3) |
|
SAS Program for Example 5.2 for the Regression Model with Effects Coding for Dummy Variables |
|
|
358 | (2) |
|
Regression Model for RCBD of Example 5.2 (Reference Cell Coding) |
|
|
360 | (6) |
|
SAS Analysis of Data of Example 5.2 Using Regression Model with Reference Cell Coding for Dummy Varibales |
|
|
362 | (4) |
|
Regression Models for the Latin Square Design |
|
|
366 | (6) |
|
Regression Model for the Latin Square Design Using Effects Coding Method to Define Dummy Variables |
|
|
366 | (1) |
|
Relations for Estimation Model Parameters (Effects Coding Method) |
|
|
367 | (1) |
|
Estimation of Parameters of Regression Model for Example 5.5 (Effects Coding Method) |
|
|
368 | (1) |
|
Extracting Residuals and Testing for Significance of the Model |
|
|
368 | (1) |
|
SAS Program for the Analysis of Responses of Example 5.5 (Effects Coding Method) |
|
|
368 | (4) |
|
Dummy Variables Regression Analysis for Example 5.5 (Reference Cell Method) |
|
|
372 | (6) |
|
Estimation of Model Parameters (Reference Cell Method) |
|
|
373 | (3) |
|
SAS Program for Fitting Model 6.16 (Reference Cell Method) for Experiment in Example 5.5 |
|
|
376 | (2) |
|
Regression Model for Example 5.7 Using Effects Coding Method to Define Dummy Variables |
|
|
378 | (9) |
|
Estimation of Dummy Variables Regression Model Parameters for Example 5.7 (Effects Coding Method) |
|
|
379 | (5) |
|
SAS Program for Regression Analysis of Data of Example 5.7 (Effects Coding Method) |
|
|
384 | (3) |
|
Dummy Variables Regression Model for Example 5.7 (Reference Cell Coding Method) |
|
|
387 | (10) |
|
Estimation of Parameters of Regression Model for Example 5.7 (Reference Cell Coding) |
|
|
389 | (4) |
|
SAS Program for Analysis of Responses of Example 5.7 (Reference Cell Coding Method) |
|
|
393 | (4) |
|
Regression Model for the Graeco-Latin Square Design |
|
|
397 | (6) |
|
Regression Model for Graeco-Latin Squares Using Effects Coding Method |
|
|
397 | (1) |
|
Estimation of Regression Parameters for Example 5.9 for the Effects Coding Model |
|
|
398 | (3) |
|
SAS Program for Responses of Example 5.9 Using Effects Coding Model |
|
|
401 | (2) |
|
Regression Model for Graeco-Latin Squares (Reference Cell Method) |
|
|
403 | (7) |
|
Estimation of Model Parameters for Reference Cell Method |
|
|
404 | (1) |
|
Estimation of the Parameters of the Model Applied to Example 5.9 |
|
|
405 | (2) |
|
SAS Program for Dummy Regression Analysis of Responses of Example 5.9 Using Reference Cell Method |
|
|
407 | (3) |
|
Regression Model for the RCBD Using Orthogonal Contrasts (Example 5.1) |
|
|
410 | (4) |
|
Regression Model for RCBD Using Orthogonal Contrasts (Example 5.2) |
|
|
414 | (3) |
|
|
417 | (2) |
|
|
419 | (2) |
|
Factorial Designs---The 2k and 3k Factorial Designs |
|
|
421 | (60) |
|
Advantages of Factorial Designs |
|
|
422 | (3) |
|
The Concept of Interaction of Factors |
|
|
422 | (3) |
|
2k and 3k Factorial Designs |
|
|
425 | (5) |
|
|
426 | (1) |
|
Standard Order for Treatment Combinations in 2k Designs |
|
|
426 | (4) |
|
Contrasts for Factorial Effects in 22 and 23 Factorial Designs |
|
|
430 | (13) |
|
|
433 | (10) |
|
General 2k Factorial Design |
|
|
443 | (2) |
|
Factorial Contrasts in 2k Factorial Designs |
|
|
443 | (2) |
|
Link between Factorial Effects and Group Theory |
|
|
445 | (1) |
|
Factorial Effects in 2k Factorial Designs |
|
|
445 | (11) |
|
2k Factorial Designs---A Single Replicate |
|
|
445 | (4) |
|
Obtaining Estimates of Responses |
|
|
449 | (5) |
|
Dealing with Significant Higher Order Interactions in the Single and Half Replicates of a 2k Factorial Design |
|
|
454 | (1) |
|
Collapsing a Single Replicate of 2k Factorial Design into a Full 2k-1 Factorial Design |
|
|
455 | (1) |
|
|
456 | (16) |
|
|
464 | (8) |
|
Extension to k Factors at Three Levels |
|
|
472 | (2) |
|
|
474 | (4) |
|
|
478 | (3) |
|
Regression Models for 2k and 3k Factorial Designs |
|
|
481 | (62) |
|
Regression Models for the 22 Factorial Design Using Effects Coding Method (Example 7.1) |
|
|
481 | (5) |
|
Estimates of the Model Parameters |
|
|
482 | (1) |
|
Testing for Significance of the Fitted Model 8.2 |
|
|
483 | (1) |
|
SAS Analysis of Data of Example 7.1 under the Model 8.1 |
|
|
484 | (2) |
|
Regression Model for Example 7.1 Using Reference Cell to Define Dummy Variables |
|
|
486 | (4) |
|
Estimates of the Model Parameters |
|
|
486 | (1) |
|
Testing for Significance of the Fitted Model |
|
|
487 | (1) |
|
SAS Analysis of Data of Example 7.1 under the Model 8.1 |
|
|
488 | (2) |
|
General Regression Models for the Three-Way Factorial Design |
|
|
490 | (7) |
|
Modeling the General Three-Way Factorial Design Using Effects Coding Method to Define Dummy Variables |
|
|
490 | (1) |
|
Estimation of Parameters for the General Three-Way Factorial Experiment with Effects Code Definition for Dummy Variables |
|
|
491 | (1) |
|
Fitting the Regression Model 8.6 (Effects Coding Method) for the Experimental Design of Example 7.2 |
|
|
492 | (2) |
|
Testing for Significance of the Fitted Model |
|
|
494 | (1) |
|
SAS Analysis of Responses of a 23 Factorial Design (Example 7.2) |
|
|
495 | (2) |
|
The General Regression Model for a Three-Way ANOVA (Reference Cell Coding Method) |
|
|
497 | (6) |
|
Regression Model for 23 Factorial Design and Relations for Estimating Parameters (Reference Cell Method) |
|
|
498 | (1) |
|
Application to Example 7.2 |
|
|
499 | (1) |
|
Testing for Significance of the Fitted Model 8.6 for Example 7.2 |
|
|
500 | (1) |
|
SAS Program for Analysis of Data of Example 7.2 (Reference Cell Method) |
|
|
501 | (2) |
|
Regression Models for the Four-Factor Factorial Design Using Effects Coding Method |
|
|
503 | (13) |
|
Regression Model for the 24 Factorial Design Using Effects Coding Method for Defining Dummy Variables |
|
|
505 | (1) |
|
Application of the Model to Example 7.3 (Effects Coding Method) |
|
|
505 | (4) |
|
SAS Program for Analysis of Data of Example 7.3 |
|
|
509 | (1) |
|
Regression Analysis for a Four-Factor Factorial Experiment Using Reference Cell Coding to Define Dummy Variables |
|
|
510 | (2) |
|
Application of Regression Model (Using Reference Cell Coding for Dummy Variables) to Example 7.3 |
|
|
512 | (1) |
|
Estimation of Parameters of the Model |
|
|
512 | (3) |
|
SAS Program for Analysis of Data of Example 7.3 |
|
|
515 | (1) |
|
Dummy Variables Regression Models for Experiment in 3k Factorial Designs |
|
|
516 | (11) |
|
Dummy Variables Regression Model (Effects Coding Method) for a 32 Factorial Design |
|
|
517 | (1) |
|
Relations for Estimating Parameters of the Model |
|
|
517 | (1) |
|
Fitting the Model to Example 7.4 |
|
|
518 | (2) |
|
SAS Program and Analysis of Data for Example 7.4 (Effects Coding Model) |
|
|
520 | (2) |
|
Fitting the Model to Example 7.4 by Reference Cell Method |
|
|
522 | (3) |
|
SAS Program and Analysis of Data for Example 7.4 (Reference Cell Model) |
|
|
525 | (2) |
|
Fitting Regression Model for Example 7.5 (Effects Coding Method) |
|
|
527 | (7) |
|
SAS Analysis of Data of Example 7.5 Using Effects Coding Method |
|
|
531 | (3) |
|
Fitting Regression Model 8.22 (Reference Cell Coding Method) to Responses of Experiment of Example 7.5 |
|
|
534 | (6) |
|
SAS Analysis of Data of Example 7.5 |
|
|
538 | (2) |
|
|
540 | (3) |
|
Fractional Replication and Confounding in 2k and 3k Factorial Designs |
|
|
543 | (52) |
|
Construction of the 2k-1 Fractional Factorial Design |
|
|
543 | (3) |
|
Some Requirements of Good 2k-1 Fractional Factorial Designs |
|
|
546 | (1) |
|
Contrasts of the 2k-1 Fractional Factorial Design |
|
|
546 | (5) |
|
Estimation of the Effects of a 2k-1 Fractional Design Using a Full 2k-1 Factorial Design |
|
|
547 | (4) |
|
General 2k-p Fractional Design |
|
|
551 | (3) |
|
Resolution of a Fractional Factorial Design |
|
|
554 | (4) |
|
|
555 | (2) |
|
|
557 | (1) |
|
|
558 | (1) |
|
Fractional Replication in 3k Factorial Designs |
|
|
558 | (6) |
|
One-Third Fraction of the 34 Factorial Design |
|
|
563 | (1) |
|
General 3k-p Factorial Design |
|
|
564 | (1) |
|
Confounding in 2k and 3k Factorial Designs |
|
|
565 | (1) |
|
Confounding in 2k Factorial Designs |
|
|
566 | (12) |
|
Blocking a Single Replicate of the 2k Factorial Design |
|
|
572 | (2) |
|
Blocking Fractionals of the 2k Factorial Design |
|
|
574 | (1) |
|
2k Factorial Design in 2p Blocks |
|
|
575 | (3) |
|
Confounding in 3k Factorial Designs |
|
|
578 | (7) |
|
Assignment of 3k Factorial Design in 3p Blocks (p=1) |
|
|
578 | (4) |
|
Assignment of the 3k Factorial Design into 3p Blocks (p=2) |
|
|
582 | (2) |
|
Assignment of the 3k Factorial Design into 3p Blocks (p>3) |
|
|
584 | (1) |
|
Partial Confounding in Factorial Designs |
|
|
585 | (4) |
|
Partial Confounding in 2k Factorial Design |
|
|
585 | (2) |
|
Partial Confounding in 3k Factorial Design |
|
|
587 | (2) |
|
Other Confounding Systems |
|
|
589 | (1) |
|
|
589 | (4) |
|
|
593 | (2) |
|
Balanced Incomplete Blocks, Lattices, and Nested Designs |
|
|
595 | (48) |
|
Balanced Incomplete Block Design |
|
|
595 | (8) |
|
Balanced Incomplete Block Design---The Model and Its Analysis |
|
|
596 | (2) |
|
Estimation of Treatment Effect and Calculation of Treatment Sum of Squares for Balanced Incomplete Block Design |
|
|
598 | (2) |
|
SAS Analysis of Responses of Experiment in Example 10.1 |
|
|
600 | (2) |
|
Precision of the Estimates and Confidence Intervals |
|
|
602 | (1) |
|
|
602 | (1) |
|
|
603 | (1) |
|
Comparison of Two Treatments |
|
|
603 | (2) |
|
Orthogonal Contrasts in Balanced Incomplete Block Designs |
|
|
605 | (2) |
|
|
607 | (8) |
|
|
607 | (5) |
|
Adjustment of Treatment Totals and Further Analysis |
|
|
612 | (3) |
|
Partially Balanced Lattices |
|
|
615 | (6) |
|
Analysis of Partially Balanced Lattices |
|
|
616 | (5) |
|
Nested or Hierarchical Designs |
|
|
621 | (11) |
|
The Model, Assumptions, and Statistical Analysis |
|
|
622 | (5) |
|
Unbalanced Two-Stage Nested Design |
|
|
627 | (4) |
|
Higher Order Nested Designs |
|
|
631 | (1) |
|
Designs with Nested and Crossed Factors |
|
|
632 | (4) |
|
SAS Program for Example 10.6 |
|
|
635 | (1) |
|
|
636 | (4) |
|
|
640 | (3) |
|
Methods for Fitting Response Surfaces and Analysis of Covariance |
|
|
643 | (56) |
|
Method of Steepest Ascent |
|
|
644 | (2) |
|
Designs for Fitting Response Surfaces |
|
|
646 | (1) |
|
Designs for Fitting First-Order Models |
|
|
646 | (1) |
|
Fitting a First-Order Model to the Response Surface |
|
|
647 | (13) |
|
Designs for Fitting Second-Order Surfaces |
|
|
656 | (1) |
|
Use of 3k Factorial Designs |
|
|
657 | (1) |
|
Central Composite Designs |
|
|
657 | (3) |
|
Fitting and Analysis of the Second-Order Model |
|
|
660 | (5) |
|
|
665 | (1) |
|
One-Way Analysis of Covariance |
|
|
666 | (8) |
|
Using SAS to Carry Out Covariance Analysis |
|
|
673 | (1) |
|
|
674 | (19) |
|
Tests about Significance of Regression |
|
|
681 | (3) |
|
Testing for Homogeneity of Slopes across Levels of Factors and Cells |
|
|
684 | (2) |
|
Using Regression for ANCOVA (Application to Two-Way ANCOVA) |
|
|
686 | (3) |
|
Mulltiple Covariates in ANCOVA |
|
|
689 | (3) |
|
Dealing with the Failure of the Homogeneity of Slopes Assumption in ANCOVA |
|
|
692 | (1) |
|
Blocking the Concomitant Variable |
|
|
692 | (1) |
|
The Johnson-Neyman Method |
|
|
693 | (1) |
|
|
693 | (4) |
|
|
697 | (2) |
|
Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) |
|
|
699 | (78) |
|
Link between ANOVA and MANOVA |
|
|
699 | (1) |
|
|
700 | (17) |
|
Tests for Equality of Vectors of Treatment Effects |
|
|
702 | (3) |
|
Alternative Testing Methods |
|
|
705 | (8) |
|
SAS Analysis of Responses of Example 12.1 |
|
|
713 | (4) |
|
Multivariate Analysis of Variance---The Randomized Complete Block Experiment |
|
|
717 | (17) |
|
SAS Solution for Example 12.2 |
|
|
729 | (5) |
|
Multivariate Two-Way Experimental Layout with Interaction |
|
|
734 | (17) |
|
SAS Program for Example 12.3 |
|
|
745 | (6) |
|
Two-Stage Multivariate Nested or Hierarchical Design |
|
|
751 | (11) |
|
SAS Program for Example 12.4 |
|
|
757 | (5) |
|
Multivariate Latin Square Design |
|
|
762 | (9) |
|
|
767 | (4) |
|
|
771 | (4) |
|
|
775 | (2) |
Appendix: Statistical Tables |
|
777 | (40) |
Index |
|
817 | |