| Preface |
|
iii | |
|
|
|
ix | |
|
|
|
xi | |
| Boxes |
|
xiii | |
| Summary |
|
xv | |
| Acknowledgments |
|
xxiii | |
| Abbreviations |
|
xxv | |
|
|
|
1 | (4) |
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
Organization of This Report |
|
|
2 | (3) |
|
Chapter Two Current Suicide Prevention Research in the United States That Is Directly Relevant to Military Personnel |
|
|
5 | (20) |
|
|
|
5 | (4) |
|
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
Identifying Studies for Abstraction |
|
|
6 | (2) |
|
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
|
|
9 | (14) |
|
Studies Identified, Funders, and Funding |
|
|
10 | (3) |
|
Funding, by NAASP Category |
|
|
13 | (6) |
|
Funding, by MOMRP Category |
|
|
19 | (4) |
|
|
|
23 | (2) |
|
Chapter Three Prioritizing Research Needs in the U.S. Department of Defense |
|
|
25 | (14) |
|
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
|
|
26 | (5) |
|
Creating Aspirational Goals |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
Selection of Stakeholder Participants |
|
|
27 | (2) |
|
Implementation of the DoD Stakeholder Elicitation Process |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
Implementing the RAND ExpertLens Process |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
|
|
31 | (5) |
|
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
Ranking Across the Five Domains |
|
|
31 | (3) |
|
Additional Elicitation from RAND Experts |
|
|
34 | (2) |
|
|
|
36 | (3) |
|
Chapter Four Preliminary Gap Analysis |
|
|
39 | (8) |
|
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
|
|
40 | (5) |
|
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
|
|
42 | (2) |
|
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
|
|
45 | (2) |
|
Chapter Five Modeling DoD's Suicide Prevention Research Priorities |
|
|
47 | (14) |
|
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
|
|
48 | (4) |
|
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
Parameterization of the Model |
|
|
49 | (3) |
|
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
|
|
53 | (7) |
|
Suicides Prevented per Cost |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
Suicides Prevented per Cost Relative to Overall Importance |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
Benefit-Cost Index Relative to Cultural Acceptability |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
Benefit-Cost Index Relative to Learning Value |
|
|
54 | (4) |
|
Funding and Study Allocation Relative to the Benefit-Cost Index |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
Chapter Six Translating Research into Practice |
|
|
61 | (28) |
|
Literature Review Strategy |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
|
|
62 | (24) |
|
1 Evidence of an Identified Need |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
2 Evidence of Research Quality |
|
|
64 | (4) |
|
3 Evidence of Effectiveness |
|
|
68 | (2) |
|
4 Leadership Buy-In and Support from Key Stakeholders |
|
|
70 | (2) |
|
5 Funding or Other Institutional Support |
|
|
72 | (2) |
|
6 Collaboration with Credible Sponsors |
|
|
74 | (2) |
|
7 Provision of Incentives or Development of Policies |
|
|
76 | (3) |
|
8 Peer Network Supportive of Adoption |
|
|
79 | (3) |
|
9 Dissemination Materials |
|
|
82 | (2) |
|
10 Expectation of a Cultural Shift |
|
|
84 | (2) |
|
|
|
86 | (3) |
|
Chapter Seven Recommendations for a Research Strategy |
|
|
89 | (8) |
|
Overarching Recommendation |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
Priorities for Research Funding |
|
|
90 | (2) |
|
Processes to Enhance and More Efficiently Allocate Research Funding |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
Processes to Close the Research-to-Practice Gap |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
|
|
94 | (3) |
|
|
|
|
A Ongoing Studies of Relevance to Suicide Prevention Among Military Personnel |
|
|
97 | (40) |
|
B Alternative Allocation Analysis |
|
|
137 | (2) |
|
C Statistical Procedure for Extracting Rankings from the RAND ExpertLens Panel |
|
|
139 | (6) |
|
D Feedback from DoD Stakeholders About the RAND ExpertLens Process |
|
|
145 | (2) |
|
E Sensitivity Analysis of the Benefit-Cost Index Rankings |
|
|
147 | (4) |
|
F Research Domains and Approaches for Assessing Research Quality |
|
|
151 | (4) |
| References |
|
155 | |
