|
|
|
xi | |
|
|
|
xv | |
| Preface |
|
xxiii | |
| Abbreviations |
|
xxv | |
| Notes cm contributors |
|
xxxi | |
|
1 Contract and tort law in the digital age: Contemporary challenges to the law of obligations |
|
|
1 | (24) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | (3) |
|
2 Main topics and the overview of the EU legal framework |
|
|
4 | (10) |
|
2.1 Liability of internet intermediaries for third-party content |
|
|
4 | (3) |
|
2.2 Liability of collaborative economy platforms |
|
|
7 | (2) |
|
2.3 Liability for artificial intelligence and other emerging digital technologies |
|
|
9 | (2) |
|
2.4 Blockchain technology and blockchain-based smart contracts |
|
|
11 | (3) |
|
3 Structure and contributions |
|
|
14 | (3) |
|
3.1 Digital technologies and other contemporary challenges in tort law |
|
|
14 | (2) |
|
3.2 Contract law challenges posed by smart contracts |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
3.3 Digital contracts, accounts, and services |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
|
|
17 | (8) |
|
PART I Digital technologies and other contemporary challenges in tort law |
|
|
25 | (94) |
|
2 Civil liability of internet intermediaries for illegal online content |
|
|
27 | (18) |
|
|
|
1 Introduction: illegal online content |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
2 Safe haven under the E-Commerce Directive |
|
|
28 | (4) |
|
|
|
28 | (2) |
|
2.2 Mere conduit and caching |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
3 Technical neutrality of service providers |
|
|
32 | (3) |
|
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
5 Unfounded takedown requests |
|
|
36 | (2) |
|
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
7 New liability regime for content-sharing service providers |
|
|
39 | (2) |
|
8 Liability for hyperlinks |
|
|
41 | (2) |
|
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
3 The sharing economy as the contemporary challenge for the law of torts |
|
|
45 | (9) |
|
|
|
1 Introduction: the sharing economy - not only pros |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
2 Private law measures as a remedy |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
3 Does tort law has a say? |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
4 The sharing economy and reasons underlying vicarious liability |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
5 Vicarious liability: the traditional view |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
6 Vicarious liability: a new approach |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
7 Future of vicarious liability and the platforms: fairness, justice, and trust |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
8 The sharing economy and vicarious liability: conclusions |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
|
|
52 | (2) |
|
4 Rethinking tort law in the corporate group situation |
|
|
54 | (23) |
|
|
|
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
2 Judgment-proofing in corporate groups |
|
|
55 | (5) |
|
3 The judicial response to judgment-proofing |
|
|
60 | (5) |
|
4 Special statutory scheme: The Oil Pollution Act 1990 |
|
|
65 | (6) |
|
|
|
71 | (3) |
|
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
|
|
74 | (3) |
|
5 Blockchain-based registration and transfer of shares: Consequences in the area of the law of obligations |
|
|
77 | (18) |
|
|
|
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
2 Keeping corporate records and share trading: legislators at the crossroads? |
|
|
78 | (6) |
|
2.1 The first problem: traeeability and intermediaries |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
2.2 The second problem: transparency |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
2.3 Is blockchain the solution? |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
2.3.1 A few technical remarks |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
2.3.2 Blockchain-based registration of shares |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
2.3.3 Blockchain-based share trading |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
3 Blockchain-based share registration and share trading versus the existing law of obligations |
|
|
84 | (3) |
|
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
3.2 Blockchain and corporate law - current state of affairs |
|
|
85 | (2) |
|
4 Civil liability for malfunctions of blockchain-based share registers or share trading platforms |
|
|
87 | (4) |
|
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
4.2 Legal nature of civil liability for fault entries in the stock ledger |
|
|
87 | (2) |
|
4.3 `Code-as-law' (or "code-as-contract"?) argument |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
4.4 Risk-based or fault-based liability? |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
5 Blockchain-based share transfers: smart contracts of sale of shares |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
|
|
93 | (2) |
|
6 Liability for artificial intelligence |
|
|
95 | (24) |
|
|
|
|
|
95 | (2) |
|
2 Current legal framework |
|
|
97 | (4) |
|
2.1 Jurisdiction in the EU |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
2.2 Common bases (types) of liability |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
2.2.1 Vault-based liability ami strict liability |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
2.2.2 Vicarious liability |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
3 Challenges to the current liability regime |
|
|
101 | (8) |
|
3.1 Characteristics of AI |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
3.2.1 Who should be responsible? |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
3.2.2 Which basis of liability should be employed? |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
|
|
104 | (1) |
|
3.2.4 Proper time and scope of regulation |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
3.2.5 Product Liability Directive |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
3.2.6 Burden of proof and causation |
|
|
107 | (2) |
|
|
|
109 | (6) |
|
4.1 Proper allocation and basis of liability |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
4.1.1 Electronic personality |
|
|
109 | (2) |
|
4.1.2 Manufacturers and users |
|
|
111 | (2) |
|
4.2 Position of injured persons |
|
|
113 | (2) |
|
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
|
|
116 | (3) |
|
PART II Contract law challenges posed by smart contracts |
|
|
119 | (62) |
|
7 What are smart contracts? An attempt at demystification |
|
|
121 | (12) |
|
|
|
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
2 The notion of smart contracts |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
3 Are smart contracts in fact contracts at ail? |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
4 The history of smart contracts |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
5 The relevance of smart contracts |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
6 Smart contracts v legal contracts |
|
|
125 | (1) |
|
7 The issues with smart contracts |
|
|
126 | (1) |
|
8 Regulation of smart contracts |
|
|
127 | (3) |
|
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
|
|
131 | (2) |
|
8 The `contracting problem' revisited: Explaining the formation of algorithmic contracts under the common law |
|
|
133 | (22) |
|
|
|
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
2 Algorithmic contracts defined |
|
|
134 | (2) |
|
3 What makes the contracting problem a problem? |
|
|
136 | (7) |
|
3.1 The insufficiency of statutory provisions in non-American common law jurisdictions |
|
|
136 | (2) |
|
3.2 The doctrinal nature of the contracting problem |
|
|
138 | (5) |
|
4 The vending machine, refurbished - a solution in two parts |
|
|
143 | (9) |
|
|
|
143 | (4) |
|
|
|
147 | (5) |
|
|
|
152 | (1) |
|
|
|
153 | (2) |
|
9 Addressing contemporary challenges in contract law through millenary concepts |
|
|
155 | (11) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155 | (2) |
|
|
|
157 | (2) |
|
3 Contemporary perspective about equity |
|
|
159 | (2) |
|
|
|
161 | (2) |
|
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
|
|
164 | (2) |
|
10 Smart contracts and the evolution of a legal perspective on the protection of human rights |
|
|
166 | (15) |
|
|
|
|
|
1 Introduction: blockchain and the digital revolution |
|
|
166 | (1) |
|
2 The concept and main features of smart contracts |
|
|
167 | (4) |
|
3 The application of smart contracts to legal relations |
|
|
171 | (1) |
|
4 Smart contracts within contract law |
|
|
172 | (3) |
|
5 Application of smart contracts |
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
6 Smart contracts and human rights |
|
|
176 | (2) |
|
|
|
178 | (1) |
|
|
|
179 | (2) |
|
PART III Digital contracts, accounts, and services |
|
|
181 | (33) |
|
11 How do terms of service agreements, as contracts of adhesion, influence users' digital accounts and their content? |
|
|
183 | (18) |
|
|
|
|
|
183 | (1) |
|
|
|
183 | (2) |
|
3 Terms of Service agreements - wrap contracts |
|
|
185 | (4) |
|
4 Inheritability of digital accounts and its content (digital assets) |
|
|
189 | (6) |
|
4.1 Ownership of an account and its content |
|
|
191 | (1) |
|
4.2 Inheritability of digital accounts and their content |
|
|
192 | (3) |
|
5 Which rights does the user have over digital content -- ownership or licence? |
|
|
195 | (2) |
|
|
|
197 | (1) |
|
|
|
198 | (3) |
|
12 Online peer-to-peer accommodation services: The ECJ's judgment in Case C-390/18, Airbnb Ireland |
|
|
201 | (13) |
|
|
|
|
|
201 | (2) |
|
2 Key regulatory issues regarding the collaborative economy |
|
|
203 | (2) |
|
3 Peer-to-peer accommodation services |
|
|
205 | (6) |
|
3.1 Participants in peer-to-peer accommodation relationship |
|
|
205 | (1) |
|
3.2 Airbnb business model |
|
|
206 | (5) |
|
4 The ECJ judgment in Airbnb Ireland |
|
|
211 | (3) |
|
|
|
214 | (1) |
| Bibliography |
|
214 | (3) |
| Index |
|
217 | |