Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

Eminent Domain: A Handbook of Condemnation Law [Pehme köide]

  • Formaat: Paperback / softback, 250 pages, kõrgus x laius x paksus: 231x152x12 mm, kaal: 335 g
  • Ilmumisaeg: 07-Jan-2014
  • Kirjastus: American Bar Association
  • ISBN-10: 1614380988
  • ISBN-13: 9781614380986
Teised raamatud teemal:
  • Formaat: Paperback / softback, 250 pages, kõrgus x laius x paksus: 231x152x12 mm, kaal: 335 g
  • Ilmumisaeg: 07-Jan-2014
  • Kirjastus: American Bar Association
  • ISBN-10: 1614380988
  • ISBN-13: 9781614380986
Teised raamatud teemal:
Eminent domain has a long and distinguished legal history, dating from the first limits on sovereign power in the Magna Carta. Just compensation is a newer concept, and court decisions such as Kelo v. New London make the exercise of eminent domain controversial. Can government condemn property to increase its tax base? Can the state transfer property from one private owner to another for incidental public benefit, and does this constitute "public use"? While eminent domain traditionally was used to acquire property for roads, waterways, defense installations, government and public buildings, and the interstate highway system, it has recently been a favored tool in developing urban areas, creating shopping malls, and building big-box retail stores. Eminent Domain: A Handbook of Condemnation Law is written by leaders in the field and will introduce general practitioners working for condemnors and property owners alike to the many intricacies of condemnation practice.
About the Editors vii
About the Contributors ix
Introduction xv
1 Public Use and Public Purpose 1(16)
Mary Massaron Ross
Hilary Ann Ballentine
Public Use Evolves to Public Purpose
1(9)
State Law Variations on Public Use and Purpose
10(1)
Public Use versus Public Necessity
11(6)
2 Compensation 17(16)
Terry C. Frank
Fair Cash Market Value
18(1)
Highest and Best Use
18(2)
Theories of Valuation
20(1)
Improvements
21(1)
Easements and Partial Property Interests
22(1)
Scope-of-the-Project Rule
23(1)
Evidence of Value
23(2)
Offsets to Value
25(2)
Interest
27(6)
3 Damages Resulting from a Taking: An Overview 33(30)
Mark M. Murakami
Christi-Anne H. Kudo Chock
Partial Physical Takings (Adjacent or Remaining Parcel)
34(1)
Loss of Access
34(1)
Zoning Restrictions
35(1)
Loss of Business
35(1)
Cost of Moving
36(1)
Improvements
36(2)
Lost Mineral Deposits
38(1)
Inclusion of Fixtures
38(1)
Inclusion of Trees and Crops
39(1)
Trespass
39(1)
Proximity Damages: Nuisance, Noise, and Lack of Access
40(1)
Temporary Takings
41(1)
Consequential and Constitutional Damages
41(22)
4 Severance Damages and Loss of Access 63(12)
Gerald Meaders
Matt Michel
Overview
63(3)
Severance Damages Related to Land Use and Zoning
66(1)
Loss of Access
67(8)
5 Prelitigation Process 75(12)
Robert H. Thomas
Initial Client Contact
76(1)
Resolution of Public Necessity
77(1)
Condemnor's Power to Take the Property at Issue
78(2)
The Uniform Relocation Act
80(1)
Letter of Offer
81(1)
Proper Parties to Suit
81(1)
Accurate Description
82(1)
Opinions of Value
82(1)
Conclusion
83(4)
6 Trial 87(26)
Charles F. Hudson
Pretrial
87(4)
Trial Briefing and Motions in Limine
91(2)
Jury Instructions
93(3)
Voir Dire
96(2)
Jury View
98(2)
Opening Statements
100(1)
Witnesses
101(2)
Exhibits
103(1)
Other Elements of the Case
104(1)
Common Evidentiary Issues
105(1)
Closing Arguments
106(2)
Verdict, Judgment, and Abandonment
108(1)
Post-trial: Cost Bills, Apportionment, and Appeal
109(4)
7 Flooding and Erosion 113(10)
Robert H. Thomas
Theories of Recovery
114(1)
Inverse Condemnation or Tort
115(1)
Water Intrusion
116(1)
Federal Navigational Servitude
117(1)
Regulatory Navigability and Other Servitudes
118(5)
8 Inverse Condemnation 123(30)
James G. Greilsheimer
Cynthia Lovinger Siderman
Police Power
4124
Definition of an Inverse Condemnation
124(6)
Moratoria
130(2)
Zoning
132(1)
Designation as Navigable Water
133(4)
Property Interest
137(1)
Ripeness
137(2)
Date of Taking
139(1)
Statute of Limitations
140(1)
Burden of Proof
140(2)
Judicial Taking
142(1)
Conclusion
143(10)
Appendix A State-by-State Survey of Public Use Standards 153(40)
Calvert G. Chipchase
Christian K. Adams
Kamaile A. Nichols
Introduction
153(1)
Survey of the Public Use Requirement
154(39)
Table of Cases 193(20)
Index 213
William Scheiderich is adjunct faculty to Eastern- and Western Oregon University. Cynthia M. Fraser is an owner with the law firm of Garvey Schubert Barer in Portland, Oregon. David Callies is Benjamin A. Kudo Professor of Law at the University of Hawaii School of Law.