"Thomas Søbirk Petersen carefully and thoughtfully integrates ethical reasoning, the best available empirical evidence, and rigorous analysis in his examination of various kinds of situational crime prevention strategies. After laying out his methodology in the opening chapter, he employs it skillfully to examine measures both familiar and more novel that are aimed at reducing crime in communities, ones that are distinct from legal punishment. The result is a highly valuable contribution to the emerging literature on the topic."
Richard L. Lippke, Emeritus Professor of Criminal Justice, Indiana University-Bloomington, USA
"Thomas Søbirk Petersen has produced an impressive ethical examination of the various ways societies attempt to reduce crime not by deterring potential offenders or reforming wrongdoers, but rather by designing physical environments to make crime less likely. From gated communities, to housing restrictions on people with criminal convictions, to installation of speed bumps to slow traffic, these so-called situational crime preventive measures pose important moral and political challenges. Rather than making sweeping assessments, Petersens detailed, nuanced account recognises that the ethical justification of particular measures will depend on the manner and the context in which they are implemented. It is an important and original achievement, a valuable contribution for criminal justice scholars, policy makers, and anyone interested in how states seek to prevent crime."
Zachary Hoskins, University of Nottingham, UK
"Ethics and Situational Crime Prevention is a fascinating and highly recommended study of an increasingly prominent approach to crime prevention. The argumentation is compelling and provocative, the case studies well-chosen, and the style straightforward, engaging and clear. It will become the landmark monograph on this topic, and will be of great interest not only to moral philosophers, legal theorists and criminologists, but to all with a serious interest in the future of crime prevention."
Thomas Douglas, University of Oxford, UK