Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Trusts and Estates Opinions [Kõva köide]

Edited by , Edited by , Edited by (Drexel University, Philadelphia)
  • Formaat: Hardback, 274 pages, kõrgus x laius x paksus: 235x160x25 mm, kaal: 600 g, Worked examples or Exercises
  • Sari: Feminist Judgment Series: Rewritten Judicial Opinions
  • Ilmumisaeg: 17-Sep-2020
  • Kirjastus: Cambridge University Press
  • ISBN-10: 1108495117
  • ISBN-13: 9781108495110
Teised raamatud teemal:
  • Kõva köide
  • Hind: 98,44 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Tavahind: 131,25 €
  • Säästad 25%
  • Raamatu kohalejõudmiseks kirjastusest kulub orienteeruvalt 3-4 nädalat
  • Kogus:
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Tasuta tarne
  • Tellimisaeg 2-4 nädalat
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Trusts and Estates OpinionsSuurem pilt
  • Formaat: Hardback, 274 pages, kõrgus x laius x paksus: 235x160x25 mm, kaal: 600 g, Worked examples or Exercises
  • Sari: Feminist Judgment Series: Rewritten Judicial Opinions
  • Ilmumisaeg: 17-Sep-2020
  • Kirjastus: Cambridge University Press
  • ISBN-10: 1108495117
  • ISBN-13: 9781108495110
Teised raamatud teemal:
Teised raamatud sellest sooduspakkumisest: Kevadine sooduspakkumine - kuni 31. maini üle miljoni raamatu kuni 25% soodsamalt
Püsilink: https://www.kriso.ee/db/9781108495110.html
Märksõnad:
For women and other marginalized groups, the reality is that the laws regulating estates and trusts may not be treating them fairly. By using popular feminist legal theories as well as their own definitions of feminism, the authors of this volume present rewritten opinions from well-known estates and trust cases. Covering eleven important cases, this collection reflects the diversity in society and explores the need for greater diversity in the law. By re-examining these cases, the contributors are able to demonstrate how women's property rights, as well as the rights of other marginalized groups, have been limited by the law.

This book analyzes estates and trusts cases through a feminist lens to demonstrate how the law has limited the property rights of women and other marginalized groups. This book will be useful to law students learning to read cases and to anyone else interested in understanding ways in which the law has been applied inequitably.

Muu info

This book analyzes estates and trusts cases through a feminist lens using some of the most popular feminist legal theories.
Advisory Panel for Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Trusts and Estates Opinions xi
Notes on Contributors xiii
Preface xv
Acknowledgments xvii
Table of Cases
xix
1 Introduction to the Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Trusts and Estates Opinions Project
1(16)
Deborah S. Gordon
Browne C. Lewis
Carlo Spivack
2 In re Strittmater's Estate, 53 A.2d 205 (N.J. 1947)
17(22)
Commentary: Lloyd Bonfield and Bridget J. Crawford
Judgment: Kristen K. Tiscione
3 In re Will of Moses, 227 So.2d 829 (Miss. 1969)
39(26)
Commentary: Claire C. Robinson May
Judgment: Julia Belian
4 In re Estate of Wilson, 59 N.Y.2d 461, 452 N.E.2d 1228 (1983)
65(16)
Commentary: Deborah S. Gordon
Judgment: Camille M. Davidson
5 O'Neal v. Wilkes, 439 S.E.2d 490 (Ga. 1994)
81(19)
Commentaries: Ayelet Blecher-Prigat and Benedetto Faedi Dummy
Judgment: Browne C. Lewis
6 Via v. Putnam, 656 So.2d 460 (Fla. 1995)
100(23)
Commentary: Eloisa C. Rodriguez-Dod
Judgment: Elena Maria Marty-Nelson
7 In re Estate of Myers, 256 Neb. 817, 594 N.W.2d 563 (1999)
123(26)
Commentary: Danaya C. Wright
Judgment: Karen J. Sneddon
8 Egelhoff v. Egelhoff, 532 U.S. 141 (2001)
149(30)
Commentary: Donna Litman
Judgment: Naomi R. Cahn
9 Drevenik v. Nardone, 862 A.2d 635 (Super. Ct. Pa. 2004)
179(11)
Commentary: Elizabeth R. Carter
Judgment: Carrie A. Hagan
10 Reece v. Elliott, 208 S.W.3d 419 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006)
190(11)
Commentary: Browne C. Lewis
Judgment: Browne C. Lewis
Elizabeth V. Sparks
11 Khabbaz v. Comm'r Soc. Sec. Admin., 930 A.2d 1180 (N.H. 2007)
201(19)
Commentary: Melanie B. Jacobs and Browne C. Lewis
Judgment: Lynda Wray Black
12 Karsenty v. Schoukroun, 959 A.2d 1147 (Md. 2008)
220(26)
Commentary: Kent D. Schenkel
Judgment: Allison A. Tait
Index 246
Deborah Gordon is Associate Professor of Law at Drexel University Thomas R. Kline School of Law. Previously, she served as Editor-in-Chief of the NYU Law Review and she practiced law for over ten years before joining the academy. Her scholarship explores the intersection of language, emotion, and gender in inheritance law. She is the co-author of Experiencing Trusts and Estates (2017). Browne Lewis is the dean at North Carolina Central University School of Law. She is a member of the American Law Institute and has been a Core Fulbright Scholar in London and a Senior Fulbright Specialist in Israel. Previously, she has published Papa's Baby: Paternity and Artificial Insemination (2012) and Arrogance, Avarice and Anguish: Addressing the Ethical and Legal Consequences of Posthumous Reproduction (2016). Carla Spivack is Oxford Research Professor of Law at Oklahoma City University School of Law. She holds a Ph.D. in English Literature from Boston College as well as a J.D. from New York University School of Law. Her dissertation was a study of backlash against female political power after the death of Elizabeth I. In her work, she focuses on gender and inequality.