| Foreword |
|
v | |
|
|
|
1 | (18) |
|
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
|
|
3 | (8) |
|
|
|
11 | (2) |
|
|
|
13 | (6) |
|
|
|
14 | (5) |
|
2 Geologic and Hydraulic Concepts of Arid Environments |
|
|
19 | (18) |
|
|
|
19 | (2) |
|
2.1.1 Desert landscape formation |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
2.2 Geologic Theories of Formative Processes |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
2.2.2 Gradualism (Uniformitarianism) |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
|
|
22 | (4) |
|
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
2.3.2 Hyperconcentrated flows |
|
|
23 | (3) |
|
|
|
26 | (6) |
|
2.4.1 Soil formation in arid environments |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
|
|
28 | (2) |
|
2.4.3 Indurated soil layers |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
2.4.4 Vegetation and biologic role in soil development |
|
|
30 | (2) |
|
2.5 Runoff, Infiltration Potential, and Transmission Losses |
|
|
32 | (5) |
|
2.5.1 Runoff and infiltration potential |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
2.5.2 Channel transmission losses |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
|
|
33 | (4) |
|
3 Traditional Approaches to Flood Hazard Identification and Mitigation on Alluvial Fans |
|
|
37 | (22) |
|
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
|
|
39 | (2) |
|
3.3 Technical Issues Regarding the Assumptions |
|
|
41 | (6) |
|
3.4 Implementation of the Assumptions |
|
|
47 | (6) |
|
3.4.1 Understanding the traditional approach |
|
|
48 | (2) |
|
3.4.2 Implementation for hazard identification |
|
|
50 | (3) |
|
3.5 An Approach to Hazard Mitigation |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
|
|
54 | (5) |
|
|
|
55 | (4) |
|
4 New Approaches for Alluvial Fan Flood Hazard |
|
|
59 | (30) |
|
4.1 Predicting Alluvial Fan Flooding --- Background |
|
|
59 | (3) |
|
4.2 FEMA's Three Phase Approach to Alluvial Fan Flood Mapping |
|
|
62 | (3) |
|
4.2.1 Identification of fan geomorphology |
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
4.2.2 Active versus inactive fan areas |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
4.2.3 100-year flood hazard modeling and mapping |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
4.3 Alluvial Fan Flood Modeling |
|
|
65 | (10) |
|
4.3.1 Developing an alluvial fan flood model |
|
|
66 | (2) |
|
4.3.2 2-D unsteady alluvial fan model limitations |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
4.3.3 Alluvial fan sediment issues |
|
|
69 | (6) |
|
4.4 Important Criteria for Flood Hazard Delineation |
|
|
75 | (2) |
|
4.5 Hazard Mapping as a Planning Tool |
|
|
77 | (5) |
|
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
4.7 Alluvial Fan Mitigation Measures |
|
|
82 | (7) |
|
|
|
84 | (5) |
|
5 Flood Hazard Mapping Versus Flood Risk Analysis |
|
|
89 | (20) |
|
5.1 Risk and Uncertainty of Alluvial Fan Flooding |
|
|
89 | (3) |
|
5.1.1 Concepts of flood hazard and flood risk: Hazard ≠ risk |
|
|
90 | (2) |
|
5.2 Stochastic versus Deterministic Flood Hazard Assessment |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
5.3 Stochastic Methods for Fan Flood Hazards |
|
|
93 | (7) |
|
5.3.1 Monte Carlo simulations |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
5.3.2 Probability distributions representing physical fan parameters |
|
|
95 | (2) |
|
5.3.3 Random walk algorithm to determine flow paths |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
5.3.4 Alluvial fan flood probability --- creating the linkage between the stochastic model and the deterministic model |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
5.3.5 Evolution of the alluvial fan --- modeling future conditions |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
5.4 Integrating Alluvial Fan Flood Hazard Mapping and Damage Assessment |
|
|
100 | (9) |
|
|
|
105 | (4) |
|
6 Playa Lake Hazards and Resources |
|
|
109 | (24) |
|
|
|
109 | (3) |
|
6.1.1 Historic role of playas in military and civilian use |
|
|
110 | (2) |
|
|
|
112 | (10) |
|
6.2.1 Predicting the depth of inundation on playa lakes |
|
|
112 | (2) |
|
6.2.2 Predicting the duration of inundation on playa lakes |
|
|
114 | (8) |
|
6.3 Geologic Hazards on Playa Lakebeds |
|
|
122 | (2) |
|
6.3.1 Evolution of desiccation cracks on playas |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
6.4 Playas as a Water Resource: Studies in Jordan |
|
|
124 | (4) |
|
|
|
125 | (2) |
|
6.4.2 Playas in the Northeastern Badia |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
|
|
128 | (5) |
|
|
|
129 | (4) |
|
7 Needs and Benefits of Co-Operation |
|
|
133 | (10) |
|
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
7.2 Identifying the Alluvial Fan Hydrologic Apex |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
7.3 Watershed Delineation |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
|
|
136 | (2) |
|
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
7.7 Aggradation and Scour |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
|
|
139 | (1) |
|
|
|
139 | (1) |
|
|
|
140 | (3) |
|
|
|
141 | (2) |
|
|
|
143 | (74) |
|
Case Study #1 Two-Dimensional Hydraulic Modeling for Alluvial Fan Floodplain Hazard Identification |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
|
|
145 | (7) |
|
8.1.1 Local regulatory framework |
|
|
147 | (1) |
|
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
8.1.3 Hydraulic model development |
|
|
149 | (3) |
|
8.2 Hydraulic Model Data and Assumptions |
|
|
152 | (7) |
|
8.2.1 Topography and grid development |
|
|
152 | (1) |
|
|
|
153 | (1) |
|
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
|
|
155 | (1) |
|
8.2.6 Boundary conditions |
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
8.2.9 Computational time step and grid element size |
|
|
158 | (1) |
|
8.3 Hydraulic Model Results |
|
|
159 | (2) |
|
8.4 Summary and Conclusions |
|
|
161 | (3) |
|
|
|
162 | (2) |
|
Case Study #2 Numerical Modeling of the 2005 La Conchita Landslide, Ventura County, California |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
|
|
164 | (2) |
|
8.6 Background, Geology, and Kinematics |
|
|
166 | (10) |
|
|
|
166 | (2) |
|
|
|
168 | (1) |
|
8.6.3 Geologic conditions |
|
|
169 | (1) |
|
8.6.4 Vegetation and soils |
|
|
169 | (3) |
|
|
|
172 | (1) |
|
8.6.6 Physical dimensions |
|
|
173 | (2) |
|
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
8.7 Previous Studies of Debris Flow Behavior |
|
|
176 | (2) |
|
8.8 FLO-2D Numerical Modeling |
|
|
178 | (11) |
|
|
|
178 | (1) |
|
8.8.2 FLO-2D modeling of debris flows |
|
|
178 | (2) |
|
|
|
180 | (5) |
|
|
|
185 | (4) |
|
|
|
189 | (3) |
|
|
|
189 | (3) |
|
Case Study #3 Tiger Wash, Western Maricopa County, Arizona, USA |
|
|
192 | (1) |
|
|
|
192 | (8) |
|
|
|
192 | (2) |
|
|
|
194 | (1) |
|
|
|
195 | (3) |
|
8.10.4 Channel morphology |
|
|
198 | (1) |
|
|
|
199 | (1) |
|
|
|
200 | (3) |
|
|
|
200 | (1) |
|
8.11.2 Peak discharge estimates |
|
|
200 | (1) |
|
8.11.3 September 26, 1997 flood |
|
|
201 | (2) |
|
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
|
|
204 | (10) |
|
8.13.1 What is an alluvial fan? |
|
|
204 | (3) |
|
8.13.2 What are the key elements of alluvial fan flooding? |
|
|
207 | (2) |
|
8.13.3 Alluvial fan boundary delineation |
|
|
209 | (1) |
|
8.13.4 Predicting avulsions |
|
|
210 | (2) |
|
8.13.5 Importance of infiltration and attenuation |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
8.13.6 Flood hazard delineation |
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
|
|
214 | (3) |
|
|
|
214 | (3) |
|
|
|
217 | |
|
|
|
217 | (1) |
|
9.2 What We Know --- What We Don't Know |
|
|
218 | (5) |
|
|
|
218 | (1) |
|
9.2.2 Precipitation and flow data issues |
|
|
219 | (1) |
|
9.2.3 Geology and geomorphology |
|
|
220 | (1) |
|
9.2.4 Monitoring and modeling |
|
|
221 | (2) |
|
|
|
223 | |
|
|
|
223 | |