Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

Grammaticalisation Paths of «Have» in English New edition [Kõva köide]

Teised raamatud teemal:
Grammaticalisation Paths of «Have» in English New editionSuurem pilt
Teised raamatud teemal:
Püsilink: https://www.kriso.ee/db/9783631600276.html
Märksõnad:
This book explores the diachronic emergence of the verb have in English in its various grammatical uses. The development of grammatical functions of have is analysed from pragmatic-semantic, morphosyntactic and phonetic angles. Apart from the well-known and formerly studied cases of the rise of perfect and obligative have, the author describes the developments of the had better structure as well as causative have which have not received much scholarly attention thus far. He shows that the first examples of the fully grammaticalised constructions with have generally appear earlier than it is commonly believed. He also offers possible motivations behind the growth of obligative and causative have. This book proves that the changes leading to the rise of new grammatical constructions occur in a specific order: pragmatic-semantic changes precede morphosyntactic changes and phonetic reductions are the last to take place.
Acknowledgments v
List of Tables
ix
List of Figures
ix
Abbreviations and Symbols xi
Chapter One Grammaticalization theory
1 Introduction
1(2)
2 The history of grammaticalisation
3(17)
2.1 From syntax to morphology---Givon
4(1)
2.2 Cologne project
5(1)
2.2.1 Lehmann's analysis
6(4)
2.2.2 Heine and Rch's analysis
10(1)
2.3 Hopper's proposals
11(7)
2.4 Traugott's pragmatic approach
18(2)
3 Recent studies on grammaticalisation
20(2)
4 The term grammaticatisation
22(3)
5 Motivation for and mechanisms of grammaticalisation
25(12)
5.1 Morphosyntactic changes
28(1)
5.2 Pragmatic-semantic changes
29(1)
5.2.1 Semantic content---a gain or loss?
29(2)
5.2.2 Metaphorisation---metonymisation vs. analogy---reanalysis
31(3)
5.3 Phonetic changes
34(2)
5.4 Gradualness
36(1)
6 Unidirectionality hypothesis and its criticism
37(4)
7 Clines and paths of grammatical change
41(3)
8 Criticism of grammaticalisation
44(5)
Chapter Two Semanticisation of HAVE
1
Chapter Outline
49(1)
2 Earliest phonological development of HAVE
49(3)
3 Desemanticisation of HAVE
52(26)
3.1 Is there bread? It hasn't. Some cross-linguistic evidence
64(5)
3.2 The rise of the HAD BETTER structure
69(9)
4 Summary and conclusion
78(1)
Chapter Three Along the posscssion-to-obligation cline
1 Introduction
79(2)
2 Synchronic characteristics of HAVE TO
81(5)
3 Traditional accounts of the development of HAVE TO
86(5)
4 The rise of HAVE TO viewed as a syntactically driven change
91(8)
5 Grammaticalisation of HAVE TO revised
99(39)
5.1 The auxiliary status of HAVE TO in Old English
101(13)
5.2 Latin influence
114(4)
5.3 Word order of HAVE + to-infinitive
118(10)
5.4 Pragmatic-semantic development of HAVE TO
128(3)
5.5 Negation of HAVE TO
131(3)
5.6 Discussion
134(4)
6 (HAVE) GOT TO
138(5)
7 Summary
143(2)
Chapter Four Possessive Perfect
4.1
Chapter Outline
145(1)
4.2 Traditional views on the rise of possessive perfect
145(4)
4.3 The rise of `have'-perfect in English
149(15)
4.3.1 Stages of the development
149(6)
4.3.2 AGAN + past participle
155(1)
4.3.3 BEON vs. HABBAN + past participle
156(8)
4.4 Functions and status of HABBAN + PPP in Old English
164(24)
4.4.1 Some differences between OE and PDE perfect
164(3)
4.4.2 The level of grammaticalisation of HABBAN + PPP structure
167(7)
4.4.3 Similarities between Old and Prescnt-Day English perfect
174(4)
4.4.4 Carey's (1994), (1995) analyses
178(6)
4.4.5 Perfect infinitive in Old English
184(4)
4.5 Causative HAVE
188(16)
4.6 Summary
204(3)
Conclusions 207(4)
Notes 211(22)
Bibliography 233(28)
Index of languages 261(2)
Index of scholars 263(4)
Index of subjects 267
The Author: Andrzej M. cki is Lecturer in Linguistics at the Pedagogical University of Cracow (Poland). He graduated from the Catholic University of Lublin in 2002 and in 2008 he earned his Ph.D. degree at the University of Silesia, Katowice.