Preface |
|
xi | |
Introduction to Second Edition |
|
xiii | |
Acknowledgements |
|
xv | |
|
|
xvii | |
|
|
1 | (12) |
|
1.1 Core principles of time management |
|
|
1 | (3) |
|
1.2 The dynamic time model |
|
|
4 | (2) |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
1.7 Planning and scheduling |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
1.8 The planning method statement |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
1.9 The project scheduler |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
1.11 Building information modelling |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
|
13 | (12) |
|
2.1 Planning method statement strategy |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
2.2 Consultant and contractor selection strategy |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
2.4 Project planning strategy |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
2.5 Progress record strategy |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
2.6 Schedule design strategy |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
2.7 Schedule update strategy |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
2.8 Schedule revision strategy |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
2.9 Time risk management strategy |
|
|
20 | (2) |
|
2.10 Schedule quality control strategy |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
2.11 Building information modelling strategy |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
2.12 Communication strategy |
|
|
23 | (2) |
|
|
25 | (16) |
|
|
25 | (2) |
|
3.2 The initial development schedule |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
3.3 The updated development schedule |
|
|
28 | (2) |
|
3.4 Calculating the predicted effect of intervening events on the development schedule |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
3.5 Planning to overcome the predicted effects of an intervening event |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
3.6 Revision of the development schedule |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
3.7 Time management of pre-construction activities |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
3.8 The initial working schedule |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
3.9 The updated working schedule |
|
|
34 | (2) |
|
3.10 Calculating the predicted effect of intervening events on the working schedule |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
3.11 Planning to overcome the predicted effects of an intervening event |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
3.12 Revision of the working schedule |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
3.13 Continuing time management of construction activities |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
4 Developing the dynamic time model |
|
|
41 | (66) |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
4.2 Schedule density design |
|
|
42 | (2) |
|
Scheduling at Low Density |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
Scheduling at Medium Density |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
Scheduling at High Density |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
4.3 Planning method statement |
|
|
44 | (3) |
|
Planning method statement at Low Density |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
Planning method statement at Medium Density |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
Planning method statement at High Density |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
Documentation of corrections |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
4.4 Software considerations |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
4.5 The structure of the schedule |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
|
48 | (2) |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
Occupational commissioning schedule |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
|
51 | (2) |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
Master schedule and subproject |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
4.9 Risk and contingencies |
|
|
53 | (3) |
|
Contingencies at Low Density |
|
|
54 | (2) |
|
Contingencies at Medium Density |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
Contingencies at High Density |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
4.10 Scheduling techniques |
|
|
56 | (6) |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
Arrow diagram method (ADM) |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
Precedence diagram method (PDM) |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
Building information modelling |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
4.11 Work breakdown structure |
|
|
62 | (2) |
|
4.12 Schedule communication |
|
|
64 | (3) |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
Short-term look-ahead report |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
|
67 | (3) |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
Calendars at Medium Density |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
Calendars at High Density |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
4.14 Work type definition |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
4.15 Activity identifier coding |
|
|
70 | (4) |
|
Activity ID at Low Density |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
Activity ID at Medium Density |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
Activity ID at High Density |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
Activity ID trailing numbers |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
4.16 Activity description |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
Descriptions at Low Density |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
Descriptions at Medium Density |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
Descriptions at High Density |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
4.17 Activity content codes |
|
|
75 | (1) |
|
|
76 | (2) |
|
Cost coding at Low Density |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
Cost coding at Medium Density |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
Cost coding at High Density |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
|
78 | (4) |
|
Estimating durations using industry standards |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
Estimating durations using benchmarking |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
Estimating activity duration by comparison with other projects |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
Calculating activity duration from resources and work content |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
Specified activity duration |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
Activity duration at Low Density |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
Activity durations at Medium Density |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
Activity durations at High Density |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
|
82 | (4) |
|
Resources at Low Density and Medium Density |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
Resources at High Density |
|
|
83 | (2) |
|
Strategic resource allocation |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
4.21 Permits and licences |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
4.22 Utilities and third-party projects |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
Computational Inconsistencies |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
|
90 | (4) |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
Lagged start-to-start and finish-to-finish |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
|
94 | (2) |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
Inflexible combinations of constraints |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
|
97 | (2) |
|
4.30 Schedule quality assurance |
|
|
99 | (8) |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
Review for schedule content |
|
|
100 | (2) |
|
Review for schedule integrity |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
|
104 | (1) |
|
|
104 | (1) |
|
Review for scheduling options |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
Review for critical paths |
|
|
105 | (2) |
|
5 Managing the dynamic time model |
|
|
107 | (34) |
|
|
107 | (2) |
|
5.2 Data communication systems |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
5.3 Building information modelling |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
|
111 | (3) |
|
Spreadsheet-recorded data |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
|
111 | (3) |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
|
114 | (4) |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
Activity identification data |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
5.6 Updating the schedule |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
5.7 Schedule review and revision |
|
|
119 | (5) |
|
Review for better information |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
Better design information |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
Better procurement information |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
Refinements to work content |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
Review for short-term work |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
Change in activity descriptions |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
Change in estimated activity durations |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
Consequential change In criticality |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
|
124 | (7) |
|
Identifying intervening events |
|
|
124 | (2) |
|
Voluntary and implied variations and other instructed changes |
|
|
126 | (1) |
|
|
126 | (1) |
|
Prime cost and provisional sums |
|
|
126 | (1) |
|
Employer's acts or omissions |
|
|
127 | (2) |
|
Acts or omissions of third parties |
|
|
129 | (1) |
|
|
129 | (1) |
|
|
129 | (1) |
|
Calculating the effect of intervening events |
|
|
129 | (2) |
|
|
131 | (7) |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
Baseline target schedule (static) |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
Variable baseline target (dynamic) |
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
Delay caused by a contractor's risk event |
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
Delay caused by an employer's risk event |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
|
136 | (2) |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
Building information modelling |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
5.10 Acceleration and recovery |
|
|
138 | (3) |
|
6 Communicating the dynamic time model |
|
|
141 | (10) |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
6.2 Proactive communication: promoting the plan |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
6.3 Reactive communication: reporting |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
|
143 | (4) |
|
|
143 | (2) |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
|
145 | (2) |
|
|
147 | (1) |
|
6.6 Feedback and benchmarking |
|
|
147 | (4) |
|
|
151 | (42) |
|
Appendix 1 Time risks that may be borne by the employer |
|
|
151 | (4) |
|
Appendix 2 Case studies in strategic planning |
|
|
155 | (12) |
|
Appendix 3 The nature of complex projects |
|
|
167 | (2) |
|
Appendix 4 The dynamic time model -- a flow chart |
|
|
169 | (4) |
|
Appendix 5 Case studies in high density scheduling contents |
|
|
173 | (6) |
|
Appendix 6 Desirable attributes of scheduling software |
|
|
179 | (10) |
|
Appendix 7 Industry productivity guides |
|
|
189 | (2) |
|
Appendix 8 Sample notice of delay |
|
|
191 | (2) |
Glossary of terms |
|
193 | (20) |
Index |
|
213 | |