Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

Hanging Together: Role-Based Constitutional Fellowship and the Challenge of Difference and Disagreement [Kõva köide]

(Waseda University, Japan)
  • Formaat: Hardback, 250 pages, kõrgus x laius x paksus: 235x157x15 mm, kaal: 450 g, Worked examples or Exercises
  • Ilmumisaeg: 21-Jul-2022
  • Kirjastus: Cambridge University Press
  • ISBN-10: 1009179284
  • ISBN-13: 9781009179287
Teised raamatud teemal:
  • Formaat: Hardback, 250 pages, kõrgus x laius x paksus: 235x157x15 mm, kaal: 450 g, Worked examples or Exercises
  • Ilmumisaeg: 21-Jul-2022
  • Kirjastus: Cambridge University Press
  • ISBN-10: 1009179284
  • ISBN-13: 9781009179287
Teised raamatud teemal:
Difference and disagreement can be valuable, yet they can also spiral out of control and damage liberal democracy. Advancing a metaphor of citizenship that the author terms 'role-based constitutional fellowship,' this book offers a solution to this challenge. Cheng argues that a series of 'divisions of labor' among citizens, differently situated, can help cultivate the foundational trust required to harness the benefits of disagreement and difference while preventing them from 'overheating' and, in turn, from leaving liberal democracy vulnerable to the growing influence of autocratic political forces. The book recognizes, however, that it is not always appropriate to attempt to cultivate trust, and acknowledges the important role that some forms of confrontation might play in identifying and rectifying undue social hierarchies, such as racial-ethnic hierarchies. Hanging Together thereby works to pave a middle way between deliberative and realist conceptions of democracy.

Arvustused

'In attempting to figure out how to better perpetuate our political institutions, to better unite liberal democrats whose nations seem to be buckling under the weight of combative antiliberalism, Cheng's effort is a useful and welcome one.' Ashton Kushner, The Review of Politics ' a valuable and politically sophisticated contribution to democratic theory on how to manage difference and disagreement' Kevin J. Elliott, Perspectives on Politics 'Eric Cheng's Hanging Together: Role-Based Constitutional fellowship and the Challenge of Difference and Disagreement is a timely and masterful account of the challenges facing liberal democracy, the significance of difference and disagreement, the binding power of role-based constitutional fellowship, and the never-ending balancing act necessary to keep the enterprise afloat. Cheng's book shows how the center could and perhaps does hold in an environment in which our differences and disagreements generate a passionate intensity that makes difficult (and sometimes impossible) the ordinary give and take of politics.' Paige Digeser, University of California, Santa Barbara 'Cheng's book provides a valuable and politically sophisticated contribution to democratic theory on how to manage difference and disagreement. His role-based approach presents an extremely promising path that remains underutilized in democratic theory. Hanging Together illustrates the great dividends that this approach can yield in addressing some of democracy's most dire challenges today.' Kevin J. Elliott, Yale University, Perspectives on Politics 'Hanging Together is a model book in Political Theory. It uses observations from our everyday, lived experiences to reveal gaps in some of our most well established thinking on democracy, while also in turn, using those democratic theories to offer clear thinking on ways to proceed from those lived experiences. Moreover, Cheng takes on perhaps the most significant problem in contemporary American politics: the erosion of trust between and among citizens. Hanging Together artfully brings together insights from some of the most prominent defenders of liberal democracy, while incorporating his own novel concept of role-based constitutional fellowship. It is an important read for anyone interested in the evolution of democratic theory and the sustainability of American democracy more generally.' Matthew Chick, Hartwick College ' a timely and masterful account of the challenges facing liberal democracy, the significance of difference and disagreement, the binding power of role-based constitutional fellowship, and the never-ending balancing act necessary to keep the enterprise afloat.' Paige Digeser, 2023 American Political Science Association Annual Meeting 'Author-Meets-Critics' Panel

Muu info

Advances a metaphor of democratic citizenship, 'role-based constitutional fellowship,' to address challenges of difference and disagreement.
Acknowledgments vii
1 Introduction: Difference, Disagreement, and Civic Aggression
1(18)
The Benefits of Difference and Disagreement
3(1)
... And the Potential Perils
4(4)
Fellowship and Negative Idealism
8(3)
Divisions of Labour
11(2)
Aiming High to Aim Low, Flexibility, and Self-Initiation
13(2)
Outline of the Book
15(4)
2 Aiming Too High, Aiming Too Low: The Limits of Discourse and Contestation
19(28)
John Rawls's Political Liberalism
20(7)
Jiirgen Habermas's Discursive Democracy
27(7)
Democratic Realism
34(12)
Aiming Too High, Aiming Too Low
46(1)
3 Fellowship's Forefather: Moving beyond Aristotelian Political Friendship
47(17)
Foundations of Aristotle's Philia
48(1)
For the Purposes of Counteracting Civic Aggression
49(2)
The General Definition of Political Friendship
51(1)
Political Friendship in Action
52(2)
Liberal Democracy and Political Equality
54(1)
Unity through a Scalable Culture of Trust
55(5)
The Problem of Initiation
60(2)
Guideposts for the Path Forward
62(2)
4 Broadening the Base: The Necessity and Dilemmas of Liberal Nationalism
64(21)
Bounded Solidarity without the Nation?
65(5)
To "Balance" or to "Prioritize"?
70(7)
Nagging Differences and Disagreements
77(6)
Toward Role-Based Constitutional Fellowship
83(2)
5 Three Dimensions of Trust
85(10)
Self-Initiation and the Charge of Elitism
88(1)
Trust within the Formal Political Sphere
89(1)
Trust within the General Citizenry
90(2)
Trust between the Political Sphere and the General Citizenry
92(2)
Now onto the Details
94(1)
6 Principled Pragmatists, Principled Purists, and the Liberal Democratic Front
95(20)
Counterintuitive Approaches to the Production of Trust
96(5)
A Division of Labour between Principled Pragmatists and Purists
101(5)
Different Circumstances, Different Responses
106(4)
Contestation in the Name of Future Trust
110(3)
Tabling Our Discussion of the Limits of Salutary Hypocrisy
113(2)
7 Talking, Shouting Back, and Listening Better
115(26)
The Need for Shouting Back
116(4)
The Need for Talking
120(2)
A Division of Labour between Talking and Shouting Back
122(5)
The Role of Allies: Listening Well
127(3)
The Persuasion of Unwitting Oppressors: Various Forms of Talking
130(10)
Uncomplacent Gradualism
140(1)
8 Justifying (and Constraining) Salutary Hypocrisy
141(15)
The Limits of Salutary Hypocrisy
142(3)
Counteracting Cynicism
145(9)
Onwards
154(2)
9 Facilitating Fellowship: Translucent Veils, Unlikely Associations, and Constraints on Campaigns
156(23)
Supporting Fellowship: Inclusive Bounded Solidarity
158(4)
Fending Off the Metaphor of Warfare among Political Actors
162(5)
Democratic Education
167(1)
Facilitating Trust among Citizens, across Difference
168(8)
We Are All in It Together: Constraining Material Inequality
176(3)
10 Conclusion: The Question of Borders and the Problem of Enemies
179(4)
Fellowship and Non-citizens
180(1)
The Problem of Enemies
181(2)
Index 183
Eric Cheng is Assistant Professor of Political Science and Economics at Waseda University.