Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

Indirect Speech Acts [Kõva köide]

  • Formaat: Hardback, 280 pages, kõrgus x laius x paksus: 222x145x17 mm, kaal: 420 g, Worked examples or Exercises
  • Sari: Key Topics in Semantics and Pragmatics
  • Ilmumisaeg: 10-Jun-2021
  • Kirjastus: Cambridge University Press
  • ISBN-10: 1108483178
  • ISBN-13: 9781108483179
  • Formaat: Hardback, 280 pages, kõrgus x laius x paksus: 222x145x17 mm, kaal: 420 g, Worked examples or Exercises
  • Sari: Key Topics in Semantics and Pragmatics
  • Ilmumisaeg: 10-Jun-2021
  • Kirjastus: Cambridge University Press
  • ISBN-10: 1108483178
  • ISBN-13: 9781108483179
"To achieve successful communication, it is crucial to say clearly what we mean, but, at the same time, we need to pay attention to the form of our utterances, to avoid misunderstandings and the risk of offending our interlocutors. To avoid these pitfalls, we use a special category of utterances called "indirect speech acts" (ISAs) that enable an optimal balance between clarity and politeness. But how do interpreters identify the meaning of these ISAs? And how does the social context influence the use ofISAs? This book attempts to answer these questions. It deals with the main theoretical and empirical questions surrounding the meaning and usage of ISAs, drawing on the latest research and neuroimaging data. Adopting a truly interdisciplinary perspective, it will appeal to students and scholars from diverse backgrounds, and anyone interested in exploring this phenomenon, which is so pervasive in our daily lives"--

Muu info

Explores the fascinating phenomenon of indirect speech acts, highlighting the situations they are used in, and how they are understood.
Acknowledgements iii
List of Tables
x
List of Figures
xi
Abbreviations xii
Introduction 1(4)
1 Classic Speech Act Theoretic Approaches
5(38)
1.1 Introduction
5(1)
1.2 Generative Semantics
6(5)
1.3 Austin
11(2)
1.4 Grice
13(3)
1.5 Searle's Speech Act Theory
16(5)
1.6 Bach and Harnish
21(3)
1.7 Recanati
24(2)
1.8 Weak Literalism
26(3)
1.9 Brown and Levinson's Politeness Theory
29(2)
1.10 Conventionalized and Standardized ISAs
31(10)
1.10.1 Conventionality of Means
32(3)
1.10.2 Standardization
35(6)
1.11 Summary
41(1)
1.12 Discussion Questions
41(1)
1.13 Suggestions for Further Reading
42(1)
2 The Semantics Of Sentence-Types
43(38)
2.1 Introduction
43(1)
2.2 Imperatives
43(8)
2.2.1 Neo-Literalist Approaches to Imperatives
43(3)
2.2.2 The Features of Imperatives
46(5)
2.3 Interrogative Sentences
51(24)
2.3.1 What Is a `Question'?
51(2)
2.3.2 Why Interrogative Requests for Information Are Direct
53(13)
2.3.3 Rhetorical Questions
66(3)
2.3.4 Interrogatives and Declaratives As Indirect Requests
69(6)
2.4 Deontic Modal Declaratives: Indirect Requests for Action?
75(4)
2.5 Summary
79(1)
2.6 Discussion Questions
80(1)
2.7 Suggestions for Further Reading
80(1)
3 Cognitive And Relevance-Based Approaches
81(26)
3.1 Introduction
81(1)
3.2 Cognitive Linguistic Approaches
81(9)
3.2.1 A Graded Notion of Speech Act Conventionality
81(4)
3.2.2 Illocutionary Force Salience
85(5)
3.3 Relevance Theory
90(14)
3.3.1 Maximal Relevance
91(3)
3.3.2 Extra Processing for Indirect Requests?
94(4)
3.3.3 Extra Cognitive Effects in Indirect Requests?
98(3)
3.3.4 Standardized Indirect Requests and Speakers' Preferences
101(3)
3.4 The Graded Salience Hypothesis
104(1)
3.5 Summary
105(1)
3.6 Discussion Questions
105(1)
3.7 Suggestions for Further Reading
106(1)
4 The Comprehension Of Is As
107(34)
4.1 Introduction
107(1)
4.2 Processing Differences between Sentences Used Directly or Indirectly
108(3)
4.3 Processing Differences between Direct and Indirect SAs
111(3)
4.4 Are Indirect Speech Acts Necessarily Secondary?
114(2)
4.5 Three Linguistic Factors Influencing the Processing of ISAs
116(12)
4.5.1 Conventionality of Means
116(4)
4.5.2 Degrees of Standardization
120(6)
4.5.3 Illocutionary Force Salience
126(2)
4.6 Measures of Cognitive Processing: Some Clarification
128(4)
4.7 Eye-Tracking Experiments into the Interpretation of ISAs
132(3)
4.8 Prosodic Aspects of ISA Comprehension
135(4)
4.9 Summary
139(1)
4.10 Discussion Questions
139(1)
4.11 Suggestions for Further Reading
140(1)
5 Indirectness, Politeness And The Social Context
141(40)
5.1 Introduction
141(1)
5.2 The Reasons behind Indirectness
141(10)
5.2.1 Face-Threat and Politeness
142(4)
5.2.2 `Communication' without Commitment
146(4)
5.2.3 Multiple Meanings, Immediacy and Intimacy
150(1)
5.3 Face Concerns and Social Variables
151(21)
5.3.1 Status Asymmetries
153(7)
5.3.2 Degree of Imposition
160(3)
5.3.3 Social Distance
163(1)
5.3.4 Status, Imposition and Distance
164(1)
5.3.5 Gender-Based Differences
165(5)
5.3.6 Individual Variables
170(2)
5.4 Explicitness and Face-Threat in Complaints
172(7)
5.5 Summary
179(1)
5.6 Discussion Questions
179(1)
5.7 Suggestions for Further Reading
180(1)
6 Computational And Artificial Intelligence Approaches To Indirectness
181(17)
6.1 Introduction
181(1)
6.2 Computational Models of ISA Interpretation
181(5)
6.2.1 Plan-Based Approaches
182(1)
6.2.2 Specific Interpretation Rules
183(1)
6.2.3 Hybrid Approaches
184(1)
6.2.4 Indirect Directives and Reasons to Act
185(1)
6.3 Indirectness in Human-Robot Interactions
186(10)
6.3.1 Do People Use Indirectness with Robots?
188(1)
6.3.2 How to Make a Robot Disambiguate ISA Utterances
189(7)
6.4 Summary
196(1)
6.5 Discussion Questions
197(1)
6.6 Suggestions for Further Reading
197(1)
Conclusion 198(4)
Glossary 202(4)
References 206(15)
Index 221
Nicolas Ruytenbeek specializes in experimental approaches to speech acts and politeness, using a combination of corpus data and psychophysiological methods. He is a Postdoctoral researcher at the Faculty of Arts and Philosophy, Department of Translation, Interpreting and Communication, Ghent University.