Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

Inflectional Paradigms: Content and Form at the Syntax-Morphology Interface [Pehme köide]

(University of Kentucky)
  • Formaat: Paperback / softback, 239 pages, kõrgus x laius x paksus: 228x152x17 mm, kaal: 450 g, 182 Tables, black and white; 33 Line drawings, unspecified
  • Sari: Cambridge Studies in Linguistics
  • Ilmumisaeg: 30-Dec-2015
  • Kirjastus: Cambridge University Press
  • ISBN-10: 1107460859
  • ISBN-13: 9781107460850
Teised raamatud teemal:
  • Formaat: Paperback / softback, 239 pages, kõrgus x laius x paksus: 228x152x17 mm, kaal: 450 g, 182 Tables, black and white; 33 Line drawings, unspecified
  • Sari: Cambridge Studies in Linguistics
  • Ilmumisaeg: 30-Dec-2015
  • Kirjastus: Cambridge University Press
  • ISBN-10: 1107460859
  • ISBN-13: 9781107460850
Teised raamatud teemal:
Sometimes dismissed as linguistically epiphenomenal, inflectional paradigms are, in reality, the interface of a language's morphology with its syntax and semantics. Drawing on abundant linguistic evidence, Stump develops a new theoretical framework to explicate the centrality of paradigms in resolving the frequent and varied mismatches between words' form and content.

Sometimes dismissed as linguistically epiphenomenal, inflectional paradigms are, in reality, the interface of a language's morphology with its syntax and semantics. Drawing on abundant evidence from a wide range of languages (French, Hua, Hungarian, Kashmiri, Latin, Nepali, Noon, Old Norse, Sanskrit, Turkish, Twi and others), Stump examines a variety of mismatches between words' content and form, including morphomic patterns, defectiveness, overabundance, syncretism, suppletion, deponency and polyfunctionality. He demonstrates that such mismatches motivate a new grammatical architecture in which two kinds of paradigms are distinguished: content paradigms, which determine word forms' syntactic distribution and semantic interpretation, and form paradigms, which determine their inflectional realization. In this framework, the often nontrivial linkage between a lexeme's content paradigm and its stems' form paradigm is the nexus at which incongruities of content and form are resolved. Stump presents clear and precise analyses of a range of morphological phenomena in support of this theoretical innovation.

Arvustused

'Inflectional paradigms is an excellent book combining clarity of exposition, rich empirical coverage and theoretical sophistication. I would like to recommend Stump's new book to all interested in morphological typology and theories of syntax-morphology interface, including not only linguists of a more theoretical stance, but typologists and descriptive linguists as well.' Peter M. Arkadiev, The Linguist List

Muu info

This book explains inflectional paradigms' role as the grammatical nexus at which mismatches between words' content and form are resolved.
List of figures
xii
List of tables
xiv
Acknowledgements xx
List of abbreviations
xxi
List of symbols and operators
xxiv
Introduction 1(7)
1 What are inflectional paradigms?
8(23)
1.1 What is an inflectional paradigm?
8(8)
1.2 Morpheme-based theories of inflection
16(7)
1.3 Paradigm-based theories of inflection
23(8)
2 Canonical inflectional paradigms
31(12)
2.1 Canonical typology and canonical inflection
31(3)
2.2 The canonical inflectional paradigm
34(7)
2.3 Summary
41(2)
3 Morphosyntactic properties
43(15)
3.1 Different kinds of inflectional categories
43(1)
3.2 The association of word forms with morphosyntactic properties
44(1)
3.3 Morphosyntactic property sets
45(1)
3.4 Relations between morphosyntactic property sets
46(1)
3.5 Property constraints
47(1)
3.6 How morphosyntactic properties are realized
48(4)
3.7 A puzzle concerning the representation of morphosyntactic properties in noncanonical inflectional paradigms
52(5)
3.8 Conclusion
57(1)
4 Lexemes
58(9)
4.1 What is a lexeme?
58(5)
4.2 Lexical entries
63(2)
4.3 Noncanonical entries in the stipulated lexicon
65(1)
4.4 Conclusion
66(1)
5 Stems
67(17)
5.1 Stem form and stem distribution
68(2)
5.2 Sources of formal differences among alternating stems
70(2)
5.3 Stem distribution
72(3)
5.4 Kinds of stem alternations
75(2)
5.5 Formalizing conditions on stem alternation
77(4)
5.6 Summary
81(3)
6 Inflection classes
84(19)
6.1 Canonical inflection classes
84(6)
6.2 Global vs segregated inflection classes
90(2)
6.3 Inflection classes are classes of stems (not of lexemes)
92(3)
6.4 Stems and inflection classes
95(8)
7 A conception of the relation of content to form in inflectional paradigms
103(17)
7.1 The canonical relation of content to form in morphology
106(4)
7.2 Content paradigms, form paradigms, realized paradigms, and the relations between them
110(5)
7.3 Inflection classes and stem distribution under the paradigm-linkage hypothesis
115(5)
8 Morphomic properties
120(27)
8.1 Lexical and morphosyntactic conditioning of morphomic properties
121(5)
8.2 Verb-agreement inflections in Hua (Trans-New-Guinea; Papua New Guinea)
126(3)
8.3 Content and form in Hua verb agreement
129(5)
8.4 Verb inflection in Noon (Niger-Congo: Senegal)
134(1)
8.5 Verb inflection in Twi (Niger-Congo: Ghana)
135(4)
8.6 Verb inflection in Nepali
139(6)
8.7 Conclusion
145(2)
9 Too many cells, too few cells
147(23)
9.1 Overabundance
147(5)
9.2 The question of shape alternants
152(3)
9.3 Overdifferentiation
155(2)
9.4 Defectiveness
157(12)
9.5 Conclusion
169(1)
10 Syncretism
170(14)
10.1 Natural-class syncretism
170(5)
10.2 Directional syncretism
175(4)
10.3 Morphomic syncretism
179(3)
10.4 Conclusion
182(2)
11 Suppletion and heteroclisis
184(13)
11.1 Suppletive and heteroclitic alternations
185(3)
11.2 Suppletion and the paradigm-linkage hypothesis
188(3)
11.3 Generalizations about suppletion
191(6)
12 Deponency and metaconjugation
197(31)
12.1 Latin deponent verbs
197(5)
12.2 Sanskrit metaconjugation
202(15)
12.3 Verb inflection in Kashmiri
217(7)
12.4 Heteroclisis and deponency in Old Norse
224(3)
12.5 Same morphology, different function
227(1)
13 Polyfunctionality
228(24)
13.1 Polyfunctional person/number marking in Noon (Niger-Congo: Senegal)
230(8)
13.2 Second example: Polyfunctional person/number marking in Baure (Maipurean: Bolivia)
238(5)
13.3 Third example: Polyfunctional person/number marking in Hungarian
243(7)
13.4 Conclusion
250(2)
14 A theoretical synopsis and two further issues
252(19)
14.1 A synopsis of the paradigm-linkage theory
252(5)
14.2 The implicative structure of inflectional paradigms
257(7)
14.3 Paradigm linkage and inflectional change
264(6)
14.4 General conclusion
270(1)
References 271(9)
Index 280
Gregory Stump is a professor of linguistics at the University of Kentucky. His principal research area is the theory and typology of complex systems of inflectional morphology.