|
|
xi | |
|
|
xii | |
Foreword |
|
xiii | |
Acknowledgements |
|
xvi | |
|
1 Importance of STEM for social, economic and environmental futures |
|
|
1 | (22) |
|
|
1 | (3) |
|
Why is SFEM so important? |
|
|
4 | (3) |
|
|
7 | (2) |
|
Changes due to advances in technology |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
Embed ethics for the use of technologies |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
Make data open and interoperable |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
Consult social scientists in technology research |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
Embrace the usefulness of useless knowledge |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
Find the right role for reskilling |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
Changing nature of learning and teaching |
|
|
14 | (2) |
|
Integrated approaches to STEM |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
Example 1 University of Edinburgh and Herriot-Watt University |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
Example 2 University of Newcastle |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
Example 3 University of Malaya and Universiti Sans Malaysia |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
Example 4 Peking University |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
Example 5 Grand Canyon University |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
Example 6 Flinders University |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
Future educational challenges |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
|
20 | (3) |
|
2 Role of technology in STEM |
|
|
23 | (21) |
|
|
23 | (2) |
|
Importance of technologies |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
Technologies for solving issues |
|
|
26 | (2) |
|
Learning experiences using technology |
|
|
28 | (2) |
|
Using specific technologies to develop STEM skills |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
Using technology to support learning |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
Using technology in specific STEM learning environments |
|
|
32 | (4) |
|
Aligning learning goals, technologies and pedagogies |
|
|
36 | (3) |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
|
40 | (4) |
|
3 Developing a pedagogical framework for STEM |
|
|
44 | (31) |
|
|
44 | (2) |
|
Characteristics of STEM disciplines |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
Prevailing practices and ways of thinking |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
Disciplines have cross-cutting concepts |
|
|
47 | (2) |
|
Disciplines have applications |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
Importance of authenticity |
|
|
50 | (2) |
|
Driving innovation using STEM |
|
|
52 | (2) |
|
Importance of active learning approaches |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
|
55 | (2) |
|
Problem-solving approaches |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
Design thinking for innovation |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
STEM learning environments |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
Learning socially to promote collaboration |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
A framework for integrating STEM |
|
|
65 | (2) |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
|
68 | (7) |
|
4 Designing integrated STEM curriculum |
|
|
75 | (19) |
|
|
75 | (1) |
|
|
76 | (3) |
|
Importance of connections to STEM |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
Importance of constructive alignment |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
Developing a theme, context, issue or challenge |
|
|
81 | (2) |
|
Choose a real-world theme, context, issue or challenge |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
Establish learning outcomes |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
Identify assessment tasks |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
Identify discipline aspects, skills and capabilities needed |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
Create learning experiences that enable students to meet the outcomes |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
Identify resources and sources of information |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
Support students to integrate knowledge and skills |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
Including active learning opportunities |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
Design thinking within challenge activities |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
Supporting effective learning environments |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
|
90 | (4) |
|
|
94 | (30) |
|
|
94 | (2) |
|
Purposes and outcomes of assessment |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
|
97 | (2) |
|
|
99 | (2) |
|
Examples of assessing capability |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
Inquiry and problem-based learning |
|
|
101 | (2) |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
|
104 | (1) |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
Work-integrated learning (WIL) |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
Collaboration -- peer and self-assessment |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
Culminating, enabling and discrete outcomes |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
Designing assessment tasks |
|
|
110 | (2) |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
|
113 | (6) |
|
Collating assessment data across outcomes |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
Summary of assessing integrated STEM |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
|
120 | (4) |
|
6 Challenges and professional learning for integrating STEM |
|
|
124 | (21) |
|
|
124 | (3) |
|
Blending discipline and capability |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
Challenge: educators have knowledge authority |
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
Challenge: accommodate student expectations |
|
|
129 | (2) |
|
Challenge: adapting pedagogies based on student development |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
Challenge: students as consumers and producers of knowledge |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
Challenge: application of evidence-based research |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
Challenge: valuing ongoing professional learning |
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
|
134 | (2) |
|
Scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL) |
|
|
136 | (2) |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
Competencies for using technologies |
|
|
138 | (2) |
|
Collaborating and mentoring |
|
|
140 | (1) |
|
Addressing challenges for integrating STEM |
|
|
140 | (2) |
|
|
142 | (3) |
|
7 Future directions for integrating STEM in higher education |
|
|
145 | (19) |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
Changing agendas and trends |
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
Drivers in higher education |
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
|
147 | (1) |
|
HEIs and future education |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
Future of STEM integration |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
Levers for integrating STEM |
|
|
150 | (2) |
|
Challenges in designing courses for STEM |
|
|
152 | (3) |
|
Aligning STEM with purposes of HEIs |
|
|
155 | (3) |
|
|
158 | (1) |
|
Taking account of changes in technology |
|
|
159 | (2) |
|
Taking a systems approach to STEM |
|
|
161 | (2) |
|
Future research on integrating STEM |
|
|
163 | (1) |
Conclusion |
|
164 | (1) |
References |
|
165 | (4) |
Index |
|
169 | |