Preface |
|
xiii | |
|
|
1 | (8) |
|
1.1 What Are the CMH and NPANOVA Tests? |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
2 | (2) |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
|
5 | (4) |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
1.4.2 Homosexual Marriage Data |
|
|
6 | (2) |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
|
9 | (20) |
|
2.1 Genesis: Cochran (1954), and Mantel and Haenszel (1959) |
|
|
9 | (3) |
|
|
12 | (3) |
|
2.2.1 Homosexual Marriage Data |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
2.3 The Nominal CMH Tests |
|
|
15 | (3) |
|
2.4 The CMH Mean Scores Test |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
2.5 The CMH Correlation Test |
|
|
19 | (10) |
|
2.5.1 The CMH C Test Defined |
|
|
19 | (2) |
|
2.5.2 An Alternative Presentation of the CMH C Test |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
2.5.3.1 Homosexual Marriage Data |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
2.5.4 Derivation of the CMH C Test Statistic for the RBD with the Same Treatment Scores in Every Stratum |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
2.5.4.1 Jams Data Revisited |
|
|
25 | (2) |
|
2.5.5 The CMH C Test Statistic Is Not, in General, Location-Scale Invariant |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
3 The Completely Randomised Design |
|
|
29 | (22) |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
3.2 The Design and Parametric Model |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
3.3 The Kruskal--Wallis Tests |
|
|
30 | (3) |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
3.3.2 Whiskey Data Revisited |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
3.4 Relating the Kruskal-Wallis and ANOVA F Tests |
|
|
33 | (2) |
|
3.5 The CMH Tests for the CRD |
|
|
35 | (2) |
|
3.5.1 Whiskey Data Revisited |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
3.6 The KW Tests Are CMH MS Tests |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
3.7 Relating the CMH MS and ANOVA F Tests |
|
|
38 | (3) |
|
3.7.1 The One-Way ANOVA F Test |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
3.7.2 WMS in Terms of the ANOVA F |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
3.7.3 Whiskey Data Revisited |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
3.7.4 Homosexual Marriage Data Revisited |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
|
39 | (2) |
|
|
41 | (2) |
|
3.9 Wald Test Statistics in the CRD |
|
|
43 | (8) |
|
3.9.1 The Wald Test Statistic of General Association for the CMH Design |
|
|
43 | (4) |
|
3.9.2 The Wald Test Statistic for the CMH MS Design |
|
|
47 | (2) |
|
3.9.3 The Wald Test Statistic for the CMH C Design |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
|
49 | (2) |
|
4 The Randomised Block Design |
|
|
51 | (22) |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
4.2 The Design and Parametric Model |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
|
53 | (3) |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
4.4 The CMH Test Statistics in the RBD |
|
|
56 | (6) |
|
4.4.1 The CMH OPA Test for the RBD |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
4.4.2 The CMH GA Test Statistic for the RBD |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
4.4.3 The CMH MS Test Statistic for the RBD |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
4.4.3.1 Food Products Data |
|
|
58 | (2) |
|
4.4.4 The CMH C Test Statistic for the RBD |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
4.4.4.1 Human Resource Data |
|
|
60 | (2) |
|
4.5 The Friedman Tests are CMH MS Tests |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
4.6 Relating the CMH MS and ANOVA F Tests |
|
|
63 | (2) |
|
4.6.1 Jams Data Revisited |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
|
65 | (3) |
|
4.8 Wald Test Statistics in the RBD |
|
|
68 | (5) |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
5 The Balanced Incomplete Block Design |
|
|
73 | (24) |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
5.3 The Relationship Between the Adjusted Durbin Statistic and the ANOVA F Statistic |
|
|
74 | (5) |
|
5.3.1 Ice Cream Flavouring Data |
|
|
76 | (2) |
|
5.3.2 Breakfast Cereal Data |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
|
79 | (3) |
|
5.5 Orthogonal Contrasts for Balanced Designs with Ordered Treatments |
|
|
82 | (11) |
|
5.5.1 Orthogonal Contrasts |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
5.5.2 Orthogonal Contrasts for Nonparametric Testing in Balanced Designs |
|
|
83 | (2) |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
5.5.3 F Orthogonal Contrasts |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
5.5.3.2 Lemonade Taste Example |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
5.5.3.4 Ice Cream Flavouring Data |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
|
90 | (3) |
|
5.6 A CMH MS Analogue Test Statistic for the BIBD |
|
|
93 | (4) |
|
5.6.1 Ice Cream Flavouring Data |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
|
95 | (2) |
|
6 Unconditional Analogues of CMH Tests |
|
|
97 | (28) |
|
|
97 | (2) |
|
6.1.1 Jams Data Revisited |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
6.2 Unconditional Univariate Moment Tests |
|
|
99 | (3) |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
6.3 Generalised Correlations |
|
|
102 | (8) |
|
6.3.1 Bivariate Generalised Correlations |
|
|
102 | (3) |
|
6.3.1 Age and Intelligence Data |
|
|
105 | (2) |
|
6.3.3 Trivariate Generalised Correlations |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
|
107 | (3) |
|
6.4 Unconditional Bivariate Moment Tests |
|
|
110 | (3) |
|
6.4.1 Homosexual Marriage Data |
|
|
111 | (2) |
|
6.5 Unconditional General Association Tests |
|
|
113 | (7) |
|
6.5.1 Cross-Over Clinical Data |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
|
120 | (5) |
|
|
123 | (2) |
|
7 Higher Moment Extensions to the Ordinal CMH Tests |
|
|
125 | (12) |
|
|
125 | (1) |
|
7.2 Extensions to the CMH Mean Scores Test |
|
|
125 | (3) |
|
7.3 Extensions to the CMH Correlation Test |
|
|
128 | (3) |
|
|
131 | (6) |
|
|
131 | (3) |
|
7.4.2 Homosexual Marriage Data |
|
|
134 | (2) |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
8 Unordered Nonparametric ANOVA |
|
|
137 | (18) |
|
|
137 | (3) |
|
|
139 | (1) |
|
8.2 Unordered NP ANOVA for the CMH Design |
|
|
140 | (1) |
|
8.3 Singly Ordered Three-Way Tables |
|
|
141 | (3) |
|
8.4 The Kruskal--Wallis and Friedman Tests Are NP ANOVA Tests |
|
|
144 | (3) |
|
8.4.1 The Kruskal--Wallis, ANOVA F, and NP ANOVA F Tests on the Ranks Are All Equivalent |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
8.4.2 The Friedman, ANOVA F, and NP ANOVA F Tests Are All Equivalent |
|
|
145 | (2) |
|
8.5 Are the CMH MS and Extensions NP ANOVA Tests? |
|
|
147 | (2) |
|
|
147 | (2) |
|
8.6 Extension to Other Designs |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
8.6.1 Aside. The Friedman Test Revisited |
|
|
150 | (1) |
|
|
150 | (3) |
|
|
151 | (2) |
|
8.8 Balanced Incomplete Blocks |
|
|
153 | (2) |
|
8.8.1 Ice Cream Flavouring Data Revisited |
|
|
153 | (1) |
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
9 The Latin Square Design |
|
|
155 | (26) |
|
|
155 | (1) |
|
9.2 The Latin Square Design and Parametric Model |
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
|
158 | (4) |
|
|
162 | (6) |
|
|
168 | (6) |
|
|
168 | (2) |
|
|
170 | (2) |
|
|
172 | (2) |
|
9.7 Orthogonal Trend Contrasts for Ordered Treatments |
|
|
174 | (4) |
|
9.7.1 Dynamite Data Revisited |
|
|
174 | (2) |
|
9.7.2 Peanut Data Revisited |
|
|
176 | (1) |
|
9.7.3 Traffic Data Revisited |
|
|
176 | (2) |
|
9.8 Technical Derivation of the RL Test |
|
|
178 | (3) |
|
|
180 | (1) |
|
10 Ordered Non-parametric ANOVA |
|
|
181 | (24) |
|
|
181 | (3) |
|
10.1.1 Strawberry Data Revisited |
|
|
181 | (3) |
|
10.2 Ordered NP ANOVA for the CMH Design |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
10.3 Doubly Ordered Three-Way Tables |
|
|
185 | (2) |
|
10.3.1 Whiskey Data Revisited |
|
|
187 | (1) |
|
10.3.2 Jams Data Revisited |
|
|
187 | (1) |
|
10.4 Extension to Other Designs |
|
|
187 | (2) |
|
10.5 Latin Square Rank Tests |
|
|
189 | (3) |
|
10.5.1 Doubly Ordered Four-Way Tables |
|
|
189 | (3) |
|
10.6 Modelling the Moments of the Response Variable |
|
|
192 | (4) |
|
10.7 Lemonade Sweetness Data |
|
|
196 | (6) |
|
10.8 Breakfast Cereal Data Revisited |
|
|
202 | (3) |
|
|
204 | (1) |
|
|
205 | (12) |
|
|
205 | (1) |
|
11.2 Homosexual Marriage Data Revisited for the Last Time! |
|
|
206 | (3) |
|
11.3 Job Satisfaction Data |
|
|
209 | (5) |
|
|
214 | (3) |
|
|
215 | (2) |
|
|
217 | (3) |
|
A.1 Kronecker Products and Direct Sums |
|
|
217 | (2) |
|
A.2 The Moore--Penrose Generalised Inverse |
|
|
219 | (1) |
Subject Index |
|
220 | (2) |
Reference Index |
|
222 | (2) |
Data Index |
|
224 | |