Preface |
|
xvii | |
Acknowledgments |
|
xxxiii | |
About the Authors |
|
xxxv | |
|
PART I UNDERSTANDING INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES |
|
|
1 | (176) |
|
Chapter 1 Interdisciplinary Studies in the Real World |
|
|
2 | (24) |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
Why Interdisciplinary Studies Matters |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
What Is Driving Interdisciplinary Studies Today? |
|
|
4 | (14) |
|
The Complexity of Nature, Society, and Ourselves |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
The Complexity of the Globalized Workplace |
|
|
5 | (2) |
|
The Need for Systems Thinking and Contextual Thinking |
|
|
7 | (3) |
|
The Changing Nature of University Research |
|
|
10 | (2) |
|
Interdisciplinary Borderlands |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
The Public World and Its Pressing Needs |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
Successful Intelligence and Integrative Thinking |
|
|
15 | (2) |
|
A Knowledge Society Needs Both Disciplinarity and Interdisciplinarity |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
The Academic Benefits of Pursuing an Interdisciplinary Studies Degree |
|
|
18 | (2) |
|
Interdisciplinary Studies and Your Career Development |
|
|
20 | (2) |
|
A Threaded Example: Basic Income |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
Critical Thinking Questions |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
Applications and Exercises |
|
|
24 | (2) |
|
Chapter 2 The Rise of the Modern Disciplines and Interdisciplinarity |
|
|
26 | (30) |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
The Rise of the Modern Disciplines |
|
|
29 | (5) |
|
The Origin of the Concept of Disciplinarity |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
The Professionalization of Knowledge |
|
|
31 | (2) |
|
Concerns About Overspecialization |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
The Rise of Interdisciplinarity |
|
|
34 | (16) |
|
The Quest for an Integrated Educational Experience |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
Interdisciplinarity in the 1960s and 1970s |
|
|
35 | (3) |
|
Interdisciplinarity Acquires Academic Legitimacy in the 1980s and 1990s |
|
|
38 | (2) |
|
Interdisciplinary Practice in the New Millennium |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
|
40 | (2) |
|
|
42 | (2) |
|
|
44 | (2) |
|
The Fine and Performing Arts |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
Problems at the Human-Nature Interface |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
The Growth of Interdisciplinarity |
|
|
48 | (2) |
|
Interdisciplinarity's Criticism of the Disciplines |
|
|
50 | (4) |
|
Specialization Can Blind Us to the Broader Context |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
Specialization Tends to Produce Tunnel Vision |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
Specialization Tends to Discount or Ignore Other Perspectives |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
Specialization Can Hinder Creative Breakthroughs |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
Specialization Fails to Address Complex Problems Comprehensively |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
Specialization Imposes a Past Approach on the Present |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
Summary of the Interdisciplinary Criticism of Disciplinary Specialization |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
Revisiting the Basic Income |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
Critical Thinking Questions |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
Applications and Exercises |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
Chapter 3 Interdisciplinary Studies Defined |
|
|
56 | (30) |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
Defining Interdisciplinary Studies |
|
|
58 | (7) |
|
Widely Recognized Definitions of Interdisciplinary Studies |
|
|
59 | (2) |
|
Commonalities Shared by These Definitions |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
The Purpose of Interdisciplinary Studies |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
The Process of Interdisciplinary Studies |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
The Product of Interdisciplinary Studies |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
An Integrated Definition of Interdisciplinary Studies |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
The Premise of Interdisciplinary Studies |
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
Differences Between Disciplinarity, Multidisciplinarity, Interdisciplinarity, and Transdisciplinarity |
|
|
65 | (7) |
|
The Fable of the Elephant House |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
|
68 | (2) |
|
The Difference Between Multidisciplinarity and Interdisciplinarity Summarized |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
Two Conceptions of Interdisciplinarity |
|
|
72 | (4) |
|
Critical Interdisciplinarity |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
Instrumental Interdisciplinarity |
|
|
74 | (2) |
|
Useful Metaphors of Interdisciplinary Studies |
|
|
76 | (6) |
|
The Metaphor of Boundary Crossing |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
The Metaphor of Bridge Building |
|
|
78 | (2) |
|
The Metaphor of Bilingualism |
|
|
80 | (2) |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
Critical Thinking Questions |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
Applications and Exercises |
|
|
83 | (3) |
|
Chapter 4 The Interdisciplinary Studies "Cognitive Toolkit" |
|
|
86 | (24) |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
|
88 | (4) |
|
|
92 | (3) |
|
|
95 | (3) |
|
|
98 | (2) |
|
|
100 | (2) |
|
Ways to Apply Your Interdisciplinary "Toolkit" |
|
|
102 | (4) |
|
Writing an Intellectual Autobiography |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
|
103 | (2) |
|
Performing Service Learning |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
Critical Thinking Questions |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
Applications and Exercises |
|
|
108 | (2) |
|
Chapter 5 Academic Disciplines |
|
|
110 | (44) |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
Disciplines and Disciplinarity Defined |
|
|
112 | (4) |
|
Commonalities Shared by These Definitions |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
The Purpose of Disciplines |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
The Content of Disciplines |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
An Integrated Definition of Discipline and Disciplinarity |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
The Epistemic, Social, and Organizational Dimensions of Disciplines |
|
|
116 | (8) |
|
Disciplines as Epistemic Communities |
|
|
116 | (2) |
|
Disciplines as Social Communities |
|
|
118 | (2) |
|
Disciplines as Organizational Units |
|
|
120 | (2) |
|
A Taxonomy of Disciplines, Applied Fields, and Professions |
|
|
122 | (2) |
|
The Concept of Disciplinary Perspective |
|
|
124 | (9) |
|
Perspective Taking in Interdisciplinary Studies |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
Types of Disciplinary Perspective |
|
|
125 | (1) |
|
Disciplinary Perspective Defined |
|
|
126 | (2) |
|
What Disciplinary Perspective Is Used For |
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
Disciplinary Perspective in an Overall Sense |
|
|
129 | (3) |
|
Three Misconceptions About Disciplinary Perspective |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
The Defining Elements of a Discipline |
|
|
133 | (14) |
|
|
134 | (2) |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
Epistemologies of the Natural Sciences |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
Epistemologies of the Social Sciences |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
Epistemologies of the Humanities |
|
|
139 | (1) |
|
|
140 | (1) |
|
Assumptions of the Natural Sciences |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
Assumptions of the Social Sciences |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
Assumptions of the Humanities |
|
|
142 | (2) |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
|
144 | (2) |
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
|
147 | (4) |
|
|
147 | (2) |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Methods |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
|
150 | (1) |
|
Disciplinary Perspective and Basic Income |
|
|
151 | (1) |
|
Critical Thinking Questions |
|
|
151 | (1) |
|
Applications and Exercises |
|
|
152 | (2) |
|
Chapter 6 The "DNA" of Interdisciplinary Studies |
|
|
154 | (23) |
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
|
155 | (1) |
|
Assumptions of Interdisciplinary Studies |
|
|
156 | (5) |
|
No. 1 The Complex Reality Beyond the University Makes Interdisciplinarity Necessary |
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
No. 2 The Disciplines Are Foundational to Interdisciplinarity |
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
No. 3 The Disciplines Are Inadequate to Address Complexity Comprehensively |
|
|
158 | (2) |
|
No. 4 Interdisciplinarity Is Able to Integrate Insights From Relevant Disciplines |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
No. 5 The Disciplines and the Institutional Policies That Reinforce Them Often Present Major Barriers to Interdisciplinarity |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
Theories Supportive of Interdisciplinary Studies |
|
|
161 | (10) |
|
|
161 | (2) |
|
Perspective-Taking Theory |
|
|
163 | (2) |
|
|
165 | (2) |
|
|
167 | (1) |
|
Theories Supportive of Integration |
|
|
168 | (3) |
|
Interdisciplinary Integration Defined |
|
|
171 | (1) |
|
Epistemology of Interdisciplinary Studies |
|
|
171 | (2) |
|
Critical and Instrumental Modes of Interdisciplinarity |
|
|
172 | (1) |
|
|
172 | (1) |
|
How Interdisciplinary Studies "Sees" |
|
|
173 | (1) |
|
It Sees Complexity in the Familiar |
|
|
173 | (1) |
|
It Sees Complex Problems in Context |
|
|
173 | (1) |
|
It Sees Commonality Amid Difference and Conflict |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
It Sees Contingency in Certainty |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
Reflections on Basic Income |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
Critical Thinking Questions |
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
Applications and Exercises |
|
|
176 | (1) |
|
PART II THINKING CRITICALLY ABOUT INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES |
|
|
177 | (66) |
|
Chapter 7 Thinking Critically About Disciplinary Perspectives |
|
|
178 | (20) |
|
|
178 | (1) |
|
|
179 | (1) |
|
What It Means to Think Critically About Disciplinary Perspectives |
|
|
179 | (1) |
|
Developing a Sophisticated Conception of Knowledge |
|
|
180 | (5) |
|
Reflect on Your Present Epistemic Position |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
Assess Your Tolerance for Multiplicity |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
Move Toward Critical Pluralism |
|
|
182 | (1) |
|
Why Some May Find the Transition to Critical Pluralism Difficult to Make |
|
|
183 | (1) |
|
How to Move From a Position of Dualism or Relativism to One of Critical Pluralism |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
Why Interrogate Disciplinary Perspectives (or Practice Critical Pluralism) |
|
|
185 | (5) |
|
The Issues of Disciplinary Depth and Interdisciplinary Breadth |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
Identifying Disciplines Relevant to the Problem |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
Why Interdisciplinarians Interrogate Perspectives |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
No. 1 Perspective Taking Is a Prerequisite for Turning Multidisciptinary Work Into Interdisciplinary Work |
|
|
187 | (1) |
|
No. 2 Perspective Taking Enables Us to See the Relevance of Other Perspectives |
|
|
188 | (1) |
|
No. 3 Perspective Taking Illumines Our Understanding of the Problem as a Whole |
|
|
189 | (1) |
|
No. 4 Perspective Taking Reduces the Possibility of Making Poor Decisions |
|
|
189 | (1) |
|
No. 5 Perspective Taking Exposes Strengths and Limitations of Disciplines |
|
|
190 | (1) |
|
How Interdisciplinarians Interrogate Disciplinary Perspectives |
|
|
190 | (5) |
|
1 What Is the Discipline's Perspective on This Particular Subject? |
|
|
190 | (2) |
|
2 How Does Each Perspective Illumine Our Understanding of the Subject as a Whole? |
|
|
192 | (4) |
|
3 What Are the Strengths and Limitations of Each Perspective? |
|
|
196 | |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
Critical Thinking Scenario |
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
Critical Thinking Questions |
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
Applications and Exercises |
|
|
196 | (2) |
|
Chapter 8 Thinking Critically About Disciplinary Insights |
|
|
198 | (26) |
|
|
198 | (1) |
|
|
199 | (1) |
|
Critical Thinking Attitudes |
|
|
200 | (3) |
|
Awareness of the Limitations of Expertise |
|
|
200 | (1) |
|
|
200 | (2) |
|
|
202 | (1) |
|
Respect for Different Viewpoints |
|
|
202 | (1) |
|
|
203 | (5) |
|
No. 1 What Are the Author's Conclusions? |
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
No. 2 What Are the Supporting Arguments? |
|
|
204 | (1) |
|
No. 3 What Assumptions Does the Author Make (and Are These Justified)? |
|
|
204 | (2) |
|
No. 4 What Evidence Does the Author Marshal? |
|
|
206 | (1) |
|
Other Types of Statements You Will Encounter |
|
|
206 | (1) |
|
Summary of This Discussion |
|
|
207 | (1) |
|
Critically Analyzing Disciplinary Insights |
|
|
208 | (13) |
|
A Distinctive Approach to Critically Analyzing Disciplinary Insights |
|
|
208 | (1) |
|
Standards for Evaluating Disciplinary Insights |
|
|
209 | (1) |
|
|
210 | (1) |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
Examples of Applying an Interdisciplinary Approach to Critically Analyzing Disciplinary Insights |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
Example 1 An Analysis of Crime by an Economist |
|
|
212 | (3) |
|
Example 2 A Newspaper Article on Climate Change 2U Example 3: An Article by a Literary Theorist on a Nineteenth-Century Latin American Novelist |
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
Mapping Interdisciplinary Connections |
|
|
215 | (2) |
|
Returning to Example V. An Analysis of Crime |
|
|
217 | (1) |
|
What Mapping the Scholarly Enterprise Reveals |
|
|
218 | (3) |
|
Critical Thinking About Basic Income |
|
|
221 | (1) |
|
Critical Thinking Questions |
|
|
221 | (1) |
|
Applications and Exercises |
|
|
221 | (3) |
|
Chapter 9 Thinking Critically About Integration and Its Results |
|
|
224 | (19) |
|
|
226 | |
|
|
225 | (1) |
|
Approaches to Interdisciplinary Integration |
|
|
226 | (7) |
|
Integrative Approach 1: Contextualization |
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
History as Integrative Context |
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
Metaphysics as Integrative Context |
|
|
227 | (1) |
|
Epistemology as Integrative Context |
|
|
227 | (1) |
|
Example of Contextualization |
|
|
228 | (2) |
|
Strengths and Limitations of Contextualization |
|
|
230 | (1) |
|
Integrative Approach 2: Conceptualization |
|
|
230 | (1) |
|
Strengths and Limitations of Conceptualization |
|
|
231 | (1) |
|
Integrative Approach 3: Problem Centering |
|
|
231 | (1) |
|
Strengths and Limitations of the Problem-Centering Approach |
|
|
232 | (1) |
|
The Broad Model Approach to Integration |
|
|
233 | (5) |
|
Examples of How the Broad Model Integrates |
|
|
235 | (1) |
|
|
235 | (2) |
|
|
237 | (1) |
|
Strategies for Integration |
|
|
238 | (1) |
|
The Result of Integration |
|
|
239 | (1) |
|
A More Comprehensive Understanding |
|
|
239 | (1) |
|
Reflecting on What Was Achieved |
|
|
240 | (1) |
|
Integration and Basic Income |
|
|
240 | (1) |
|
Critical Thinking Scenario |
|
|
241 | (1) |
|
Critical Thinking Questions |
|
|
241 | (1) |
|
Applications and Exercises |
|
|
241 | (2) |
|
PART III INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AND WRITING |
|
|
243 | (74) |
|
Chapter 10 An Interdisciplinary Research "Road Map" |
|
|
244 | (26) |
|
|
244 | (1) |
|
|
245 | (1) |
|
The Power and Usefulness of Research |
|
|
246 | (1) |
|
Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Approaches to Research |
|
|
247 | (2) |
|
The Broad Model of the Interdisciplinary Research Process |
|
|
249 | (2) |
|
STEP 1 Define the Problem or State the Research Question |
|
|
251 | (8) |
|
What Is a Good Research Question? |
|
|
251 | (1) |
|
How Do You Develop a Good Research Question? |
|
|
252 | (1) |
|
The Research Question Identifies the Focus of the Study |
|
|
252 | (1) |
|
The Research Question Defines the Scope of the Study |
|
|
252 | (1) |
|
The Research Question Avoids Three Tendencies |
|
|
253 | (2) |
|
The Research Question Answers the "So What?" Question |
|
|
255 | (1) |
|
The Broad Model Rubric Applied to STEP 1 |
|
|
255 | (4) |
|
Some Useful Group Exercises |
|
|
259 | (1) |
|
STEP 2 Justify Using an Interdisciplinary Approach |
|
|
260 | (6) |
|
Commonly Used Justifications |
|
|
260 | (1) |
|
The Problem or Research Question Is Complex |
|
|
260 | (1) |
|
Important Insights Into the Problem Are Offered by Two or More Disciplines |
|
|
261 | (1) |
|
No Singte Discipline Has Been Able to Address the Problem Comprehensively |
|
|
261 | (1) |
|
The Problem Is an Unresolved Issue or Unmet Societal Need |
|
|
262 | (1) |
|
The Broad Model Rubric Applied to STEP 2 |
|
|
263 | (1) |
|
Evaluating Practitioner and Student Justifications |
|
|
263 | (3) |
|
Researching a Basic Income |
|
|
266 | (1) |
|
Critical Thinking Questions |
|
|
267 | (1) |
|
Applications and Exercises |
|
|
267 | (3) |
|
Chapter 11 Identifying Relevant Disciplines and Gathering Information About the Problem |
|
|
270 | (24) |
|
|
271 | (1) |
|
|
271 | (1) |
|
STEP 3 Identify Relevant Disciplines |
|
|
272 | (9) |
|
Action No. 1: Connect the Problem as a Whole to Phenomena Typically Studied by Disciplines and Interdisciplinary Fields |
|
|
272 | (1) |
|
Problem/Research Question No. V. What is the cause of teen apathy toward learning? |
|
|
273 | (1) |
|
Problem/Research Question No. 2: Should natural gas replace coal as a fuel source for electricity production? |
|
|
273 | (1) |
|
Problem/Research Question No. 3: What is the meaning of the growing popularity of action superheroes in media? |
|
|
273 | (3) |
|
Action No. 2: "Decompose" the Problem |
|
|
276 | (1) |
|
Action No. 3: Mapping the Problem |
|
|
277 | (2) |
|
Action No. 6: Reflect on the Problem |
|
|
279 | (1) |
|
"Rules of Thumb" to Help You Perform STEP 3 |
|
|
280 | (1) |
|
STEP 4 Conduct a Literature Search |
|
|
281 | (2) |
|
Remember That Different Disciplines Employ Terminology Differently |
|
|
281 | (1) |
|
Categorize Publications According to Their Disciplinary Source |
|
|
281 | (1) |
|
Focus on Quality Rather Than Quantity |
|
|
282 | (1) |
|
Develop a Data Management System |
|
|
282 | (1) |
|
The Broad Model Rubric Applied to STEPS 3 and 4 |
|
|
283 | (9) |
|
|
286 | (5) |
|
|
291 | (1) |
|
Investigating Basic Income |
|
|
292 | (1) |
|
Critical Thinking Questions |
|
|
293 | (1) |
|
Critical Thinking Scenario |
|
|
293 | (1) |
|
Peer Evaluation and Edit Activity |
|
|
293 | (1) |
|
Chapter 12 Analyzing Insights and Reflecting on Process |
|
|
294 | (23) |
|
|
295 | (1) |
|
|
295 | (1) |
|
STEP 5 Critically Analyze the Disciplinary Insights Into the Problem |
|
|
296 | (11) |
|
Strategies for Critically Analyzing Disciplinary Insights |
|
|
298 | (1) |
|
Strategy No. 1: Identify the Key Elements of Each Insight |
|
|
298 | (1) |
|
Strategy No. 2: Organize This Information |
|
|
298 | (1) |
|
Strategy No. 3: Critically Analyze This Information |
|
|
299 | (3) |
|
The Broad Model Rubric Applied to STEP 5 |
|
|
302 | (5) |
|
STEP 6 Reflect on How an Interdisciplinary Approach Has Enlarged Your Understanding of the Problem |
|
|
307 | (8) |
|
How Has the Project Challenged Your Bias Toward the Problem? |
|
|
308 | (1) |
|
How Has the Research Process Influenced Your Perception of Disciplinary Perspective and Expertise? |
|
|
309 | (1) |
|
How Has an Interdisciplinary Approach Enlarged Your Understanding of the Problem as a Whole? |
|
|
309 | (1) |
|
How Is an Interdisciplinary Approach Applicable Beyond the Classroom? |
|
|
310 | (1) |
|
The Broad Model Rubric Applied to STEP 6 |
|
|
311 | (4) |
|
|
315 | (1) |
|
|
315 | (1) |
|
Critical Thinking Questions |
|
|
316 | (3) |
Appendixes |
|
317 | (68) |
|
Appendix A Intellectual Autobiography |
|
|
319 | (8) |
|
Appendix B Student Portfolios and Blogging |
|
|
327 | (10) |
|
Appendix C Service Learning, Internships, and Alternative Projects for Nontraditional Students |
|
|
337 | (20) |
|
Appendix D The Broad Model Rubric: Instructor Version and Sample Student Outline |
|
|
357 | (12) |
|
|
369 | (16) |
Glossary of Key Terms |
|
385 | (4) |
References |
|
389 | (10) |
Index |
|
399 | |