Preface |
|
xv | |
Acknowledgments |
|
xxvii | |
About the Authors |
|
xxix | |
|
PART I UNDERSTANDING INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES |
|
|
1 | (138) |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
Chapter 1 Learning Outcomes |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
1 Interdisciplinary Studies in the Real World |
|
|
3 | (20) |
|
Why Interdisciplinary Studies Matters |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
What Is Driving Interdisciplinary Studies Today |
|
|
3 | (16) |
|
The Complexity of Nature, Society, and Ourselves |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
The Fine and Performing Arts |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
Problems at the Human-Nature Interface |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
The Complexity of the Globalized Workplace |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
The Need for Systems Thinking and Contextual Thinking |
|
|
8 | (2) |
|
The Changing Nature of University Research |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
Interdisciplinary Borderlands |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
The Fine and Performing Arts |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
The Public World and Its Pressing Needs |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
Revolutionary Insights and Generative Technologies |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
Successful Intelligence and Integrative Thinking |
|
|
16 | (2) |
|
A Knowledge Society Needs Both Disciplinarity and Interdisciplinarity |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
The Academic Benefits of Pursuing an Interdisciplinary Studies Degree |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
Interdisciplinary Studies and Your Career Development |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
Critical Thinking Questions |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
Applications and Exercises |
|
|
21 | (2) |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
Chapter 2 Learning Outcomes |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
2 Interdisciplinary Studies Defined |
|
|
23 | (26) |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
Defining Interdisciplinary Studies |
|
|
24 | (5) |
|
Widely Recognized Definitions of Interdisciplinary Studies |
|
|
24 | (2) |
|
Commonalities Shares by These Definitions |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
The Purpose of Interdisciplinary Studies |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
The Process of Interdisciplinary Studies |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
The Product of Interdisciplinary Studies |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
An Integrated Definition of Interdisciplinary Studies |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
The Premise of Interdisciplinary Studies |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
Differences Between Disciplinarity, Multidisciplinarity, Interdisciplinarity, and Transdisciplinarity |
|
|
29 | (7) |
|
The Fable of the Elephant House |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
|
32 | (3) |
|
The Difference Between Multidisciplinarity and Interdisciplinarity Summarized |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
Two Conceptions of Interdisciplinarity |
|
|
36 | (4) |
|
Critical Interdisciplinarity |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
Instrumental Interdisciplinarity |
|
|
38 | (2) |
|
Useful Metaphors of Interdisciplinary Studies |
|
|
40 | (5) |
|
The Metaphor of Boundary Crossing |
|
|
40 | (2) |
|
The Metaphor of Bridge Building |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
The Metaphor of Bilingualism |
|
|
43 | (2) |
|
Critical Thinking Questions |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
Applications and Exercises |
|
|
45 | (4) |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
Chapter 3 Learning Outcomes |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
3 The Interdisciplinary Studies "Cognitive Toolkit" |
|
|
49 | (14) |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
|
50 | (3) |
|
|
53 | (2) |
|
|
55 | (2) |
|
Ways to Apply Your Interdisciplinary "Toolkit" |
|
|
57 | (3) |
|
Writing an Intellectual Autobiography |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
Preparing a Portfolio 58 Performing Service Learning |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
Critical Thinking Questions |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
Applications and Exercises |
|
|
61 | (2) |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
Chapter 4 Learning Outcomes |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
4 The Rise of the Modern Disciplines and Interdisciplinarity - |
|
|
63 | (22) |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
The Rise of the Modern Disciplines |
|
|
64 | (4) |
|
The Origin of the Concept of Disciplinarity |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
A Call for Less Specialization |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
The Consolidation of the Disciplines |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
The Professionalization of Knowledge |
|
|
66 | (2) |
|
Concerns About Overspecialization |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
The Rise of Interdisciplinarity |
|
|
68 | (9) |
|
The Quest for an Integrated Educational Experience |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
Interdisciplinarity in the 1960s and 1970s |
|
|
69 | (3) |
|
Interdisciplinarity Acquires Academic Legitimacy in the 1980s and 1990s |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
Interdisciplinary Practice in the New Millennium |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
The Growth of Interdisciplinarity |
|
|
75 | (2) |
|
Interdisciplinarity's Criticism of the Disciplines |
|
|
77 | (4) |
|
Specialization Can Blind Us to the Broader Context |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
Specialization Tends to Produce Tunnel Vision |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
Specialization Tends to Discount or Ignore Other Perspectives |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
Specialization Can Hinder Creative Breakthroughs |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
Specialization Fails to Address Complex Problems Comprehensively |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
Specialization Imposes a Past Approach on the Present |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
Summary of the Interdisciplinary Criticism of Disciplinary Specialization |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
Critical Thinking Questions |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
Applications and Exercises |
|
|
81 | (4) |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
Chapter 5 Learning Outcomes |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
|
85 | (36) |
|
Disciplines and Disciplinarity Defined |
|
|
85 | (4) |
|
Commonalities Shared by These Definitions |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
The Purpose of Disciplines |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
The Content of Disciplines |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
An Integrated Definition of Discipline and Disciplinarity |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
The Epistemic, Social, and Organizational Dimensions of Disciplines |
|
|
89 | (5) |
|
Disciplines as Epistemic Communities |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
Disciplines as Social Communities |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
Disciplines as Organizational Units |
|
|
91 | (2) |
|
A Taxonomy of Disciplines, Fields, and Professions |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
The Concept of Disciplinary Perspective |
|
|
94 | (8) |
|
Perspective Taking in Interdisciplinary Studies |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
Types of Disciplinary Perspective |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
Disciplinary Perspective Defined |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
What Disciplinary Perspective Is Used For |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
Disciplinary Perspective in an Overall Sense |
|
|
98 | (3) |
|
Three Misconceptions About Disciplinary Perspective |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
The Defining Elements of a Discipline |
|
|
102 | (16) |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
|
103 | (3) |
|
Epistemologies of the Natural Sciences |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
Epistemologies of the Social Sciences |
|
|
106 | (3) |
|
Epistemologies of the Humanities |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
Assumptions of the Natural Sciences |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
Assumptions of the Social Sciences |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
Assumptions of the Humanities |
|
|
110 | (2) |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
|
114 | (3) |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Methods |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
Critical Thinking Questions |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
Applications and Exercises |
|
|
118 | (3) |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
Chapter 6 Learning Outcomes |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
6 The "DNA" of Interdisciplinary Studies |
|
|
121 | (18) |
|
Assumptions of Interdisciplinary Studies |
|
|
122 | (3) |
|
No. 1 The Complex Reality Beyond the University Makes Interdisciplinarity Necessary |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
No. 2 The Disciplines Are Foundational to Interdisciplinarity |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
No. 3 The Disciplines Are Inadequate to Address Complexity Comprehensively |
|
|
123 | (2) |
|
No. 4 Interdisciplinarity Is Able to Integrate Insights From Relevant Disciplines |
|
|
125 | (1) |
|
No. 5 The Disciplines and the Institutional Policies That Reinforce Them Often Present Major Barriers to Interdisciplinarity |
|
|
125 | (1) |
|
Theories of Interdisciplinary Studies |
|
|
125 | (9) |
|
|
126 | (1) |
|
Perspective Taking Theory |
|
|
127 | (2) |
|
|
129 | (2) |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
Theories Supportive of Integration |
|
|
131 | (2) |
|
Interdisciplinary Integration Defined |
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
Epistemology of Interdisciplinary Studies |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
Critical and Instrumental Modes of Interdisciplinarity |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
How Interdisciplinary Studies "Sees" |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
It Sees Complexity in the Familiar |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
It Sees Complex Problems in Context |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
It Sees Commonality Amid Difference and Conflict |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
It Sees Contingency in Certainty |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
Critical Thinking Questions |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
Applications and Exercises |
|
|
137 | (2) |
|
PART II THINKING CRITICALLY ABOUT INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES |
|
|
139 | (56) |
|
|
140 | (1) |
|
Chapter 7 Learning Outcomes |
|
|
140 | (1) |
|
7 Thinking Critically About Disciplinary Perspectives |
|
|
141 | (20) |
|
What It Means to Think Critically About Disciplinary Perspectives |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
Developing a Sophisticated Conception of Knowledge |
|
|
141 | (4) |
|
Reflect on Your Present Epistemic Position |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
Assess Your Tolerance for Multiplicity |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
Move Toward Critical Pluralism |
|
|
143 | (1) |
|
Why Some May Find the Transition to Critical Pluralism Difficult to Make |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
How to Move From a Position of Dualism or Relativism to One of Critical Pluralism |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
Why Interrogate Disciplinary Perspectives (or Practice Critical Pluralism) |
|
|
145 | (7) |
|
The Issues of Disciplinary Depth and Interdisciplinary Breadth |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
Identifying Disciplines Relevant to the Problem |
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
Why Interdisciplinarians Interrogate Perspectives |
|
|
147 | (1) |
|
No. 1 Perspective Taking Is a Key Feature of Interdisciplinarity That Is Necessitated by Complexity |
|
|
147 | (1) |
|
No. 2 Perspective Taking Is a Prerequisite for Turning Multidisciplinary Work Into Interdisciplinary Work |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
No. 3 Perspective Taking Enables Us to See the Relevance of Other Perspectives |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
No. 4 Perspective Taking Illumines Our Understanding of the Problem as a Whole |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
No. 5 Perspective Taking Reduces the Possibility of Making Poor Decisions |
|
|
150 | (1) |
|
No. 6 Perspective Taking Exposes Strengths and Limitations of Disciplines |
|
|
150 | (2) |
|
How Interdisciplinarians Interrogate Disciplinary Perspectives |
|
|
152 | (6) |
|
1 What Is the Discipline's Perspective on This Particular Subject? |
|
|
152 | (2) |
|
2 How Does Each Perspective Illumine Our Understanding of the Subject as a Whole? |
|
|
154 | (2) |
|
3 What Are the Strengths and Limitations of Each Perspective? |
|
|
156 | (2) |
|
Critical Thinking Scenario |
|
|
158 | (3) |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
Chapter 8 Learning Outcomes |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
8 Thinking Critically About Disciplinary Insights |
|
|
161 | (20) |
|
Critical Thinking Attitudes |
|
|
161 | (3) |
|
Awareness of the Limitations of Expertise |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
Respect for Different Viewpoints |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
|
164 | (3) |
|
No. 1 What Are the Author's Conclusions? |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
No. 2 What Are the Supporting Arguments? |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
No. 3 What Assumptions Does the Author Make? |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
No. 4 What Evidence Does the Author Marshal? |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
Other Types of Statements You Will Encounter |
|
|
166 | (1) |
|
Summary of This Discussion |
|
|
167 | (1) |
|
Critically Analyzing Disciplinary Insights |
|
|
167 | (6) |
|
A Distinctive Approach to Critically Analyzing Disciplinary Insights |
|
|
167 | (2) |
|
How to Find What You Need in Disciplinary Insights |
|
|
169 | (1) |
|
|
169 | (1) |
|
|
169 | (1) |
|
|
170 | (1) |
|
Examples of Applying an Interdisciplinary Approach to Critically Analyzing Disciplinary Insights |
|
|
170 | (1) |
|
Example 1 An Analysis of Crime by an Economist |
|
|
171 | (1) |
|
Example 2 A Newspaper Article on Global Warming |
|
|
172 | (1) |
|
Example 3 An Article by a Literary Theorist on a Nineteenth-Century Latin American Novelist |
|
|
173 | (1) |
|
Mapping Interdisciplinary Connections |
|
|
173 | (5) |
|
Returning to Example 1: An Analysis of Crime |
|
|
174 | (2) |
|
What Mapping the Scholarly Enterprise Reveals |
|
|
176 | (2) |
|
Critical Thinking Questions |
|
|
178 | (1) |
|
Applications and Exercises |
|
|
178 | (3) |
|
|
180 | (1) |
|
Chapter 9 Learning Outcomes |
|
|
180 | (1) |
|
9 Thinking Critically About Integration and Its Results |
|
|
181 | (14) |
|
Approaches to Interdisciplinary Integration |
|
|
181 | (6) |
|
Integrative Approach 1: Contextualization |
|
|
182 | (1) |
|
History as Integrative Context |
|
|
182 | (1) |
|
Metaphysics as Integrative Context |
|
|
182 | (1) |
|
Epistemology as Integrative Context |
|
|
182 | (1) |
|
Example of a Contextual Integration |
|
|
183 | (2) |
|
Strengths and Limitations of Approaches to Contextual Integration |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
Integrative Approach 2: Conceptualization |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
Strengths and Limitations of the Conceptual Approach to Integration |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
Integrative Approach 3: Problem Centering |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
Strengths and Limitations of the Problem-Centering Approach |
|
|
187 | (1) |
|
The Broad Model Approach to Integration |
|
|
187 | (4) |
|
Examples of How the Broad Model Integrates |
|
|
188 | (1) |
|
|
189 | (1) |
|
|
190 | (1) |
|
"Partial" and "Full" Integration |
|
|
191 | (1) |
|
The Result of Integration |
|
|
191 | (2) |
|
A More Comprehensive Understanding |
|
|
191 | (1) |
|
Core Premises That Underlie the Concept |
|
|
192 | (1) |
|
Reflecting on What Was Achieved |
|
|
193 | (1) |
|
Critical Thinking Scenario |
|
|
193 | (2) |
|
PART III INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AND WRITING |
|
|
195 | (70) |
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
Chapter 10 Learning Outcomes |
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
10 An Interdisciplinary Research "Road Map" |
|
|
197 | (24) |
|
The Power and Usefulness of Research |
|
|
198 | (1) |
|
Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Approaches to Research |
|
|
198 | (2) |
|
The Broad Model of the Interdisciplinary Research Process |
|
|
200 | (2) |
|
Step 1 Define the Problem or State the Research Question |
|
|
202 | (8) |
|
What Is a Good Research Question? |
|
|
202 | (1) |
|
How Do You Develop a Good Research Question? |
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
The Statement Identifies the Focus of the Study |
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
The Statement Defines the Scope of the Study |
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
The Statement Avoids Three Tendencies |
|
|
204 | (1) |
|
The Statement Answers the "So What" Question |
|
|
205 | (1) |
|
The Broad Model Rubric Applied to STEP 1 |
|
|
206 | (4) |
|
Step 2 Justify Using an Interdisciplinary Approach |
|
|
210 | (6) |
|
Commonly Used Justifications |
|
|
210 | (1) |
|
The Problem or Research Question Is Complex |
|
|
210 | (1) |
|
Important Insights Into the Problem Are Offered by Two or More Disciplines |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
No Single Discipline Has Been Able to Address the Problem Comprehensively |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
The Problem Is an Unresolved Issue or Unmet Societal Need |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
The Broad Model Rubric Applied to STEP 2 |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
Evaluating Practitioner and Student Justifications |
|
|
213 | (3) |
|
Applications and Exercises |
|
|
216 | (2) |
|
|
218 | (3) |
|
|
220 | (1) |
|
Chapter 11 Learning Outcomes |
|
|
220 | (1) |
|
11 Identifying Relevant Disciplines and Gathering Information About the Problem |
|
|
221 | (24) |
|
Step 3 Identify Relevant Disciplines |
|
|
221 | (10) |
|
Action No. 1 Connect the Problem as a Whole to Phenomena Typically Studied by Disciplines and Interdisciplinary Fields |
|
|
222 | (2) |
|
Problem/Research Question No. 1 What is the cause of teen apathy toward learning? |
|
|
224 | (1) |
|
Problem/Research Question No. 2 Should natural gas replace coal as a fuel source for electricity production? |
|
|
224 | (1) |
|
Problem/Research Question No. 3 What is the meaning of the growing popularity of action super heroes in media? |
|
|
224 | (3) |
|
Action No. 2 "Decompose" the Problem |
|
|
227 | (1) |
|
Action No. 3 Externalize the Problem |
|
|
227 | (2) |
|
Action No. 4 Reflect on the Problem |
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
"Rules of Thumb" to Help You Perform STEP 3 |
|
|
230 | (1) |
|
Step 4 Conduct a Literature Search |
|
|
231 | (2) |
|
Categorize Publications According to Their Disciplinary Source |
|
|
231 | (1) |
|
Focus on Quality Rather Than Quantity |
|
|
231 | (1) |
|
Develop a Data Management System |
|
|
232 | (1) |
|
The Broad Model Rubric Applied to STEPS 3 and 4 |
|
|
233 | (9) |
|
|
234 | (8) |
|
|
242 | (1) |
|
Critical Thinking Scenario |
|
|
242 | (1) |
|
Peer Evaluation and Edit Activity |
|
|
243 | (2) |
|
|
244 | (1) |
|
Chapter 12 Learning Outcomes |
|
|
244 | (1) |
|
12 Analyzing Insights-and Reflecting on Process |
|
|
245 | (20) |
|
Step 5 Critically Analyze the Disciplinary Insights Into the Problem |
|
|
246 | (4) |
|
Strategies for Critically Analyzing Disciplinary Insights |
|
|
246 | (1) |
|
Strategy No. 1 Identify the Key Elements of Each Insight |
|
|
246 | (1) |
|
Strategy No. 2 Organize This Information |
|
|
247 | (1) |
|
Strategy No. 3 Critically Analyze This Information |
|
|
247 | (3) |
|
The Broad Model Rubric Applied to STEP 5 |
|
|
250 | (6) |
|
Step 6 Reflect on How an Interdisciplinary Approach Has Enlarged Your Understanding of the Problem |
|
|
256 | (7) |
|
How Has the Project Challenged Your Bias on the Problem? |
|
|
256 | (1) |
|
How Has the Research Process Influenced Your Perception of Disciplinary Perspective and Expertise? |
|
|
257 | (1) |
|
How Has an Interdisciplinary Approach Enlarged Your Understanding of the Problem as a Whole? |
|
|
257 | (1) |
|
How Is an Interdisciplinary Approach Applicable Beyond the Classroom? |
|
|
258 | (1) |
|
The Broad Model Rubric Applied to STEP 6 |
|
|
258 | (5) |
|
|
263 | (2) |
|
|
265 | (40) |
|
A Intellectual Autobiography |
|
|
267 | (10) |
|
|
277 | (10) |
|
|
287 | (6) |
|
D The Broad Model Rubric: Instructor Version |
|
|
293 | (4) |
|
|
297 | (8) |
Glossary of Key Terms |
|
305 | (6) |
References |
|
311 | (10) |
Author Index |
|
321 | (4) |
Subject Index |
|
325 | |