With the threat to intellectual freedom increasing around the country, this book takes a look at the first ever school book ban case to be decided by the high courts, and offers insights into how we can use history to help the future.
In 1975, the school board members of a small Long Island town did what they thought was a no-brainer: they ordered the removal of nine books from a high school library. The books included some classics Richard Wright's Black Boy; Desmond Morris's The Naked Ape; Kurt Vonnegut's Slaughterhouse-Five but that didn't matter to board chair Richard Ahrens, who called the collection "anti-American, anti-Christian, anti-Semitic, and just plain filthy." Maybe he thought the town was with him. Maybe he thought nobody would care. He certainly didn't think he would be sued by seventeen-year-old Steven Pico or that the case would end up before the United States Supreme Court, the first and only book ban dispute ever to do so.
The only one so far. Recent years have seen a surge in book challenges, and it is only a matter of time before another reaches the high court. Island Trees v. Pico ended in a loss for the school board, but not a resounding one. It left enough daylight for the current justices to reach a different conclusion. What was the court's ruling? How did it come about? What was the book ban climate in the 1970s and 80s, and how did it differ from today's? Just Plain Filthy is the first book to tell the complete story of Island Trees v. Pico, the flawed yet fascinating case that is the cornerstone of intellectual freedom in America. For now.
Arvustused
A vividly personal case for books that teach young readers how to cope with desire and live a life of self-acceptance. * Kirkus Reviews * Just Plain Filthy is a readable, even personable look at the historic context of todays surge in censorship. Aycock writes engagingly about the legal arguments and specific details of the cases brought before the U.S. Supreme Court about our First Amendment rights. He concludes with what seems a likely prediction: Pico is headed for a revisit and the longstanding precedents that have underwritten our understanding of intellectual freedom may not survive. -- James LaRue, author of On Censorship: A Public Librarian Examines Cancel Culture in the US Using his own life as a framework, Anthony Aycock has written a history of book banning that is both specific and comprehensive in scope. The Island Trees v Pico US Supreme Court case provides a perfect historical case for understanding our current intellectual freedom landscape. -- Emily J.M. Knox, Professor at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA This book is essential reading for anyone concerned about book bans and free expression. Aycock shows how libraries, students, and school boards, as well as judges and juries, shape the First Amendment in real-life applications. -- John Chrastka, Executive Director, EveryLibrary, USA
Muu info
With the threat to intellectual freedom increasing around the country, this book takes a look at the first ever school book ban case to be decided by the high courts, and offers insights into how we can use history to help the future.
Introduction: Bible Drill Meets Penthouse Forum
1. Faithful Watchdogs
2. Killing Reason Itself
3. Too Bloody Stupid
4. Diagnosis: Censor
5. Desperately Seeking Sources
6. To Cull a Mockingbird
7. Battle of the Books
8. Hello, Newman
9. Supreme Court, B1t¢hes!
10. Keep Suing. Keep Fighting
Appendix: Supreme Court opinion
Anthony Aycock is the legislative library director at the North Carolina General Assembly. He is a writer, teacher, and librarian and has spent 25 years working in government, academic, and private law libraries, as well as teaching academic and creative writing. A frequent contributor to Medium and Information Today, he has also written for Slate, the Washington Post, Literary Hub, Reactor (formerly Tor.com), the Missouri Review, the Gettysburg Review, Ploughshares, and more.
