Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

Liability for Wrongful Interferences with Chattels [Kõva köide]

(Jesus College, Oxford University)
  • Formaat: Hardback, 242 pages, kõrgus x laius x paksus: 236x158x26 mm, kaal: 560 g
  • Ilmumisaeg: 02-Nov-2011
  • Kirjastus: Hart Publishing
  • ISBN-10: 1849461511
  • ISBN-13: 9781849461511
Teised raamatud teemal:
  • Kõva köide
  • Hind: 117,30 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Tavahind: 138,00 €
  • Säästad 15%
  • Raamatu kohalejõudmiseks kirjastusest kulub orienteeruvalt 3-4 nädalat
  • Kogus:
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Tasuta tarne
  • Tellimisaeg 2-4 nädalat
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • Raamatukogudele
    • Hart e-raamatud
  • Formaat: Hardback, 242 pages, kõrgus x laius x paksus: 236x158x26 mm, kaal: 560 g
  • Ilmumisaeg: 02-Nov-2011
  • Kirjastus: Hart Publishing
  • ISBN-10: 1849461511
  • ISBN-13: 9781849461511
Teised raamatud teemal:
This book examines the protection of property rights in chattels through the law of torts, focusing on the four actions of conversion, detinue, trespass, and negligence. Traditionally, these actions have been governed by arcane divisions which have led to unnecessary complexity and arbitrariness. Revitalizing the subject in this area of law, the principal argument made in the book is that significant developments in the modern law point towards abolition of these arcane divisions and permit the chattel torts to be understood by reference to a coherent and justifiable structure. It is argued that the only division which should be drawn in the modern chattel torts is between intentional interferences with chattels, where liability is strict, and unintentional interferences with chattels, where liability is fault based. In order to demonstrate this structure, it is first argued that the actions of conversion, detinue, and trespass amount, in substance, to a single cause of action which imposes strict liability for the intentional interference with another's chattel. It is then argued that the tort of negligence recognizes a fault-based cause of action for the unintentional interference with another's chattel. It is further argued that this basic structure, unlike the arcane divisions which have traditionally governed this area of law, can be justified and can be exported to other areas of tort law.

Arvustused

...seamlessly argued account of liability for wrongful interferences with chattels [ The author] substantiates [ his] argument with clear and methodical analysis of the case-law, and convinces at almost every turn. What is more, the book based on the author's doctoral thesis is a pleasure to read. * Yearbook on European Tort Law * ...the book is interesting and thoughtful and the author's arguments are sophisticated. It will appeal to those interested in the history and theoretical bases of the torts under discussion. The views expressed could usefully be taken into account in New Zealand is and when law reform in this area is proposed. -- Cynthia Hawes * New Zealand Law Journal *

Table of Cases
xi
Table of Legislation
xix
1 Introduction
1(8)
I The Focus on the Law of Torts
1(2)
II The Proposed Structure
3(6)
PART I THE RIGHTS PROTECTED BY THE CHATTEL TORTS
2 Property Rights Relating to Chattels
9(10)
I Property Rights
9(5)
A Rights in Rem and Rights in Personam
9(3)
B Personal Rights and the Chattel Torts
12(2)
II Chattels
14(2)
III Intangibles
16(3)
3 Types of Property Rights
19(30)
I Ownership
20(10)
A Content of Ownership
21(3)
B Relativity of Ownership
24(3)
C Acquisition
27(3)
II Possessory Rights
30(3)
III Chattel Leases
33(3)
IV Security Interests
36(3)
A Possessory Security
37(2)
B Non-possessory Security
39(1)
V Equitable Title
39(9)
A The Position of Beneficiaries Suing in the Chattel Torts
40(4)
B Proprietary Status of an Equitable Interest
44(4)
VI Conclusion
48(1)
PART II LIABILITY FOR INTENTIONAL INTERFERENCES WITH CHATTELS
49(90)
Introduction to Part II
49(2)
4 Conversion
51(27)
I Historical Development of Conversion
51(10)
A Origin of Conversion
52(3)
B Expansion
55(6)
II Features of the Modern Action
61(16)
A Conversion's Status as a Tort
62(2)
B The Basis of Liability in Conversion
64(13)
III Conclusion
77(1)
5 Detinue
78(18)
I The Basis of Liability
78(12)
A Orthodox View: A Detention
79(5)
B Alternative Approach: Careless Loss
84(5)
C Tort or Vindication
89(1)
II The Abolition of Detinue
90(4)
III Conclusion
94(2)
6 Trespass
96(19)
I Historical Development of Trespass
97(7)
A Origins of the `Directness' Requirement
97(2)
B The Meaning of `Directness'
99(2)
C The Relevance of the Defendant's Mental State
101(3)
II The Emergence of the Modern Tort of Trespass
104(10)
A From `Direct' to `Intentional' Interference
105(6)
B The Meaning of `Intentional Interference' in Trespass
111(3)
III Conclusion
114(1)
7 A Single Tort
115(24)
I Common Features of the Three Torts
116(7)
A The Basis of Liability
116(4)
B The Standard of Liability
120(3)
II Calls for the Formal Recognition of the Single Tort
123(3)
A The 18th Report: Calls for a Single Tort
123(2)
B The Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977
125(1)
III Justifying the Structure of the Chattel Torts
126(11)
A Historical Explanations for Strict Liability
127(2)
B Modern Theories of Strict Liability
129(8)
IV Conclusion
137(2)
PART III LIABILITY FOR UNINTENTIONAL INTERFERENCES WITH CHATTELS
139(46)
Introduction to Part III
139(2)
8 Introduction to the Tort of Negligence
141(18)
I Historical Development of Negligence
141(4)
A Early History
142(1)
B Re-orientation of Case from `Indirect' to `Negligent'
143(2)
II The Basis of Liability: `Interference' or `Damage'?
145(13)
A The Meaning of `Damage'
146(4)
B `Interference' as the Basis of Liability
150(8)
III Conclusion
158(1)
9 Establishing `Duty' and `Fault' in Negligence
159(26)
I An Additional Requirement of Proving Duty?
160(8)
A The Three-Stage Test
161(2)
B The Role of Policy in Chattel Cases: The Nicholas H
163(5)
II The Need for Fault
168(14)
A The Meaning of `Fault'
169(2)
B Justifying the Need for Fault
171(5)
C Establishing Fault in Chattel Cases
176(6)
III Conclusion
182(3)
PART IV APPLYING THE STRUCTURE TO REMEDIES
185(24)
10 Compensation
187(19)
I Establishing a Loss
188(10)
A Assessment of Damages in the Intentional Chattel Torts
189(6)
B Assessment of Damages in the Tort of Negligence
195(3)
II Causation of Loss
198(6)
A Causation of Loss in the Intentional Chattel Torts
199(2)
B Causation of Loss in the Tort of Negligence
201(2)
C Justifying the Different Approaches to Causation of Loss
203(1)
III Conclusion
204(2)
11 Conclusion
206(3)
Bibliography 209(8)
Index 217
Simon Douglas is a Fellow and Tutor in Law at Jesus College, Oxford.