Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

Metahistory of Western Knowledge in the Modern Era: Four Evolving Metaparadigms, 1648 to Present [Kõva köide]

The book is a study of the evolving history of knowledge in the arts and sciences in the modern era – from 1648 through the present. Modernism is treated as an epoch with evolving disciplines whose articulated problems of a time and the inquiry methods to address them, develop in a coordinated manner, given a mutual awareness.

When one organizes the development of knowledge over periods of years, and gives it an appellation such as “Modernism,” the organization of facts is guided by concepts and values discerned throughout these periods. These facts of knowledge development share sufficient understandings to be called an “era,” or an “epoch,” or other terms that insist on the shared aspects of those years. One can call such an effort a “metahistory,” in that what is tracked is not merely a knowledge that is political, economic, ideological, sociological, or scientific, but an overview that tracks the respective conceptual developments of the fields in how they have changed and augmented their problem formulations, inquiry methods, and explanatory conceptions over time.



The book is a study of the evolving history of knowledge in the arts and sciences in the modern era –from 1648 through the present. Modernism is treated as an epoch with evolving disciplines whose articulated problems of a time and the inquiry methods to address them develop in a coordinated manner, given a mutual awareness.

Arvustused

Blums vision is as panoramic as the title suggests, moving freely among fields usually kept separate from Pufendorff to Elfriede Jelinek. The work will stimulate discussion and controversy, as ambitious projects always do. It will interest anyone who values the European tradition of grand meta-historical thinking. Whatever ones verdict on Blum's metaparadigms, it is heartening to see the revival of a genre that had once seemed defunct. Hans Kellner, Professor of English, Chair of the NCSU Faculty, North Carolina State University, USA

Muu info

A metahistory of knowledge political, economic, ideological, sociological, and scientific and the respective conceptual developments of the fields 1648 to the present
Introduction 1(20)
Part I The First Modern Metap aradigm, c.1648-c. 1750
21(62)
Chapter One The First Phase: Seminal Ideation, c. 1648-c. 1670: The Focus upon Definition and Hypothesis
23(16)
A History/Philosophy of History
25(6)
Thomas Hobbes (1588-1670) and Samuel Pufendorf (1632-1694)
25(6)
B Literature--The Modern Novel
31(3)
Anton Ulrich (1633-1714)
31(3)
C Mathematics--The Development of Logical Calculus (A Precursor of Calculus)
34(5)
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646-1717)
34(5)
Chapter Two The Second Phase: Developing a Systematic Theory for Future Inquiry and Problem-Solving c. 1670-c. 1690
39(14)
A History/Philosophy of History
40(5)
Thomas Hobbes (1588-1670)
40(3)
Samuel Pufendorf (1632-1694)
43(2)
B Literature
45(2)
Anton Ulrich (1633-1714)
45(2)
C Mathematics--The Further Development of Logical Calculus: Two Studies (1679)
47(6)
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646-1717)
47(6)
Chapter Three The Third Phase: Material Inquiry into the Verifiability of Specific Concepts, and Conflict over the Implications of the Findings c.1690-c 1720
53(12)
A History/Philosophy of History
56(5)
Anthony Ashley-Cooper, Third Earl of Shaftesbury (1671-1713)
56(5)
B Literature
61(2)
Daniel Defoe (1660-1731)
61(2)
C Mathematics--A Study in the Logical Calculus, Early 1690s
63(2)
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646-1717)
63(2)
Chapter Four The Fourth Phase: Integrating the New Four Causal Understandings with the Traditional c. 1720-c. 1750
65(18)
A Philosophy of History /Societal Development of Political Institutions
69(5)
Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Brede et de Montesquieu (1689-1755)
69(5)
B Literature
74(3)
C Biology--Environmental Determinism as the Cause of the Evolution of Plants, Animals and Homo Sapiens
77(6)
Montesquieu (1689-1755)
11(72)
Part II The Second Modern Metaparadigm, c. 1750-c. 1865
83(62)
Chapter Five The First Phase: Seminal Ideation, c. 1750-c. 1770: The Focus upon Definition and Hypothesis
85(16)
A Philosophy of History/Development of Institutions
86(3)
Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778)
86(3)
B Literature
89(6)
Gotthold Ephraim Lessing (1729-1781) and Edward Young (1683-1765)
89(6)
C Biology and Botany--Discovery of the Male-Female Participation in the Evolution of the Embryo
95(6)
Friedrich Caspar Wolff (1733-1794)
95(6)
Chapter Six The Second Phase: Developing a Systematic Structure for Guiding New Inquiry and Explanation c.1770-c.1790
101(16)
A History/Philosophy of History
103(6)
Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) andjohann Gottfried Herder (1744-1803)
104(5)
B Literature
109(4)
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749-1832)
110(3)
C Biology/Botany
113(4)
Erasmus Darwin (1731-1802)
113(4)
Chapter Seven The Third Phase: Material Inquiry into the Verifiability of Specific Concepts, and Conflict over the Implications of the Findings c.1790-c. 1820
117(1)
A Philosophy of History
11(106)
7 Immanuel Kant (1724-1804)
117(12)
B Literature
119(2)
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749-1831)
119(2)
C Biology/Botany
121(8)
Erasmus Darwin (1731-1802)
121(8)
Chapter Eight The Fourth Phase: Integrating the New Four Causal Understandings with the Traditional c. 1820-c. 1860
129(16)
A Philosophy of History/History
131(7)
Leopold von Ranke (1795-1886)
131(2)
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770-1831)
133(2)
Karl Marx (1818-1883)
135(3)
B Literature
138(3)
Honore Balzac (1799-1850)
138(3)
C Biology
141(4)
Charles Darwin (1809-1882)
141(4)
Part III The Third Modern Metaparadigm c. 1860-c. 1960
145(60)
Chapter Nine The First Phase: Seminal Ideation, c.1860-1870: The Focus upon Definition and Hypothesis
149(18)
A Philosophy of History
149(3)
Karl Marx (1818-1883)
149(3)
B Literature/Drama
152(4)
Henrik Ibsen (1828-1906)
152(4)
C Biology
156(11)
Herbert Spencer (1820-1903)
156(11)
Chapter Ten The Second Phase: Developing a Systematic Structure for Guiding New Inquiry and Explanation c. 1870-c. 1895
167(10)
A Philosophy of History
167(3)
Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900)
167(3)
B Literature/Drama
170(3)
Henrik Ibsen (1828-1906)
170(3)
C Psychology
173(4)
Franz Brentano (1838-1917)
173(4)
Chapter Eleven The Third Phase: Material Inquiry into the Verifiability of Specific Concepts, and Conflict over the Implications of the Findings c. 1890-c. 1920
177(10)
A History
177(3)
Heinrich Friedjung (1851-1920) 17
7(173)
B Literature
180(3)
Thomas Mann (1875-1955)
180(3)
C Psychology
183(4)
Sigmund Freud (1856-1939)
183(4)
Chapter Twelve The Fourth Phase: Integrating the New Four Causal Understandings with the Traditional c. 1920-c. 1960
187(18)
A History/Philosophy of History
189(3)
Sigmund Freud (1856-1939)
189(3)
B Literature/Drama
192(6)
Jean-Paul Sartre (1905-1980)
192(6)
C Micro-Sociology
198(7)
Kurt Lewin (1890-1947)
198(7)
Part IV The Fourth Modern Metaparadigm, c. 1970-c.2060
205(38)
Chapter Thirteen The First Phase: Seminal Ideation, c.1960-1980: The Focus upon Definition and Hypothesis
207(12)
A Philosophy of History
207(3)
Hoyden White (1928-2018)
207(3)
B Drama
210(4)
Judith Malina (1926-2015)
210(4)
C Group Dynamics: Advent of the Encounter Group
214(5)
Morton A. Lieberman, IrvinD. Talom (1931--Present) and Matthew B. Miles
214(5)
Chapter Fourteen The Second Phase: Developing a Systematic Structure for Guiding New Inquiry and Explanation c. 1970-1990
219(12)
A Historiography
219(6)
Hoyden White (1928-2018)
219(6)
B Drama
225(3)
Judith Malina (1926-2015)
225(3)
C Group Dynamics: The Guiding Principles of Encounter Groups
228(3)
Morton A. Lieberman, Irvin D. Talom (1931-Present) and Matthew B. Miles
228(3)
Chapter Fifteen The Third Phase: Material Inquiry into the Verifiability of Specific Concepts, and Conflict over the Implications of the Findings c.1990-c 2020
231(12)
A Philosophy of History
231(3)
Hoyden White (1928-2018)
231(3)
B Literature
234(5)
Elfriedejelinek (1946-Present)
234(1)
Eljrie.de. Jelinek, The Piano Teacher, A Novel
234(5)
C Group Dynamics--The Focus Group
239(4)
Charles E. Bosch
239(4)
Conclusion 243(4)
Bibliography 247(8)
Index 255
Mark E. Blum is a professor of European history at the University of Louisville. He has a masters degree in English history from the University of Pennsylvania, and a PhD in Austrian-German history from the University of Pennsylvania. He has published over nine books, several focusing upon the epistemology of human consciousness in its verbal as well as figural foundations.