Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

Methods of Meta-analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings 2nd Revised edition [Kõva köide]

  • Formaat: Hardback, kõrgus x laius x paksus: 254x178x32 mm, kaal: 1247 g, Illustrations
  • Ilmumisaeg: 19-Apr-2004
  • Kirjastus: SAGE Publications Inc
  • ISBN-10: 1412909120
  • ISBN-13: 9781412909129
Teised raamatud teemal:
  • Kõva köide
  • Hind: 193,12 €*
  • * saadame teile pakkumise kasutatud raamatule, mille hind võib erineda kodulehel olevast hinnast
  • See raamat on trükist otsas, kuid me saadame teile pakkumise kasutatud raamatule.
  • Kogus:
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Tasuta tarne
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • Formaat: Hardback, kõrgus x laius x paksus: 254x178x32 mm, kaal: 1247 g, Illustrations
  • Ilmumisaeg: 19-Apr-2004
  • Kirjastus: SAGE Publications Inc
  • ISBN-10: 1412909120
  • ISBN-13: 9781412909129
Teised raamatud teemal:

Meta-analysis is arguably the most important methodological innovation in the social and behavioral sciences in the last 25 years. Developed to offer researchers an informative account of which methods are most useful in integrating research findings across studies, this book will enable the reader to apply, as well as understand, meta-analytic methods. Rather than taking an encyclopedic approach, the authors have focused on carefully developing those techniques that are most applicable to social science research, and have given a general conceptual description of more complex and rarely-used techniques. Fully revised and updated, Methods of Meta-Analysis, Second Edition is the most comprehensive text on meta-analysis available today.

List of Tables
xv
List of Figures
xix
Preface to Second Edition xxiii
Preface to First Edition xxvii
Acknowledgments xxxiii
Part I: Introduction to Meta-Analysis
1(72)
Integrating Research Findings Across Studies
3(30)
General Problem and an Example
3(5)
A Typical Interpretation of the Example Data
4(3)
Conclusions of the Review
7(1)
Critique of the Sample Review
7(1)
Problems With Statistical Significance Tests
8(3)
Is Statistical Power the Solution?
11(2)
Confidence Intervals
13(2)
Meta-Analysis
15(2)
Role of Meta-Analysis in the Behavioral and Social Sciences
17(5)
The Myth of the Perfect Study
17(1)
Some Relevant History
18(4)
Role of Meta-Analysis in Theory Development
22(2)
Increasing Use of Meta-Analysis
24(1)
Meta-Analysis in Industrial-Organizational Psychology
24(2)
Wider Impact of Meta-Analysis on Psychology
26(2)
Impact of Meta-Analysis Outside Psychology
28(1)
Impact in Medicine
28(1)
Impact in Other Disciplines
29(1)
Meta-Analysis and Social Policy
29(1)
Meta-Analysis and Theories of Data
30(2)
Conclusions
32(1)
Study Artifacts and Their Impact on Study Outcomes
33(40)
Study Artifacts
34(23)
Sampling Error
34(1)
Error of Measurement
34(2)
Dichotomization
36(1)
Range Variation in the Independent Variable
37(2)
Attrition Artifacts: Range Variation on the Dependent Variable
39(2)
Imperfect Construct Validity in the Independent Variable
41(10)
Imperfect Construct Validity in the Dependent Variable
51(2)
Computational and Other Errors in the Data
53(1)
Extraneous Factors Introduced by Study Procedure
54(1)
Bias in the Sample Correlation
55(2)
Sampling Error, Statistical Power, and the Interpretation of Research Findings
57(8)
An Illustration of Statistical Power
57(2)
A More Detailed Examination of Statistical Power
59(6)
When and How to Cumulate
65(1)
Undercorrection for Artifacts in the Corrected Standard Deviation
66(2)
Coding Study Characteristics and Capitalization on Sampling Error in Moderator Analysis
68(3)
A Look Ahead in the Book
71(2)
Part II: Meta-Analysis of Correlations
73(168)
Meta-Analysis of Correlations Corrected Individually for Artifacts
75(62)
Introduction and Overview
75(6)
Bare-Bones Meta-Analysis: Correcting for Sampling Error Only
81(14)
Estimation of Sampling Error
81(2)
Correcting the Variance for Sampling Error and a Worked Example
83(7)
Moderator Variables Analyzed by Grouping the Data and a Worked Example
90(2)
Correcting Feature Correlations for Sampling Error and a Worked Example
92(3)
Artifacts Other Than Sampling Error
95(23)
Error of Measurement and Correction for Attenuation
95(8)
Restriction or Enhancement of Range
103(9)
Dichotomization of Independent and Dependent Variables
112(3)
Imperfect Construct Validity in Independent and Dependent Variables
115(2)
Attrition Artifacts
117(1)
Extraneous Factors
117(1)
Bias in the Correlation
118(1)
Multiple Simultaneous Artifacts
118(2)
Meta-Analysis of Individually Corrected Correlations
120(7)
Individual Study Computations
121(1)
Combining Across Studies
122(3)
Final Meta-Analysis Estimation
125(2)
A Worked Example: Indirect Range Restriction
127(5)
Summary of Meta-Analysis Correcting Each Correlation Individually
132(2)
Exercise 1: Bare-Bones Meta-Analysis: Correcting for Sampling Error Only
134(1)
Exercise 2: Meta-Analysis Correcting Each Correlation Individually
135(2)
Meta-Analysis of Correlations Using Artifact Distributions
137(52)
Full Artifact Distribution Meta-Analysis
138(31)
The Mean Correlation
140(2)
The Standard Deviation of Correlations
142(8)
A Worked Example: Error of Measurement
150(3)
A Worked Example: Unreliability and Direct Range Restriction
153(1)
A Worked Example: Personnel Selection With Fixed Test (Direct Range Restriction)
154(4)
Personnel Selection With Varying Tests
158(1)
Personnel Selection: Findings and Formulas in the Literature
159(7)
A Worked Example: Indirect Range Restriction (Interactive Method)
166(2)
Refinements to Increase Accuracy of the SDp Estimate
168(1)
Accuracy of Corrections for Artifacts
169(4)
Mixed Meta-Analysis: Partial Artifact Information in Individual Studies
173(7)
An Example: Dichotomization of Both Variables
175(5)
Summary of Artifact Distribution Meta-Analysis of Correlations
180(3)
Phase 1: Cumulating Artifact Information
181(1)
Phase 2a: Correcting the Mean Correlation
181(1)
Phase 2b: Correcting the Standard Deviation of Correlations
181(2)
Exercise: Artifact Distribution Meta-Analysis
183(6)
Technical Questions in Meta-Analysis of Correlations
189(52)
r Versus r2: Which Should Be Used?
189(3)
r Versus Regression Slopes and Intercepts in Meta-Analysis
192(3)
Range Restriction
192(1)
Measurement Error
192(1)
Comparability of Units Across Studies
193(1)
Comparability of Findings Across Meta-Analyses
194(1)
Intrinsic Interpretability
194(1)
Technical Factors That Cause Overestimation of SDp
195(6)
Presence of Non-Pearson rs
195(1)
Presence of Outliers and Other Data Errors
196(1)
Use of r Instead of r in the Sampling Error Formula
197(1)
Undercorrection for Sampling Error Variance in the Presence of Range Restriction
198(1)
Nonlinearity in the Range Correction
198(2)
Other Factors Causing Overestimation of SDp
200(1)
Fixed- and Random-Effects Models in Meta-Analysis
201(4)
Accuracy of Different Random-Effects Models
203(2)
Credibility Versus Confidence Intervals in Meta-Analysis
205(1)
Computing Confidence Intervals in Meta-Analysis
206(1)
Range Restriction in Meta-Analysis: New Technical Analysis
207(1)
Domains With No Range Restriction
208(5)
Random Measurement Error
209(1)
Systematic Error of Measurement
210(1)
Artificial Dichotomization
210(1)
Multiple Artifacts
211(1)
Meta-Analysis for Simple Artifacts
211(2)
Direct Range Restriction
213(11)
Range Restriction as a Single Artifact
213(2)
Correction for Direct Range Restriction
215(1)
Meta-Analysis for Range Restriction as a Single Artifact
215(1)
Two Populations in Direct Range Restriction
216(1)
Error of Measurement in the Independent Variable in Direct Range Restriction
216(3)
Error of Measurement in the Dependent Variable in Direct Range Restriction
219(2)
Error of Measurement in Both Variables: Direct Range Restriction
221(1)
Meta-Analysis in Direct Range Restriction: Previous Work
221(1)
Educational and Employment Selection
222(1)
Meta-Analysis Correcting Correlations Individually: Direct Range Restriction
223(1)
Artifact Distribution Meta-Analysis: Direct Range Restriction
224(1)
Indirect Range Restriction
224(16)
A Causal Model for Indirect Range Restriction
226(2)
Range Restriction on S
228(1)
Range Restriction on Other Variables in Indirect Range Restriction
228(1)
Estimation in Indirect Range Restriction
229(1)
The Correlation Between S and T in Indirect Range Restriction
230(1)
The Attenuation Model in Indirect Range Restriction
231(1)
Predictor Measurement Error in Indirect Range Restriction
232(1)
Meta-Analysis Correcting Each Correlation Individually: Indirect Range Restriction
233(1)
Artifact Distribution Meta-Analysis for Indirect Range Restriction
233(7)
Criticisms of Meta-Analysis Procedures for Correlations
240(1)
Part III: Meta-Analysis of Experimental Effects and Other Dichotomous Comparisons
241(150)
Treatment Effects: Experimental Artifacts and Their Impact
243(30)
Quantification of the Treatment Effect: The d Statistic and the Point Biserial Correlation
244(3)
Sampling Error in d Values: Illustrations
247(5)
Case 1: N = 30
248(2)
Case 2: N = 68
250(1)
Case 3: N = 400
251(1)
Error of Measurement in the Dependent Variable
252(4)
Error of Measurement in the Treatment Variable
256(4)
Variation Across Studies in Treatment Strength
260(1)
Range Variation on the Dependent Variable
261(1)
Dichotomization of the Dependent Variable
262(2)
Imperfect Construct Validity in the Dependent Variable
264(2)
Imperfect Construct Validity in the Treatment Variable
266(1)
Bias in the Effect Size (d Statistic)
266(2)
Recording, Computational, and Transcriptional Errors
268(1)
Multiple Artifacts and Corrections
269(4)
Meta-Analysis Methods for d Values
273(62)
Effect Size Indexes: d and r
275(7)
Maximum Value of Point Biserial r
276(1)
The Effect Size (d Statistic)
277(2)
Correction of the Point Biserial r for Unequal Sample Sizes
279(1)
Examples of the Convertibility of r and d
280(2)
Problems of Artificial Dichotomization
282(1)
An Alternative to d: Glass's d
282(1)
Sampling Error in the d Statistic
283(3)
The Standard Error for d
283(3)
The Confidence Interval for δ
286(1)
Cumulation and Correction of the Variance for Sampling Error
286(6)
Bare-Bones Meta-Analysis
287(2)
A Worked Numerical Example
289(2)
Another Example: Leadership Training by Experts
291(1)
Analysis of Moderator Variables
292(9)
Using Study Domain Subsets
293(1)
Using Study Characteristic Correlations
294(1)
A Worked Example: Training by Experts Versus Training by Managers
295(3)
Another Worked Example: Amount of Training
298(3)
The Correlational Moderator Analysis
301(1)
Correcting d-Value Statistics for Measurement Error in the Dependent Variable
301(12)
Meta-Analysis of d Values Corrected Individually and a Worked Example
305(3)
Artifact Distribution Meta-Analysis and a Worked Example
308(5)
Measurement Error in the Independent Variable in Experiments
313(2)
Other Artifacts and Their Effects
315(1)
Correcting for Multiple Artifacts
316(12)
Attenuation Effect of Multiple Artifacts and Correction for the Same
317(2)
Disattenuation and Sampling Error: The Confidence Interval
319(1)
A Formula for Meta-Analysis With Multiple Artifacts
320(8)
Summary of Meta-Analysis of d Values
328(3)
Exercise: Meta-Analysis of d Values
331(4)
Technical Questions in Meta-Analysis of d Values
335(56)
Alternative Experimental Designs
335(2)
Within-Subjects Experimental Designs
337(33)
The Potentially Perfect Power of the Pre-Post Design
338(1)
Deficiencies of the Between-Subjects Design
339(5)
Error of Measurement and the Within-Subjects Design
344(5)
The Treatment by Subjects Interaction
349(7)
Sampling Error
356(14)
Meta-Analysis and the Within-Subjects Design
370(4)
The d Statistic
370(1)
The Treatment by Subjects Interaction
371(3)
Statistical Power in the Two Designs
374(8)
Designs Matched for Number of Subjects
375(3)
Designs Matched for Number of Measurements or Scores
378(4)
Threats to Internal and External Validity
382(5)
History
383(1)
Maturation
384(1)
Testing
384(1)
Instrumentation
384(1)
Regression to the Mean
385(1)
Reactive Arrangements
386(1)
Interaction Between Testing and Treatment
387(1)
Interaction Between Selection and Treatment
387(1)
Bias in Observed d Values
387(1)
Use of Multiple Regression in Moderator Analysis of d Values
388(3)
Part IV: General Issues in Meta-Analysis
391(126)
General Technical Issues in Meta-Analysis
393(36)
Fixed-Effects Versus Random-Effects Models in Meta-Analysis
393(6)
Second-Order Sampling Error: General Principles
399(2)
Detecting Moderators Not Hypothesized a Priori
401(5)
Second-Order Meta-Analyses
406(2)
Large-N Studies and Meta-Analysis
408(3)
Second-Order Sampling Error: Technical Treatment
411(12)
The Homogeneous Case
415(2)
The Heterogeneous Case
417(1)
A Numerical Example
418(2)
The Leadership Training by Experts Example
420(1)
The Skills Training Moderator Example
421(2)
The Detection of Moderator Variables: Summary
423(1)
Hierarchical Analysis of Moderator Variables
424(3)
Exercise: Second-Order Meta-Analysis
427(2)
Cumulation of Findings Within Studies
429(16)
Fully Replicated Designs
429(1)
Conceptual Replication
430(2)
Conceptual Replication and Confirmatory Factor Analysis
432(3)
Conceptual Replication: An Alternative Approach
435(4)
Analysis of Subgroups
439(3)
Subgroups and Loss of Power
440(1)
Subgroups and Capitalization on Chance
440(1)
Subgroups and Suppression of Data
441(1)
Subgroups and the Bias of Disaggregation
441(1)
Conclusion: Use Total Group Correlations
442(1)
Summary
442(3)
Methods of Integrating Findings Across Studies and Related Software
445(22)
The Traditional Narrative Procedure
445(1)
The Traditional Voting Method
446(1)
Cumulation of p Values Across Studies
447(2)
Statistically Correct Vote-Counting Procedures
449(4)
Vote-Counting Methods Yielding Only Significance Levels
449(1)
Vote-Counting Methods Yielding Estimates of Effect Sizes
450(3)
Meta-Analysis of Research Studies
453(10)
Descriptive Meta-Analysis Methods: Glassian and Related Methods
454(4)
Meta-Analysis Methods Focusing Only on Sampling Error: Hedges's Methods, Rosenthal's Methods, and Bare-Bones Methods
458(3)
Psychometric Meta-Analysis: Correction for Multiple Artifacts
461(2)
Unresolved Problems in Meta-Analysis
463(1)
Summary of Methods of Integrating Studies
463(1)
Computer Programs for Meta-Analysis
464(3)
Locating, Evaluating, Selecting, and Coding Studies
467(26)
Conducting a Thorough Literature Search
467(1)
What to Do About Studies With Methodological Weaknesses
468(2)
Coding Studies in Meta-Analysis
470(1)
What to Include in the Meta-Analysis Report
471(2)
Information Needed in Reports of Primary Studies
473(6)
Correlational Studies
473(1)
Experimental Studies
474(1)
Studies Using Multiple Regression
475(1)
Studies Using Factor Analysis
476(1)
Studies Using Canonical Correlation
476(1)
Studies Using Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA)
477(1)
General Comments on Reporting in Primary Studies
477(2)
Appendix: Coding Sheet for Validity Studies
479(14)
Availability and Source Bias in Meta-Analysis
493(18)
Some Evidence on Publication Bias
494(1)
Effects of Methodological Quality on Mean Effect Sizes From Different Sources
495(1)
Multiple Hypotheses and Other Considerations in Availability Bias
496(2)
Methods for Detecting Availability Bias
498(5)
File Drawer Analysis Based on p Values
499(1)
File Drawer Analysis Based on Effect Size
500(1)
A Graphic Method for Detecting Availability Bias: The Funnel Plot
501(2)
Methods for Correcting for Availability Bias
503(8)
The Original Hedges-Olkin (1985) Method
504(1)
The Iyengar-Greenhouse (1988) Method
505(1)
The Begg-Mazumdar (1994) Method
505(1)
Further Work by Hedges and Associates
506(2)
The Duval-Tweedie (2000) Trim-and-Fill Method
508(1)
Summary of Methods for Correcting Availability Bias
509(2)
Summary of Psychometric Meta-Analysis
511(6)
Meta-Analysis Methods and Theories of Data
511(1)
What Is the Ultimate Purpose of Meta-Analysis?
512(1)
Psychometric Meta-Analysis: Summary Overview
513(4)
Appendix: Windows-Based Meta-Analysis Software Package 517(10)
References 527(36)
Name Index 563(6)
Subject Index 569(12)
About the Authors 581