Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

Migration Diversity and Social Cohesion: Reassessing the Dutch Policy Agenda 1st ed. 2023 [Kõva köide]

, , ,
  • Formaat: Hardback, 187 pages, kõrgus x laius: 235x155 mm, kaal: 477 g, 1 Illustrations, black and white; XIII, 187 p. 1 illus., 1 Hardback
  • Sari: Research for Policy
  • Ilmumisaeg: 17-Nov-2022
  • Kirjastus: Springer International Publishing AG
  • ISBN-10: 3031142233
  • ISBN-13: 9783031142239
Teised raamatud teemal:
  • Kõva köide
  • Hind: 48,70 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Tavahind: 57,29 €
  • Säästad 15%
  • Raamatu kohalejõudmiseks kirjastusest kulub orienteeruvalt 2-4 nädalat
  • Kogus:
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Tasuta tarne
  • Tellimisaeg 2-4 nädalat
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
Migration Diversity and Social Cohesion: Reassessing the Dutch Policy Agenda 1st ed. 2023Suurem pilt
  • Formaat: Hardback, 187 pages, kõrgus x laius: 235x155 mm, kaal: 477 g, 1 Illustrations, black and white; XIII, 187 p. 1 illus., 1 Hardback
  • Sari: Research for Policy
  • Ilmumisaeg: 17-Nov-2022
  • Kirjastus: Springer International Publishing AG
  • ISBN-10: 3031142233
  • ISBN-13: 9783031142239
Teised raamatud teemal:
Püsilink: https://www.kriso.ee/db/9783031142239.html

This Open Access book shows policymakers which initiatives work when responding to the increasing diversity in cities, towns and neighborhood's. In recent times, policymakers have grappled with ways of responding to this increase, which has resulted in a plethora of policy initiatives, some more effective than others. Bringing together a large amount of research and evidence-based policy recommendations, this book offers both a sense of strategic direction as well as more specific, actionable advice. It brings together a remarkable mixture of policy areas that touch upon issues of diversity, immigration policy, education, and labour policy. It is of benefit and importance to all those making policies for a country with increasing immigration.

1 Introduction
1(16)
1.1 Fourfold Increase in Migration Diversity
3(3)
1.1.1 Greater Ethnic Diversity
3(1)
1.1.2 Greater Diversity by Length of Stay
4(1)
1.1.3 Greater Diversity by Motivation and Status
5(1)
1.1.4 More Geographical Diversity
6(1)
1.2 Three Important Issues
6(3)
1.2.1 Better Organization of Reception and Integration
7(1)
1.2.2 A New Agenda for Conviviality
8(1)
1.2.3 Gearing Migration Policy to Social Cohesion
9(1)
1.3 The Idiom of This Publication
9(5)
1.3.1 What Do We Mean by `Immigration Society' and `Migration Society'?
10(1)
1.3.2 What Do We Mean by Migrants?
11(1)
1.3.3 What Do We Mean by Migrant Background?
12(1)
1.3.4 Why Do We Use the Term Migrant Background?
12(1)
1.3.5 Why the Second Generation?
12(1)
1.3.6 How Do We Measure Diversity by Origin?
13(1)
1.4 Outline
14(3)
2 The Netherlands as a Country of Immigration
17(26)
2.1 Increasing Immigration
18(6)
2.1.1 Postcolonial Migration
19(1)
2.1.2 Labour Migration
19(1)
2.1.3 Family Migration
20(1)
2.1.4 Postindustrial Migration
20(1)
2.1.5 Decline of `Traditional' Migrant Groups and Increase in `Smaller' Ones
21(2)
2.1.6 Immigration Is Likely to Remain High in the Future
23(1)
2.2 Increasing Ethnic Diversity
24(9)
2.2.1 Emigration
27(2)
2.2.2 A Closer Look at Net Migration
29(2)
2.2.3 Differences in Natural Population Growth
31(1)
2.2.4 Diversity by Origin Continues to Increase
32(1)
2.3 Increasing Transience
33(4)
2.3.1 Migrants Stay Shorter
33(1)
2.3.2 Durations Unknown
34(1)
2.3.3 Motives for Migration
35(1)
2.3.4 Other Characteristics
36(1)
2.4 Diversity Between Communities
37(3)
2.4.1 Considerable Diversity by Origin
37(2)
2.4.2 Limited Variation in Duration of Stay
39(1)
2.5 Conclusions: More Migration, More Diversity, More Transience
40(3)
3 Societal Challenges
43(16)
3.1 Ethnic Diversity and Social Cohesion
43(9)
3.1.1 Diversity Hampers Conviviality
43(3)
3.1.2 Social Capital
46(2)
3.1.3 Feelings of Loss
48(1)
3.1.4 Social Safety
49(3)
3.2 Transience and Social Cohesion
52(1)
3.3 Considering Local Diversity
52(5)
3.3.1 Majority-Minority Cities
53(1)
3.3.2 Metropolitan Suburbs
54(1)
3.3.3 Larger Provincial Cities
54(1)
3.3.4 Medium-Sized Towns with One Specific Migrant Group
54(1)
3.3.5 Expat Communities
55(1)
3.3.6 Horticultural Districts
55(1)
3.3.7 Border Communities
56(1)
3.3.8 Homogeneous Communities
56(1)
3.4 Conclusions
57(2)
4 Successive National Policy Models
59(20)
4.1 Changing National Models for Integration Policy
59(13)
4.1.1 Laissez-Faire
62(2)
4.1.2 Multiculturalism
64(3)
4.1.3 Disadvantage-Driven Policy
67(2)
4.1.4 Citizenization
69(3)
4.1.5 Summary
72(1)
4.2 Little Coherence Between Migration and Integration Policies
72(5)
4.2.1 Summary
76(1)
4.3 Inadequate National Models and Local Variation
77(1)
4.3.1 Summary
77(1)
4.4 Conclusion: A Reassessment of the Policy Agenda
78(1)
5 Better Local Reception and Civic Integration
79(22)
5.1 Before Arrival: Influencing the Nature and Extent of Migration
80(4)
5.1.1 Attracting Labour Migrants
81(1)
5.1.2 Matching Asylum Migrants
82(2)
5.1.3 Summary
84(1)
5.2 Arrival: One Reception for All
84(5)
5.2.1 Role of the Reception Centre
87(2)
5.2.2 Summary
89(1)
5.3 Residence: More Consideration of Temporary Stays
89(3)
5.3.1 Housing
89(2)
5.3.2 Education
91(1)
5.3.3 Summary
92(1)
5.4 Settlement: Civic Integration for All
92(4)
5.4.1 EU Labour Migrants
93(1)
5.4.2 Highly Skilled Migrants
94(1)
5.4.3 Student Migrants
94(1)
5.4.4 Bespoke Civic Integration for All
95(1)
5.4.5 Summary
96(1)
5.5 Consider Departure Too
96(3)
5.5.1 Local Departure Policy
97(2)
5.5.2 Summary
99(1)
5.6 Conclusions
99(2)
6 Strengthening Social Cohesion
101(34)
6.1 Diversity and Transience Put Social Cohesion Under Pressure
101(2)
6.1.1 Issues Around Social Cohesion
102(1)
6.2 Strengthening Neighbourhood Social Cohesion
103(11)
6.2.1 Strengthening Social Interaction: Experiences from the United Kingdom and Canada
104(2)
6.2.2 Promoting Public Familiarity in the Neighbourhood
106(2)
6.2.3 The Importance of Good Semi-public Facilities
108(3)
6.2.4 The Importance of New-Style Community Work
111(1)
6.2.5 Strengthening Local Identities
112(1)
6.2.6 Summary
113(1)
6.3 Social Cohesion at Schools and Voluntary Associations
114(9)
6.3.1 Segregation Undermines Cohesion Through Education
114(1)
6.3.2 Diversity and Belonging
115(2)
6.3.3 Diversity and Interethnic Relations in Schools
117(1)
6.3.4 Policy Significance: Scope for Cultural Familiarity and Greater Professionalism
118(2)
6.3.5 Diversity and Transience Also Put Pressure on Voluntary Associations
120(2)
6.3.6 Policy Significance: Do Not Expect Too Much of Voluntary Associations
122(1)
6.3.7 Summary
122(1)
6.4 Strengthening National Cohesion
123(9)
6.4.1 Diversity Reduces Overlapping Cleavages
123(3)
6.4.2 But Diversity Also Increases the Risk of Fragmentation
126(1)
6.4.3 Rules for Conviviality
126(2)
6.4.4 Debates About National Identity Divide Rather Than Unite
128(1)
6.4.5 Creating Unifying Stories and Institutions
129(2)
6.4.6 Summary: National Coherence Through Rules Backed by Unifying Stories
131(1)
6.5 Conclusion: Solidarity, Familiarity and Reciprocity
132(3)
6.5.1 Summary
133(2)
7 Towards Migration Policy with an Eye for Social Cohesion
135(20)
7.1 Migration Policy as a Balancing Act
135(2)
7.2 Labour Migration: Demand-Driven and Circular
137(6)
7.2.1 Complementary Workforce Required
137(1)
7.2.2 The Importance of Circularity
138(2)
7.2.3 Demand for Different Types of Labour Migrant
140(1)
7.2.4 Do Highly Skilled Migrants Make Us Any Wiser?
141(1)
7.2.5 Labour Migration and Social Cohesion
142(1)
7.2.6 Summary
142(1)
7.3 Family Migration: Respect for Private and Family Life with an Eye for Social Cohesion
143(5)
7.3.1 Family Reunification and Formation
143(1)
7.3.2 Family Migration and Social Cohesion
144(2)
7.3.3 Stricter Requirements Have Boosted Labour-Market Participation
146(1)
7.3.4 Are More Requirements Needed?
147(1)
7.3.5 Summary
148(1)
7.4 Asylum Migration: A More Active Government Approach
148(6)
7.4.1 More Invited Refugees
149(3)
7.4.2 More Consideration of Absorption Capacity
152(1)
7.4.3 Summary
153(1)
7.5 Conclusion
154(1)
8 Reassessing the Policy Agenda
155(14)
8.1 New Migration Patterns Are Not Yet Sufficiently Anchored in Policy
155(2)
8.2 Basic Principles: More Permanence, Coherence and Local Variation
157(1)
8.2.1 From Ad-Hoc to Systematic Policy
157(1)
8.2.2 Consider Conviviality as Well as Integration
157(1)
8.2.3 Room for Local Variation
158(1)
8.3 Policy Recommendations
158(7)
8.3.1 Increase Local Responsibility for Settlement
159(1)
8.3.2 Create Reception Facilities for All Migrants
160(1)
8.3.3 Provide Differentiated Civic Integration Services for All
160(1)
8.3.4 Provide Good Physical and Social Infrastructure
161(1)
8.3.5 Strengthen Intercultural Skills in Education and Other Parts of the Public Sector
162(1)
8.3.6 Enforce the Basic Rules of Conviviality
163(1)
8.3.7 Ensure that Labour Migration from Outside the EU/EFTA Zone Is Complementary and Circular
164(1)
8.3.8 Take Account of Society's Capacity to Incorporate Asylum Migrants
165(1)
8.4 Concluding Remarks
165(4)
8.4.1 A Greater Role for Local Authorities
165(1)
8.4.2 Employers Also Have Responsibilities
166(1)
8.4.3 Focus Upon Everyday Diversity
167(2)
Bibliography 169(16)
Index 185
Roel Jennissen is researcher at the Netherlands Scientific Council for Government Policy (WRR). He obtained a PhD in demography from the University of Groningen on the basis of the book Macro-Economic Determinants of International Migration in Europe (2004). Currently, his main research interests are crime, international migration and super-diversity. 





Mark Bovens is a member of the Netherlands Scientific Council for Government Policy. He is attached to the Utrecht University School of Governance (USG) as professor of public administration. Central themes in his research include public accountability, democracy, the constitutional state and citizenship in the information society, political trust, and success and failure of policy.





 





Godfried Engbersen is a member of the Netherlands Scientific Council for Government Policy. He is professor of sociology and the director of the Sociology Department at Erasmus University Rotterdam. His current research is focused on transnationalism, labour migration from Central and Eastern Europe and the relationships between international migration and criminality.





 





Meike Bokhorst is researcher at the Netherlands Scientific Council for Government Policy. She studied Philosophy, Journalism and Political Science and completed her doctoral thesis in 2014 on the legitimacy of regulations. Meike is researching the assumption made in Dutch and European legislative policy that closer proximity of normative guidelines leads to more legitimacy.