Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

Model-Free Stabilization by Extremum Seeking 1st ed. 2017 [Pehme köide]

  • Formaat: Paperback / softback, 127 pages, kõrgus x laius: 235x155 mm, kaal: 2234 g, 33 Illustrations, color; 13 Illustrations, black and white; IX, 127 p. 46 illus., 33 illus. in color., 1 Paperback / softback
  • Sari: SpringerBriefs in Control, Automation and Robotics
  • Ilmumisaeg: 30-Dec-2016
  • Kirjastus: Springer International Publishing AG
  • ISBN-10: 3319507893
  • ISBN-13: 9783319507897
  • Pehme köide
  • Hind: 62,59 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Tavahind: 73,64 €
  • Säästad 15%
  • Raamatu kohalejõudmiseks kirjastusest kulub orienteeruvalt 2-4 nädalat
  • Kogus:
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Tasuta tarne
  • Tellimisaeg 2-4 nädalat
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • Formaat: Paperback / softback, 127 pages, kõrgus x laius: 235x155 mm, kaal: 2234 g, 33 Illustrations, color; 13 Illustrations, black and white; IX, 127 p. 46 illus., 33 illus. in color., 1 Paperback / softback
  • Sari: SpringerBriefs in Control, Automation and Robotics
  • Ilmumisaeg: 30-Dec-2016
  • Kirjastus: Springer International Publishing AG
  • ISBN-10: 3319507893
  • ISBN-13: 9783319507897
With this brief, the authors present algorithms for model-free stabilization of unstable dynamic systems. An extremum-seeking algorithm assigns the role of a cost function to the dynamic system"s control Lyapunov function (clf) aiming at its minimization. The minimization of the clf drives the clf to zero and achieves asymptotic stabilization. This approach does not rely on, or require knowledge of, the system model. Instead, it employs periodic perturbation signals, along with the clf. The same effect is achieved as by using clf-based feedback laws that profit from modeling knowledge, but in a time-average sense. Rather than use integrals of the systems vector field, we employ Lie-bracket-based (i.e., derivative-based) averaging.The brief contains numerous examples and applications, including examples with unknown control directions and experiments with charged particle accelerators. It is intended for theoretical control engineers and mathematicians, and practitioners working

in various industrial areas and in robotics.

Introduction.- Weak Limit Averaging for Studying the Dynamics of Extremum-Seeking-Stabilized Systems.- Minimization of Lyapunov Functions.- Control Affine Systems.- Non-C2 Extremum Seeking.- Bounded Extremum Seeking.- Extremum Seeking for Stabilization of Systems Not Affine in Control.- General Choice of Extremum-Seeking Dithers.- Application Study: Particle Accelerator Tuning.

Arvustused

This monograph presents a novel extension and applications of extremum seeking, as a technique for the stabilization of unknown control systems, including trajectory tracking and on-line optimization. The monograph will be useful to researchers and graduate students interested in extremum-seeking control and model-free and adaptive stabilization methods. (Nicolas Hudon, Mathematical Reviews, November, 2018)

The results of the book are based on the main theoretical results represented by the weak-limit averaging theorem that can be considered as an interesting alternative to other stabilization methods. The book is worth being consulted by mathematics and control theory students and researchers. (Liviu Gora, zbMATH 1380.37004, 2018)

1 Introduction
1(12)
1.1 Motivation
1(5)
1.2 Classical ES Background
6(3)
1.3 Stabilizing by Minimization
9(4)
2 Weak Limit Averaging for Studying the Dynamics of Extremum Seeking-Stabilized Systems
13(12)
2.1 Mathematical Notation
13(1)
2.2 Convergence of Trajectories and Practical Stability
14(4)
2.3 Weak Limit Averaging
18(7)
3 Minimization of Lyapunov Functions
25(6)
3.1 Is Assumption 1 Equivalent to Stabilizability?
26(1)
3.2 Is Assumption 1 Reasonable for Systems with Unknown Models?
27(1)
3.3 Comparison with Nussbaum Type Control
28(3)
4 Control Affine Systems
31(24)
4.1 Scalar Linear Systems with Unknown Control Directions
31(1)
4.2 Vector Valued Linear Systems with Unknown Control Directions
32(12)
4.3 Linear Systems in Strict-Feedback Form
44(3)
4.4 Nonlinear MIMO Systems with Matched Uncertainties
47(4)
4.5 Trajectory Tracking
51(4)
5 Non-C2 ES
55(10)
5.1 Introduction
55(2)
5.2 Averaging for Systems Not Differentiable at a Point
57(2)
5.3 Non-C2 Control for Time-Varying Systems
59(2)
5.4 Comparison with C2 Controllers
61(4)
6 Bounded ES
65(10)
6.1 Introduction
65(1)
6.2 Immunity to Measurement Noise
66(1)
6.3 Physical Motivation
67(1)
6.4 Extremum Seeking for Unknown Map
68(1)
6.5 Nonlinear MIMO Systems with Matched Uncertainties
69(1)
6.6 2D Vehicle Control
70(3)
6.7 2D Vehicle Simulations
73(2)
6.7.1 Stationary Source Seeking
73(1)
6.7.2 Tracking by Heading Rate Control, with Disturbances
74(1)
7 Extremum Seeking for Stabilization of Systems Not Affine in Control
75(16)
7.1 The Main Result
76(3)
7.2 An Application of the Main Result
79(1)
7.3 Example of System Not Affine in Control
80(3)
7.4 Robustness of Nonlinear Approximation
83(8)
7.4.1 Dominant Odd Power Terms
85(1)
7.4.2 Dominant Even Power Terms
86(1)
7.4.3 Even Nonlinearities in Bounded System
87(1)
7.4.4 Summary of Robustness Study
88(3)
8 General Choice of ES Dithers
91(10)
8.1 The On-Average Equivalence of Various Dithers
91(6)
8.2 Application to Inverter Switching Control
97(4)
9 Application Study: Particle Accelerator Tuning
101(16)
9.1 Guidelines for Digital Implementation
102(2)
9.1.1 Cost and Constraints
102(1)
9.1.2 Choice of ω, and Δ
102(1)
9.1.3 Choice of k and α
103(1)
9.1.4 Digital Resolution
103(1)
9.1.5 Normalization of Parameters
104(1)
9.2 Automatic Particle Accelerator Tuning: 22 Quadrupole Magnets and 2 Buncher Cavities
104(5)
9.2.1 Magnet Tuning for Beam Transport
105(1)
9.2.2 Magnet and RF Buncher Cavity Tuning
106(2)
9.2.3 Adaptation to Time Varying Phase Delay and Beam Characteristics
108(1)
9.3 In-Hardware Applicaiton: RF Buncher Cavity Tuning
109(8)
9.3.1 RF Cavity Background
110(2)
9.3.2 Phase Measurement Based Resonance Controller
112(2)
9.3.3 Experimental Results
114(3)
10 Conclusions
117(2)
Series Editor Biography 119(2)
References 121
Alexander Scheinker is with the radio frequency control group at Los Alamos National Laboratory. His research is in dynamical systems and control theory with applications to uncertain, nonlinear, and time-varying systems with a focus on utilizing extremum seeking as feedback control for unknown, open-loop unstable systems. He has been working at the Los Alamos Neutron Science Center linear particle accelerator, developing new algorithms and implementing various control algorithms in hardware.

Miroslav Krsti holds the Alspach endowed chair and is the founding director of the Cymer Center for Control Systems and Dynamics at UC San Diego. He also serves as Associate Vice Chancellor for Research at UCSD. Krstic is Fellow of IEEE, IFAC, ASME, SIAM, and IET (UK), Associate Fellow of AIAA, and foreign member of the Academy of Engineering of Serbia. He has received the PECASE, NSF Career, and ONR Young Investigator awards, the Axelby and Schuck paperprizes, the Chestnut textbook prize, the ASME Nyquist Lecture Prize, and the first UCSD Research Award given to an engineer. Krstic has also been awarded the Springer Visiting Professorship at UC Berkeley, the Distinguished Visiting Fellowship of the Royal Academy of Engineering, the Invitation Fellowship of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, and the Honorary Professorships from the Northeastern University (Shenyang), Chongqing University, Donghua University, and Dalian Maritime University, China. Krstic has coauthored eleven books on adaptive, nonlinear, and stochastic control, extremum seeking, control of PDE systems including turbulent flows, and control of delay systems.