|
|
1 | (16) |
|
1.1 From Usability to Experience |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
1.2 Two Distinct Approaches in User Experience Research |
|
|
3 | (5) |
|
1.2.1 Reductionist Approaches |
|
|
4 | (2) |
|
1.2.2 Holistic Approaches |
|
|
6 | (2) |
|
1.3 Diversity in User Experience |
|
|
8 | (3) |
|
1.3.1 A Framework of Diversity in Subjective Judgments |
|
|
8 | (2) |
|
1.3.2 Four Sources of Diversity in User Experience |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
1.4 Methodological Issues in Accounting for Diversity |
|
|
11 | (4) |
|
1.4.1 Understanding Interpersonal Diversity through Personal Attribute Judgments |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
1.4.2 Understanding the Dynamics of Experience through Experience Narratives |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
|
15 | (2) |
|
2 Personal Attribute Judgments |
|
|
17 | (24) |
|
|
17 | (3) |
|
2.2 The Repertory Grid Technique |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
2.3 The Quantitative Side of Repertory Grid - Some Concerns |
|
|
21 | (4) |
|
2.3.1 Are We Really Interested in Idiosyncratic Views? |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
|
22 | (3) |
|
2.3.3 On the Measurement of Meaning |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
2.4 Analyzing Personal Attribute Judgments - An Initial Exploration |
|
|
25 | (2) |
|
|
27 | (2) |
|
|
27 | (2) |
|
|
29 | (6) |
|
2.6.1 Identifying Homogeneous User Groups in the User Segmentation Map |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
2.6.2 Classifying Attributes for Interpersonal Analysis |
|
|
29 | (2) |
|
2.6.3 Charting Perceptual Maps for Homogeneous Groups of Users |
|
|
31 | (4) |
|
|
35 | (3) |
|
|
38 | (3) |
|
3 Analyzing Personal Attribute Judgments |
|
|
41 | (16) |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
3.3 A Multi-dimensional Scaling Approach to Account for Diversity |
|
|
42 | (11) |
|
3.3.1 Identifying the Different Views |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
3.3.2 Defining Goodness-of-Fit Criteria |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
3.3.3 Two Diverse Views for One Participant |
|
|
45 | (3) |
|
3.3.4 Assessing the Similarity between Different Views |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
3.3.5 Grouping the Homogeneous Views |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
3.3.6 How Do the Diverse Views Compare to the Average View? |
|
|
50 | (3) |
|
|
53 | (3) |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
4 User Experience Over Time |
|
|
57 | (28) |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
4.2 Background on Experience and Temporality |
|
|
58 | (2) |
|
4.2.1 Temporal Aspects in Frameworks of Experience |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
4.2.2 Beauty, Goodness and Time |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
|
60 | (6) |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
|
61 | (3) |
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
4.3.4 Limitations of the Study |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
|
66 | (15) |
|
|
67 | (2) |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
|
70 | (8) |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
4.4.5 Implications for Design |
|
|
79 | (2) |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
|
82 | (3) |
|
5 iScale: Studying Long-Term Experiences through Memory |
|
|
85 | (30) |
|
|
85 | (4) |
|
5.2 Reconstructing Experiences from Memory |
|
|
89 | (5) |
|
5.2.1 The Constructive Approach |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
5.2.2 The Value-Account Approach |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
5.2.3 Graphing Affect as a Way to Support the Reconstruction of Experiences |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
|
91 | (3) |
|
5.3 Study 1: Understanding Graphing as a Tool for the Reconstruction of Experiences |
|
|
94 | (8) |
|
|
94 | (2) |
|
5.3.2 Analysis and Results |
|
|
96 | (5) |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
5.4 Study 2: Benefits and Drawbacks of the Constructive and the Value-Account Version of iScale |
|
|
102 | (8) |
|
|
102 | (3) |
|
5.4.2 Analysis and Results |
|
|
105 | (3) |
|
|
108 | (2) |
|
5.5 Conclusion and Future Work |
|
|
110 | (3) |
|
5.6 Appendix - Temporal Transformation |
|
|
113 | (2) |
|
6 A Semi-Automated Approach to the Content Analysis of Experience Narratives |
|
|
115 | (22) |
|
|
115 | (2) |
|
6.2 Automated Approaches to Semantic Classification |
|
|
117 | (3) |
|
6.2.1 The Latent-Semantic Analysis Procedure |
|
|
117 | (2) |
|
6.2.2 Limitations of Latent-Semantic Analysis in the Context of Qualitative Content Analysis |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
6.3 A Semi-automated Approach to Content Analysis |
|
|
120 | (9) |
|
6.3.1 Incorporating Existing Domain-Specific Knowledge |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
6.3.2 Iterative Open Coding |
|
|
121 | (5) |
|
6.3.3 Computing Narrative Similarity |
|
|
126 | (1) |
|
6.3.4 Hierarchical Clustering |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
6.3.5 Visualizing Insights |
|
|
127 | (2) |
|
6.4 Validation of the Proposed Approach |
|
|
129 | (5) |
|
6.4.1 Preparing the Dataset |
|
|
129 | (1) |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
6.4.3 Latent-Semantic Analysis on Restricted Terms |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
6.4.4 Traditional Latent-Semantic Analysis |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
6.4.5 Cluster Analysis on Dissimilarity Matrices |
|
|
132 | (2) |
|
|
134 | (2) |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
|
137 | (14) |
|
7.1 Contributions of This Work |
|
|
137 | (5) |
|
7.1.1 Conceptualizing Diversity in User Experience |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
7.1.2 Establishing Empirical Evidence for the Prevalence of Diversity in User Experience |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
7.1.3 Proposing Methodological Tools for the Study of Diversity |
|
|
139 | (3) |
|
7.2 Implications for the Product Creation Process |
|
|
142 | (2) |
|
7.2.1 Integrating Subjective and Behavioral Data |
|
|
142 | (2) |
|
7.2.2 The End of Specifications? |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
7.3 Avenues for Future Research |
|
|
144 | (7) |
|
7.3.1 Leveraging Insights across Different Exploratory Studies |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
7.3.2 Computational Tools for Making Survey Research Scalable |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
7.3.3 Empirical Knowledge Bases for Forming Design Goals |
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
7.3.4 A New Basis for User Insights? |
|
|
146 | (5) |
References |
|
151 | |