Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

Officer Career Management: Steps Toward Modernization in the 2018 and 2019 National Defense Authorization Acts [Pehme köide]

  • Formaat: Paperback / softback, 158 pages
  • Ilmumisaeg: 31-May-2019
  • Kirjastus: RAND
  • ISBN-10: 1977402372
  • ISBN-13: 9781977402370
  • Formaat: Paperback / softback, 158 pages
  • Ilmumisaeg: 31-May-2019
  • Kirjastus: RAND
  • ISBN-10: 1977402372
  • ISBN-13: 9781977402370
In this report, the authors summarize departmental views on the military officer career management policies examined in the two reports required by the 2018 National Defense Authorization Act and provide data to inform potential policy changes.
Preface iii
Figures
ix
Tables
xi
Summary xiii
Abbreviations xxi
Chapter One Introduction
1(4)
Background
1(1)
Methodology
2(2)
Organization of the Report
4(1)
Chapter Two Promotions
5(1)
Reporting Requirement: Evaluation of the Impact on Officer Retention of Granting Promotion Boards the Authority to Recommend Officers of Particular Merit Be Placed at the Top of the Promotion List
6(13)
Reporting Requirement: An Analysis of the Reasons and Frequency with Which Officers in the Grade of 0-3 or Above Are Passed Over for Promotion to the Next-Highest Grade, Particularly Those Officers Who Have Pursued Advanced Degrees, Broadening Assignments, and Nontraditional Career Paths
19(6)
Reporting Requirement: An Analysis of the Utility and Feasibility of Creating New Competitive Categories or an Independent Career and Promotion Path for Officers in Low-Density Military Occupational Specialties
25(4)
Reporting Requirement: An Analysis of How the Armed Forces Can Avoid an Officer Corps Disproportionately Weighted Toward Officers Serving in the Grades of Major, Lieutenant Colonel, and Colonel and Navy Grades of Lieutenant Commander, Commander, and Captain, If Statutory Officer Grade Caps Are Relaxed
29(1)
Conclusions
30(3)
Chapter Three Tenure
33(1)
Reporting Requirement: A Statistical Analysis Based on Exit Surveys and Other Data Available to the Military Departments on the Impact That Current Personnel Policies Under the Defense Officer Personnel Management Act Have on Recruiting and Retention of Qualified Regular and Reserve Officers of the Armed Forces
34(3)
Reporting Requirement: An Analysis of the Benefits and Limitations of the Current Promotion Time Lines and the "Up-or-Out" System Required by Policy and Law
37(3)
Reporting Requirement: An Analysis of the Utility and Feasibility of Encouraging Officers to Pursue Careers of Lengths That Vary from the Traditional 20-Year Military Career and the Mechanisms That Could Be Employed to Encourage Officers to Pursue These Varying Career Lengths
40(2)
Reporting Requirement: An Analysis of the Current Officer Force-Shaping Authorities and Any Changes Needed to These Authorities to Improve Recruiting, Retention, and Readiness
42(2)
Reporting Requirement: An Analysis of Any Other Matters the Secretary of Defense Considers Appropriate to Improve the Effective Recruitment and Retention of Officers
44(1)
Conclusions
45(2)
Chapter Four Talent Management
47(2)
Reporting Requirement: An Analysis of the Extent to Which Current Personnel Policies Inhibit the Professional Development of Officers
49(6)
Reporting Requirement: An Analysis of the Efficacy of Officer Talent Management Systems Currently Used by the Military Departments
55(3)
Reporting Requirement: An Analysis of How Best to Encourage and Facilitate the Recruitment and Retention of Officers with Technical Expertise
58(5)
Chapter Five Active/Reserve Permeability
63(1)
Reporting Requirement: An Analysis of the Utility and Feasibility of Allowing Officers to Transition Repeatedly and Seamlessly Between Active Duty and Reserve Active-Status Throughout the Course of Their Military Careers
63(6)
Conclusions
69(2)
Chapter Six Crosscut ting Issues
71(1)
Reporting Requirement: An Analysis of What Actions Have Been or Could Be Taken Within Current Statutory Authority to Address Officer Management Challenges
71(1)
Reporting Requirement: An Analysis of What Actions Can Be Taken by the Armed Forces to Change the Institutional Culture Regarding Commonly Held Perceptions on Appropriate Promotion Time Lines, Career Progression, and Traditional Career Paths
72(1)
Reporting Requirement: An Analysis of the Impact That Increased Flexibility in Promotion, Assignments, and Career Length Would Have on Officer Competency in Their Military Occupational Specialties
73(2)
Chapter Seven Flexibilities Introduced in the 2019 National Defense Authorization Act
75(1)
Background
75(1)
Specific Provisions
75(4)
Relationship to Reporting Requirements in the 2018 National Defense Authorization Act
79(4)
Chapter Eight Conclusions and Recommendations
83(2)
APPENDIXES
A Review and Reporting Topics
85(4)
B Selected Status of Forces Survey Results
89(10)
C Statutory and Policy Provisions by Topic
99(34)
Bibliography 133