Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

Parliaments Secret War [Pehme köide]

(University of Cambridge), (University of Oxford, UK)
  • Formaat: Paperback / softback, 272 pages, kõrgus x laius: 234x156 mm, kaal: 386 g
  • Sari: Hart Studies in Security and Justice
  • Ilmumisaeg: 25-Jun-2020
  • Kirjastus: Hart Publishing
  • ISBN-10: 1509939822
  • ISBN-13: 9781509939824
Teised raamatud teemal:
  • Pehme köide
  • Hind: 48,27 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Tavahind: 56,79 €
  • Säästad 15%
  • Raamatu kohalejõudmiseks kirjastusest kulub orienteeruvalt 2-4 nädalat
  • Kogus:
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Tasuta tarne
  • Tellimisaeg 2-4 nädalat
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • Formaat: Paperback / softback, 272 pages, kõrgus x laius: 234x156 mm, kaal: 386 g
  • Sari: Hart Studies in Security and Justice
  • Ilmumisaeg: 25-Jun-2020
  • Kirjastus: Hart Publishing
  • ISBN-10: 1509939822
  • ISBN-13: 9781509939824
Teised raamatud teemal:
The invasion of Iraq in 2003, and the Coalition Government's failure to win parliamentary approval for armed intervention in Syria in 2013, mark a period of increased scrutiny of the process by which the UK engages in armed conflict. For much of the media and civil society there now exists a constitutional convention which mandates that the Government consults Parliament before commencing hostilities. This is celebrated as representing a redistribution of power from the executive towards a more legitimate, democratic institution. This book offers a critical inquiry into Parliament's role in the war prerogative since the beginning of the twentieth century, evaluating whether the UK's decisions to engage in conflict meet the recognised standards of good governance: accountability, transparency and participation. The analysis reveals a number of persistent problems in the decision-making process, including Parliament's lack of access to relevant information, government 'legalisation' of parliamentary debates which frustrates broader discussions of political legitimacy, and the skewing of debates via the partial public disclosure of information based upon secret intelligence. The book offers solutions to these problems to reinvigorate parliamentary discourse and to address government withholding of classified information. It is essential reading for anyone interested in war powers, the relationship between international law and domestic politics, and the role of the Westminster Parliament in questions of national security.

Arvustused

The literature on parliamentary control of military action has blossomed since the predictably ill-fated war in Iraq. Parliaments Secret War represents its clear high point. It is exceptionally well researched, intellectually well rounded, and responds fully to the challenge it sets itself, showing why the war powers convention falls short and making a compelling case for reforms which might remedy some of its current failings. -- Paul F Scott, School of Law, University of Glasgow * Public Law * By any measure, this is an excellent book. It is innovative, timely, thorough, and challenges orthodoxy in a sustained, compelling, and methodical way. Bringing together research from both domestic and international legal scholarship gives the book depth and nuance. -- Leah Trueblood, St Hildas College, University of Oxford * Law Quarterly Review * The book is a timely, comprehensive, and necessary study of how Britain constitutionally decides to go to war, or, how the House of Commons is and should be involved in the decision to send British troops into harms way... The books core message that we must strive to keep in good health the political constitution, that we must continue to expose and scrutinise those hidden power structures will resonate not only with those concerned specifically with the issue of domestic accountability arrangements vis-à-vis UK war powers, and the place of the nascent War Powers Convention within these arrangements. The book will be of interest to those keen to understand how the UKs constitutional machinery continues to evolve against the backdrop of pressing issues of contemporary constitutional import, more broadly. -- Mark Bennett, School of Law and Social Justice, University of Liverpool * Legal Studies *

Muu info

This book offers a critical inquiry into Parliaments role in the war prerogative since the beginning of the twentieth century, evaluating whether the UKs decisions to engage in conflict meet the recognised standards of good governance.
Preface v
1 Parliament's Secret War
1(24)
Veronika Fikfak
Hayley J. Hooper
A The Role of the House of Commons in War Powers Decisions: An Historical View
4(5)
I The Adjournment Motion: Procedural Marginalisation and Public Deception
4(2)
II Debate and Vote on a Substantive Motion: Empowering the House of Commons
6(3)
B From Discretion to Democratisation
9(16)
I The Recognition of the War Powers Convention and the Values of Parliamentary Involvement
9(3)
a Accountability
12(1)
b Participation
13(1)
c Transparency
14(1)
II Towards Balanced Political Deliberation
15(2)
C Roadmap of the Book
17(4)
D Methodology: The Political Constitution and Evidence-Based Public Law
21(4)
2 A Legal War?
25(42)
Veronika Fikfak
A Use of Force as an International Legal Question
29(10)
I The Prominent Position of the Security Council
29(4)
II Securing International Authorisation for Action Under Article 42 of the UN Charter
33(1)
a Three Conflicts---Korea, the Gulf War, and Libya
33(1)
b Wide International Consensus as Priority
34(2)
c An `International' Military Action
36(3)
B Bringing the War Question Home
39(17)
I Playing Both Sides---the Self-Defence Argument at Home and Internationally
39(1)
a Falklands
40(1)
b Afghanistan
41(3)
c Use of Force as a Domestic Question
44(1)
I Reducing the Importance of International Institutions
44(3)
II Using Parliament to Compensate for the Lack of an International Basis
47(1)
a Iraq 2003
48(4)
b Humanitarian Interventions---Kosovo 1999 and Syria 2013
52(4)
D The Implications of Linking International Legality to Parliament's Constitutional Role on War
56(8)
I Turning a Political Discourse into a Legal Discourse
56(2)
II Law as a Trump
58(6)
E Shining a Light on the Subjugation of Politics
64(3)
3 The Convention as a Battlefield
67(38)
Veronika Fikfak
A The Role of Conventions in the UK Constitutional Sphere
72(11)
I The Flexibility of Constitutional Conventions
72(2)
II The Importance of the Cabinet Manual
74(3)
B The Timing of the Engagement
77(1)
I The Importance of Prior Engagement
77(2)
II Compromising on Timing
79(4)
A The Rally Behind the Crown Effect
83(12)
b The Narrow Application of the Convention
85(5)
c Parliament's Hollow Veto Power
90(5)
D Emergencies, Drones and Special Forces
95(5)
E Unrealised Accountability
100(5)
4 The Deployment of Secrecy
105(32)
Hayley J. Hooper
A Groupthink and Information Asymmetry
107(3)
B Complete Asymmetry: Refusing Debates and Making Secret Pre-commitments
110(5)
I Justifying Secrecy: Protecting Classified Information
110(2)
II Secret Arrangements and Pre-commitments
112(3)
C Partial Asymmetry: Selective Disclosures
115(10)
I Sharing Information on `Privy Council Terms'
116(2)
II Selective Disclosure of Intelligence in Parliamentary Debates
118(7)
D Reforming the Intelligence Machinery: An Incomplete Solution
125(9)
E Towards a New Nomenclature of Secrecy
134(3)
5 Re-arming Parliament: Fostering Politics
137(50)
Veronika Fikfak
Hayley J. Hooper
A Moving Beyond the Standard Solutions
138(8)
I Reform Proposals to Date
138(3)
II Issues Common to Both Proposals
141(1)
III Parliamentary Resolution: Specific Issues
142(1)
IV War Powers Act: Specific Issues
142(4)
B Creating Space for Politics and Equipping Parliament for Deliberation
146(28)
I The Security Council and the House of Commons: Different Institutions, Different Roles
148(4)
II The Parliamentary Role on Questions of Legality
152(1)
a Distinguishing Domestic and International Legality
152(2)
b The Uncertainty of International Law and its Implications
154(6)
III Creating a Culture of Challenge: Interventions as Wars of Choice
160(1)
a From False Certainty to Distinguishing Legality and Legitimacy
160(3)
b From False Dichotomies to Wars of Choice
163(7)
IV An Informed Parliament
170(4)
C Voting Within a Culture of Justification
174(13)
I The Competing Demands of Representation on Parliamentarians
175(4)
II Armed Conflict Votes as Votes of Conscience
179(2)
III Realising a Culture of Justification
181(6)
6 Closed Intelligence Sessions
187(44)
Hayley J. Hooper
A Chilcot's Proposal for Parliamentary Scrutiny of Intelligence Material
190(3)
B The Alternative: Closed Intelligence Sessions of the Whole House of Commons
193(8)
C Justifications for Initiating a Closed Intelligence Session
201(15)
I The Westminster Parliament During Wartime
202(6)
II The United States' Congress
208(5)
III The European Parliament
213(3)
D Controlling Abuse of Closed Intelligence Sessions
216(6)
I The Westminster Parliament During Wartime
216(3)
II United States' Congress
219(1)
III The European Parliament
220(1)
IV The Moral Limits of Secrecy in a Legislature
221(1)
E Security Considerations
222(6)
F Inclusive Secrecy, Transparency, Participation and Accountability
228(3)
Conclusion 231(8)
Veronika Fikfak
Hayley J. Hooper
Bibliography 239(8)
Index 247
Veronika Fikfak is Fellow and Lecturer in Law at Homerton College, University of Cambridge.

Hayley J Hooper is Fellow in Law at Christ Church, University of Oxford.