| Part I: Introduction |
|
|
Chapter 1 Anatomy of a patent |
|
|
3 | (28) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 | (12) |
|
1.1.1 What patents are, and are not |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
1.1.1.1 The right to exclude, not to do |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
1.1.1.2 Patents have nationality |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
1.1.1.3 Patents v. copyrights, patents v. trademarks |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
1.1.1.4 Patenting v. trade secrets |
|
|
13 | (3) |
|
1.2 Parts of a patent, and how to read one |
|
|
16 | (3) |
|
1.2.1 Specification, figures, and claims |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
1.2.2 Patent as instrument of legal rights v. patent as "prior art" |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
1.2.2.3 A useful table about specification and claims |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
1.3 The application for a patent: what kind of patent? What kind of application? |
|
|
19 | (2) |
|
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
1.3.2 Kinds of applications, and a non-application |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
1.3.2.2 Regular application |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
1.3.2.3 Statutory invention registration |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
1.4 Requirements of a utility patent |
|
|
21 | (4) |
|
1.4.1 The invention - especially as claimed |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
1.4.2 The invention, especially what is in the specification |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
1.4.2.1 Written description |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
1.5.1 A sample patent: 6,055,695, Lint Roller Assembly (Figure 1, pages 6 through 11) |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
1.5.2 Should I patent my invention or hold it as a trade secret? |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
|
|
26 | (5) |
| Part II: Inventive activities |
|
|
Chapter 2 Research records in the patent process |
|
|
31 | (18) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 | (3) |
|
2.2 Legal situations where laboratory records are reviewed |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
2.2.1 Predating prior art |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
2.2.3 Defense to a charge of patent infringement |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
2.2.4 Determination of inventorship |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
2.2.5 Nondisclosure agreement prior knowledge |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
2.2.6 Trade secret issues |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
2.3 Types of research records and their usage |
|
|
35 | (6) |
|
2.3.1 Primary notebook usage |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
2.3.1.1 Notebook assignment |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
2.3.2 Supplemental records |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
2.3.3 Alternate media references |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
2.3.4 Electronic record-keeping variations |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
|
|
41 | (3) |
|
2.4.1 Technologist-custodian interface |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
2.4.3 Storage and security |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
2.4.4 Accessing stored information |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
2.4.4.1 Evidentiary inquiry |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
2.4.4.2 Technical inquiry |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
2.5 Trade secret maintenance |
|
|
44 | (2) |
|
2.5.1 Compartmentalized information |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
|
|
47 | (2) |
|
Chapter 3 Inventor actions that can jeopardize patent rights |
|
|
49 | (12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
3.2 The concept of the "critical date" |
|
|
50 | (2) |
|
3.3 The "invention" in 102(b) |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
3.4 Sales and offers for sale |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
3.5 Sales: the special case of method patents |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
3.6 Licensing the patent or the invention |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
3.8 Negating public use: experimental use |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
3.10 Reminder: other countries' patent laws are different |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
3.10.1 Strategies for selling and using before applying for a patent |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
3.10.1.1 Watching the clock |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
3.10.1.2 The provisional application |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
3.10.1.3 Confidentiality agreements |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
3.11.1 The "on sale" bar and co-inventors |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
|
|
58 | (3) |
|
Chapter 4 The invention disclosure document: recording the essential facts of your invention |
|
|
61 | (22) |
|
|
|
|
4.1 Introduction - the necessity for complete and accurate information |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
4.2 What an invention disclosure document is...and is not |
|
|
63 | (3) |
|
4.3 Preparing an invention disclosure document |
|
|
66 | (8) |
|
4.3.1 Preparing a standard form |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
4.3.2 Background of the invention |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
4.3.2.1 What is the problem? |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
4.3.2.2 How have others solved it in the past? |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
4.3.3 Description of the invention |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
4.3.3.1 Why is your invention a better solution? |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
4.3.3.2 How is the invention made? |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
4.3.3.3 How does the invention work? |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
4.3.3.4 What is the kernel of the invention? |
|
|
72 | (2) |
|
4.4 Who is likely to use the invention? |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
4.5 Publications, sales, offers to sell, and other public disclosures |
|
|
74 | (2) |
|
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
Appendix. Exemplary invention disclosure document forms |
|
|
77 | (7) |
|
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
|
|
79 | (4) |
| Part III: Relationships |
|
|
Chapter 5 Ownership of intellectual property: employer rights to intellectual property |
|
|
83 | (16) |
|
Ernest I. Gifford and Avery N. Goldstein |
|
|
|
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
5.2 Employment agreements |
|
|
84 | (3) |
|
5.2.1 Basic employment agreement elements relating to intellectual property |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
5.2.2 Common employment agreement issues |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
5.2.2.1 Employment agreement breach |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
5.2.2.2 Posthiring obligation to assign intellectual property |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
5.3 Ownership of intellectual property |
|
|
87 | (7) |
|
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
5.3.1.1 Employment agreement scope |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
5.3.1.2 Obligation to assign absent an agreement |
|
|
87 | (4) |
|
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
5.4 Shop rights and assignments |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
5.4.1 Employer time and facilities |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
5.4.3 Functions outside traditional employment relationship |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
|
|
96 | (2) |
|
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
|
|
99 | (22) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
6.2 Why it is important to determine proper inventorship |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
6.3 Determination of inventorship |
|
|
100 | (2) |
|
6.3.1 Conception of the subject matter at issue |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
6.3.2 Recitation of the subject matter in a patent claim |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
6.4 Inventorship and ownership |
|
|
102 | (8) |
|
6.4.1 Employer-employee contract |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
6.4.2 Employed to invent doctrine |
|
|
103 | (3) |
|
6.4.3 An employer's shop rights |
|
|
106 | (4) |
|
|
|
110 | (2) |
|
|
|
112 | (3) |
|
6.6.1 Definition of joint inventorship |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
6.7 Correcting inventorship errors |
|
|
115 | (3) |
|
6.7.1 Correcting inventorship errors in a patent application |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
6.7.2 Correcting inventorship errors in an issued patent |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
6.7.3 Correcting inventorship errors in an issued patent during litigation |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
|
|
119 | (2) |
|
Chapter 7 Internet patent document searching and interactions with an information specialist |
|
|
121 | (26) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
7.2 Information available through a patent search |
|
|
123 | (6) |
|
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
7.2.2 Patent/application/publication number |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
7.2.3 Date of patent/publication |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
|
|
124 | (3) |
|
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
7.2.7 Assignee /applicant |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
7.2.8 Assignee /applicant address |
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
7.2.12 International patent class |
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
7.2.13 NationaVregional patent classification |
|
|
129 | (1) |
|
|
|
129 | (1) |
|
7.3 Overview of patent databases available over the Internet |
|
|
129 | (3) |
|
7.3.1 European Patent Office (ep.espacenet.com) |
|
|
129 | (1) |
|
7.3.2 Japan (wwwl9.ipol.jpo.go.jp/pal/cgi-bin/palinit) |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
7.3.3 United States Patent and Trademark Office (www.uspto.gov/patft/index.html) |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
7.3.4 Germany (www.depatisnet.dpma.de) |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
7.3.5 Canada (patentsl.ic.gc.ca/intro-e.html) |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
7.3.6 Russia (www.fips.ru/ensite) |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
7.3.7 World Intellectual Property Organization (http://ipol.wipo.int/) |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
7.3.8 Commercial databases |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
7.4 Performing various types of searches |
|
|
132 | (11) |
|
7.4.1 Informational searches |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
7.4.1.1 Identifier searches |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
7.4.1.2 State-of-the-art searches |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
|
|
134 | (5) |
|
|
|
139 | (1) |
|
|
|
139 | (1) |
|
7.4.2.2 Infringement search |
|
|
141 | (2) |
|
7.5 Tips on preparing search inputs |
|
|
143 | (2) |
|
|
|
143 | (2) |
|
7.5.2 Determining relevant classification |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
7.5.2.1 International patent classification |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
7.5.2.2 United States patent classification |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
|
|
145 | (2) |
|
Chapter 8 Interactions with a patent agent or attorney |
|
|
147 | (56) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
|
|
149 | (17) |
|
8.2.1 Regarding activities |
|
|
150 | (1) |
|
8.2.1.1 Activities in the laboratory |
|
|
151 | (1) |
|
8.2.1.2 Activities involving multiple inventors or collaborators |
|
|
152 | (1) |
|
8.2.1.3 Activities involving sales |
|
|
153 | (1) |
|
8.2.1.4 Activities involving public use |
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
8.2.2 Exploring invention patentability |
|
|
155 | (1) |
|
8.2.2.1 An invention may be patented even if a working prototype has not been made |
|
|
155 | (1) |
|
8.2.2.2 Avoiding 102-rejections and achieving patentability |
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
8.2.2.3 Avoiding 103-rejections and achieving patentability |
|
|
158 | (1) |
|
8.2.2.4 Infringment analysis may be conducted at the same time as patentability analysis |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
8.2.2.5 Avoiding 101-rejections and achieving patentablity |
|
|
161 | (5) |
|
8.3 Information needed to draft a patent application |
|
|
166 | (4) |
|
8.3.1 Examples where not enough information was provided |
|
|
167 | (2) |
|
8.3.2 The inventor needs to provide information on the best way (best mode) of making and using the invention |
|
|
169 | (1) |
|
8.3.3 The inventor should provide the attorney with information regarding the level of skill of one of ordinary skill in the field |
|
|
170 | (1) |
|
8.4 Reviewing a patent application draft |
|
|
170 | (3) |
|
8.4.1 Example of a patent where the specification succeeded in supporting an invention described in a claim |
|
|
171 | (1) |
|
8.4.2 Example of a patent where the specification failed to support an invention described in a claim |
|
|
171 | (1) |
|
8.4.3 Writing style in a patent application necessarily differs from the writing style in a scientific publication |
|
|
172 | (1) |
|
8.5 Commenting on Office Actions |
|
|
173 | (14) |
|
8.5.1 Prosecution history estoppel |
|
|
173 | (1) |
|
8.5.1.1 Amendment to a claim to avoid a prior art rejection |
|
|
179 | (1) |
|
8.5.1.2 Amendment to a claim made for no reason |
|
|
180 | (1) |
|
8.5.1.3 Amendment to a claim made in order to avoid a 112-rejection |
|
|
180 | (1) |
|
8.5.1.4 Repeated assertions regarding a claim |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
8.5.1.5 Details of types of prosecution history that can later prevent the application of the doctrine of equivalents |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
|
|
183 | (1) |
|
8.5.2 Use of declarations |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
8.5.2.1 Declarations to establish the earlier date of making or building the invention |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
8.5.2.2 Declarations to establish the skill level of "one of ordinary skill in the art" |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
8.5.2.3 Declarations to persuade the examiner that a prior art patent is invalid and should not be used in a prior art rejection |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
|
|
187 | (10) |
|
8.6.1 Amgen v. Hoechst and Transkaryotic Therapies (D. Mass. 2001) |
|
|
187 | (1) |
|
8.6.2 Bayer AG v. Elan (N.D. Ga 1999) and Bayer AG v. Elan (Fed. Cir. 2000) |
|
|
188 | (1) |
|
8.6.3 Eli Lilly Corp. v. Barr Laboratories (Fed. Cir. 2000) |
|
|
188 | (1) |
|
8.6.4 Hess v. Advanced Cardiovascular Systems Inc. (Fed. Cir. 1997) |
|
|
189 | (1) |
|
8.6.5 Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. Proctor & Gamble (Fed. Cir. 1992) |
|
|
189 | (1) |
|
8.6.6 In re Mahurkar patent litigation (N.D. Ill. 1993); Mahurkar v. Impra (Fed. Cir. 1995) |
|
|
190 | (1) |
|
8.6.7 Microchemical, Inc. v. Great Plains Chemical Co, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 1997) |
|
|
191 | (1) |
|
8.6.8 Monsanto Co. v. Mycogen Plant Science, Inc. (D. Del. 1999) |
|
|
192 | (2) |
|
8.6.9 In re Oetiker (Fed. Cir. 1992) |
|
|
194 | (1) |
|
8.6.10 Promega v. Novagen (D. W. Wisc. 1997) |
|
|
194 | (1) |
|
8.6.11 Refac v. Lotus (D.S.N.Y. 1995) |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
8.6.12 Schendel v. Curtis, Park, and Cosman (Fed. Cir. 1996) |
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
8.6.13 In re Strahilevitz (C.C.P.A. 1982) |
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
|
|
197 | (1) |
|
|
|
197 | (6) |
| Part IV: Ancillary patent activities |
|
|
Chapter 9 How to read a patent |
|
|
203 | (38) |
|
|
|
|
9.1 Quick tips on reading a patent |
|
|
204 | (1) |
|
9.2 What? me read a patent? |
|
|
204 | (1) |
|
9.3 Dissecting a U.S. patent |
|
|
205 | (1) |
|
|
|
206 | (3) |
|
|
|
209 | (18) |
|
|
|
209 | (7) |
|
9.5.2 Field of the invention |
|
|
216 | (1) |
|
9.5.3 Background of the invention |
|
|
216 | (1) |
|
9.5.4 Summary of the invention |
|
|
217 | (2) |
|
9.5.5 Brief description of the drawings |
|
|
219 | (1) |
|
9.5.6 Detailed description of the preferred embodiments |
|
|
219 | (2) |
|
|
|
221 | (5) |
|
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
9.6 Understanding patent claims |
|
|
227 | (6) |
|
|
|
228 | (1) |
|
9.6.2 The transitory phrase |
|
|
229 | (2) |
|
|
|
231 | (1) |
|
|
|
232 | (1) |
|
|
|
233 | (9) |
|
|
|
234 | (1) |
|
|
|
235 | (2) |
|
9.7.3 Method of use claims |
|
|
237 | (1) |
|
9.7.4 Product by process claims |
|
|
238 | (2) |
|
|
|
240 | (1) |
|
Chapter 10 Technology transfer: patent licensing and related Strategies |
|
|
241 | (28) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
242 | (1) |
|
10.2 Purpose of technology transfer |
|
|
243 | (1) |
|
10.3 Finding potential licensees |
|
|
244 | (3) |
|
10.4 Contacting potential licensees |
|
|
247 | (1) |
|
|
|
248 | (1) |
|
10.6. Confidentiality agreements |
|
|
249 | (1) |
|
|
|
250 | (2) |
|
10.8 Types of commercialization agreements |
|
|
252 | (3) |
|
|
|
255 | (3) |
|
|
|
258 | (1) |
|
|
|
259 | (2) |
|
10.12 Drafting licensing agreements |
|
|
261 | (1) |
|
|
|
262 | (4) |
|
|
|
263 | (1) |
|
|
|
264 | (1) |
|
|
|
265 | (1) |
|
|
|
266 | (3) |
| Index |
|
269 | |