Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

Performance Funding for Higher Education: What Are the Mechanisms? What Are the Impacts?: ASHE Higher Education Report, 39:2 [Pehme köide]

  • Formaat: Paperback / softback, 152 pages, kõrgus x laius x paksus: 229x150x9 mm, kaal: 245 g
  • Sari: J-B ASHE Higher Education Report Series (AEHE)
  • Ilmumisaeg: 08-Aug-2013
  • Kirjastus: Jossey-Bass Inc.,U.S.
  • ISBN-10: 1118754387
  • ISBN-13: 9781118754382
  • Pehme köide
  • Hind: 41,61 €*
  • * saadame teile pakkumise kasutatud raamatule, mille hind võib erineda kodulehel olevast hinnast
  • See raamat on trükist otsas, kuid me saadame teile pakkumise kasutatud raamatule.
  • Kogus:
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Tasuta tarne
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • Formaat: Paperback / softback, 152 pages, kõrgus x laius x paksus: 229x150x9 mm, kaal: 245 g
  • Sari: J-B ASHE Higher Education Report Series (AEHE)
  • Ilmumisaeg: 08-Aug-2013
  • Kirjastus: Jossey-Bass Inc.,U.S.
  • ISBN-10: 1118754387
  • ISBN-13: 9781118754382

After first appearing in 1979 in Tennessee, performance funding for higher education went on to be adopted by another 26 states. This monograph reviews research on a multitude of states to address these questions:
• What impacts does performance funding have on institutional practices and, ultimately, student outcomes?
• What obstacles and unintended effects do performance funding encounter?
This monograph finds considerable impacts on institutional practices, weak impacts on student outcomes, substantial obstacles, and sizable unintended impacts. Given this, the monograph closes with a discussion of the implications for future research and for public policymaking on performance funding.

This is the 2nd issue of the 39th volume of the Jossey-Bass series ASHE Higher Education Report. Each monograph is the definitive analysis of a tough higher education issue, based on thorough research of pertinent literature and institutional experiences. Topics are identified by a national survey. Noted practitioners and scholars are then commissioned to write the reports, with experts providing critical reviews of each manuscript before publication.

Executive Summary ix
Foreword xiii
Acknowledgments xv
Introduction 1(4)
Performance Funding: Nature and Forms
5(4)
Performance Funding versus Performance Budgeting and Reporting
5(1)
Performance Funding 1.0 and 2.0
6(1)
Types of Performance Indicators: Ultimate and Intermediate Student Outcomes
7(2)
Conceptual Framework and Research Methods
9(8)
Conceptualizing the Impacts of Performance Funding
9(4)
Data Search
13(1)
Data Analysis
14(1)
Limitations
15(2)
Description of State Performance Funding Programs
17(18)
Which States Have Had Performance Funding Programs?
17(2)
Florida's Two Performance Funding Programs
19(4)
Missouri's Funding for Results Program
23(1)
North Carolina's Program for Community Colleges
24(1)
Ohio's Old and New Performance Funding Programs
25(2)
Pennsylvania's PF 2.0 Program
27(1)
South Carolina's Early PF 2.0 Program
28(2)
Tennessee's Old and New Performance Funding Programs
30(2)
Washington's Two Programs: One Abandoned, One Added Later
32(3)
Policy Instruments and Their Immediate Institutional Impacts
35(10)
Changing Funding Incentives
35(2)
Increasing Awareness of State Priorities
37(2)
Increasing Awareness of Institution's Own Performance
39(1)
Increasing Status Competition among Institutions
40(1)
Building Capacity for Organizational Learning
41(4)
Intermediate Institutional Impacts
45(8)
Alterations to Academic Policies, Programs, and Practices
45(3)
Changes in Developmental Education and Tutoring
48(1)
Alterations to Student Service Policies, Programs, and Practices
49(4)
Intended Student Outcomes
53(4)
Graduation Numbers and Rates
53(3)
Retention Rates
56(1)
Remedial Education Completion Rates
56(1)
Obstacles to the Effectiveness of Performance Funding
57(14)
Inappropriate Performance Funding Measures
58(3)
Instability in Performance Funding Levels, Indicators, and Measures
61(1)
The Brief Duration of Many PF Programs
62(1)
Inadequate State Funding of Performance Funding
63(1)
Shortfalls in Regular State Funding
63(1)
Uneven Knowledge about Performance Funding Within Colleges
64(3)
Inequality of Institutional Capacity
67(1)
Institutional Resistance to and Gaming of the System
68(3)
Unintended Impacts of Performance Funding
71(8)
Costs of Compliance
71(1)
Narrowing of Institutional Missions
72(1)
Grade Inflation and Weakening of Academic Standards
73(2)
Restrictions of Student Admissions
75(1)
Diminished Faculty Voice in Academic Governance
76(3)
Summary and Conclusions
79(12)
Main Findings
79(1)
Research Implications
80(2)
Implications for Practice
82(8)
Concluding Thoughts
90(1)
Appendix
91(12)
Table A1 Data Analysis Categories: Number of Studies Where They Appear
91(5)
Table A2 Multivariate Analyses of Impacts of Performance Funding on Graduation and Retention Numbers and Rates
96(7)
Notes 103(6)
References 109(12)
References for Individual States 121(4)
Name Index 125(3)
Subject Index 128(5)
About the Authors 133