Introduction |
|
ix | |
|
PART I Public Interest and Trends for the Future |
|
|
1 | (38) |
|
1 Serving the Public Interest |
|
|
3 | (16) |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
Professional Associations, Ethical Principles, and the Public Interest |
|
|
4 | (2) |
|
Trustee of the Public Interest versus Delegate of Special or Group Interests |
|
|
6 | (2) |
|
Direct Democracy as a Reflection of Majority Will |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
Practical Exercise--Your Leadership Role |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
Defining the Public Interest |
|
|
10 | (2) |
|
Why a Policy Focus on the Public Interest Is Critical for Success |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
Practical Exercise---Public Interest or Private Interest |
|
|
14 | (5) |
|
2 Trends That Impact Local Government Policy |
|
|
19 | (20) |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
|
20 | (3) |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
Globalization, Growth, Deteriorating Infrastructure, and Federalism |
|
|
24 | (5) |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
Collapse in Public Confidence |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
|
31 | (2) |
|
Practical Exercise--Trends for the Future |
|
|
33 | (6) |
|
PART II Identifying the Community Public Interest |
|
|
39 | (22) |
|
3 Discovering the Community-wide Public Interest |
|
|
41 | (20) |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
Environmental Requirements for Success |
|
|
43 | (3) |
|
|
46 | (2) |
|
Mission for Leadership Steering Team |
|
|
48 | (2) |
|
Strategic Planning Is Not Easy or Short in Duration |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
The Public Interest Mandates Citizen Engagement |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
Deliberative Processes for Citizen Engagement |
|
|
51 | (2) |
|
The Planning Process Is Not Fixed in Stone |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
|
54 | (2) |
|
Practical Exercise---Strategic Planning |
|
|
56 | (5) |
|
PART III Tools for Policy Analysis |
|
|
61 | (52) |
|
4 Analyze Single Policy Option through Sustainability |
|
|
63 | (22) |
|
Sustainability Analysis to Address Single Policy Alternatives |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
Geneses for Sustainability |
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
Operationalizing the Three Components Plus One |
|
|
65 | (2) |
|
Administrative/Governance Capacity |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
Criteria for Evaluating Sustainable Public Policy |
|
|
68 | (2) |
|
Evaluating Administrative/Governing Capacity |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
Weighting the Criteria for Relative Importance |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
Real World Examples of Sustainability Analysis |
|
|
71 | (7) |
|
Interpreting Public Interest When All Three Components Do Not Intersect |
|
|
78 | (3) |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
Practical Exercise---Sustainability Analysis and Administrative/Governing Capacity |
|
|
81 | (4) |
|
5 Comparative Analysis to Address Multiple Alternatives |
|
|
85 | (18) |
|
Identifying the Policy Issue or Problem |
|
|
85 | (3) |
|
Practical Exercise---Identifying Policy Issue |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
Identifying Alternatives That May Address the Policy Issue |
|
|
89 | (2) |
|
Practical Exercise---Developing Alternatives and Involving Stakeholders |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
Establishing Criteria to Analyze the Alternatives |
|
|
92 | (3) |
|
Practical Exercise---Developing Criteria |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
Analyzing the Criteria with Alternatives Using the Comparative Matrix |
|
|
96 | (2) |
|
Recommendation of Alternatives |
|
|
98 | (2) |
|
Practical Exercise---Developing Your Policy Issue |
|
|
100 | (2) |
|
Practical Exercise---Developing Action Plan and Comparitve Matrix |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
6 Conclusion: Moving from Analysis to Recommendation |
|
|
103 | (10) |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
Staff Review of Policy Analysis |
|
|
104 | (1) |
|
Submission of Analysis for Legislative Action |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
|
106 | (3) |
|
Practical Exercise---Evaluating Staff Analysis and Legislative Process |
|
|
109 | (4) |
Appendix A |
|
113 | (2) |
Appendix B |
|
115 | (2) |
Appendix C |
|
117 | (2) |
Appendix D |
|
119 | (16) |
Index |
|
135 | |