Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

Policyholder's Reasonable Expectations [Pehme köide]

(University of Manchester, UK)
  • Formaat: Paperback / softback, 280 pages, kõrgus x laius: 234x156 mm, kaal: 399 g
  • Ilmumisaeg: 21-Mar-2019
  • Kirjastus: Hart Publishing
  • ISBN-10: 1509927891
  • ISBN-13: 9781509927890
Teised raamatud teemal:
  • Pehme köide
  • Hind: 48,27 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Tavahind: 56,79 €
  • Säästad 15%
  • Raamatu kohalejõudmiseks kirjastusest kulub orienteeruvalt 2-4 nädalat
  • Kogus:
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Tasuta tarne
  • Tellimisaeg 2-4 nädalat
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • Formaat: Paperback / softback, 280 pages, kõrgus x laius: 234x156 mm, kaal: 399 g
  • Ilmumisaeg: 21-Mar-2019
  • Kirjastus: Hart Publishing
  • ISBN-10: 1509927891
  • ISBN-13: 9781509927890
Teised raamatud teemal:
Over the past two decades, protecting contractual parties' reasonable expectations has incrementally gained judicial recognition in English contract law. In contrast, however, the similar 'doctrine' of 'policyholder's reasonable expectations' has been largely rejected in English insurance law. This is injurious, firstly, to both the consumer and business policyholder's reasonable expectations of coverage of particular risks, and, secondly, to consumer policyholder's reasonable expectations of bonuses in with-profits life insurance. To remedy these problems, this book argues for an incremental but definite acceptance of the conception of policyholder's reasonable expectations in English insurance law. It firstly discusses the homogeneity between insurance law and contract law, as well as the role of (reasonable) expectations and their relevance to the emerging duty of good faith in contract law. Secondly, following a review and re-characterisation of the American insurance law 'doctrine' of reasonable expectations, the book addresses the conventional English objections to the reasonable expectations approach in insurance law. In passing, it also rethinks the approach to the protection of policyholder's reasonable expectations of bonuses in with-profits life insurance through a revisit to the (in)famous case Equitable Life Assurance Society v Hyman [ 2000] UKHL 39, particularly to its relevant business and regulatory background.

Arvustused

This book provides a stimulating and critical review of a doctrine that is far from dead. -- Professor Malcolm Clarke, Professor Emeritus of Commercial Contract Law, St Johns College, University of Cambridge A thoroughly researched inquiry that is both broad in scope and nuanced in its analysis of case law and concepts. It not only re-examines and corrects much of the conventional wisdom regarding the reasonable expectations concept but also appreciates the application of the doctrine to the overall insurer-policyholder relationship as well as to coverage disputes...A fresh and interesting exploration that has both perspective and detail. The book makes insightful observations and marshals specific supporting evidence that requires rethinking of traditional views of both insurance law and contract law....Just when you thought everything had been said about the reasonable expectations doctrine, Professor Han provides new and important insights that will prove valuable to scholars addressing the topic, judges deciding cases, and lawyers representing both insurers and policyholders. -- Jeffrey W Stempel, Doris S & Theodore B Lee Professor of Law, William S Boyd School of Law This sweeping study of the policyholders reasonable expectations makes a strong case for placing greater emphasis on this notion in English insurance law. Analyzing the issue from both doctrinal and comparative law perspectives, it is a must-read for anyone in the field. -- Professor Kenneth S Abraham, David and Mary Harrison Distinguished Professor of Law, University of Virginia School of Law This book provides the most systematic and comprehensive analysis in the literature on the principle that courts should safeguard policyholders reasonable expectations of coverage. In the process, it offers a convincing argument that English insurance law should consider policyholders reasonable expectations of coverage. -- Professor Daniel Schwarcz, Julius E. Davis Professor of Law, University of Minnesota This book provides an analysis of the concept of the policyholder's reasonable expectations and an enquiry into the place this concept holds and should hold in English law on insurance contracts. In doing so the book addresses wider questions, such as the justifications for not making substantial distinctions in law between insurance contracts and contracts in general, the subsumed role of expectations in contract law, and the real significance of good faith in the performance of contracts under English law. It argues that English law's reluctance to engage with the policyholder's reasonable expectations as a contextualist interpretative principle is misplaced and unjustifiable. It is a thought-provoking, engaging and timely discussion of an issue the relevance of which is likely to increase in the aftermath of the reforms to English insurance law. -- Dr Miriam Goldby, Reader in Shipping, Insurance, and Commercial Law, Queen Mary University of London

Muu info

The first detailed monograph on the divergence of UK contract and insurance law on policyholder's reasonable expectations.
Foreword vii
Preface ix
Acknowledgements xi
Table of Cases xix
Table of Statutes xxxiii
1 Introduction 1(6)
I An Anomaly
1(2)
II Policyholder's Reasonable Expectations of Coverage and of Bonuses
3(1)
III Structure of the Book
4(3)
2 Contract Law and Insurance Law: the Homogeneity 7(24)
I 'Special Nature' of Insurance Law, or of Insurance?
7(5)
A The Sui Generis Nature of Insurance Law?
7(2)
B The Special Economic Rationale of Insurance (versus Sales)
9(2)
C One Legal Framework for Plural Types of Transactions
11(1)
II The Common Legal Framework
12(9)
A Formation of contract
12(2)
B Performance of Contract: Insurance Payment
14(6)
Aleatory and Conditional Performance by Insurers
14(1)
Insurance Payment in Contingency Insurance
14(2)
Indemnity in Insurance and in Non-insurance Contract
16(4)
C Remedies for Breach of Contract
20(1)
III The Shared Principles of Interpretation of Contracts
21(2)
IV Particular Differences-How Different?
23(7)
A Insurance Contract and Utmost Good Faith
23(2)
B Pre-contractual Duty of Disclosure
25(3)
C 'Conditions' and 'Warranties'
28(2)
V Conclusion
30(1)
3 Rediscovering Expectations in Contract Law 31(30)
I Expectations in Contract Formation and Damages
32(9)
A Expectations in the Formation of Contract
32(4)
B Expectations and the Binding Force of Contract
36(3)
C Expectations, Contract Liabilities and Expectation Damages
39(2)
II Reasonable Expectations in the Positive Law of Contract
41(3)
III Reasonable Expectations in Contract Law: Just a Slogan?
44(7)
IV Reasonable Expectations and Contract Interpretation
51(8)
A Expectations and the Contextual Approach
51(2)
B Expectations, Intention, Contract Purpose
53(13)
Intentions and Expectations in Behavioural Science
53(1)
Intentions and Expectations in Contract Law
54(4)
Contract Purpose, Intention and Expectations
58(1)
V Conclusion
59(2)
4 Relating Good Faith to Reasonable Expectations 61(37)
I The Relevance of Good Faith to Reasonable Expectations
62(4)
II Good Faith in the Common Law of Contract
66(17)
A Good Faith in English Contract Law
66(7)
B Good Faith in Contract Law of Other Common Law Jurisdictions
73(10)
Australia
73(3)
Canada and the USA
76(2)
Singapore
78(3)
New Zealand and Hong Kong
81(2)
Summary
83(1)
III Insurer's Duty of Good Faith
83(13)
A Mutuality of the Duty of Good Faith in Insurance Law
84(1)
B Insurer's Pre-contractual Good Faith: Disclosure
85(5)
Insurer's Duty to Disclose Material Circumstances
85(3)
Insurer's Duty to Remind Policyholders of Non-coverage
88(1)
Duty to Explain the Terms and Conditions?
89(1)
C Insurer's Post-contractual Good Faith: Claims Handling
90(9)
Duty to Handle Claims Promptly and Fairly
91(2)
Duty to Provide Guidance?
93(1)
Duty not to Abuse Avoidance or Termination of Contract
93(1)
Duty in Relation to Defence and Settlement
94(2)
IV Conclusion
96(2)
5 Revisiting the Doctrine of Reasonable Expectations in American Insurance Law 98(40)
I The Doctrine of Reasonable Expectations in the US: A Brief Overview
99(4)
A What is its Origin?
99(2)
B Controversies over the Doctrine of Reasonable Expectations
101(2)
II Recharacterising the Doctrine of Reasonable Expectations: From 'Doctrine' to 'Principle'
103(33)
A Keeton's 'Characterisation System'
103(4)
B Cases from 1998 to Date
107(10)
Type 0-Rejection of DRE/PREC
107(1)
Type 1.0-Ambiguity is the prerequisite for applying DRE/PREC
108(2)
Type 1.5-Ambiguity is a prerequisite (with other rationales)
110(2)
Type 2.0-Ambiguity is not a prerequisite at all
112(3)
Type 3.0-Adopted conceptually, but without clear rationale
115(2)
C Cases before 1998
117(14)
Type 0-Rejection of DRE/PREC
118(1)
Type 1.0-Ambiguity is the prerequisite for applying DRE/PREC
119(1)
Type 1.5-Ambiguity is a prerequisite (with other rationales)
120(2)
Type 2.0-Ambiguity is not a prerequisite at all
122(2)
Type 3.0-Adopted conceptually, but without clear rationale
124(5)
Type 4.0-Unclear whether DRE/PREC was accepted or rejected
129(2)
D Rethinking the Doctrine of Reasonable Expectations under Keeton's 'Characterisation System'
131(3)
E Dworkin and Abraham's Perspectives
134(2)
III Conclusion
136(2)
6 Reassessing the Objections to Policyholder's Reasonable Expectations of Coverage in English Insurance Law 138(61)
I Policyholder's Reasonable Expectations of Coverage: Where Are We?-Consumer Insurance
138(6)
II Addressing the Objections to Policyholder's Reasonable Expectations of Coverage
144(20)
A Uncertainty and Inconsistency?
144(5)
B Other Doctrines Will Do?
149(8)
Presumption in Favour of Coverage
150(2)
Contra Proferentem
152(1)
Mistake
153(1)
Insurer's Misrepresentation
154(2)
Insurer's Waiver (or Election) and Estoppel
156(1)
C No Public Policy Considerations?
157(7)
Public Policies: 'Disabling' and 'Enabling'
158(3)
Insurance and the Decline of the Welfare State
161(1)
Conceptions of Insurance
162(2)
III Business Insurance and Policyholder's Reasonable Expectations of Coverage
164(32)
A Reasonable Expectations in Relational Commercial Contracts
164(6)
B Business Insurance as Relational
170(4)
C A General Approach to Policyholder's Reasonable Expectations of Coverage in Business Insurance
174(7)
D Whose Expectations Should Prevail in Business Insurance?
181(15)
Insurer's Expectations
182(3)
PREC, Risk Pool Solvency and the Purpose of Insurance
185(11)
E The Lingering General Concern
196(1)
IV Conclusion
196(3)
7 Policyholder's Reasonable Expectations of Bonuses in With-Profits Life Insurance 199(24)
I Discovering Policyholder's Reasonable Expectations of Bonuses: Revisiting Equitable Life
201(5)
A Salient Facts and Issues
201(2)
B Policyholder's Reasonable Expectations of Bonuses in the House of Lords
203(1)
C Policyholder's Reasonable Expectations of Bonuses in the Lower Courts
204(2)
II Policyholder's Reasonable Expectations of Bonuses in the Actuarial Profession
206(6)
A The Origin of the Concept in the Actuarial Profession
206(3)
B Policyholder's Reasonable Expectations of Bonuses under the Guidance Note of the Actuarial Profession
209(2)
C Policyholder's Reasonable Expectations of Bonuses and the Insurance Technical Actuarial Standard
211(1)
III Policyholder's Reasonable Expectations of Bonuses in Insurance Regulation
212(4)
A Policyholder's Reasonable Expectations of Bonuses and the Insurance Companies Acts
212(1)
B From Policyholders' Reasonable Expectations of Bonuses to the 'Treating Customers Fairly' Principle under the 2000 Act
213(3)
IV Reflections on Equitable Life in the House of Lords
216(5)
A Contract Law Realism versus Formalism
216(1)
B The Necessity Test for Implication of the Term in Equitable Life
217(2)
C The Relevance of Background to Implication of Terms
219(2)
V Conclusion
221(2)
8 Conclusion 223(8)
Bibliography 231(8)
Index 239
Yong Qiang Han is Lecturer in Commercial Law at the University of Manchester, UK.