Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

Predicting Our Climate Future: What We Know, What We Don't Know, And What We Can't Know [Kõva köide]

4.00/5 (28 hinnangut Goodreads-ist)
(Principal Research Fellow, London School of Economics and Political Science)
  • Formaat: Hardback, 368 pages, kõrgus x laius x paksus: 240x164x21 mm, kaal: 800 g
  • Ilmumisaeg: 12-Oct-2023
  • Kirjastus: Oxford University Press
  • ISBN-10: 0198812930
  • ISBN-13: 9780198812937
Teised raamatud teemal:
  • Kõva köide
  • Hind: 23,35 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Tavahind: 31,14 €
  • Säästad 25%
  • Raamatu kohalejõudmiseks kirjastusest kulub orienteeruvalt 2-4 nädalat
  • Kogus:
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Tasuta tarne
  • Tellimisaeg 2-4 nädalat
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
Predicting Our Climate Future: What We Know, What We Don't Know, And What We Can't KnowSuurem pilt
  • Formaat: Hardback, 368 pages, kõrgus x laius x paksus: 240x164x21 mm, kaal: 800 g
  • Ilmumisaeg: 12-Oct-2023
  • Kirjastus: Oxford University Press
  • ISBN-10: 0198812930
  • ISBN-13: 9780198812937
Teised raamatud teemal:
Püsilink: https://www.kriso.ee/db/9780198812937.html
Märksõnad:
A popular audience book that argues that todays climate change science undersells what we know with huge confidence and oversells what we know with little confidence, thereby misleading both the public and important international debates and negotiations.

This book is about how climate science works and why you should absolutely trust some of its conclusions and absolutely distrust others.

Climate change raises new, foundational challenges in science. It requires us to question what we know and how we know it. The subject is important for society but the science is young and history tells us that scientists can get things wrong before they get them right. How, then, can we judge what information is reliable and what is open to question?

Stainforth goes to the heart of the climate change problem to answer this question. He describes the fundamental characteristics of climate change and shows how they undermine the application of traditional research methods, demanding new approaches to both scientific and societal questions. He argues for a rethinking of how we go about the study of climate change in the physical sciences, the social sciences, economics, and policy. The subject requires nothing less than a restructuring of academic research to enable integration of expertise across diverse disciplines and perspectives.

An effective global response to climate change relies on us agreeing about the underlying, foundational, scientific knowledge. Our universities and research institutes fail to provide the necessary clarity - they fail to separate the robust from the questionable - because they do not acknowledge the peculiar and unique challenges of climate prediction. Furthermore, the widespread availability of computer simulations often leads to research becoming divorced from understanding, something that risks undermining the relevance of research conclusions.

This book takes the reader on a journey through the maths of complexity, the physics of climate, philosophical questions regarding the origins and robustness of knowledge, and the use of natural science in the economics and policy of climate change.

Arvustused

Readable [ and] erudite ... a helpful addition to furthering our understanding about matters of probability in our age of a warming planet. * John R. Wennersten, Washington Independent Review of Books * Climate is, in some respects, highly predictable; yet, in other respects, highly unpredictable. But there is no contradiction. The resolution of this seeming paradox in Predicting Our Climate Future leads in turn to a vision for how humankind must respond to this most important problem of all time. * George Akerlof, Nobel Laureate in Economics, 2001 * A profound yet very accessible guide to climate science, highlighting the significant uncertainties without apology. This book explains clearly why doubt creates a greater and more urgent need to act now to build a better future. * Trevor Maynard, Executive Director of Systemic Risks, Cambridge Centre for Risk Studies * The immense complexity of the climate system raises deep questions about what science can usefully say about the future. David Stainforth navigates philosophical and mathematical questions that could hardly be of greater practical importance. He questions what it is reasonable to ask of climate scientists and his conclusions challenge the way in which science should be conducted in the future. * Jim Hall, Professor of Climate and Environmental Risk, University of Oxford * Is the science settled? Are climate models rubbish? Stainforth's book serves up nuanced answers to big questions in climate science, in an easy conversational style. * Cameron Hepburn, Professor of Environmental Economics, University of Oxford * A thoughtful exploration of the foundations and limitations of climate prediction that explains how its chaotic and probabilistic nature lead to deep uncertainty when assessing climate risk. * Ramalingam Saravanan, Professor of Atmospheric Sciences, Texas A&M University * Predicting Our Climate Future is an erudite and very personal reflection on climate change, the state of climate science, and their implications for the decisions society needs to take. It should be top of the reading list for scientists, practitioners and anyone who wants to truly comprehend the challenge of climate prediction. * Simon Dietz, Professor of Environmental Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science * A provocative contribution to the literature of climate change. * Kirkus * Predicting Our Climate Future is an ambitious exploration of a critical topic. It is a recommended read for climate scientists, especially those trying to model the future, for the researchers-in many disciplines-that are focused on understanding and forecasting the physical and human impacts of the coming climate changes, and for policy makers engaged in climate issues. * Steven Earle, New York Journal of Books * Intelligent, accessible, well reasoned and working very hard to get it's teeth into a complex but vitally important issue. * Irish Tech News * Fascinating...[ there is a] a refreshing honesty [ in Stainforth's writing] about the limitations we have with certain kinds of prediction. * Brian Clegg, Popular Science * Stainforth is good at explaining the complexities [ of climate modelling], leavening the highly technical bits with ... lots of relatable real-world analogies. * Geordie Torr, The Geographical * A wonderful book ... I think it's very sobering for those who are certain about everything, and it's also very clear about the reasons why, in this world of uncertainty, we should act. * Dieter Helm, The best books on Economics and the Environment, Five Books * A journey through the maths of complexity, the physics of climate, philosophical questions regarding the origins of knowledge, and the use of natural science in the economics and policy of climate change. * Michael Svoboda, Yale Climate Connections * Recommended for anyone interested in understanding nuanced aspects of climate change, whether physical, social, or economic, that play a role in the evolution of the climate system. * Choice Reviews * Stainforth uses the tools of mathematics and physics, yet his writing retains a readable style that does require a high-level understanding of these subjects. This book is recommended for anyone interested in understanding nuanced aspects of climate change, whether physical, social, or economic, that play a role in the evolution of the climate system. * Choice * There have been many books about climate change but this one is different from the rest ... anyone seriously interested in the future of human society would benefit from reading this book. It is an important one. * Peter Main, Physics Education * I would recommend Predicting our Climate Future to people who plan to work in climate modelling or would like to delve into deep questions of what we know, what we don't know, and what we can't know. * Hannah Findley, Royal Meteorological Society *


Section 1
Chapter 1: The obvious and the obscure
Chapter 2: A problem of prediction
Chapter 3: Going beyond what we've seen
Chapter 4: The one-shot bet.
Chapter 5: From chaos to pandemonium
Chapter 6: The curse of bigger and better computers
Chapter 7: Talking at cross purposes
Chapter 8: Not just of academic interest
Section 2
Challenge 1: How to balance justified arrogance with essential humility.
Chapter 9 - Stepping up to the task of prediction
Chapter 10 The Times They Are A Changin'
Chapter 11 Starting from scratch
Chapter 12 Are scientists being asked to answer impossible questions?
Challenge 2: Tying down what we mean by climate and climate change.
Chapter 13 The essence of climate
Chapter 14 A Walk in Three Dimensions
Chapter 15 A walk in three dimensions over a two dimensional sea
Challenge 3: When is a study with a climate model a study of climate change?
Chapter 16 Climate change in climate models
Challenge 4: How can we measure what climate is now and how it has changed?
Chapter 17 Measuring climate change
Challenge 5: How can we relate what happens in a model to what will happen in reality?
Chapter 18 - Can climate models be realistic?
Chapter 19 More models, better information?
Chapter 20 How bad is too bad?
Challenge 6: How can we use today's climate science well?
Chapter 21 - What we do with what we've got
Challenge 7: Getting a grip on the scale of future changes in climate?
Chapter 22 - Stuff of the Genesis myth
Chapter 23 Things ... can only get hotter
Challenge 8: How can we use the information we have, or could have, to design a future that is better than it would otherwise be?
Chapter 24 - Making it personal
Chapter 25 - Where physics and economics meet.
Challenge 9: How can we build physical and social science that is up to the task of informing society about what matters for society?
Chapter 26 - Controlling factors.
Chapter 27 - Beyond comprehension? No, just new challenges for human intellect.
After studying Physics at Oxford, David Stainforth worked on ocean modelling and then studied for a Masters on Environmental Management before working as a renewable energy consultant. He returned to academia to pursue research on computer models of the atmosphere before joining Professor Myles Allen to develop the climateprediction.net project, a public-resource, distributed-computing project which engaged hundreds of thousands of people worldwide with climate modelling. He went on to an Associate Professor position at Exeter University and then to LSE, pursuing research on the philosophy of climate science, climate economics, climate modelling and climate decision making under deep uncertainty.