Foreword |
|
xvii | |
|
Foreword |
|
xix | |
|
Preface |
|
xxi | |
Chapter 1 Tax Valuation and the Necessity for Expert Appraisals |
|
1 | (11) |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
The Need for Valuation Experts |
|
|
1 | (3) |
|
Valuation in Tax Reporting |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
Valuation in Tax Litigation |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
Valuation in Business and Familial Matters |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
Valuation Calculation Standards |
|
|
4 | (3) |
|
Fair Market Value Defined |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
Cash Value and Market Value |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
Computing Fair Market Value |
|
|
7 | (2) |
|
Step 1: Calculating Net Asset Value |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
Step 2: Applying Discounts and Premiums |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
Common Tax Appraisal Reports |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
Appraisal Reports to Support Tax Reporting Positions |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
Appraisal Reports to Support Tax Litigation |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
Proliferation of Litigation |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
|
11 | (1) |
Chapter 2 Qualified Appraisal |
|
12 | (19) |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
Defining Qualified Appraisal |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
Situations in Which a Qualified Appraisal May Be Required |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
Qualified Appraisal Requirements for Charitable Contribution Deductions Context |
|
|
14 | (15) |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
|
16 | (2) |
|
Statutory Definition of a Qualified Appraisal |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
Regulatory Definition of a Qualified Appraisal |
|
|
18 | (9) |
|
Requirement 1: The 60-Day Requirement: Treas. Reg. § 1.170A-13(c)(3)(i)(A) |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
Requirement 2: The Qualified Appraiser Requirement: Treas. Reg. § 1.170A-13(c)(3)(i)(B) |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
Requirement 3: The Substantive Requirements: Treas. Reg. § 1.170A-13(c)(3)(i)(C) |
|
|
20 | (7) |
|
Requirement 3.1: Property Description: Treas. Reg. § 1.170A-13(c)(3)(ii)(A) |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
Requirement 3.2: Tangible Property: Treas. Reg. § 1.170A-13(c)(3)(ii)(B) |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
Requirement 3.3: Date of Contribution: Treas. Reg. § 1.170A-13(c)(3)(ii)(C) |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
Requirement 3.4: Terms of Agreement: Treas. Reg. § 1.170A-13(c)(3)(ii)(D) |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
Requirement 3.5: Identifying Information of the Qualified Appraiser: Treas. Reg. § 1.170A-13(c)(3)(ii)(E) |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
Requirement 3.6: The Qualifications of the Qualified Appraiser: Treas. Reg. § 1.170A-13(c)(3)(ii)(F) |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
Requirement 3.7: Statement of Preparation for Income Tax Purposes: Treas. Reg. § 1.170A-13(c)(3)(ii)(G) |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
Requirement 3.8: Date(s) of Appraisal: Treas. Reg. § 1.170A-13(c)(3)(ii)(H) |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
Requirement 3.9: Appraised Fair Market Value: Treas. Reg. § 1.170A-13(c)(3)(ii)(I) |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
Requirements 3.10 and 3.11: Valuation and Basis Used to Determine Fair Market Value: Treas. Reg. §§ 1.170A-13(c)(3)(ii)(J) and (K) |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
Requirement 4: No Prohibited Fee Arrangement: Treas. Reg. § 1.170A-13(c)(3)(i)(D) |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
The Qualified Appraisal Requirement and Pass-Through Entities |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
Interplay of the Qualified Appraisal and Appraisal Summary Requirements |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
Litigation Concerning Qualified Appraisals |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
|
29 | (2) |
Chapter 3 Qualified Appraiser |
|
31 | (12) |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
|
32 | (3) |
|
Statutory Requirement #1: Appraisal Designation or Certain Minimum Education and Experience Requirements |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
Statutory Requirement #2: Regularly Performs Appraisals for Compensation |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
Statutory Requirement #3: Verifiable Education and Experience |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
Statutory Requirement #4: Not Prohibited from Practice by 31 U.S.C. § 330(c) |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
|
35 | (6) |
|
|
35 | (3) |
|
Regulatory Requirement #1: Declaration That Individual Is an Appraiser: Treas. Reg. § 1.170A-13(c)(5)(i)(A) |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
Regulatory Requirement #2: Declaration That the Appraiser Is Qualified to Value the Property: Treas. Reg. § 1.170A-13(c)(5)(i)(B) |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
Regulatory Requirement #3: Declaration That the Appraiser Is Not an Excluded Person: Treas. Reg. § 1.170A-13(c)(5)(i)(C) |
|
|
36 | (2) |
|
Regulatory Requirement #4: Declaration That the Appraiser Understands Consequences of Fraudulent Valuation: Treas. Reg. § 1.170A-13(c)(5)(i)(D) |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
Additional Declaration Requirements of Notice 2006-96 |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
Denial of Appraiser Status |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
Appraisals by More than One Appraiser |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
Judicial Interpretation of the Requirements |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
Sufficiency of Documentation |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
Scrutiny of Qualifications |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
|
42 | (1) |
Chapter 4 Substantial Compliance vs. Strict Compliance |
|
43 | (15) |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
Overview of the Strict and Substantial Compliance Doctrines |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
Applicability of the Substantial Compliance Doctrine |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
Judicial Approaches to the Substantial Compliance Doctrine |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
Survey of Cases Applying the Substantial Compliance Doctrine |
|
|
45 | (8) |
|
Bond v. Commissioner: The First Application of the Substantial Compliance Doctrine in the Context of the Qualified Appraisal Regulation |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
Post-Bond Decisions: Cases Finding Substantial Compliance |
|
|
47 | (2) |
|
Supplemental Information from Form 8283 |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
Sufficient Information for IRS to Evaluate Reported Contributions as Intended by Congress |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
Post-Bond Decisions: Cases Finding No Substantial Compliance |
|
|
49 | (11) |
|
Absence of Qualified Appraisal |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
|
50 | (3) |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
Judicial Approaches to the Strict Compliance Doctrine |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
The Substantial Compliance Doctrine in the Appellate Courts |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
Reasonable Cause: Codification of the Substantial Compliance Doctrine |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
|
56 | (2) |
Chapter 5 Government Expert Witnesses |
|
58 | (10) |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
The Government's Need for Expert Testimony |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
IRS Criteria for Expert Selection |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
Internal IRS Valuation Experts |
|
|
60 | (4) |
|
IRS Hiring, Training, and Evaluation of Internal Valuation Experts |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
Performance Evaluation and Management Oversight |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
IRS Use of Internal Valuation Expert Witnesses |
|
|
63 | (5) |
|
Advantages to Using an Internal Valuation Expert as an Expert Witness |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
The Inherent Bias Problem |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
Court Reactions to Government Employee Expert Witnesses |
|
|
64 | (2) |
|
Government's Decision to Not Present an Expert Witness |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
|
67 | (1) |
Chapter 6 The Practicalities of Selection and Preparation of Experts |
|
68 | (8) |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
|
68 | (6) |
|
Education, Training, Professional Experience, and Accrediting Organization Participation |
|
|
69 | (2) |
|
The American Society of Appraisers |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
The Institute of Business Appraisers |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
The National Association of Valuers and Analysts |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
Being a Good Communicator |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
Offering a Neutral, Detached Opinion of Value |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
Avoiding the Bias Perception |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
Selecting the Expert Who Prepared the Appraisal That Supports the Tax Reporting Position |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
Early and Significant Appraiser Involvement |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
Appraiser Scheduling and Availability |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
Correcting Errors in the Expert's Report |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
"Skeletons in the Closet" |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
Acquainting the Expert with the Cast of Characters and Venue |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
Attorney Comprehension of Expert Opinions |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
Expert Testimony Preparation |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
|
75 | (1) |
Chapter 7 From Daubert to Bolter |
|
76 | (23) |
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
Standard of Admissibility for Expert Witness Testimony-The Federal Rules of Evidence |
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
Daubert and Its Progeny in Courts Other than the Tax Court |
|
|
77 | (4) |
|
Boltar as the Modern Incarnation of Daubert in the Tax Court |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
Daubert Challenges Generally |
|
|
82 | (16) |
|
Illustrations of Daubert Factors in Practice |
|
|
83 | (17) |
|
Factor 1: Has the theory or technique been tested? |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
Factor 2: Has the theory or technique been subjected to peer review and publication? |
|
|
84 | (2) |
|
Factor 3: Is there a known or potential rate of error or standards for the theory or technique applied? |
|
|
86 | (2) |
|
Factor 4: Has the theory or technique gained general acceptance? |
|
|
88 | (2) |
|
Factor 5: Is the expert testifying about matters growing naturally and directly out of research conducted independent of the litigation? |
|
|
90 | (3) |
|
Factor 6: Has the expert unjustifiably extrapolated from an accepted premise to an unfounded conclusion? |
|
|
93 | (2) |
|
Factor 7: Has the expert adequately accounted for obvious alternative explanations? |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
Factor 8: Is the expert being as careful as he would be in his regular professional work? |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
Factor 9: Is the field or expertise claimed by the expert known to reach reliable results for the type of opinion the expert would give? |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
Factor 10: Has the theory or method offered by the expert been put to any non-judicial use? |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
Factor 11: Whether the expert's opinion fails to square with a judge's opinion and common sense |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
|
98 | (1) |
Chapter 8 Discovery of Expert Material |
|
99 | (21) |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
Important Limitations on Discovery |
|
|
100 | (2) |
|
The Attorney-Client Privilege |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
The IRS's Summons Authority |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
Procedures with Respect to Expert Witnesses Prepared in Connection with Litigation |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
|
103 | (16) |
|
|
104 | (9) |
|
General Provisions Regarding Discovery |
|
|
105 | (2) |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
|
108 | (2) |
|
|
110 | (2) |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
|
113 | (6) |
|
General Provisions Regarding Discovery |
|
|
113 | (4) |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
Production of Documents, Electronically Stored Information, and Other Similar Items |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
Expert Should Be Present at Opposing Expert's Deposition |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
|
119 | (1) |
Chapter 9 Expert Appraisal Reports |
|
120 | (20) |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
|
120 | (2) |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
Noncompliance with USPAP Does Not Render an Expert Report Unreliable |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
Appraisal Reports Generally |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
Contents of the Appraisal Report |
|
|
123 | (15) |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
Executive Summary or Cover Letter |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
|
124 | (12) |
|
Identifying the Retaining Party and Other Intended Users |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
|
125 | (1) |
|
Standard of Value and Source |
|
|
125 | (1) |
|
Effective Date of the Appraisal and the Date of the Report |
|
|
126 | (2) |
|
Purpose of the Appraisal and Its Intended Use |
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
Summary of the Scope of Work |
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
Summary of Information Considered |
|
|
129 | (2) |
|
Describing the Subject Property, the Type of Asset, the Interest Valued, and Geographic Data |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
Restrictions, Hypotheticals, and Limiting Conditions |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
Valuation of the Subject Property |
|
|
132 | (2) |
|
Summary of Approaches Utilized |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
Consider a Regression Analysis |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
|
136 | (2) |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
Work File as Support for an Appraisal Report |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
|
139 | (1) |
|
|
139 | (1) |
Chapter 10 Assessing the Quality of the Appraisal Report |
|
140 | (7) |
|
|
140 | (1) |
|
Required Items Under the USPAP and Revenue Ruling 59-60 |
|
|
140 | (2) |
|
Making the Report Understandable to the Audience |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
|
143 | (1) |
|
|
143 | (1) |
|
Forecasting Future Results |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
Economic and Industry Sections |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
Comply with Applicable Court Rules |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
|
146 | (1) |
Chapter 11 Concurrent Evidence: A Novel Approach to Expert Testimony |
|
147 | (23) |
|
|
147 | (1) |
|
A New Approach to Expert Testimony |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
Our Long and Deep Distrust of Partisan Experts |
|
|
148 | (3) |
|
|
151 | (1) |
|
Heating Up the Tub: The Concurrent Evidence Method |
|
|
152 | (7) |
|
|
155 | (1) |
|
Foreign Court Experiences |
|
|
155 | (2) |
|
American Experience with Concurrent Experts |
|
|
157 | (2) |
|
Suggested Four-Stage Hot Tub Approach for Tax Court Judges |
|
|
159 | (5) |
|
Stage One: Pretrial Expert Meeting and Joint Report |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
Stage Two: The Expert Oath |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
Stage Three: The Trial Hot Tub Conversation |
|
|
161 | (2) |
|
Stage Four: Cross-Examination and Rebuttal |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
Common Misperceptions of the Concurrent Witness Model |
|
|
164 | (2) |
|
Myth 1: Concurrent Testimony Replaces the Traditional Model |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
Myth 2: The Consent of Both Parties Is Needed |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
Myth 3: More Work Is Created for the Trier of Fact |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
Myth 4: Concurrent Evidence Is Received Off the Record |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
Myth 5: The Concurrent Witness Model Is an Auction |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
Myth 6: The Lawyers Lose All Control in the Courtroom |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
Myth 7: Hot Tubbing Is Prevalent in Tax Cases |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
Practical Benefits and Claimed Drawbacks |
|
|
166 | (3) |
|
|
169 | (1) |
Chapter 12 Penalties Associated with Faulty Appraisals |
|
170 | (21) |
|
|
170 | (1) |
|
The Importance and Prevalence of Penalties in Modern-Day Appraisal Practice |
|
|
170 | (1) |
|
Framework for Examination |
|
|
171 | (1) |
|
Accuracy-Related Penalties Possibly Applicable to Client-Taxpayers |
|
|
171 | (9) |
|
The Substantial Valuation Misstatement Penalty |
|
|
172 | (4) |
|
Imposition of the Penalty |
|
|
172 | (1) |
|
Substantial Valuation Misstatement Penalty Applies on a Property-by-Property Basis |
|
|
172 | (1) |
|
Dollar Limitation for Substantial Valuation Misstatements |
|
|
173 | (1) |
|
Substantial Valuation Misstatements and Pass-Through Entities |
|
|
173 | (1) |
|
Increase in Penalty Rate for Gross Valuation Misstatements |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
|
174 | (2) |
|
The Gross Valuation Misstatement Penalty |
|
|
176 | (4) |
|
Gross Valuation Misstatement Applies on a Property-by-Property Basis |
|
|
177 | (1) |
|
Dollar Limitation for Gross Valuation Misstatements |
|
|
177 | (1) |
|
Gross Valuation Misstatements and Pass-Through Entities |
|
|
177 | (1) |
|
Elimination of Reasonable Cause Exception |
|
|
178 | (1) |
|
The Applicability of the Gross Valuation Misstatements to Transactions Determined to Lack Economic Substance |
|
|
178 | (2) |
|
Estate or Gift Tax Valuation Understatements |
|
|
180 | (1) |
|
Civil Penalties Potentially Applicable to Appraisers |
|
|
180 | (9) |
|
The Section 6695A Accuracy-Related Penalty |
|
|
180 | (2) |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
Statute of Limitations and Collection of Penalty |
|
|
182 | (1) |
|
|
182 | (1) |
|
Referral for Professional Sanctions |
|
|
182 | (1) |
|
Paid Preparer Penalty-Section 6694 |
|
|
182 | (4) |
|
|
183 | (2) |
|
Appraisers as Paid Return Preparers |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
Aiding and Abetting an Understatement of Tax-The Section 6701 Penalty |
|
|
186 | (3) |
|
|
187 | (1) |
|
Coordination with Other Penalties |
|
|
188 | (1) |
|
Injunctions against Appraisers |
|
|
188 | (1) |
|
Effect of Imposition of the Section 6701 Penalty |
|
|
188 | (1) |
|
|
189 | (1) |
|
|
189 | (1) |
|
Disqualification of Appraisers under Circular 230 |
|
|
189 | (1) |
|
|
189 | (1) |
|
|
190 | (1) |
Chapter 13 Attorney Involvement |
|
191 | (14) |
|
|
191 | (1) |
|
Framework for Examination |
|
|
191 | (1) |
|
Attorney Involvement in Selecting the Appraiser |
|
|
192 | (2) |
|
An Appraiser's Ability to Withstand a Daubert Challenge |
|
|
193 | (1) |
|
The Importance of Having the Attorney Engage the Appraiser |
|
|
193 | (1) |
|
Attorney Involvement in the Appraisal Process |
|
|
194 | (4) |
|
The Fact-Gathering Process |
|
|
194 | (1) |
|
The Report Preparation Process |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
Sanctions for Improper Attorney Assistance |
|
|
197 | (1) |
|
The Tax Preparation Process |
|
|
198 | (1) |
|
Coordinating the Attorney's and the Appraiser's Involvement in Negotiations with Tax Authorities |
|
|
198 | (1) |
|
Attorney Involvement in Litigation Where Expert Reports Will Be Submitted |
|
|
199 | (1) |
|
Discovery and the Expert Appraiser |
|
|
200 | (1) |
|
Submitting the Expert Appraisal Report to the Court |
|
|
200 | (3) |
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
|
202 | (1) |
|
Qualifying the Appraiser as an Expert and Satisfying Daubert |
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
Cross-Examination and Rehabilitation |
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
Rehabilitating the Expert Witness |
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
|
204 | (1) |
Chapter 14 Common Errors with Appraisal Reports and How to Avoid Them |
|
205 | (14) |
|
|
205 | (1) |
|
Common Defects with Appraisals |
|
|
205 | (13) |
|
Defect 1: Untimely Appraisal Report |
|
|
206 | (1) |
|
|
206 | (1) |
|
|
206 | (1) |
|
Defect 2: Inadequate Description of Property |
|
|
207 | (1) |
|
|
207 | (1) |
|
|
207 | (1) |
|
Defect 3: Failing to Analyze Agreements and Restrictions with Respect to the Property |
|
|
208 | (1) |
|
|
208 | (1) |
|
|
208 | (1) |
|
Defect 4: Qualifications Not Disclosed |
|
|
209 | (1) |
|
|
209 | (1) |
|
|
209 | (1) |
|
Defect 5: No Statement That Appraisal Was Prepared for Federal Tax Purposes |
|
|
210 | (1) |
|
|
210 | (1) |
|
|
210 | (1) |
|
Defect 6: Wrong Measure of Value |
|
|
210 | (3) |
|
|
210 | (2) |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
Defect 7: Lack of Reconciliation |
|
|
213 | (2) |
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
|
214 | (1) |
|
Defect 8: Consideration of Subsequent Events |
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
|
216 | (1) |
|
Defect 9: Tax-Affecting S Corporations |
|
|
216 | (1) |
|
Requirement and Opportunity for Error |
|
|
216 | (1) |
|
|
217 | (1) |
|
Potential Defect 10: Failure to Include a Regression Analysis |
|
|
217 | (1) |
|
|
218 | (1) |
Table of Cases |
|
219 | (4) |
About the Authors |
|
223 | (2) |
Index |
|
225 | |