This book addresses the tendency to mischaracterise liberalism as a “neoliberal” reform project, arguing that liberal political philosophy is concerned only to sustain the conditions that make individual freedom possible. This is illustrated with reference to the design of pensions. Considered in terms of liberal justice, retirement systems require redistributive transfers to help the poor, measures to ensure that retirees are rewarded on their merits, and provisions that treat everyone with equal dignity and respect. Rather than presenting liberal pensions as a close analogue to neoliberalism, this volume highlights their egalitarian virtues. This book will appeal to scholars of retirement and pensions, social policy, economics and political philosophy.
|
1 Liberty, Equality, or Fraternity? A "Liberal" Approach to the Design of Pensions? |
|
|
1 | (26) |
|
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
Political Philosophy and Pensions |
|
|
3 | (2) |
|
The Normative Biases of Social Policy Analysis |
|
|
5 | (6) |
|
Bias in Favour of Social Solidarity |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
Hostility Towards the Market |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
Mischaracterisation of Liberalism |
|
|
8 | (3) |
|
A Liberal Approach to Pension Design? |
|
|
11 | (7) |
|
Justifying the Foundational Importance of Liberty |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
|
|
15 | (3) |
|
|
|
18 | (4) |
|
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
|
|
23 | (4) |
|
2 Need and Just Pension Design |
|
|
27 | (30) |
|
|
|
27 | (2) |
|
Appropriate Normative Foundations |
|
|
29 | (10) |
|
|
|
30 | (4) |
|
|
|
34 | (5) |
|
Appropriate Pension Design |
|
|
39 | (12) |
|
A Selective Welfare State? |
|
|
39 | (2) |
|
A Universal Welfare State? |
|
|
41 | (4) |
|
Evaluating Alternative Designs for the Retirement Income Safety-Net |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
Designing a Just Universal Citizen's Pension |
|
|
46 | (5) |
|
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
|
|
53 | (4) |
|
3 Desert and Just Pension Design |
|
|
57 | (28) |
|
|
|
57 | (2) |
|
Appropriate Normative Foundations |
|
|
59 | (9) |
|
|
|
60 | (4) |
|
|
|
64 | (4) |
|
Appropriate Pension Design |
|
|
68 | (11) |
|
|
|
70 | (5) |
|
|
|
75 | (2) |
|
|
|
77 | (2) |
|
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
|
|
80 | (2) |
|
|
|
82 | (3) |
|
4 Citizenship and Just Pension Design |
|
|
85 | (26) |
|
|
|
85 | (2) |
|
Appropriate Normative Foundations |
|
|
87 | (10) |
|
|
|
88 | (5) |
|
|
|
93 | (4) |
|
Appropriate Pension Scheme Design |
|
|
97 | (8) |
|
|
|
98 | (3) |
|
|
|
101 | (3) |
|
|
|
104 | (1) |
|
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
|
|
107 | (4) |
|
|
|
111 | (16) |
|
|
|
111 | (2) |
|
Mischaracterising Liberalism |
|
|
113 | (4) |
|
Reinforcing Individualism |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
Disparaging the Least-Advantaged |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
Diverting Attention Away from "Social" Injustice |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
Imposing a Narrow Conception of Human Nature |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
The Paternalist Alternative |
|
|
117 | (6) |
|
|
|
119 | (2) |
|
|
|
121 | (2) |
|
Unacceptable Paternalism? |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
|
|
124 | (3) |
| Index |
|
127 | |
Mark Hyde is a Reader in Work and Pensions at the University of Plymouth, UK. His most recent work on the privatisation of pensions has included several books and monographs: The Marketization of Social Security (2001), The Privatization of Mandatory Retirement Income Protection (2006), The Intergenerational Covenant (2010), Classical Liberalism and Conservatism (2014) and, most recently, Rent-Seeking in Private Pensions: Concentration, Pricing and Performance (2016). Rory Shand is a Senior Lecturer in Public Services at Manchester Metropolitan University, UK. His research has generated publications in several fields including the nature and scope of enterprise in a public services setting, the political philosophy of the public good, and disability as a form of social stratification. His most recent books include The Governance of Sustainable Rural Renewal (2016) and Sport, Community Regeneration, Governance and Development (2017).
