Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

Revolution and Evolution in Private Law [Kõva köide]

Edited by (University of Melbourne, Australia), Edited by (University of Cambridge, UK), Edited by (University of Cambridge)
  • Formaat: Hardback, 376 pages, kõrgus x laius: 244x169 mm, kaal: 794 g
  • Ilmumisaeg: 11-Jan-2018
  • Kirjastus: Hart Publishing
  • ISBN-10: 1509913246
  • ISBN-13: 9781509913244
  • Kõva köide
  • Hind: 151,72 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Tavahind: 178,50 €
  • Säästad 15%
  • Raamatu kohalejõudmiseks kirjastusest kulub orienteeruvalt 3-4 nädalat
  • Kogus:
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Tasuta tarne
  • Tellimisaeg 2-4 nädalat
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • Formaat: Hardback, 376 pages, kõrgus x laius: 244x169 mm, kaal: 794 g
  • Ilmumisaeg: 11-Jan-2018
  • Kirjastus: Hart Publishing
  • ISBN-10: 1509913246
  • ISBN-13: 9781509913244
The development of private law across the common law world is typically portrayed as a series of incremental steps, each one delivered as a result of judges dealing with marginally different factual circumstances presented to them for determination. This is said to be the common law method. According to this process, change might be assumed to be gradual, almost imperceptible. If this were true, however, then even Darwinian-style evolution which is subject to major change-inducing pressures, such as the death of the dinosaurs would seem unlikely in the law, and radical and revolutionary paradigms shifts perhaps impossible. And yet the history of the common law is to the contrary. The legal landscape is littered with quite remarkable revolutionary and evolutionary changes in the shape of the common law.

The essays in this volume explore some of the highlights in this fascinating revolutionary and evolutionary development of private law. The contributors expose the nature of the changes undergone and their significance for the future direction of travel. They identify the circumstances and the contexts which might have provided an impetus for these significant changes.

The essays range across all areas of private law, including contract, tort, unjust enrichment and property. No area has been immune from development. That fact itself is unsurprising, but an extended examination of the particular circumstances and contexts which delivered some of private laws most important developments has its own special significance for what it might indicate about the shape, and the shaping, of private law regimes in the future.

Arvustused

Taking the individual contributions, all are interesting, and many are novel or challenging. -- Daniel J Carr, University of Edinburgh * Edinburgh Law Review *

Muu info

A volume of essays exploring revolution and evolution in private law, including world-leading editors and contributors, following on the from the successful Obligations VIII conference at Downing College, Cambridge.
Preface v
Table of Cases
xiii
Table of Legislation
xxv
Notes on Contributors xxix
FOUNDATIONS
1 Revolution and Evolution in Private Law
3(8)
Sarah Worthington
2 Revolutions in Private Law?
11(20)
David Ibbetson
I Introduction
11(2)
II The Law of Tort
13(6)
III Contract
19(5)
IV Unjust Enrichment
24(5)
V Concluding Thoughts
29(2)
3 Private Law's Revolutionaries: Authors, Codifiers and Merchants?
31(20)
Hector L MacQueen
I Introduction
31(1)
II Berman's Law and Revolutions
32(3)
III Roman Law in the Western Legal Tradition
35(6)
IV Civil Codes and Revolutions
41(2)
V Revolutions in the Law of Obligations: Scotland and Stair
43(4)
VI Mercantile Contracts
47(4)
4 Paradigms Lost or Paradigms Regained? Legal Revolutions and the Path of the Law
51(24)
TT Arvind
I Introduction: The Revolutionary Turn in Private Law
51(4)
II The Limits of Legal Revolutions
55(4)
A (Mis)interpreting the Past: A Revolutionary Problem
55(3)
B Normative Choices and Legal Change
58(1)
III Scientific Revolutions and Legal Revolutions
59(3)
A A Matter of Light
59(1)
B A Legal Parallel?
60(2)
IV Paradigms, Theories and Black-Letter Law
62(9)
A Revolutions and Paradigms
62(3)
B Theoretical Revolutions and Black-Letter Law
65(6)
V Conclusion: The Failure of Legal Revolutions
71(4)
DOCTRINES
5 Risk Revolutions in Private Law
75(24)
Jenny Steele
I Introduction
75(2)
II Risk Revolutions and Private Law
77(5)
A Security and Responsibility
77(1)
B Risk Revolutions: A Brief Overview
77(2)
C Risk in Private Law
79(2)
D Risk and Regulatory Change
81(1)
III A Recognised `Security' Revolution
82(5)
A Security Revolution and the Context of Private Law
85(1)
B After Effects
86(1)
IV Backwards or Forwards with a New Risk Revolution
87(5)
V Tort, Security, Responsibility and Risk
92(4)
VI Conclusions: Revolution upon Revolution?
96(3)
6 The Unacknowledged Revolution in Liability for Negligence
99(22)
Steve Hedley
I Introduction
99(1)
II Asocial Theories
100(2)
III Bringing in the Modern World
102(1)
IV Modern Irrelevance of Asocial Theories?
103(3)
V Abolishing Tort?
106(1)
VI Tort from the Government's Point of View
107(6)
VII Modern Theories about Tort
113(4)
A Tort as Compensation or Insurance
113(1)
B Abolition
114(1)
C Symbolic Theories
115(2)
VIII Symbolic Action: Current Debates
117(2)
IX Bureaucratic Action: Prospects for the Future
119(1)
X Conclusion
120(1)
7 A Revolution in Vicarious Liability: Lister, the Catholic Child Welfare Society Case and Beyond
121(20)
Paula Giliker
I Introduction
121(2)
II Tracing the Need for Change: Sexual Abuse and Vicarious Liability
123(4)
III The Lister Revolution: Replacing `Unauthorised Mode' with the `Close Connection' Test
127(4)
IV Lister Revisited: A Modern Theory of Vicarious Liability
131(3)
V Back to the Supreme Court: Cox, Mohamud and the Two-Stage Test
134(4)
VI Conclusion
138(3)
8 Revolutions in Contractual Interpretation: A Historical Perspective
141(20)
Joanna McCunn
I Introduction
141(1)
II Some Background
142(3)
III Contractual Interpretation in the Sixteenth Century
145(9)
A Throckmerton v Tracy
145(2)
B The Identification of Intentions
147(1)
C Intentions and Reason
148(2)
D Conceptions of Contractual Intention
150(2)
E Interpretation and Equity
152(2)
IV Two Approaches to Interpretation
154(3)
V The Seventeenth Century and Beyond
157(2)
VI Conclusion
159(2)
9 Revolutions and Counterrevolutions in Equitable Estoppel
161(16)
Andrew Robertson
I Introduction
161(2)
II Early Expansionism: Making Representations Good
163(3)
III The Nineteenth-Century Contraction
166(3)
IV Re-expansion: Proprietary and Promissory Estoppel
169(3)
A Proprietary Estoppel
169(2)
B Promissory Estoppel
171(1)
V Contemporary Contractionary Turns
172(3)
VI Conclusion
175(2)
10 Reflections on the Restitution Revolution
177(1)
1 England and Wales
177(16)
Amy Goymour
I Introduction
177(1)
II The First Edition of Goff and Jones
178(3)
A The Pre-existing Legal Landscape
178(1)
B Ambitions of the First Edition
179(1)
C Contemporary Critical Reception
180(1)
III The Development of the Subject Since 1966
181(6)
A Evolution
182(1)
(i) Tracking Evolution via Statistics
182(1)
(ii) Tracking Evolution via Substantive Developments
183(1)
B Attempts at Revolution
184(3)
IV The Place of Goff and Jones in the Subject's Intellectual Evolution
187(3)
A `But for' the Publication of Goff and Jones in 1966
187(1)
B Viewing the Precise Contribution of Goff and Jones, with the Benefit of Hindsight
188(1)
(i) Stages in the Subject's Intellectual Evolution
188(1)
(ii) The Place of Goff and Jones in the Evolutionary Process
189(1)
(iii) Evaluating this Mode of Intellectual Evolution
189(1)
V The Future (R)evolution of the Subject
190(3)
A Some Micro-level Concerns
190(1)
B Some Macro-level Concerns
191(1)
C Goff and Jones at 100?
192(1)
2 Australia
193(9)
Elise Bant
I A Potted History of Unjust Enrichment in Australia pre-AFSL v Hills Industries
193(1)
II AFSL v Hills Industries
194(2)
III The Future of Unjust Enrichment and Restitution Law in Australia
196(5)
A Evolution and Refinement of the Fourfold Inquiry
196(1)
B Unjust Enrichment and Restitution
197(2)
C Equity and Unjust Enrichment
199(2)
IV Conclusion
201(1)
3 Canada
202(8)
Mitchell McInnes
I Introduction
202(1)
II History
202(2)
III A False Start
204(1)
IV A New Direction
205(1)
V Positive Developments
205(2)
VI A Very Bad Idea
207(3)
VII Conclusion
210(1)
4 South Africa
210(9)
Helen Scott
I The Idea of Unjustified Enrichment
210(3)
II The Rationalisation of Unjustified Enrichment
213(3)
III Farewell to Unjustified Enrichment?
216(3)
5 A Judicial Perspective
219(8)
Sir Terence Etherton
11 Revolutions in Personal Property: Redrawing the Common Law's Conceptual Map
227(24)
Sarah Worthington
I Introduction
227(2)
II What Has English Law Done with the Numerus Clausus Principle?
229(1)
III Which `Things' Count as Property?
230(5)
IV Which `Types of Interests' Count as Property?
235(8)
V Consequences
243(4)
VI Conclusion
247(4)
GENERAL ISSUES
12 Modern Equity: Revolution or Renewal from Within?
251(22)
Pauline Ridge
I Introduction
251(1)
II A Revolutionary Narrative of Modern Equity
252(1)
III A Counter Narrative of Modern Equity
253(1)
IV The Integration of Common Law and Equity
254(10)
A The Revolutionary Narrative: Undue Influence
254(3)
B The Counter Narrative: The Claim for Money Had and Received
257(1)
C Ancillary Liabilities for Receipt of Trust Property
258(1)
(i) Background: The Knowing Receipt and Persisting Property Claims
258(1)
(ii) The Revolutionary Narrative and Knowing Receipt
259(1)
(iii) The Counter Narrative: The Heperu Claim
259(1)
(iv) The Revolutionary Narrative: Great Investments Ltd v Warner
260(3)
(v) Has Either Narrative Prevailed?
263(1)
V Conscience
264(3)
A Introduction
264(1)
B The Two Roles of Conscience
265(1)
(i) Conscience as a Doctrinal Rationale: The Heperu Claim
265(2)
(ii) Conscience as a Determinant of Liability
267(1)
VI Judicial Method
267(3)
VII Conclusion
270(3)
13 Concurrent Liability: A Spluttering Revolution
273(22)
Paul S Davies
I Introduction
273(2)
II Contract versus Tort
275(13)
A First Steps: Contract Trumps Tort
275(2)
B Asserting Concurrent Liability
277(4)
C The Beginnings of a Counter Revolution?
281(1)
(i) Remoteness
281(4)
(ii) Type of Loss
285(1)
(iii) Contributory Negligence
286(1)
(iv) Choice of Law
287(1)
(v) Limitation
287(1)
D Conclusions
288(1)
III Contract versus Trusts
288(5)
IV Conclusions
293(2)
14 The Illegality Revolution
295(20)
Graham Virgo
I Introduction
295(1)
II The Central Controversy: Rule versus Discretion
296(7)
A No Reliance on Illegality
299(1)
B Withdrawal from an Illegal Transaction
300(1)
C The Parties are not In Pari Delicto
301(1)
D The Policy Behind the Illegality
302(1)
E Close Connection or Inextricable Link
302(1)
III Patel v Mirza
303(6)
IV Patel v Mirza: Revolution or Evolution?
309(2)
A Impact on Legal Doctrine
309(1)
B Judicial Reception of the Decision
310(1)
V Synthesis
311(4)
15 The Revolutionary Trajectory of EU Contract Law towards Post-national Law
315(22)
Hugh Collins
I A Revolutionary Cocktail for the Ancien Regime
315(2)
II Techno-law
317(6)
A Instrumentalism
318(3)
B Functions
321(1)
C Incompleteness
322(1)
III The Impact of Techno-law
323(3)
IV From Rule-Book to Rights-Based Conception of the Rule of Law
326(6)
A Legitimation
328(2)
B Enhanced Functionalism
330(1)
C The Implications of a Rights-Based Conception of the Rule of Law
331(1)
V Real Transnational Law
332(3)
VI Post-national Law
335(2)
Index 337
Sarah Worthington KC (Hon) FBA is the Downing Professor of the Laws of England and Fellow of Trinity College, University of Cambridge, and Director of the Cambridge Private Law Centre. Andrew Robertson is Professor of Law at the University of Melbourne and Conjoint Professor at Lund University. Graham Virgo KC (Hon) is Professor of English Private Law in the Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge; Fellow of Downing College, University of Cambridge; and Pro-Vice-Chancellor for Education, University of Cambridge. He is co-director of the Cambridge Private Law Centre.