| Acknowledgments |
|
vii | |
|
|
|
1 | (12) |
|
2 An Overview of Social Security: Purposes, Modalities and Historical Evolution |
|
|
13 | (18) |
|
2.1 Purposes and Modalities |
|
|
13 | (8) |
|
2.1.1 Pension systems as a social contract: The pay-as-you-go modality |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
2.1.2 Demographic challenges |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
2.1.3 Defined contributions and defined benefits |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
2.1.4 Wage-labor, the self-employed and social security |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
2.1.5 Volatility in financial markets |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
2.2 Historical Origins of Social Security and Pension Systems |
|
|
21 | (8) |
|
2.2.1 Core Capitalist economies |
|
|
21 | (3) |
|
2.2.2 Containment of social security benefits in the 1980s |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
2.2.3 Further cuts in pension benefits during the 1990s and 2000s |
|
|
25 | (4) |
|
2.3 Brief Historical Background of Social Security in Latin America |
|
|
29 | (2) |
|
3 The Rise and Fall of Pension Privatization in Latin America and Central and Eastern Europe |
|
|
31 | (20) |
|
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
3.2 Privatization within Worldwide Dominance of Public Pension Systems |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
3.3 The Cycle of Pension System Privatization and De-privatization |
|
|
33 | (6) |
|
3.3.1 The privatization phase: Objectives, assumptions and reality) |
|
|
34 | (5) |
|
3.3.2 The de-privatization phase: Reversals |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
3.4 The Pension Privatization/De-privatization Cycle in Argentina (1994--2008), Hungary (1998--2011) and Poland (1999--2014) |
|
|
39 | (12) |
|
3.4.1 The case of Argentina |
|
|
40 | (2) |
|
3.4.2 The case of Hungary |
|
|
42 | (3) |
|
|
|
45 | (3) |
|
3.4.4 Lessons of comparative international experience in de-privatization |
|
|
48 | (3) |
|
4 The Evolution of Social Protection and Pension Systems in Chile from the 19th Century until Its Privatization in the 1980s |
|
|
51 | (26) |
|
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
4.2 Development of Social Security and Labor Legislation from the 19th Century |
|
|
52 | (8) |
|
4.2.1 The Rush of Labor Legislation in the 1920s |
|
|
54 | (2) |
|
4.2.2 The Reforms of 1952--53 |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
4.2.3 Reform Efforts by the Frei-Montalva and Allende Governments |
|
|
57 | (3) |
|
4.3 The Pinochet Regime: From Eclectic Corporatism (Draft Pension Law of 1975) to a Privatized Pension System (DL 3,500 of 1980) |
|
|
60 | (5) |
|
4.3.1 Corporatists and Neoliberals |
|
|
61 | (4) |
|
4.4 The Military Entertains Doubts on the Privatization Scheme and Remain in Their Old State-Funded System |
|
|
65 | (2) |
|
|
|
67 | (10) |
|
5 Empirical Elements for Evaluating the Privatized Chilean Pension System |
|
|
77 | (20) |
|
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
5.2 Average Old Age Pensions Paid by Private and Public Contributory Pillars |
|
|
78 | (2) |
|
5.3 Frequency Distribution for Old age Pensions Paid by the AFP System |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
5.4 Pension Levels for Members of the Armed Forces and National Police |
|
|
80 | (2) |
|
5.5 Incidence of Public Expenditure in the Pension System |
|
|
82 | (4) |
|
5.6 Effects on Savings, Inequality and Level of Pensions |
|
|
86 | (2) |
|
5.7 How Pension Funds Are Invested? |
|
|
88 | (4) |
|
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
5.9 Political Economy and Forced Savings |
|
|
93 | (4) |
|
6 Synthesis and Conclusions: Reform Paralysis and the Road to De-privatization |
|
|
97 | (8) |
|
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
6.2 The 2008 Reforms under Bachelet I: Creation of a Basic Pension Pillar |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
6.3 Reform Proposals under Bachelet II and Pinera II |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
6.4 De-privatizing the Chilean Pension System |
|
|
100 | (5) |
| References |
|
105 | (4) |
| Index |
|
109 | |