Chapter 1 Introduction to the PROACT Root Cause Analysis (RCA) Work Process |
|
1 | (16) |
|
Mean Time between Failure (MTBF) |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
|
5 | (4) |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
|
10 | (7) |
Chapter 2 Introduction to the Field of Root Cause Analysis |
|
17 | (10) |
|
What is Root Cause Analysis (RCA)? |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
Why Do Undesirable Outcomes Occur? The Big Picture |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
Are All RCA Methodologies Created Equal? |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
Attempting to Understand RCA — Is This Good for the Industry? |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
What is Not Root Cause Analysis? |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
How to Compare Different RCA Methodologies When Comparing Them |
|
|
21 | (3) |
|
What Are the Primary Differences between Six Sigma and RCA? |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
Obstacles to Learning from Things That Go Wrong |
|
|
25 | (2) |
Chapter 3 Creating the Environment for RCA to Succeed: The Reliability Performance Process (TRPP) |
|
27 | (16) |
|
The Role of Executive Management in RCA |
|
|
27 | (2) |
|
The Role of a RCA Champion (Sponsor) |
|
|
29 | (2) |
|
The Role of the RCA Driver |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
Setting Financial Expectations: The Reality of the Return |
|
|
32 | (2) |
|
Institutionalizing Root Cause Analysis (RCA) in the System |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
|
35 | (5) |
|
Appendix I: Sample RCA Procedure |
|
|
40 | (3) |
Chapter 4 Failure Classification |
|
43 | (8) |
|
|
49 | (2) |
Chapter 5 Opportunity Analysis: "The Manual Approach" |
|
51 | (20) |
|
Step 1: Perform Preparatory Work |
|
|
55 | (5) |
|
Define the System to Analyze |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
|
56 | (2) |
|
Draw Block Diagram (Use the Contact Principle) |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
Describe the Function of Each Block |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
Develop Preliminary Interview Sheets and Schedule |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
|
60 | (3) |
|
Step 3: Summarize and Encode Data |
|
|
63 | (2) |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
Step 5: Determine the "Significant Few" |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
|
68 | (3) |
Chapter 6 Asset Performance Management Systems (APMS): Automating the Opportunity Analysis Process |
|
71 | (14) |
|
Determining Our Event Data Needs |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
Establish a Workflow to Collect the Data |
|
|
72 | (2) |
|
Employ a Comprehensive Data Collection System |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
|
75 | (10) |
Chapter 7 The PROACT® RCA Methodology |
|
85 | (20) |
|
|
86 | (2) |
|
The Error-Change Phenomenon |
|
|
88 | (2) |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
Continuous Process Industries (Oil, Steel, Aluminum, Paper, Chemicals, etc.) |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
Discrete Product Industries (Automobiles, Package Delivery, Bottling Lines, etc.) |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
Healthcare (Hospitals, Nursing Homes, Outpatient Care Center, Long-Term Care, etc.) |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
|
92 | (2) |
|
|
94 | (3) |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
|
98 | (7) |
Chapter 8 Ordering the Analysis Team |
|
105 | (12) |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
|
107 | (10) |
Chapter 9 Analyzing the Data: Introducing the PROACT Logic Tree |
|
117 | (22) |
|
|
131 | (6) |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
The Troubleshooting Flow Diagram |
|
|
138 | (1) |
Chapter 10 Communicating Findings and Recommendations |
|
139 | (14) |
|
The Recommendation Acceptance Criteria |
|
|
139 | (1) |
|
Developing the Recommendations |
|
|
140 | (1) |
|
|
141 | (4) |
|
|
145 | (8) |
Chapter 11 Tracking for Bottom-Line Results |
|
153 | (12) |
|
Getting Proactive Work Orders Accomplished in a Reactive Environment |
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
Sliding the Proactive Work Scale |
|
|
155 | (1) |
|
Developing Tracking Metrics |
|
|
156 | (3) |
|
|
159 | (2) |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
Recognizing the Life Cycle Effects of RCA on the Organization |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
|
162 | (3) |
Chapter 12 Automating Root Cause Analysis: The Utilization of The PROACT Enterprise Version 3.0+ |
|
165 | (44) |
|
Customizing Proact for Our Facility |
|
|
165 | (2) |
|
Setting Up a New Analysis in the New Proact FMEA and OA Module |
|
|
167 | (5) |
|
Setting Up a New Analysis in the New PROACT RCA Module |
|
|
172 | (11) |
|
Automating the Preservation of Event Data |
|
|
183 | (2) |
|
Automating the Analysis Team Structure |
|
|
185 | (4) |
|
Automating the Root Cause Analysis — Logic Tree Development |
|
|
189 | (8) |
|
Automating the RCA Report Writing |
|
|
197 | (3) |
|
Automating Tracking Metrics |
|
|
200 | (9) |
Chapter 13 Case Histories |
|
209 | (52) |
|
Case History #1: ISPAT Inland, Inc. East Chicago, IN |
|
|
210 | (12) |
|
Line Item from Modified FMEA: Identified Root Causes |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
Implemented Corrective Actions |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
|
214 | (1) |
|
|
214 | (1) |
|
|
214 | (8) |
|
Case History #2: Eastman Chemical Company Kingsport, TN |
|
|
222 | (4) |
|
Line Item from Modified FMEA |
|
|
223 | (1) |
|
|
223 | (1) |
|
Implemented Corrective Actions |
|
|
224 | (1) |
|
|
224 | (1) |
|
|
224 | (1) |
|
|
224 | (1) |
|
|
225 | (1) |
|
Case History #3: LYONDELL-CITGO Refining Houston, TX |
|
|
226 | (12) |
|
Line-Item From Modified FMEA |
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
|
227 | (1) |
|
Implemented Corrective Actions |
|
|
227 | (1) |
|
|
227 | (1) |
|
|
228 | (1) |
|
|
228 | (1) |
|
|
228 | (10) |
|
Case History #4: Eastman Chemical Company World Headquarters Kingsport, TN |
|
|
238 | (5) |
|
Line Item from Modified FMEA |
|
|
239 | (1) |
|
|
239 | (1) |
|
|
240 | (1) |
|
Implemented Corrective Actions |
|
|
241 | (1) |
|
Effect On Company Bottom Line |
|
|
241 | (1) |
|
|
241 | (2) |
|
Case History #5: Southern Companies Alabama Power Company Parrish, AL |
|
|
243 | (3) |
|
Line Item From Modified FMEA |
|
|
243 | (1) |
|
|
243 | (1) |
|
|
244 | (1) |
|
Implemented Corrective Actions |
|
|
244 | (1) |
|
Effect On Company Bottom Line |
|
|
245 | (1) |
|
|
245 | (1) |
|
|
245 | (1) |
|
|
245 | (1) |
|
Case History #6: Weyerhauser Company Valliant, OK |
|
|
246 | (15) |
|
Line Item from Modified FMEA Identified Root Causes |
|
|
251 | (1) |
|
Implemented Corrective Actions |
|
|
252 | (1) |
|
Effect On Bottom-Line Tracking Metrics |
|
|
253 | (1) |
|
|
253 | (1) |
|
Corrective Action Time Frames |
|
|
253 | (1) |
|
|
253 | (1) |
|
|
253 | (1) |
|
|
254 | (7) |
Index |
|
261 | |