Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

Same-Sex Parenting and the Best Interests Principle [Kõva köide]

(University of Limerick)
  • Formaat: Hardback, 270 pages, kõrgus x laius x paksus: 235x158x19 mm, kaal: 500 g, Worked examples or Exercises
  • Ilmumisaeg: 26-Mar-2020
  • Kirjastus: Cambridge University Press
  • ISBN-10: 1108497195
  • ISBN-13: 9781108497190
Teised raamatud teemal:
  • Kõva köide
  • Hind: 107,55 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Tavahind: 143,40 €
  • Säästad 25%
  • Raamatu kohalejõudmiseks kirjastusest kulub orienteeruvalt 3-4 nädalat
  • Kogus:
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Tasuta tarne
  • Tellimisaeg 2-4 nädalat
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
Same-Sex Parenting and the Best Interests PrincipleSuurem pilt
  • Formaat: Hardback, 270 pages, kõrgus x laius x paksus: 235x158x19 mm, kaal: 500 g, Worked examples or Exercises
  • Ilmumisaeg: 26-Mar-2020
  • Kirjastus: Cambridge University Press
  • ISBN-10: 1108497195
  • ISBN-13: 9781108497190
Teised raamatud teemal:
Teised raamatud sellest sooduspakkumisest: Kevadine sooduspakkumine - kuni 31. maini üle miljoni raamatu kuni 25% soodsamalt
Püsilink: https://www.kriso.ee/db/9781108497190.html
Märksõnad:
This book is written for academics, students, policymakers and practitioners interested in the legal recognition of LGBT+ parenting. It provides readers with a new conceptual framework for the best interests principle and demonstrates how to apply this framework in the areas of parental responsibility, adoption, donor-conception and surrogacy.

This book is written for academics, students, policymakers, practitioners, and non-governmental organisations interested in the legal recognition of LGBT+ parenting. The book presents arguments in favour of the legal recognition of gay and lesbian families that are based on consideration of the best interests of the child. In this context, 'best interests' is informed by reference to children's rights and to social science data. Applied in this manner, it is argued that the best interests of children can be used to demand that same-sex parenting arrangements are afforded legal recognition and protection. Suggestions are also presented as to the most appropriate manner of providing for this recognition in the areas of parental responsibility, adoption, donor-conception and surrogacy. These suggestions are drawn from comparative case studies, focusing on England and Wales, Ireland and South Africa, that are used to facilitate assessment of the best interests principle.

Muu info

Uses the concept of the best interests of the child to advocate for legal recognition of LGBT+ parenting.
Table of Cases
xi
Table of Instruments
xiv
Introduction 1(13)
1.1 Introduction
1(2)
1.2 Central Themes
3(4)
1.2.1 The Best Interests Principle
3(1)
1.2.2 Comparative Case Studies
4(2)
1.2.3 Social Reality
6(1)
1.3 Terminology
7(3)
1.4
Chapter Structure
10(4)
1 The Best Interests Principle: Theoretical Understanding
14(44)
1.1 Introduction
14(3)
1.2 Foundational Development of the UNCRC
17(4)
1.3 Widespread Acceptance
21(3)
1.4 Criticisms of the Best Interests Principle
24(13)
1.4.1 Indeterminacy
24(5)
1.4.2 `Smokescreen' Argument
29(3)
1.4.3 Paternalism and Rights-Based Determinations
32(5)
1.5 A Conceptual Framework for the Best Interests Principle
37(1)
1.6 Domestic Application of the Best Interests Principle
38(18)
1.6.1 England and Wales: The Welfare Principle
38(6)
1.6.2 Ireland: The Best Interests Principle
44(4)
1.6.3 South Africa: The Best Interests Principle
48(8)
1.7 Conclusion
56(2)
2 The Best Interests of the Child: Sociological and Psychological Research
58(20)
2.1 Introduction
58(3)
2.2 Applying Social Science Research in Child Law
61(2)
2.3 Are Married Opposite-Sex Parents the `Ideal'?
63(5)
2.4 Outcomes for Children Raised by Gay and Lesbian Parents
68(8)
2.5 Conclusion
76(2)
3 Parental Responsibility
78(36)
3.1 Introduction
78(1)
3.2 What Is Parental Responsibility?
79(9)
3.2.1 Language and Terminology
79(3)
3.2.2 Parental Responsibility in England and Wales
82(2)
3.2.3 Guardianship in Ireland
84(1)
3.2.4 Parental Responsibilities and Rights in South Africa
85(2)
3.2.5 Reflections on Terminology and Definitions
87(1)
3.3 The Exercise of Parental Responsibility
88(9)
3.3.1 England and Wales
88(2)
3.3.2 Ireland
90(5)
3.3.3 South Africa
95(2)
3.4 Extending Parental Responsibility for Status and Security
97(15)
3.4.1 Known Fathers and Parental Responsibility
99(5)
3.4.2 Social Parents and Parental Responsibility
104(8)
3.5 Conclusion
112(2)
4 Adoption
114(33)
4.1 Introduction
114(1)
4.2 Adoption as a Means of Securing Existing Family Relationships
115(6)
4.2.1 The Appropriateness of Second-Parent Adoption
116(3)
4.2.2 The Appropriateness of Second-Parent Adoption in the Context of Intercountry Adoptions
119(2)
4.3 Domestic Adoption
121(15)
4.3.1 England and Wales
122(5)
4.3.2 Ireland
127(4)
4.3.3 South Africa
131(5)
4.3.4 Summary of Comparative Jurisdictions
136(1)
4.4 Approach of the ECtHR
136(9)
4.4.1 Adoption and Marriage
137(2)
4.4.2 Gas and Dubois v. France
139(4)
4.4.3 X and Others v. Austria
143(2)
4.5 Conclusion
145(2)
5 Donor Conception
147(45)
5.1 Introduction
147(2)
5.2 The Legal Framework for Donor Conception in England and Wales, Ireland and South Africa
149(17)
5.2.1 England and Wales: Human Fertilisation and Embryology Acts 1990 and 2008
149(3)
5.2.2 Ireland: Children and Family Relationships Act 2015
152(11)
5.2.3 South Africa: Children's Act 2005
163(3)
5.3 Donor Conception and the Best Interests of the Child
166(19)
5.3.1 The Child's Right to Identity
166(2)
5.3.2 Safeguarding the Right to Identity
168(13)
5.3.3 Identity and the `Fatherless' Child
181(4)
5.4 Should Non-clinical Procedures Be Subject to Different Rules of Parentage than Clinical Procedures?
185(5)
5.5 Conclusion
190(2)
6 Surrogacy
192(49)
6.1 Introduction
192(1)
6.2 The Regulation of Surrogacy
193(11)
6.2.1 `[ A] Surrogacy Agreement Is Degrading to the Child Who Is to Be the Outcome of It'
196(3)
6.2.2 The `Motherless Child'
199(5)
6.3 The European Convention on Human Rights
204(6)
6.4 Surrogacy in England and Wales
210(8)
6.4.1 The Delayed Model of Parentage
214(4)
6.5 Surrogacy in Ireland
218(6)
6.6 Surrogacy in South Africa
224(3)
6.7 Pre-conception Allocation of Parentage
227(5)
6.8 International Surrogacy
232(2)
6.9 Conclusion
234(1)
Conclusion
235(1)
7.1 Introduction
235(1)
7.2 The Way Forward: Implications of the Best Interests Principle
236(3)
7.3 Conclusion
239(2)
Bibliography 241(13)
Index 254
Lydia Bracken is Assistant Dean, Equality, Diversity and Inclusion (AHSS) and a Lecturer in Law, University of Limerick, Ireland. She is a former Department of Children and Youth Affairs Research Scholar and author of numerous publications on child law, having received funding for her research from the Irish Research Council and other prestigious funding bodies.