Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

Shipping Interdiction and the Law of the Sea [Pehme köide]

4.00/5 (2 hinnangut Goodreads-ist)
(University College London)
  • Formaat: Paperback / softback, 436 pages, kõrgus x laius x paksus: 229x152x22 mm, kaal: 680 g, 10 Tables, black and white
  • Sari: Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law
  • Ilmumisaeg: 22-Dec-2011
  • Kirjastus: Cambridge University Press
  • ISBN-10: 1107639077
  • ISBN-13: 9781107639072
Teised raamatud teemal:
Shipping Interdiction and the Law of the SeaSuurem pilt
  • Formaat: Paperback / softback, 436 pages, kõrgus x laius x paksus: 229x152x22 mm, kaal: 680 g, 10 Tables, black and white
  • Sari: Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law
  • Ilmumisaeg: 22-Dec-2011
  • Kirjastus: Cambridge University Press
  • ISBN-10: 1107639077
  • ISBN-13: 9781107639072
Teised raamatud teemal:
Püsilink: https://www.kriso.ee/db/9781107639072.html
Märksõnad:
A comparative study of shipping interdiction, which considers the State action of stopping, searching and arresting foreign flag vessels and crew on the high seas in cases such as piracy, slavery, drug smuggling, fisheries management, migrant smuggling, the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and maritime terrorism.

In this comparative study of shipping interdiction, Douglas Guilfoyle considers the State action of stopping, searching and arresting foreign flag vessels and crew on the high seas in cases such as piracy, slavery, drug smuggling, fisheries management, migrant smuggling, the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and maritime terrorism. Interdiction raises important questions of jurisdiction, including: how permission to board a foreign vessel is obtained; whether boarding State or flag State law applies during the interdiction (or whether both apply); and which State has jurisdiction to prosecute any crimes discovered. Rules on the use of force and protection of human rights, compensation for wrongful interdiction and the status of boarding State officers under flag State law are also examined. A unified and practical view is taken of the law applicable across existing interdiction regimes based on an extensive survey of state practice.

Arvustused

Review of the hardback: ' Douglas Guilfoyle has shed considerable light on an area that has been somewhat neglected the book achieves its aims unreservedly extremely well written highly accessible throughout This volume constitutes an outstanding contribution to the current corpus of literature on the modern law of the sea and appears set to constitute the cornerstone publication on this area of the law for a considerable period of time.' Journal of International Maritime Law 'Shipping Interdiction and the Law of the Sea by Douglas Guilfoyle is the most comprehensive volume of contemporary theory and state practice available on the subject His analysis and judgments are sound, making [ the book] a reference for scholars, government civilian officials, and especially the uniformed judge advocates of the sea services [ It] is unique in its coverage of maritime interdiction, and the text moves effortlessly across civil, criminal, and military seams. The volume is very well researched and well written, and it is authoritative yet highly readable. Guilfoyle strikes just the right balance between detail and depth throughout ' American Journal of International Law 'As one can appreciate, the legal regime governing a State's right to board, visit and seize a vessel is a complex one. In Shipping Interdiction and the Law of the Sea, Douglas Guilfoyle nevertheless succeeds in steering his way across this complex topic in a clear and accessible manner.' Vincent Roobaert, NATO Legal Gazette 'As an in-depth and engaging analysis of maritime interdiction under the laws of peace, Guilfoyle's book is attaining the profile of a standard in the field.' Cameron A. Miles, British Yearbook of International Law

Muu info

This book is a comparative study of shipping interdiction.
Foreword xv
James Crawford
Preface xvii
Acknowledgements xviii
List of abbreviations
xx
Table of treaties and other international agreements
xxv
Table of cases
xlviii
PART I General principles
1(20)
1 Introduction: policing the oceans
3(4)
2 Basic principles of maritime jurisdiction
7(14)
1 State jurisdiction over vessels at sea
7(3)
2 Zones of maritime jurisdiction
10(6)
2.1 Introduction
10(1)
2.2 Territorial sea
10(2)
2.3 The contiguous zone
12(2)
2.4 The Exclusive Economic Zone
14(1)
2.5 The continental shelf
14(2)
3 Jurisdiction upon the high seas: flag and stateless vessels and hot pursuit
16(3)
3.1 A flag state's exclusive jurisdiction
16(1)
3.2 Stateless vessels
16(2)
3.3 Hot pursuit
18(1)
4 Conclusion
19(2)
PART II Interdiction and maritime policing
21(242)
3 General introduction to Part II
23(3)
4 Piracy and the slave trade
26(53)
1 Piracy
26(49)
1.1 Introduction
26(2)
1.2 The prohibition on piracy: theoretical justifications
28(1)
1.3 Current legal definitions: conventional and customary law
29(1)
1.3.1 UNCLOS
29(1)
1.3.2 The Harvard Draft Convention
30(2)
1.4 The exclusion of political offences?
32(10)
1.5 Special elements and geographical limits of the offence
42(3)
1.6 Modern forms of piracy
45(8)
1.7 Case study: the Malacca and Singapore straits
53(8)
1.8 Case study: piracy off Somalia
61(13)
1.9 Conclusion
74(1)
2 The slave trade
75(2)
3 Conclusion
77(2)
5 Drug trafficking
79(18)
1 Introduction
79(1)
2 US-UK bilateral practice on smuggling
80(3)
3 The 1988 UN Narcotics Convention
83(2)
4 The 1990 Spanish-Italian Treaty
85(1)
5 The 1995 Council of Europe Agreement
86(3)
6 US bilateral agreements
89(6)
6.1 High-seas interdictions
89(2)
6.2 Territorial-sea interdictions
91(4)
7 Conclusion: practical issues in drug interdiction under treaty arrangements
95(2)
6 Fisheries management
97(73)
1 Introduction
97(2)
2 Jurisdiction over fisheries
99(4)
2.1 The assertion of fisheries zones prior to UNCLOS
99(1)
2.2 UNCLOS fisheries management obligations
100(3)
3 The 1995 Straddling Fish Stocks Agreement
103(9)
3.1 RFMOs and third parties
103(2)
3.2 Provision for boarding and inspecting vessels
105(1)
3.2.1 Inspection
106(1)
3.2.2 Investigation
107(1)
3.2.3 Enforcement
107(1)
3.2.4 State responsibility
108(1)
3.2.5 Stateless vessels
108(1)
3.3 The FSA `default' boarding scheme for subsequent RFMOs
108(4)
4 Common measures in international fisheries management: the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas precedent
112(4)
5 The practice of regional fisheries management organisations
116(44)
5.1 Introduction
116(1)
5.2 The North Pacific Anadromous Fish Commission
117(1)
5.2.1 Background
117(1)
5.2.2 Boarding and inspection under the Convention
118(1)
5.2.3 Third-party co-operation: the US-China ship-rider agreement
119(1)
5.2.4 NPAFC high-seas enforcement practice
120(4)
5.2.5 Conclusion
124(1)
5.3 The North-East Atlantic Fisheries Commission
124(1)
5.3.1 The NEAFC inspection scheme
125(3)
5.3.2 The NEAFC Non-Contracting Party Scheme
128(4)
5.3.3 Conclusions on NEAFC practice
132(1)
5.4 The Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization
133(1)
5.4.1 The Estai incident
134(3)
5.4.2 The present NAFO boarding and inspection scheme
137(1)
5.4.3 The NAFO non-contracting party scheme
137(1)
5.4.4 NAFO practice under the scheme
138(2)
5.5 The Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources
140(1)
5.5.1 Introduction
140(3)
5.5.2 The CCAMLR System of Inspection
143(1)
5.5.3 Enforcement under the System of Inspection
143(1)
5.5.4 Co-operation between Australia and France
144(2)
5.5.5 Australian enforcement practice in its Antarctic EEZs
146(4)
5.5.6 Enforcement practice in the French Antarctic EEZs
150(4)
5.5.7 Conclusion
154(2)
5.6 The South East Atlantic Fisheries Organization
156(2)
5.7 The Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission
158(2)
6 Countermeasures and custom: a general international law of fisheries interdiction?
160(8)
6.1 A general international law right of boarding or duty to permit it
161(1)
6.2 A general international law obligation to co-operate with RFMOs
162(2)
6.3 Countermeasures
164(4)
6.4 Conclusions on unilateral enforcement
168(1)
7 General conclusions
168(2)
7 Unauthorised broadcasting on the high seas
170(10)
1 Introduction
170(1)
2 A short history of unauthorised broadcasting
170(6)
3 Jurisdiction under UNCLOS
176(2)
4 UK practice after 1982
178(1)
5 Conclusion
179(1)
8 Transnational crime: migrant smuggling and human trafficking
180(52)
1 Introduction
180(2)
2 Migrant smuggling by sea
182(44)
2.1 The criminal enterprise of migrant smuggling
182(2)
2.2 The UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime
184(1)
2.3 The Protocol against the Smuggling of Migrants
184(3)
2.4 US practice
187(1)
2.4.1 Haiti
188(4)
2.4.2 Cuba
192(3)
2.4.3 The Dominican Republic
195(2)
2.5 Australian practice
197(1)
2.5.1 Political co-operation
197(1)
2.5.2 Maritime interdiction of irregular migrants and the Tampa incident
198(6)
2.5.3 Australian `border protection' legislation and practice, 2001-2007
204(5)
2.6 Mediterranean practice: Italy, Spain and Malta
209(1)
2.6.1 Introduction
209(1)
2.6.2 Italy
209(7)
2.6.3 Spain
216(4)
2.6.4 Malta
220(2)
2.7 Returning asylum-seekers interdicted at sea and non-refoulement
222(4)
3 Human trafficking
226(5)
3.1 Introduction
226(2)
3.2 Human trafficking and the slave trade
228(3)
4 Conclusions
231(1)
9 Maritime counter-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction
232(31)
1 Introduction
232(1)
2 Statements of political intent
233(5)
3 UNSCR 1540 (28 April 2004)
238(5)
3.1 Content and adoption of the resolution
238(2)
3.2 UNSCR 1540 and criminal jurisdiction over the territorial sea
240(3)
4 WMD-related interdiction in state practice
243(3)
5 The US bilateral WMD interdiction agreements
246(8)
6 The SUA Protocol 2005
254(5)
7 Conclusion: criminalisation, liability and implementation
259(4)
PART III The general law of interdiction
263(82)
10 Interdiction: modalities and international law standards
265(30)
1 The structure of Part III
265(1)
2 Applicable safeguards in interdicting foreign vessels, including human rights law
266(5)
3 The use of force in interdicting foreign vessels
271(22)
3.1 Introduction
271(1)
3.2 The UN Charter
272(5)
3.3 Customary international law and codification: the Caribbean Area Agreement rules
277(3)
3.3.1 Rules 1-4 and 8: the proportionate use of force as a last resort, warning shots and aircraft
280(2)
3.3.2 Rule 5: respect for local law
282(5)
3.3.3 Rule 6: applicable national law on the use of force
287(2)
3.3.4 Rule 7: firearms
289(3)
3.3.5 Rule 9: the prohibition on reprisals
292(1)
3.3.6 Rule 10: individual self-defence
292(1)
4 Conclusion
293(2)
11 National jurisdiction and immunities during interdictions
295(29)
1 Introduction
295(1)
2 Enforcement of boarding-state law against interdicted vessels
296(1)
3 Boarding-state obligations under receiving-state law
297(2)
4 Boarding-state immunity from flag-state criminal jurisdiction
299(19)
4.1 Introduction
299(3)
4.2 The immunity from local criminal jurisdiction of visiting police organs: an unanswered question?
302(2)
4.3 The jurisdictional immunities of visiting armed forces
304(1)
4.3.1 Introduction
304(3)
4.3.2 Immunity from local criminal law when among the general population: the general law
307(3)
4.3.3 Immunity from local criminal law when among the general population: Status of Forces agreements
310(4)
4.3.4 The immunity of visiting forces `within lines': barracks, bases and areas of operation
314(4)
5 Conclusion: distinguishing immune and non-immune police acts
318(6)
12 International responsibility and settlement of claims
324(15)
1 Liability: applicable standards and diplomatic protection
324(7)
2 The flag or coastal state: issues of individual and joint liability
331(6)
3 Conclusion
337(2)
13 General conclusions: a law of interdiction?
339(6)
Select bibliography 345(17)
Index 362
Douglas Guilfoyle is a lecturer at University College London, where he teaches in public law and public international law.