|
|
ix | |
|
|
xi | |
Acknowledgements |
|
xii | |
|
|
1 | (10) |
|
1.1 Escapable from silence? |
|
|
1 | (8) |
|
|
9 | (2) |
|
Chapter 2 Silent arguments as elliptic arguments |
|
|
11 | (44) |
|
|
11 | (3) |
|
2.2 Pronoun-based approach to radical pro-drop |
|
|
14 | (14) |
|
2.2.1 Pronominal nature of radical pro-drop and related issues |
|
|
14 | (3) |
|
2.2.2 Radical pro-drop as null indefinite pronoun |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
|
18 | (4) |
|
2.2.2.2 Null counterpart of English one |
|
|
22 | (5) |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
2.3 Ellipsis-based approach to radical pro-drop |
|
|
28 | (12) |
|
2.3.1 Verb-stranding verb phrase ellipsis and argument ellipsis |
|
|
28 | (6) |
|
2.3.2 Verb-stranding verb phrase ellipsis versus argument ellipsis |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
2.3.2.1 Ellipsis of subject |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
|
35 | (3) |
|
2.3.2.3 The verb-identity requirement |
|
|
38 | (2) |
|
2.4 More arguments for argument ellipsis |
|
|
40 | (12) |
|
|
40 | (6) |
|
2.4.2 Complex predicate and anti-reconstruction |
|
|
46 | (6) |
|
2.5 Summary of the chapter |
|
|
52 | (3) |
|
Chapter 3 The silent syntax of silent arguments |
|
|
55 | (50) |
|
|
55 | (4) |
|
3.2 Overt extraction out of Japanese null arguments |
|
|
59 | (16) |
|
3.2.1 Long-distance scrambling |
|
|
59 | (6) |
|
3.2.2 Pseudoraising and raising-to-object |
|
|
65 | (6) |
|
3.2.3 PP left-branch extraction |
|
|
71 | (3) |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
3.3 Covert extraction out of Japanese null arguments |
|
|
75 | (20) |
|
3.3.1 Null operator movement |
|
|
75 | (5) |
|
|
80 | (5) |
|
3.3.3 Covert possessor raising |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
3.3.3.1 Inalienable possessor raising |
|
|
85 | (6) |
|
3.3.3.2 Possessor raising idiom |
|
|
91 | (4) |
|
3.4 Summary of the chapter and implications for pro and verb-stranding verb phrase ellipsis |
|
|
95 | (4) |
|
Appendix: Overt clausal proform soo `so' |
|
|
99 | (6) |
|
Chapter 4 Cross-linguistic investigations into silent arguments |
|
|
105 | (62) |
|
4.1 Argument ellipsis in Chinese, Korean, Mongolian, and Turkish |
|
|
105 | (30) |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
4.1.1.1 Null arguments in Chinese, Korean, Mongolian, and Turkish |
|
|
105 | (4) |
|
4.1.1.2 Argument for ellipsis I: Obviation of condition B |
|
|
109 | (2) |
|
4.1.1.3 Argument for ellipsis II: `Sloppy' reading |
|
|
111 | (4) |
|
4.1.2 Verb-stranding verb phrase ellipsis or argument ellipsis? |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
4.1.2.1 Ellipsis of subject |
|
|
115 | (5) |
|
4.1.2.2 `Immobile' element |
|
|
120 | (8) |
|
|
128 | (3) |
|
4.1.2.4 The verb-identity requirement |
|
|
131 | (3) |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
4.2 Overt extraction out of null arguments cross-linguistically |
|
|
135 | (15) |
|
4.2.1 Long-distance scrambling: Korean Mongolian, and Turkish |
|
|
135 | (5) |
|
4.2.2 ECM-movement: Korean, Mongolian, and Turkish |
|
|
140 | (5) |
|
4.2.3 Topicalization and superraising: Chinese |
|
|
145 | (4) |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
4.3 Covert extraction out of null arguments cross-linguistically |
|
|
150 | (14) |
|
4.3.1 Null operator movement |
|
|
150 | (1) |
|
4.3.1.1 Cleft and comparative deletion: Korean, Mongolian, and Turkish |
|
|
150 | (7) |
|
4.3.1.2 Relative clause: Chinese |
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
4.3.2 Scope-shifting movement |
|
|
158 | (1) |
|
4.3.2.1 Quantifier raising: Korean and Turkish |
|
|
158 | (3) |
|
4.3.2.2 A-not-A question: Chinese |
|
|
161 | (3) |
|
4.4 Summary of the chapter |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
|
165 | (2) |
|
Chapter 5 Silent arguments = Overtly empty but covertly complex |
|
|
167 | (58) |
|
5.1 PF-deletion versus LF-copying |
|
|
167 | (3) |
|
5.2 Elliptic arguments via LF-copying |
|
|
170 | (6) |
|
5.3 Theoretical implications |
|
|
176 | (28) |
|
5.3.1 Null operator movement = LF-movement |
|
|
176 | (1) |
|
5.3.1.1 Chomsky (1995): Strong feature versus weak feature |
|
|
176 | (2) |
|
|
178 | (4) |
|
|
182 | (2) |
|
5.3.2 Against base-generation + merger |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
5.3.2.1 Chung, Ladusaw and McCloskey (1995) and related issues |
|
|
184 | (5) |
|
5.3.2.2 Argument ellipsis and locality |
|
|
189 | (8) |
|
5.3.2.3 Argument ellipsis and absence of island-repair |
|
|
197 | (5) |
|
5.3.3 PF-deletion versus LF-copying revisited: A view from phases |
|
|
202 | (2) |
|
5.4 Consequences for other syntactic phenomena |
|
|
204 | (13) |
|
|
204 | (4) |
|
|
208 | (4) |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
|
213 | (4) |
|
5.5 Summary of the chapter |
|
|
217 | (1) |
|
Appendix: Wh-in-situ and null arguments cross-linguistically |
|
|
217 | (8) |
|
Chapter 6 Concluding remarks and additional issues |
|
|
225 | (12) |
|
|
225 | (1) |
|
6.2 When is argument ellipsis available? |
|
|
226 | (11) |
References |
|
237 | (22) |
Author index |
|
259 | (4) |
Subject index |
|
263 | |