|
|
xvii | |
|
|
xxix | |
Foreword |
|
xxxi | |
|
About the editor |
|
xxxv | |
|
|
1 | (12) |
|
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
|
4 | (6) |
|
1.3.1 Part I: mobility and mechanisms |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
1.3.2 Part II: sensing, perception, and GNC |
|
|
6 | (2) |
|
1.3.3 Part III: astronaut-robot interaction |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
1.3.4 Part IV: system engineering |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
|
10 | (3) |
|
|
10 | (3) |
|
PART I Mobility and mechanisms |
|
|
|
2 Wheeled planetary rover locomotion design, scaling, and analysis |
|
|
13 | (30) |
|
|
|
2.1 Background: modeling the granular environment |
|
|
13 | (4) |
|
|
17 | (6) |
|
2.2.1 Theory: wheel parameter scaling for output parameters of mechanical power and translational velocity in granular media |
|
|
17 | (4) |
|
2.2.2 Experimentation: planetary regolith simulants and testing environments |
|
|
21 | (2) |
|
2.3 Studies giving context to scaling theory |
|
|
23 | (13) |
|
2.3.1 Study one: mechanical power and translational velocity prediction variance by granular material and wheel shape |
|
|
23 | (3) |
|
2.3.2 Study two: mechanical power prediction variance by mass, velocity, and motor placement |
|
|
26 | (3) |
|
2.3.3 Study three: context of deviations and examination of scaling law application sinkage threshold |
|
|
29 | (3) |
|
2.3.4 Study four: investigating gravity-variant scaling using MBD-DEM simulations |
|
|
32 | (4) |
|
2.4 Recommendations and future work |
|
|
36 | (7) |
|
|
38 | (5) |
|
3 Compliant pneumatic muscle structures and systems for extra-vehicular and intra-vehicular activities in space environments |
|
|
43 | (34) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
3.2 Robotic solutions for space environments |
|
|
44 | (3) |
|
3.2.1 Soft robotic systems as an alternative robotic solution for space environments |
|
|
45 | (2) |
|
3.3 Soft robotic systems based on PMA as an alternative to rigid robotic systems for space environments |
|
|
47 | (11) |
|
3.3.1 Modeling of a pneumatic muscle actuator |
|
|
49 | (2) |
|
3.3.2 Characterization of contractor PMA |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
3.3.3 Analysis of contractor PMA |
|
|
52 | (5) |
|
3.3.4 Modeling of extensor PMA |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
3.4 PMA designs that can be adapted as robotic manipulators for space |
|
|
58 | (7) |
|
3.4.1 Self-bending contraction actuator and extensor-bending pneumatic artificial muscles |
|
|
59 | (2) |
|
3.4.2 Double-bending pneumatic muscle actuator |
|
|
61 | (2) |
|
3.4.3 Extensor-contraction pneumatic muscle actuator |
|
|
63 | (2) |
|
3.4.4 Circular pneumatic muscle actuator |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
3.5 PMA applications in developing novel grippers, manipulators, and power assistive glove for space environments |
|
|
65 | (7) |
|
3.5.1 Three fingers gripper base on SBCA |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
3.5.2 Extension-circular gripper |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
3.5.3 Three CPMAs gripper |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
3.5.4 Soft robot manipulators |
|
|
69 | (2) |
|
3.5.5 Power assistive soft glove |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
3.6 Recommendations and future works |
|
|
72 | (5) |
|
|
74 | (3) |
|
4 Biologically-inspired mechanisms for space applications |
|
|
77 | (48) |
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 Subsurface exploration |
|
|
78 | (3) |
|
4.1.1 Ovipositor drilling |
|
|
78 | (2) |
|
4.1.1.1 Dual-reciprocating drill |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
4.2 Surface mobility inspired by animals |
|
|
81 | (7) |
|
4.2.1 Gecko and spider adhesion |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
4.2.1.3 Legged excursion mechanical utility rover |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
4.2.1.4 Additional concepts |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
4.2.2.3 Additional concepts |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
|
88 | (2) |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
4.3.2 Kangaroo vibration suppression |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
4.4 Mobility inspired by plants |
|
|
90 | (3) |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
4.4.2 Vine and tendril climbing |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
4.5 Artificial muscle actuators |
|
|
93 | (2) |
|
4.5.1 Ionic polymer metal composites |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
4.5.2 Dielectric elastomers |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
4.6.1 Wing-flapping mechanisms |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
4.7 Navigation systems for mobility |
|
|
96 | (5) |
|
4.7.1 Natural and invasive interfacing |
|
|
96 | (2) |
|
4.7.1.1 Insect/machine hybrid controller |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
4.7.2.1 Bio-inspired engineering of exploration systems |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
4.7.3.1 Elementary motion detectors |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
4.7.3.2 Additional concepts |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
4.8 Multi-agent spacecraft system architectures |
|
|
101 | (4) |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
4.8.1.1 Autonomous Nano Technology Swarm |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
4.8.1.2 Additional concepts |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
4.8.2 Cellular spacecraft architecture |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
4.8.2.2 Satellite Stem Cell |
|
|
104 | (1) |
|
4.9 Hibernation for human spaceflight |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
|
105 | (20) |
|
|
108 | (17) |
|
PART II Sensing, perception and GNC |
|
|
|
5 Autonomous visual navigation for spacecraft on-orbit operations |
|
|
125 | (34) |
|
|
|
|
|
125 | (3) |
|
5.2 Theoretical foundation |
|
|
128 | (6) |
|
5.2.1 The equations of relative motion |
|
|
128 | (3) |
|
5.2.2 Camera pose estimation |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
5.2.3 Relative pose estimation |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
5.3 Deep-learning-based spacecraft pose estimation |
|
|
134 | (5) |
|
5.3.1 Keypoint-based pose estimation |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
|
134 | (2) |
|
5.3.1.2 Landmark regression |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
5.3.2 Non-keypoint-based pose estimation |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
5.4 Advancements in simulators and experimental testbeds |
|
|
139 | (11) |
|
|
139 | (3) |
|
5.4.2 Ground-based physical testbeds |
|
|
142 | (4) |
|
5.4.3 The methodology of simulating relative motion |
|
|
146 | (4) |
|
5.5 Analytical results and comparison |
|
|
150 | (2) |
|
5.6 Recommendations and future trends |
|
|
152 | (7) |
|
|
154 | (5) |
|
6 Inertial parameter identification, reactionless path planning and control for orbital robotic capturing of unknown objects |
|
|
159 | (44) |
|
|
|
|
|
160 | (5) |
|
6.1.1 Relative work and development status |
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
6.1.1.1 Method for identifying inertial parameters of space non-cooperative targets |
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
6.1.1.2 Reactionless path planning for non-cooperative objects capture |
|
|
163 | (2) |
|
6.1.1.3 Attitude stable control method of spacecraft-manipulator-target system |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
6.2 Joint kinetic model of spacecraft and unknown object |
|
|
165 | (4) |
|
6.2.1 System kinematic analysis |
|
|
166 | (1) |
|
6.2.1.1 System position vector analysis |
|
|
166 | (1) |
|
6.2.1.2 System velocity vector analysis |
|
|
166 | (1) |
|
6.2.1.3 Velocity Jacobian matrix |
|
|
167 | (1) |
|
6.2.1.4 System linear and angular momentum calculation |
|
|
167 | (1) |
|
6.2.2 System kinetic analysis |
|
|
168 | (1) |
|
6.3 Unknown object inertial parameter identification |
|
|
169 | (6) |
|
6.3.1 Basic theory of identification |
|
|
169 | (3) |
|
6.3.2 Identification scheme incorporating information of contact force together with force/torque of end-effector |
|
|
172 | (2) |
|
6.3.3 Solution of the modified identification equation using the hybrid RLS-APSA algorithm |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
6.4 Adaptive reactionless control strategy during manipulation of unknown obj ect |
|
|
175 | (5) |
|
6.4.1 Adaptive reactionless path planning via SW-RLS |
|
|
175 | (2) |
|
6.4.2 Robust adaptive control strategy via the PSO-ELM algorithm |
|
|
177 | (1) |
|
6.4.2.1 Adaptive control term via PSO-ELM algorithm |
|
|
177 | (2) |
|
6.4.2.2 Robust control strategy |
|
|
179 | (1) |
|
6.4.2.3 Stability analysis of the proposed control strategy |
|
|
180 | (1) |
|
|
180 | (12) |
|
6.5.1 Inertial parameter identification simulation |
|
|
180 | (6) |
|
6.5.2 Path planning and control simulation |
|
|
186 | (6) |
|
|
192 | (5) |
|
6.7 Recommendations and future work |
|
|
197 | (6) |
|
|
198 | (5) |
|
7 Autonomous robotic grasping in orbital environment |
|
|
203 | (34) |
|
|
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
7.2 Human grasping in space |
|
|
204 | (2) |
|
7.3 Applications of orbital grasping |
|
|
206 | (3) |
|
|
206 | (1) |
|
7.3.2 In-space telescope assembly |
|
|
207 | (1) |
|
7.3.3 Active debris removal |
|
|
207 | (1) |
|
7.3.4 Astronaut-robot interaction |
|
|
208 | (1) |
|
7.4 Robotic hardware for orbital grasping |
|
|
209 | (9) |
|
7.4.1 Coupling interfaces |
|
|
210 | (3) |
|
7.4.2 Engine nozzle probing |
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
|
214 | (2) |
|
|
216 | (2) |
|
7.5 Latest R & D on orbital grasping |
|
|
218 | (7) |
|
7.5.1 Alternative gripper designs |
|
|
218 | (2) |
|
|
220 | (1) |
|
7.5.3 Affordance-based grasping |
|
|
221 | (1) |
|
|
222 | (3) |
|
|
225 | (2) |
|
|
225 | (1) |
|
|
225 | (1) |
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
7.7 Technical challenges of orbital grasping |
|
|
227 | (10) |
|
7.7.1 Algorithmic modelling -- design challenges |
|
|
227 | (1) |
|
7.7.1.1 Target state estimation |
|
|
227 | (1) |
|
7.7.1.2 Identification of grasping point |
|
|
227 | (1) |
|
7.7.1.3 Grasp analysis and modelling |
|
|
227 | (1) |
|
|
228 | (1) |
|
|
228 | (1) |
|
7.7.2 Physical challenges |
|
|
228 | (1) |
|
7.7.2.1 Space environment |
|
|
228 | (1) |
|
7.7.2.2 Impact mitigation |
|
|
228 | (1) |
|
7.7.2.3 Debris generation |
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
7.7.3 Operational -- verification challenges |
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
7.7.3.1 Post-capture operations |
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
7.7.3.2 Standardisation and benchmarking |
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
7.7.3.3 Verification and validation |
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
|
230 | (7) |
|
PART III Astronaut-robot interaction |
|
|
|
8 BCI for mental workload assessment and performance evaluation in space teleoperations |
|
|
237 | (38) |
|
|
|
|
|
8.1 Human--robot interaction in space -- what we learn from simulators |
|
|
237 | (6) |
|
|
239 | (1) |
|
8.1.2 Canadarm2 and Dextre |
|
|
240 | (3) |
|
8.2 Cognitive models underlying neuroergonomics in space flight |
|
|
243 | (2) |
|
8.2.1 Neuroergonomics and spatial attention |
|
|
244 | (1) |
|
8.3 Workload and performance measures in human-robot collaborative tasks |
|
|
245 | (3) |
|
8.4 BCIs in workload and attention |
|
|
248 | (10) |
|
|
248 | (3) |
|
|
251 | (1) |
|
8.4.3 Eye-tracking-based BCI |
|
|
252 | (1) |
|
8.4.3.1 Point of gaze and eye movements |
|
|
252 | (1) |
|
8.4.3.2 Eye-tracking systems |
|
|
253 | (2) |
|
8.4.3.3 Eye-tracking-based mental workload detection |
|
|
255 | (1) |
|
8.4.3.4 Eye-tracking-based skill assessment |
|
|
256 | (1) |
|
8.4.4 Neurolmaging in space |
|
|
256 | (2) |
|
8.5 Artificial intelligence in BCI-based workload detection |
|
|
258 | (2) |
|
8.6 Cognitive workload estimation during simulated teleoperations -- a case study |
|
|
260 | (6) |
|
8.7 Recommendations and future work |
|
|
266 | (9) |
|
|
268 | (7) |
|
9 Physiological adaptations in space and wearable technology for biosignal monitoring |
|
|
275 | (66) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
275 | (3) |
|
9.2 Cardiovascular system |
|
|
278 | (14) |
|
9.2.1 Blood pressure, haemodynamic response and orthostatic intolerance |
|
|
278 | (1) |
|
9.2.1.1 Heart rate, blood pressure and cardiac output |
|
|
278 | (2) |
|
9.2.1.2 Central venous pressure and hypovolemia |
|
|
280 | (2) |
|
9.2.1.3 Orthostatic intolerance |
|
|
282 | (1) |
|
9.2.2 Electrocardiographic variations |
|
|
283 | (1) |
|
9.2.3 Cardiac remodelling in space |
|
|
284 | (1) |
|
9.2.4 Vascular function and cell adaptations in space |
|
|
285 | (1) |
|
9.2.5 Jugular venous blood flow and thrombus formation |
|
|
286 | (1) |
|
9.2.6 Biomarkers of cardiovascular diseases |
|
|
287 | (2) |
|
9.2.7 Cardiovascular disease mortality and radiation risks in astronauts |
|
|
289 | (3) |
|
9.3 Other physiological adaptations in microgravity |
|
|
292 | (14) |
|
9.3.1 Gastrointestinal system and nutrition |
|
|
292 | (2) |
|
|
294 | (1) |
|
9.3.3 Brain and peripheral nervous system |
|
|
295 | (1) |
|
9.3.3.1 Adaptations to neuro-vestibular, visual and somatosensory systems |
|
|
295 | (3) |
|
9.3.4 Thermoregulation in space |
|
|
298 | (1) |
|
9.3.5 The stress response in astronauts |
|
|
299 | (2) |
|
9.3.6 Lymphatic and urinary systems |
|
|
301 | (2) |
|
|
303 | (2) |
|
9.3.7.1 Sweat as a biosignalling fluid |
|
|
305 | (1) |
|
9.4 Musculoskeletal system modifications in space |
|
|
306 | (6) |
|
9.4.1 Muscle atrophy in space |
|
|
306 | (2) |
|
9.4.2 Bone demineralization |
|
|
308 | (2) |
|
9.4.3 Markers of bone health |
|
|
310 | (1) |
|
9.4.4 Bone health monitoring |
|
|
311 | (1) |
|
|
311 | (1) |
|
9.5 Wearable technology for space biosignal monitoring |
|
|
312 | (12) |
|
9.5.1 Wearable systems for thermoregulation |
|
|
321 | (3) |
|
9.6 Recommendations and future trends |
|
|
324 | (17) |
|
|
325 | (16) |
|
10 Future of human-robot interaction in space |
|
|
341 | (36) |
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 The challenge of human-robot interaction in space |
|
|
342 | (15) |
|
10.1.1 Humans, the complexity of spaceoperations |
|
|
344 | (4) |
|
10.1.2 Space robots, a technological challenge |
|
|
348 | (5) |
|
10.1.3 Interaction, theory and practice |
|
|
353 | (4) |
|
10.2 Future of interaction with autonomous robotics in space |
|
|
357 | (6) |
|
10.2.1 Motivations for shared autonomy |
|
|
357 | (2) |
|
10.2.2 Capabilities for the future of interaction |
|
|
359 | (1) |
|
10.2.2.1 Research on signifiers from human agent -- sensors and neuro-ergonomics |
|
|
360 | (1) |
|
10.2.2.2 Research on natural mapping and feedback mechanisms -- embodied interaction/humanoids |
|
|
360 | (1) |
|
10.2.2.3 Research to support human capabilities -- crew autonomy |
|
|
361 | (1) |
|
10.2.2.4 Research of different interaction paradigms of human--robot teaming |
|
|
361 | (1) |
|
10.2.2.5 Research to simulate operation realism and pressure -- working with time delay |
|
|
362 | (1) |
|
10.3 Case study: a future crew assistant |
|
|
363 | (4) |
|
10.3.1 CIMON® -- the intelligent astronaut assistant |
|
|
363 | (1) |
|
|
363 | (1) |
|
10.3.1.2 Implementation as fast track experiment for the horizons mission |
|
|
364 | (1) |
|
10.3.1.3 Functionalities of CIMON on board |
|
|
365 | (1) |
|
10.3.2 The case for crew assistance robot -- for space and earth |
|
|
366 | (1) |
|
10.4 Recommendations and trends |
|
|
367 | (1) |
|
|
368 | (9) |
|
PART IV System engineering |
|
|
|
11 Verification for space robotics |
|
|
377 | (32) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.1 Formal specification and verification techniques |
|
|
378 | (2) |
|
11.1.1 Formal specification and verification for autonomous robotic systems |
|
|
378 | (1) |
|
|
378 | (1) |
|
11.1.1.2 Answering RQ1: challenges |
|
|
379 | (1) |
|
11.1.1.3 Answering RQ2: formalisms, tools and approaches |
|
|
379 | (1) |
|
11.1.1.4 Answering RQ3: limitations |
|
|
380 | (1) |
|
11.1.1.5 Application to space robotics |
|
|
380 | (1) |
|
11.2 Theorem proving for space robotics using modal and temporal logics |
|
|
380 | (2) |
|
11.2.1 The multi-modal logic K |
|
|
381 | (1) |
|
11.2.2 Metric temporal logic |
|
|
382 | (1) |
|
11.3 Verifiable space robot architectures |
|
|
382 | (4) |
|
11.3.1 FOL contract specifications |
|
|
383 | (1) |
|
11.3.2 Measuring confidence in verification |
|
|
384 | (1) |
|
|
385 | (1) |
|
11.4 Case study 1: Simulation and verification of the Mars Curiosity rover |
|
|
386 | (6) |
|
|
387 | (4) |
|
|
391 | (1) |
|
11.4.3 Runtime verification |
|
|
391 | (1) |
|
11.5 Case study 2: Verification of astronaut-rover teams |
|
|
392 | (4) |
|
11.6 Modelling and verification of multi-objects systems |
|
|
396 | (7) |
|
|
396 | (2) |
|
11.6.2 Logics for parameterised systems |
|
|
398 | (2) |
|
11.6.3 Translating broadcast protocols to MFOTL |
|
|
400 | (3) |
|
11.7 Conclusions, recommendations and future trends |
|
|
403 | (6) |
|
|
403 | (6) |
|
12 Cyber security of new space systems |
|
|
409 | (21) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.1 A reference architecture for attack surface analysis in space systems |
|
|
410 | (3) |
|
|
413 | (9) |
|
12.2.1 Cyber security requirements |
|
|
418 | (2) |
|
12.2.2 Evaluation of threat modelling approaches |
|
|
420 | (2) |
|
|
422 | (4) |
|
12.4 Security-minded verification of space systems |
|
|
426 | (3) |
|
12.4.1 Security-minded verification methodology |
|
|
426 | (3) |
|
|
429 | (1) |
|
|
430 | (1) |
References |
|
430 | (7) |
Index |
|
437 | |