Introduction |
|
9 | (8) |
|
Chapter One Introducing Cardinal Numeral Constructions |
|
|
17 | (6) |
|
Chapter Two The Genitive of Quantification: a history of solutions |
|
|
23 | (16) |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
2.2 Noun as the head in phrases with higher numerals |
|
|
24 | (3) |
|
2.3 The numeral as the key element in Numeral Noun Constructions |
|
|
27 | (5) |
|
2.4 Some other approaches to the structure and case conundrum in GoQ |
|
|
32 | (5) |
|
|
37 | (2) |
|
Chapter Three Core claims on the morpho-syntax of the Polish NNC |
|
|
39 | (60) |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
3.2 The four-way hybrid structure of the Polish NNC |
|
|
39 | (2) |
|
3.3 Component parts of the analysis |
|
|
41 | (14) |
|
3.3.1 Internal morphosyntax of Numeral Phrases |
|
|
42 | (5) |
|
3.3.2 The structural relation between the Numeral and NP |
|
|
47 | (6) |
|
3.3.3 Diachronic change as the source of derivational complexity |
|
|
53 | (2) |
|
3.4 The Genitive of Quantification and Case Projections (Kseq) |
|
|
55 | (13) |
|
3.4.1 Case projections within Polish nominals: preliminary assumptions |
|
|
56 | (5) |
|
3.4.2 The derivation of the Genitive of Quantification |
|
|
61 | (7) |
|
3.5 The hybrid agreement as a manifestation of equidistance |
|
|
68 | (7) |
|
3.6 Alternative accounts and open questions |
|
|
75 | (20) |
|
3.6.1 Genitive (partitive) as an unmarked domain-specific case (Norris 2014) |
|
|
75 | (2) |
|
3.6.2 The Nominative-Genitive hypothesis (Klockmann 2015) |
|
|
77 | (8) |
|
3.6.3 Lethal ambiguity and feature (non)valuation (Willim 2015) |
|
|
85 | (3) |
|
3.6.4 Genitive of Quantification as case attraction (Caha 2013) |
|
|
88 | (3) |
|
3.6.5 The structure of the NNC as conjunction (Przepiorkowski and Patejuk 2012) |
|
|
91 | (4) |
|
|
95 | (4) |
|
Chapter Four Ramifications of the key concept: Accusative Numeral Subjects and Complex Numeral Noun Constructions |
|
|
99 | (58) |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
4.2 The Accusative Numeral Subject in Polish |
|
|
99 | (20) |
|
4.2.1 The ANS and tests for subjecthood |
|
|
101 | (13) |
|
4.2.2 Tfin and the ANS: Agree-copy and Maximize Matching |
|
|
114 | (4) |
|
4.2.3 Partial conclusions |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
4.3 Complex Numeral Noun Constructions |
|
|
119 | (12) |
|
4.3.1 Complex numerals and the cardinal-as-the head structure |
|
|
120 | (6) |
|
4.3.2 The correlation between the case-independence pattern in NNCs and nominal interpretation |
|
|
126 | (2) |
|
|
128 | (3) |
|
4.4 Case and ψ-feature concord |
|
|
131 | (23) |
|
4.4.1 Concord as FF raising in covert syntax (Carstens 2000) |
|
|
131 | (4) |
|
4.4.2 Agree as feature sharing (Danon 2011) |
|
|
135 | (7) |
|
4.4.3 Concord differs from Agree (Norris 2014) |
|
|
142 | (5) |
|
4.4.4 Morphological realization of case features in NNCs |
|
|
147 | (7) |
|
4.5 Some other idiosyncrasies of Polish numerals |
|
|
154 | (3) |
|
Chapter Five The NNC in the context of phase-based syntax |
|
|
157 | (18) |
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
5.2 NPs as phases - the interfaces |
|
|
157 | (5) |
|
|
162 | (4) |
|
5.4 The syntax of extractions and the DP vs. NP split |
|
|
166 | (2) |
|
5.5 An experimental approach to the LBE in the NNC |
|
|
168 | (4) |
|
5.5.1 The experimental study |
|
|
168 | (2) |
|
5.5.2 Results and discussion |
|
|
170 | (2) |
|
|
172 | (3) |
Conclusions |
|
175 | (10) |
References |
|
185 | |