Note on Supplementary Material |
|
ix | |
|
List of Figures and Tables |
|
|
x | |
Preface |
|
xii | |
|
Preface |
|
xiii | |
|
About the Author |
|
xiv | |
|
|
1 | (18) |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
1A Goals; "Knowledge of Language" in Cognitive Linguistics |
|
|
1 | (8) |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
What Does Knowledge of Language Consist of? |
|
|
2 | (5) |
|
How Can Changes in Knowledge of Language Be Accounted for in Terms of Cognitive Construction Grammar? |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
Sources of Data and Evidence |
|
|
7 | (2) |
|
1B Essentials of Cognitive Construction Grammar |
|
|
9 | (7) |
|
Basic Principles of Cognitive Linguistics |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
Basic Principles of Cognitive Construction Grammar |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
1 Knowledge of Linguistic Conventions |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
2 Storage in the Constructicon |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
3 Knowledge of Constructions Is Both "Item-Specific" and "Generalized or Schematic" |
|
|
12 | (2) |
|
4 No Strict Dichotomy between Lexical and Grammatical Constructions |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
5 Semantics, Information Structure, and Pragmatics Are Interrelated |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
6 Knowledge of Language Is Usage-Based |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
7 Knowledge of Grammar Is Dynamic |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
|
16 | (2) |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
2 Essentials of a Historical Perspective on Language |
|
|
19 | (20) |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
2A Introducing Language Change |
|
|
19 | (11) |
|
Why Does Language Change? |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
Gradual vs. Instantaneous Change |
|
|
22 | (2) |
|
|
24 | (6) |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
2B Constructionalization and Constructional Changes |
|
|
30 | (9) |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
Constructionalization and Constructional Changes |
|
|
31 | (2) |
|
A Revised Characterization |
|
|
33 | (5) |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
3 Grammaticalization and Constructionalization Compared |
|
|
39 | (21) |
|
|
39 | (13) |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
Some Characterizations of the Term Grammaticalization |
|
|
40 | (2) |
|
|
42 | (5) |
|
|
47 | (2) |
|
Typology and Grammaticalization |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
The "Loss-and-Gain" Model |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
3B The Complementarity of Constructionalization and Grammaticalization |
|
|
52 | (8) |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
The Main Research Questions |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
Positions Regarding Unidirectionality |
|
|
54 | (2) |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
Reconceptualizing a Change in Terms of Diachronic Construction Grammar |
|
|
57 | (2) |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
4 Discourse Structuring Markers, including Discourse Markers |
|
|
60 | (20) |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
4A Introduction to Discourse Structuring Markers, including Discourse Markers |
|
|
61 | (8) |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
Characterization of Pragmatic Markers |
|
|
61 | (8) |
|
4B Introduction to Discourse Structuring Markers: AFTER ALL |
|
|
69 | (11) |
|
After all in Contemporary English |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
A Brief History of after all |
|
|
71 | (7) |
|
|
78 | (2) |
|
5 Some Alternative Approaches to the Development of Pragmatic Markers |
|
|
80 | (21) |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
5A The Grammaticalization and Pragmaticalization Hypotheses |
|
|
81 | (8) |
|
The Grammaticalization Hypothesis |
|
|
81 | (6) |
|
|
87 | (2) |
|
|
89 | (12) |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
|
91 | (8) |
|
Cognitive Construction Grammar |
|
|
99 | (2) |
|
|
101 | (18) |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
6A The Development of also and eac |
|
|
102 | (7) |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
|
102 | (4) |
|
|
106 | (3) |
|
6B The Development of further, furthermore, moreover, and Other Elaborators |
|
|
109 | (10) |
|
|
109 | (2) |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
|
112 | (2) |
|
|
114 | (4) |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
|
119 | (21) |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
7A The Development of but and instead |
|
|
120 | (7) |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
|
120 | (5) |
|
|
125 | (2) |
|
7B The Development of the Contrastive DSMS All the Same and Anyway |
|
|
127 | (13) |
|
What Is Meant by "Concessive"? |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
The Development of all the same |
|
|
128 | (6) |
|
Use of all the same in a Courtesy Formula |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
|
135 | (3) |
|
|
138 | (2) |
|
|
140 | (23) |
|
|
140 | (1) |
|
|
140 | (1) |
|
8A The Development of a Digressive DM: by the way |
|
|
141 | (11) |
|
|
141 | (3) |
|
The Development of dm by the way |
|
|
144 | (6) |
|
|
150 | (2) |
|
8B A Digressive DM Combination: Oh, by the way |
|
|
152 | (11) |
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
|
154 | (6) |
|
|
160 | (2) |
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
|
163 | (17) |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
9A Constraints on DM or DSM Combinations |
|
|
163 | (9) |
|
|
163 | (3) |
|
From Combination to Unit: Is Oh, by the way Coming to Be Used as a Unit? |
|
|
166 | (1) |
|
From Combination to Unit: now then |
|
|
167 | (4) |
|
|
171 | (1) |
|
|
172 | (8) |
|
Position Relative to the Clause |
|
|
172 | (7) |
|
|
179 | (1) |
|
10 Constructional Networks, Wrap Up |
|
|
180 | (15) |
|
|
180 | (1) |
|
|
180 | (8) |
|
|
182 | (2) |
|
|
184 | (4) |
|
|
188 | (1) |
|
10B Wrapup: Summary of the Main Points of the Lectures |
|
|
188 | (7) |
|
|
194 | (1) |
References |
|
195 | (15) |
About the Series Editor |
|
210 | (1) |
Websites for Cognitive Linguistics and CIFCL Speakers |
|
211 | |