Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

Thetics and Categoricals [Kõva köide]

Edited by (Tokyo University of Foreign Studies), Edited by (University of Munich), Edited by (Groningen University & University of Vienna)
  • Formaat: Hardback, 390 pages, kaal: 850 g
  • Sari: Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 262
  • Ilmumisaeg: 22-Jul-2020
  • Kirjastus: John Benjamins Publishing Co
  • ISBN-10: 9027207402
  • ISBN-13: 9789027207401
  • Kõva köide
  • Hind: 122,85 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Raamatu kohalejõudmiseks kirjastusest kulub orienteeruvalt 2-4 nädalat
  • Kogus:
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Tasuta tarne
  • Tellimisaeg 2-4 nädalat
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • Formaat: Hardback, 390 pages, kaal: 850 g
  • Sari: Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 262
  • Ilmumisaeg: 22-Jul-2020
  • Kirjastus: John Benjamins Publishing Co
  • ISBN-10: 9027207402
  • ISBN-13: 9789027207401
"Thetics and Categoricals do not belong to the categories of German grammar. Thetics were introduced in logic as impersonal and broad focus constructions. They left profound and extensive traces in the logic of the late 19th century. For the class of thetic propositions, the criterion of textual exclusion plays the major role, i.e. the absence of any common grounds and of any anaphorism and background. In the foreground are sentences with subject inversion, subject suppression and detopicalization. Theseand only these are suitable for text beginnings, jokes, stage advertisements and solipsistic exclamatives, thus speech acts without communicative goals - free expressives in the true sense of the word. The contributions in this volume not only guide the reader through the history of philosophical logic and distributions of impersonals in contrast to Kantian categorical sentences, but also the correspondences in Japanese and Chinese which, in contrast to German and English, sport specific morphological markers for thetics as opposed to categoricals"--

Thetics and Categoricals do not belong to the categories of German grammar. Thetics were introduced in logic as impersonal and broad focus constructions. They left profound and extensive traces in the logic of the late 19th century. For the class of thetic propositions, the criterion of textual exclusion plays the major role, i.e. the absence of any common grounds and of any anaphorism and background. In the foreground are sentences with sub­ject inversion, subject suppression and detopicalization. These and only these are suitable for text begin­nings, jokes, stage advertisements and solipsistic exclamatives, thus speech acts without com­mu­nicative goals – free expressives in the true sense of the word. The contribu­tions in this volume not only guide the reader through the history of philosophical logic and distributions of impersonals in contrast to Kantian categorical sentences, but also the correspondences in Japanese and Chinese which, in contrast to German and English, sport specific morphological markers for thetics as opposed to categoricals.
Preface viii
Introduction: What this volume is about 1(12)
Werner Abraham
Part 1 Logic and philosophical background
Categorical versus thetic sentences in the Universal Grammar of Realism
13(20)
Elisabeth Leiss
Part 2 Impersonal constructions
Are theticity and sentence-focus encoded grammatical categories of Dutch?
33(36)
Thomas Belligh
Presentational and related constructions in Norwegian with reference to German
69(36)
Lars Hellan
Dorothee Beermann
Copulas and information structure in Tanti Dargwa
105(38)
Nina Sumbatova
Part 3 From logic content to linguistic form
Infinitive constructions and theticity in German
143(12)
Yukari Isaka
Strong and weak nominal reference in thetic and categorical sentences: Sampling German and Chinese
155(24)
Meng-Chen Lee
Adjectives and mode of expression: Psych-adjectives in attributive and predicative usage and implications for the thetic/categorical discussion
179(20)
Yoshiyuki Muroi
Unaccusativity and theticity
199(26)
Patricia Irwin
Part 4 The logic-linguistics across languages
From philosophical logic to linguistics: The architecture of information autonomy: Categoricals vs. Thetics revisited
225(58)
Werner Abraham
Pseudocategorical or purely thetic? A contrastive case study of how thetic statements are expressed in Japanese, English, and German
283(28)
Yasuhiro Fujinawa
The thetic/categorical distinction as difference in common ground update: With application to Biblical Hebrew
311(26)
Daniel J. Wilson
Part 5 Lexical links to attitudinality
B-grade subjects and theticity
337(14)
Shin Tanaka
Perception description, report and thetic statements: Roles of sentence-final particles in Japanese and modal particles in German
351(36)
Junji Okamoto
Index 387